WO2000003193A1 - Geographically limited missile - Google Patents

Geographically limited missile Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000003193A1
WO2000003193A1 PCT/US1998/014150 US9814150W WO0003193A1 WO 2000003193 A1 WO2000003193 A1 WO 2000003193A1 US 9814150 W US9814150 W US 9814150W WO 0003193 A1 WO0003193 A1 WO 0003193A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
projectile
navigation system
positions
coordinate information
unacceptable
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1998/014150
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Nelson E. Cobleigh
Original Assignee
Raytheon Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Raytheon Company filed Critical Raytheon Company
Priority to IL12871298A priority Critical patent/IL128712A/en
Priority to EP98935568A priority patent/EP1012525B1/en
Priority to TR1999/00669T priority patent/TR199900669T1/en
Priority to DK98935568T priority patent/DK1012525T3/en
Priority to AU84785/98A priority patent/AU740261B2/en
Priority to PCT/US1998/014150 priority patent/WO2000003193A1/en
Priority to ES98935568T priority patent/ES2206960T3/en
Priority to NO19990942A priority patent/NO313721B1/en
Publication of WO2000003193A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000003193A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G7/00Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
    • F41G7/34Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on predetermined target position data
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42CAMMUNITION FUZES; ARMING OR SAFETY MEANS THEREFOR
    • F42C11/00Electric fuzes
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42CAMMUNITION FUZES; ARMING OR SAFETY MEANS THEREFOR
    • F42C13/00Proximity fuzes; Fuzes for remote detonation

Definitions

  • ground-to-ground missiles such as cruise missiles, one type of which is the Tomahawk Missile
  • DSMAC Digital Scene Mapping Area Correlation
  • a target is selected and the missile homes in upon the target .
  • Another example of a guided missile is an air-to-air missile.

Abstract

This invention is directed to a self-destruct device (10) for an airborne projectile (8, 38). This device includes a navigational system (14) which allows the projectile to determine its own position, and a memory (24) for storing a plurality of positions, some of them are designated as acceptable positions (40) for this projectile, and others as unacceptable (44, 46, 48,). An electronic control unit (12) searches for a location in the memory which corresponds to the position of the projectile as given by the navigational system to determine if this position is acceptable or unacceptable, in which case it initiates a self-destruct signal (26) which causes the projectile to self-destruct.

Description

GEOGRAPHICALLY LIMITED MISSILE
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT This invention was made with government support under Grant No. F08626-93-C0044 awarded by the Department of Defense. The government has certain rights in this invention.
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION This invention relates generally to airborne projectiles having navigation capabilities and, more particularly, to airborne projectiles having radio based navigation systems to provide position data and a self- destruct feature which causes the projectile to self- destruct when the missile enters undesirable airspaces .
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION There are several missile systems having various applications for strategic and defense purposes. Such systems include air-to-air, air-to-ground, ground-to-air, and ground-to-ground missiles. A typical missile may have any one of a number of targeting systems known to those skilled in the art. For example, ground-to-ground missiles, such as cruise missiles, one type of which is the Tomahawk Missile, includes a Digital Scene Mapping Area Correlation (DSMAC) guidance system which uses a mapping of the terrain in order to guide the missile to a predetermined geographic area. When the cruise missile reaches the predetermined area, a target is selected and the missile homes in upon the target . Another example of a guided missile is an air-to-air missile. For example, an Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) uses radar to lock in on distant objects to which the missile is guided. Some surface-to-air missiles also use radar guidance systems to lock on to airborne targets. Further yet, some air-to-ground missiles use radar or laser based guidance systems to home in upon a target illuminated by a laser signal .
With the constant improvements in weaponry, the range of several of the missiles discussed above is rather substantial . When a missile has a substantial range, the missile can sometimes wander into friendly or neutral airspace and detonate. Current missile guidance systems do not presently enable the missile to determine its absolute position to prevent it from wandering into unwanted air spaces . A missile wandering into undesired airspace could potentially cause unwanted damage. Thus, there exists a need to implement a self-destruct feature in a missile which operates in accordance with the absolute, global position of the missile.
Thus, it is the object of the present invention to provide a missile which can determine its absolute, global position.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a missile which determines its absolute, global position and determines if the absolute, global position is within acceptable or unacceptable airspace.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a missile having a self-destruct feature which causes the missile to self-destruct when the missile enters unacceptable air space.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention is directed to a self-destruct apparatus for an airborne projectile. The apparatus includes a navigational system which determines the position of the projectile. The apparatus also includes memory for storing a plurality of positions. Some of the plurality of positions are designated as acceptable positions for the projectile, and others of the positions defined as unacceptable positions for the projectile. An electronic control unit searches for a location in memory which corresponds to the position determined by the navigation system to determine if the position of the projectile is acceptable or unacceptable. The electronic control unit initiates a self-destruct signal which causes the projectile to self-destruct if the position of the projectile is unacceptable.
Additional objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and the appended claims, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the drawings, which form an integral part of the specification, and are to be read in conjunction therewith, like reference numerals are employed to designate identical components in the various views:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a self-destruct mechanism for a missile arranged in accordance with the present invention; and
FIG. 2 is an exemplary table which may be stored in memory to determine acceptable and unacceptable positions of the projectile; and
FIG. 3 is a plan view of an airborne missile having implemented therein the invention of FIG. 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an electronic control system 10 for a projectile 8. The electronic control system 10 includes an electronic control unit 12. The electronic control unit 12 receives navigational information from a navigation system 14. The navigation system 14 includes an antenna 16. The antenna 16 receives electromagnetic signals 18 radiated by an electromagnetic transmitter, such as satellite 20. An example of such a satellite 20 may be found with reference to one or a plurality of satellites 20 such as are found in a Global Positioning System (GPS) , any ground-based electromagnetic transmitters such as may be found in a LOng RANge (LORAN) navigation system, or any other system known to those skilled in the art . The antenna 16 provides electronic input signals to the navigation system 14 in accordance with the received electromagnetic signals 18. Alternatively, the navigation system 14 may be an inertial type navigation system. The navigation system 14 determines the position of the projectile 8. For example, the navigation system 14 may determine the position of the projectile 8 by determining the latitude and longitude in accordance with the electromagnetic signals 18 received from the one or a plurality of satellites 20. The navigation system 14 may also determine speed and bearing information of the projectile 8 as well. The navigation system 14 outputs this information to the electronic control unit 12. The electronic control unit also communicates with a memory 24. The memory 24 typically stores a table of acceptable and unacceptable latitude and longitude coordinates . The latitude and longitude coordinates provide indices to the table locations. The memory locations corresponding to the latitude and longitude indices define acceptable and unacceptable positions of the projectile 8.
The electronic control unit 12 reads the memory location in accordance with the latitude and longitude coordinates provided by navigation system 14. If the coordinate position of the projectile 8 is acceptable in accordance with the table stored in memory 24, the electronic control unit 12 continues to provide guidance information to control the flight path of the projectile 10. If the memory location 24 indicated by the latitude coordinate location output by navigation system 14 is unacceptable as determined by the table stored in memory 24, the electronic control unit provides a signal to a self-destruct system 26.
FIG. 2 shows an exemplary table 30 which may be stored in the memory 24. The inputs to the table can be found along the upper row and left column of the table. Each row defines a coordinate latitude, and each column defines a coordinate longitude. Within the table, an A indicates an acceptable position for the projectile 8, and a U indicates an unacceptable position for the projectile 8. Each latitude and longitude coordinate position preferably defines boundary points of acceptable and unacceptable positions . The latitude and longitude coordinates output by the navigation system 14 are then matched to the latitudes and longitudes found in table 30 by associating each latitude and longitude coordinate position output by navigation system 14 with the nearest latitude and longitude found in the table 30. In this manner, entire areas can be designated as acceptable or unacceptable positions for the projectile 8. Further, the right column of table 30 also could be used to determine altitude, if desired. In this matter, three inputs, latitude, longitude, and altitude cooperate to determine acceptable and unacceptable positions of the projectile 8. FIG. 3 depicts a plan view of operation of the electronic control system 10 to operate the self-destruct system 26. In FIG. 3, a plane 36 launches a missile 38 in a geographical boundary defined as a no-fly zone 40. The missile 38 receives electromagnetic signals 18 from satellite 20. As described with respect to FIG. 1, these signals provide navigational information to determine the coordinate position of the missile 38. The path of the missile 38 is indicated by arrow 42. If the missile 38 goes beyond the boundary of no-fly zone 40, indicated in phantom, the missile 38 may enter the territory of a neutral country 44 or a non-combatant country 46. In order to prevent the missile 38 from entering either of these countries, table 30 of FIG. 2 is arranged so that the missile 38 self-destructs when it reaches the boundary of the no-fly zone 42. This prevents the missile 38 from entering the airspace of the neutral country 44, the non-combatant country 46, or the friendly country 48 and greatly improves the safety and operation of the missile 38.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention enables the safe use of projectile 8, such as rockets or missiles, by including navigational instrumentation in the electronic control portion of the projectile 8. The electronic control portion thus determines if the projectile 8 is located in an acceptable position as determined by latitude, longitude, and/or altitude. If the rocket is in an unacceptable coordinate location, the rocket self-destructs in order to prevent the missile from striking inadvertent targets.
Although the invention has been described with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims

What is claimed is :
1. An airborne projectile apparatus (8), comprising: a navigational system (14) which determines a position of the projectile; memory (24) for storing a plurality of positions, some of the plurality of positions designated as acceptable positions for the projectile and others of the positions defined as unacceptable positions for the projectile; and an electronic control unit (12) which searches for a location in the memory (24) which corresponds to the position determined by the navigation system (14) to determine if the position of the projectile (8) is acceptable or unacceptable, the electronic control unit (12) initiating a self-destruct signal causing the projectile to self-destruct if the position of the projectile is unacceptable.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the navigation system (14) includes a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the navigation system (14) provides at least one of latitude coordinate information, longitude coordinate information, and altitude information of the projectile.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the navigation system (14) provides at least one of speed and direction information of the projectile.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the navigation system (14) provides the position of the projectile in accordance with received radio signals.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the navigational system (14) includes an inertial navigation system.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the positions stored in memory (24) include at least one of latitude coordinate information, longitude coordinate information, and altitude information.
AMENDED CLAIMS
[received by the International Bureau on 21 Mai 1999 (21.05.99); original claims l-3and 5 amended; new claims 8 added; remaining claims unchanged (2 pages)]
What is claimed is:
1. An airborne projectile apparatus (8), comprising: a navigational system (14) which determines a position of the projectile, the navigation system (14) providing at least one of latitude coordinate information and longitude coordinate information; memory (24) for storing a plurality of positions, some of the plurality of positions designated as acceptable positions for the projectile (8) and others of the positions defined as unacceptable positions for the projectile (8) ; and an electronic control unit (12) which searches for a location in the memory (24) which corresponds to the position determined by the navigation system (14) to determine if the position of the projectile (8) is acceptable or unacceptable, the electronic control unit (12) initiating a self-destruct signal causing the projectile (8) to self-destruct if the position of the projectile (8) is unacceptable.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the navigation system (14) includes a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the navigation system (14) additional provides altitude information of the projectile (8) .
4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the navigation system (14) provides at least one of speed and direction information of the projectile (8) .
5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the navigation system (14) provides the position of the projectile in accordance, based on electromagnetic signals (18) received from an electromagnetic transmitter (20) .
6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the navigational system (14) includes an inertial navigation system.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the positions stored in memory (24) include at least one of latitude coordinate information, longitude coordinate information, and altitude information.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the navigation system (14) provides both latitude coordinate information and longitude coordinate information.
STATRMF.NT T1NOF.R ARTTCLE 19m
Dear Sir:
This is in response to the communication dated 24 March 1999, notifying Applicant of an international search report and transmitting the same. In accordance with Article 19 and Rule 46, Applicant submits herewith revised pages 10-11 containing the claims.
Claim 1 is amended by incorporating therein two of the three limitations recited in Claim 3; Claim 3 is accordingly amended to delete the incorporated two limitations and to specify that the third limitation is in addition to the incorporated two limitations. Claim 5 is amended to more precisely state Applicant's invention by replacing "in accordance with received radio signals" with -, based on electromagnetic signals received from an electromagnetic transmitter--, as set forth on 4, lines 13-15. Claims 1, 3, and 4 are amended to provide the call-out number of the projectile (8). New Claim 8 is added to specify that the navigation system provides both latitude coordinate information and longitude coordinate information; see, e.g., page 7, lines 1-10.
If there are any questions regarding the foregoing, the undersigned may be contacted at the telephone number given below.
PCT/US1998/014150 1996-08-28 1998-07-09 Geographically limited missile WO2000003193A1 (en)

Priority Applications (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IL12871298A IL128712A (en) 1997-06-26 1998-07-09 Geographically limited missile
EP98935568A EP1012525B1 (en) 1996-08-28 1998-07-09 Geographically limited missile
TR1999/00669T TR199900669T1 (en) 1998-07-09 1998-07-09 Geographically restricted projectile.
DK98935568T DK1012525T3 (en) 1998-07-09 1998-07-09 Geographically limited missile
AU84785/98A AU740261B2 (en) 1998-07-09 1998-07-09 Geographically limited missile
PCT/US1998/014150 WO2000003193A1 (en) 1998-07-09 1998-07-09 Geographically limited missile
ES98935568T ES2206960T3 (en) 1998-07-09 1998-07-09 MISSILE WITH GOGRAPHIC LIMITATION.
NO19990942A NO313721B1 (en) 1998-07-09 1999-02-26 Airborne projectile with navigation system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US1998/014150 WO2000003193A1 (en) 1998-07-09 1998-07-09 Geographically limited missile

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000003193A1 true WO2000003193A1 (en) 2000-01-20

Family

ID=22267445

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/014150 WO2000003193A1 (en) 1996-08-28 1998-07-09 Geographically limited missile

Country Status (6)

Country Link
AU (1) AU740261B2 (en)
DK (1) DK1012525T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2206960T3 (en)
NO (1) NO313721B1 (en)
TR (1) TR199900669T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000003193A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004106967A1 (en) * 2003-05-23 2004-12-09 Raytheon Company A method for providing integrity bounding of weapons
US7207517B2 (en) 2003-05-23 2007-04-24 Raytheon Company Munition with integrity gated go/no-go decision
EP2093532A1 (en) * 2008-02-21 2009-08-26 MBDA UK Limited Missile training system
WO2009104015A2 (en) 2008-02-21 2009-08-27 Mbda Uk Limited Missile training system

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3949954A (en) * 1971-07-26 1976-04-13 Ato Inc. Loran guidance for remote bomb
GB2211371A (en) * 1987-10-17 1989-06-28 Ferranti Plc Position warning system
US5260709A (en) * 1991-12-19 1993-11-09 Hughes Aircraft Company Autonomous precision weapon delivery using synthetic array radar
EP0583972A1 (en) * 1992-08-17 1994-02-23 Texas Instruments Incorporated Improvements in and relating to precision targeting
US5689420A (en) * 1994-09-06 1997-11-18 Brewster; Robert J. Range safety tracking and data processing system

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3949954A (en) * 1971-07-26 1976-04-13 Ato Inc. Loran guidance for remote bomb
GB2211371A (en) * 1987-10-17 1989-06-28 Ferranti Plc Position warning system
US5260709A (en) * 1991-12-19 1993-11-09 Hughes Aircraft Company Autonomous precision weapon delivery using synthetic array radar
EP0583972A1 (en) * 1992-08-17 1994-02-23 Texas Instruments Incorporated Improvements in and relating to precision targeting
US5689420A (en) * 1994-09-06 1997-11-18 Brewster; Robert J. Range safety tracking and data processing system

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004106967A1 (en) * 2003-05-23 2004-12-09 Raytheon Company A method for providing integrity bounding of weapons
US7207517B2 (en) 2003-05-23 2007-04-24 Raytheon Company Munition with integrity gated go/no-go decision
US7367525B2 (en) 2003-05-23 2008-05-06 Raytheon Company Munition with integrity gated go/no-go decision
EP2093532A1 (en) * 2008-02-21 2009-08-26 MBDA UK Limited Missile training system
WO2009104015A2 (en) 2008-02-21 2009-08-27 Mbda Uk Limited Missile training system
WO2009104015A3 (en) * 2008-02-21 2009-10-22 Mbda Uk Limited Missile training system
US8274023B2 (en) 2008-02-21 2012-09-25 Mbda Uk Limited Missile training system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2206960T3 (en) 2004-05-16
NO313721B1 (en) 2002-11-18
NO990942L (en) 2000-01-20
TR199900669T1 (en) 2003-04-21
DK1012525T3 (en) 2003-12-15
NO990942D0 (en) 1999-02-26
AU740261B2 (en) 2001-11-01
AU8478598A (en) 2000-02-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6142411A (en) Geographically limited missile
US11067696B2 (en) System and methods for countering satellite-navigated munitions
US6300898B1 (en) Airborne GPS guidance system for defeating multiple jammers
US4315609A (en) Target locating and missile guidance system
US5554994A (en) Self-surveying relative GPS (global positioning system) weapon guidance system
US4925129A (en) Missile defence system
US7953524B1 (en) Navigation through reception of a remote position fix via data link
US4179088A (en) Offset beacon homing
AU740261B2 (en) Geographically limited missile
EP1012525B1 (en) Geographically limited missile
US20070262874A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Tagging, Tracking, Targeting, and Termination of Mobile Targets
US3286955A (en) Low altitude air defense system and method
EP0965856B1 (en) Method and apparatus for the deception of satellite navigation
US20080150788A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Tagging, Tracking, Targeting, and Termination of Mobile Targets
KR102217902B1 (en) Guided Weapon System having Bistatic Homming Devive and Operating Method thereof
Baijal et al. GPS: A military perspective
Poteat Stealth, Countermeasures, and ELINT, 1960-1975
Papadakis et al. Joint Vision 2010 and the Operational Commander: Is GPS a Double-Edged Sword?
Heaston et al. Handbook of PGM Related Acronyms and Terms
US3368776A (en) Method of determining the launch time of air-to-air missiles
Dale et al. GPS Capabilities for the Warfighter
Turner Omega—A documented analysis
Gruetzmacher et al. Fratricide: The Ultimate Cost of Joint Interoperability Failure
BEDOYA et al. Survivable penetration
Yerget No Longer Guaranteed... Global Positioning System Alternative Necessary

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 128712

Country of ref document: IL

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998935568

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1019997001546

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 84785/98

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1999/00669

Country of ref document: TR

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU IL KR NO TR

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998935568

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1019997001546

Country of ref document: KR

WWR Wipo information: refused in national office

Ref document number: 1019997001546

Country of ref document: KR

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 84785/98

Country of ref document: AU

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1998935568

Country of ref document: EP