US6285989B1 - Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system - Google Patents

Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6285989B1
US6285989B1 US09/131,048 US13104898A US6285989B1 US 6285989 B1 US6285989 B1 US 6285989B1 US 13104898 A US13104898 A US 13104898A US 6285989 B1 US6285989 B1 US 6285989B1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
market
trading
auction
primitives
universal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US09/131,048
Inventor
Yoav Shoham
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ariba Inc
Original Assignee
Ariba Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ariba Inc filed Critical Ariba Inc
Priority to US09/131,048 priority Critical patent/US6285989B1/en
Assigned to TRADING DYNAMICS INC. reassignment TRADING DYNAMICS INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SHOHAM, YOAV
Assigned to TRADING DYNAMICS, INC. reassignment TRADING DYNAMICS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EPHRATI, EITHAN Y., SHOHAM, YOAV
Priority to KR1020017001663A priority patent/KR20010079626A/en
Priority to JP2000564145A priority patent/JP2002526820A/en
Priority to EP99937641A priority patent/EP1101180A4/en
Priority to AU52433/99A priority patent/AU5243399A/en
Priority to BR9912851-9A priority patent/BR9912851A/en
Priority to PCT/US1999/017248 priority patent/WO2000008578A1/en
Priority to CA002349913A priority patent/CA2349913A1/en
Priority to US09/410,856 priority patent/US7558752B1/en
Assigned to ARIBA, INC. reassignment ARIBA, INC. MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TRADINGDYNAMICS, INC.
Publication of US6285989B1 publication Critical patent/US6285989B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Priority to US11/982,306 priority patent/US20080162331A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/04Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the use of networked computer systems for the design and deployment of an on-line trading market.
  • the PX is a double auction in which buyers and sellers of electrical power trade on a daily basis.
  • the PX is designed to support at least two kinds of market—the day ahead market and the hour ahead market. In the day-ahead market twenty-four different auctions take place in parallel, one each for an hour of the next day.
  • the rules for participation in each auction are complex, but here is a flavor.
  • the bidding proceeds in rounds. In any given round a seller may offer to sell a certain quantity at a certain price, and a buyer may submit a similar buy bids. The price in the round is selected so that supply equals demand (the “clearing price”).
  • a seller may only decrease his bid, and a buyer may only increase it (in both cases there is a minimum change required).
  • there is an additional rule which is designed to encourage bidders to bid meaningfully rather than wait to the last round before doing so.
  • this “activity rule” a seller whose price exceeded the clearing price in the previous round must improve his/her bid, or forever lose the right to do so (a similar rule applies to buyers).
  • bidders may (irrevocably) withdraw bids.
  • OpenSite offers solutions for hosting online, interactive Internet auctions.
  • OpenSite sells three types of auction software solutions, which correspond to small, medium and large businesses.
  • Opensite offers four different types of auctions.
  • the additional configuration of the product to the customer's environment is extremely limited, and thus the software cannot be applied universally to a wide range of different types of customers.
  • Bonsai builds custom online auctions for particular applications. Its core product, EasyAuction, is very basic auction system. To implement specific auction types, Bonsai must resort to standard, labor-intensive custom software development.
  • Moai, Inc. The product of Moai, Inc. typifies products that are not auction products in themselves but rather specific software solutions, which embody auction technology. Moai builds software for creating online auctioning solutions for manufacturers or resellers, to sell surplus-goods and excess inventories. While Moai's software solution can be tailored to meet the needs of the customer, the auction style and mechanism do not change from one environment to the other. In that respect, the type of customers that Moai can cater to are limited by the applicability of the specific auction type that Moai uses.
  • Onsale, Inc. and Priceline, Inc. are the best representatives of Internet-based auction houses procure goods. Both have developed in-house software with which to conduct auctions. These home-brew systems were designed to the specific needs of the companies, and do not have the universal functionality to be modified readily, to be deployed in a completely different business context that may require auction solutions. The software is not available for easy deployment as a package, without massive customization, to other environments that require auctioning solutions.
  • any would-be online market creator has had two options—develop the software from scratch (either in-house or by outsourcing), or use one of several extremely limited toolkits.
  • the resulting software has taken a long time to develop, and the end results proved to be very difficult to modify or augment.
  • the latter property has been particularly limiting, since it is a consistent experience with exchanges that the initial rules must be modified, either because the market designers had not design the best rules in the first place, or because the market requirements had changed.
  • AuctionBot a software system built by Dr. Michael Wellman and his colleagues at the University of Michigan.
  • AuctionBot is a service that allows a party to start one of several kinds of auction, and then proceeds to run and manage the auction—accepting bids, notifying bidders of auction results, et cetera. It is to our knowledge the most versatile such service.
  • the auctions it supports include M th and M+1 st price auction (which are generalizations of st - and 2 nd -price auction, respectively, to the case in which multiple units of good are being sold, possibly by multiple sellers), English auction.
  • AuctionBot too suffers an inherent shortcoming—while it supports a broader set of auctions than other services, there is nothing universal or extensible about that set. In particular, if one wishes to add a new auction type to AuctionBot, for all intents and purposes one must write a brand-new program. In particular, AuctionBot cannot support activity rules of the sort encountered in industrial markets such as the FCC spectrum auction and the CalPX.
  • the present invention is a method and apparatus for designing and deploying an interactive, real-time, universal on-line trading market system serving traders communicating via the Internet.
  • the present invention is a method and apparatus that can be used to build any type of online auction using building blocks of its software technology. It includes a generic toolkit that can be used to build auction solutions ranging from simple to very complex and sophisticated auctions.
  • the invention includes a universal auction specification system including a network accessible set of trading primitives and a script generator for combining the set of primitives into a temporal protocol script representing a particular auction specification.
  • the system also includes a script interpreter for interpreting a temporal protocol script representing a particular auction specification, the script including references to at least a portion of the set of trading primitives.
  • FIG. 1 is a system block diagram showing the components of the preferred embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a three-tier specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the front end architecture of the preferred embodiment.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the back end architecture of the preferred embodiment.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a detailed block diagram of the application and databases.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the relationship of the various tiers of the system to each other and in relation to a legacy system.
  • FIG. 7 outlines the use case view of the system.
  • the present invention is a method and apparatus for designing and deploying a universal, interactive, real-time, on-line trading market system serving traders communicating via the Internet and similar networks.
  • numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.
  • the present invention includes the following primary components:
  • a Market-Specification Console (MSC) 110 This component consists of a computer running a program with which a market designer may specify any of an infinite number of possible market protocols, and then submit (“upload”) the defined market to the Programmable Auction Server (PAS) 140 for execution.
  • PAS Programmable Auction Server
  • These markets can be as simple as English or Dutch auction with some parameters filled in, or an arbitrary novel design never encountered before.
  • a Programmable Auction Server (PAS) 140 This component consists of a computer running a program, which can accept multiple market, protocols submitted to it from market-specification consoles, and executes those protocols as prescribed. Such execution includes, but is not limited to, opening auctions, accepting bids, clearing prices, notifying traders of market events, and closing auctions.
  • a Universal Trading Console (UTC) 120 This component consists of a computer running a program, which enables a trader to trade in any market protocol executing on the PAS 140 .
  • the UTC 120 presents to the trader information in a way that automatically adapts to the specific market protocol executing, and allows the trader to participate in the trading.
  • a Universal Surveillance Console (USC) 130 This component consists of a computer running a program which enables a surveillance body—such as a regulatory agency or and independent audit firm—to monitor the operation of the markets executing on the PAS 140 , ascertain that the execution conforms to norms, and optionally intervene in the market when deviations are detected.
  • a surveillance body such as a regulatory agency or and independent audit firm
  • a Market Administration Console (MAC) 150 This component consists of a computer running a program which enables a market operator, an entity housing the PAS 140 and responsible for its operation, to monitor the execution of various markets operating on the PAS 140 and troubleshoot the system in real time.
  • the various components are organized into a complete system via a 3-tier architecture bounded by double firewalls as depicted in FIG. 1 .
  • the 3-tier architecture is described in more detail in a later section of this document. We now describe the various components in more detail.
  • the role of the Market-Specification Console (MSC) 110 is to make to the market designer available the full spectrum of market protocols, and available in an intuitive fashion. These market protocols range from simple auctions such as English, Dutch, 1 st and 2 nd price auctions, to highly complex auctions such as those conducted on the trading floors of financial exchanges and the CalPX.
  • the repertoire of auctions includes, but is not limited to, the ones provided and classified in Table 1 below.
  • the crux of the present invention is the ability to define novel market protocols suited to any given situation.
  • Ts Trading Primitives
  • a time line specifying the times and conditions under which each entity either may or must execute a TP.
  • the market entities include sellers, buyers, an auctioneer, dealers, specialists, settlement agencies, accreditation bodies, and other entities.
  • the set of primitives is more involved. There is in fact no unique set of primitives, but rather several such sets can be created. Together with the gluing mechanism discussed below, the richness of the set of TPs defines the space of market protocols.
  • a representative set of TPs is provided in Table 2. It is to be understood that each such primitive is implementable as a method in an object oriented setting, and as such possesses additional structure not depicted in the table (including, for example, the number of arguments and their types).
  • Market Define Dynamic Dynamic in the sense that the Operator Restrictions of the above restriction becomes active types. based on some event in the market. Example: If trader A modifies a bid by more than Z % then close access to the market for trader A and investigate for gaming behavior.
  • Market Define Information These rights define what Operator Access Rights information is available to which participants. For example, buyers, sellers, observers, and auditors may have very different permissions.
  • Market Define Logging Structure The system is very modular and Operator allows flexible logging. For example a market operator may specify that bids should be logged after specific stages (after entry into system, after passing restriction checks, after auction processing, . . .) The detail of the log information will also be controllable.
  • Bid Priority Rules Bid A is Better than Bid B if: Operator 1) the price in A is greater than the price in B, 2) Or, if equal prices then if time of bid A is earlier than time for B, . . . Trader Register May be extensive and involve financial deposits, or could be quick involving identification only.
  • Trader Receive Confirmations Auction may send confirmations of bids, information requests, trades, . . . Settlement Receive Trade Details Describes what goods and funds Agency must be transferred between traders.
  • a simple way to specify a time line is to list the steps exhaustively, and tag each step for the time at which, and conditions under which, the step is taken.
  • the time can refer to absolute time or to time relative to other events in the execution stream (“after five minutes of inactivity close the auction”).
  • Conditions can refer to any information that is part of the execution, and in particular the termination conditions of other steps (“if the last bid was for $x, then set the minimum next bid at $x+10”).
  • script generator 121 is used to generate a CommerceScript in the preferred embodiment in the manner described above.
  • the system of the present invention can present to the designer a visual scripting option.
  • the designer can graphically draw a time line, and place along the time line various trading primitives.
  • Each TP is annotated with relevant information, including the market entity executing the TP, whether this execution is mandatory or merely permissible, and what preconditions must precede this step in addition to the temporal precondition.
  • the output of the visual specification component is identical to that of a textual specification component. It is noted that various visual programming tools exist in the prior art, however, such tools have not been applied to the creation of a trading market specification.
  • One key novel element in the visual specification component of the present invention is the annotation of processing steps as “mandatory” or “permissible”, which is unique to the commerce application.
  • the Programmable Auction Server (PAS)
  • the extreme versatility of the MSC 110 calls for commensurate versatility on the part of the Programmable Auction Server (PAS) 140 .
  • PAS Programmable Auction Server
  • the PAS 140 is extensible. Both the built-in set of TPs and the built-in set of market protocols can be enriched by a market designer submitted a new ones.
  • Each augmented market protocol is called a Trading Cartridge; there is in principle no bound on the range of allowable Trading Cartridges, other than the pragmatic limitations of the PAS 140 in terms of computer memory and other computational resources.
  • the set of TPs is augmentable in a more cautious way for security and robustness reasons. We discussed this topic next.
  • a critical feature of the PAS 140 is its generic way of handling permissions regardless of the particular market protocol executing. Each step in the execution of the protocol is gated by the type of the trading primitive being executed, its particular instantiation (in particular, the value of the arguments), and the entity attempting to execute it.
  • the PAS 140 in the preferred embodiment logs every activity that takes place on the system. This creates a perfect audit trail, which is usually expected by the market participants, and sometimes required by regulation.
  • the trade registration module is responsible for recording all consummated trades and the obligations incurred as a result. This stands in contrast to usual practice on financial exchanges, where the registration and settlement services are provided from outside the trading system, usually by investment banks. Here too, it is possible for third parties to provide the registration service, but from the technical point of view this module is an integral part of the system.
  • the PAS 140 possesses a rich set of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) 510 .
  • APIs Application Program Interfaces
  • the purpose of the APIs is to turn the system from a closed one, which one can use in totality or not at all, into an open system that one may add components or services to and have these additions integrate seamlessly with the existing components.
  • the APIs allow integration of PAS 140 with legacy software, with accreditation agencies, and most importantly, with programs performing trades which bypass the Universal Trading Console 120 discussed below.
  • the Universal Trading Console (UTC)
  • the UTC 120 offers the trader two functionalities—display of information, and bid input.
  • the information displayed to the user is of kinds: 1) activities on the PAS 140 , and 2) ancillary information.
  • PAS 140 activities are in principle any event logged by the PAS 140 , such as the start of an auction, the bids placed, and the prices cleared.
  • Actual information displayed will vary dramatically from one market to another, reflecting the different market designs.
  • the amount of information displayed may vary.
  • two Simultaneous Ascending Bids auctions may vary on the information disclosure policy, with the one auction releasing after each round the entire list of bidders and their bid in that round, whereas another might release only the aggregate bids supplied with no bidder-specific information.
  • Ancillary information may be any information that is relevant to making trade decisions but that is not inherent in the market activity. For example, in energy markets as well as many other futures markets weather forecasts turn out to be quite important.
  • the bids entered by the trader are entered in one of two ways—direct bidding, or proxy bidding.
  • direct bidding the bidder manually selects an auction and enters a bid using the computer keyboard and mouse.
  • proxy bidding the user defines a script that bids on his or her behalf in one or more auctions running on the PAS 140 .
  • the trader also specifies whether the script is to run on the trader's machine (i.e. proxy bidder 509 ), or be transmitted to the PAS 140 and run there (i.e. proxy bidder 508 ).
  • this diversity is accommodated by introducing a database layer between the PAS 140 and the UTC 120 .
  • the PAS 140 populates the database with specific data and that data is displayed in the UTC 120 automatically using dynamic HTML.
  • the key feature of this design is that while the database tables in the PAS 140 must be created specifically for the particular auction, the UTC 120 requires no modification.
  • USB Universal Surveillance Console
  • Every professional trading market is associate with one or more surveillance bodies, whose job it is to monitor the trading activities and ensure that they adhere to certain standards. Such monitoring is essential to ensure that traders have continued faith in the operation of the market, and that applicable laws and regulations are observed.
  • monitoring bodies can be federal agencies such as the SEC in financial markets, the FCC in telecommunication, or FERC in energy; State agencies such as the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC); internal monitoring departments of exchanges, and external private audit agencies.
  • the USC 130 is much like the UTC 120 , in that it presents to the surveillance agency information from the marketplace. The primary difference is that the USC 130 does not provide for ways in which to trade in the market, but on the other hand does provide market controls that are not provided to traders. Examples of such controls are broadcasting messages that appear on all UTCs 120 , and halting trading activity.
  • the system of the present invention is designed to adapt to the needs of a variety of different types of trading markets. Operating on a wide range of hardware, from single-user personal computers (PCs) to integrated, client/server based platforms; the system of the present invention is well suited to a small number of users and to a market with thousands of users. The system may be field-modified to handle an increasing number of users as market requirements mature and change.
  • FIG. 2 shows a particular three-tiered architecture that supports this scalability in the preferred embodiment. Note that other equivalent system architectures may be implemented.
  • the first tier 110 includes a front-end database 112 and Web applications running on Web server(s) 111 that constitute the interface between the users 114 and the back-end 116 of the system.
  • Authorized users may access the system through a web browser.
  • the Graphical User Interface (GUI) may be run either as a Java Applet or as a common HTML (depending on the user's choice and browser version).
  • the Java and HTML programming languages are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • the Web application is surrounded by a firewall 122 in a DMZ (Demilitarized Zone) configuration making it almost impossible to penetrate the application server(s) 120 .
  • the application's logic constitutes the second tier 115 .
  • the middleware 130 environment is component-based allowing high-availability and scalability.
  • the third tier 133 contains the database 136 and the interface 138 to a market administrator's legacy systems. Note that because the output of the auctioning process is being polled by a legacy system, the full security of the legacy environment is assured at all times. This will be described in more detail below.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a more detailed description of the front-end 110 ; all users 114 may log on to the system over the Internet 113 .
  • the browser running in user computer 114 shifts to a conventional Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) mode to secure the session data.
  • SSL Secure Sockets Layer
  • a connection is established with a cluster of Web servers 111 through a firewall 122 .
  • Each Web server 111 uses a front-end database 112 to communicate with the application 210 running in the second tier 115 . Queries and bids stored in the front-end database 112 are being polled by the application 210 in the second tier 115 to further secure the application 210 .
  • Communication to the application 210 running in the second tier 115 is monitored by another leg of the firewall 122 as yet another measure of security adds an additional layer of security.
  • Each web server 111 is coupled with an application server 120 as to maintain sessions over a connectionless protocol.
  • the processing logic of the present invention resides in a cluster of application servers 120 .
  • the application 210 includes software components that interact through a “named service” paradigm; the basic re-usable logical market components have been synthesized and distributed among the application servers 120 as services 310 . These basic market components 310 will be described in more detail below.
  • each bid, query or market event is assigned a sequence of services 310 to perform in order to fully process the bid, query, or market event.
  • these services 310 share a cluster of databases 136 which maintain an updated replication of data at all times.
  • the databases 136 that store a sequential log of the trading activity and the results data bases are accessible for inquires by the legacy system.
  • This logical and physical distribution of the present invention provides the necessary scalability, high-availability, reliability, and configurability (i.e. the universal functionality) of the system as illustrated in this description of the preferred embodiment.
  • the application software 210 of the present invention provides all the capabilities necessary to support multiple auctions simultaneously, with the inherent flexibility to conform to the unique requirements and environment of each auction mechanism.
  • the underlying structure of the software of the present invention makes it easy to define the rules of the auction (e.g., minimum accepted bids, bidding increments and length of rounds, etc), sequences of activity, required data elements, critical events, activity and flow requirements. This universal configurability is described in more detail below.
  • the application 210 includes a transaction monitor and controller 410 .
  • the transaction monitor 410 receives requests from a client 114 and other system events via interface 412 .
  • Interface 412 may be implemented using any of a variety of conventional protocols.
  • the requests thus received by transaction monitor 410 may represent the invocation of particular functions made available by the GUI on the client 114 .
  • system and market events may cause a communication with transaction monitor 410 .
  • the client requests typically correspond to a request for a specific market related action or query.
  • such requests could be the submittal or confirmation of a bid, a request for information related to traders or goods, or a request for market or trader specific constraints.
  • these market specific requests are typically handled by custom logic hard-coded into the client or server software.
  • the present invention employs a more flexible architecture.
  • the transaction monitor 410 is insulated from the details of the specific market for which it has been installed. The transaction monitor 410 receives the client requests/system events and activates a corresponding service or set of services configured to handle the request/event. These services are illustrated in FIG. 5 as general services 420 and market specific services 430 .
  • General services 420 represent the services common to all supported market types. These services may include, for example, bid time-stamping or bid logging.
  • the market specific services 430 represent services specific to a particular type of market or a specific individual market. For example, a service supporting a request to submit a bid for multiple goods in a single round would not be appropriate in an English auction.
  • the present invention allows a new market type to be supported by substituting the market specific services 430 of the new market type for the market specific services of the old market type.
  • the transaction monitor 410 and the general services 420 can remain intact. In this manner, new markets may be quickly and inexpensively created or modified.
  • the market specific services 430 may be implemented as Java applets or dynamic link library (DLL) modules.
  • the services 430 may thereby be easily installed and uninstalled depending upon the market type implementation. Once installed, the service 430 registers itself with the transaction monitor 410 and identifies the client requests/system events the installed service can process. When the identified request/event is received by transaction monitor 410 through interface 412 , the appropriate installed market specific service 430 is activated to process the request/event.
  • DLL dynamic link library
  • this architecture permits a first service to activate a second or other subsequent services to handle a particular request/event.
  • a service is a general service 420 (always installed) or an installed market specific service 430 , the service may be used by other services without an explicit request from the client 114 . In this manner, a single client request/system event my cause a cascade of services 420 and 430 to be activated.
  • Rules 450 represent the particular manner in which a specific market of a particular type is to be administered. Rules 450 include, for example, the specification of minimum accepted bids, bidding increments and length of rounds. Constraints 460 represent boundary conditions that limit certain actions to a defined domain. For example, constraints 460 may include price restrictions, quantity restrictions, and/or trader limits.
  • the rules 450 and constraints 460 are used by the services 430 to determine the manner in which a particular request/event is to be handled for a specific market. By maintaining the rules 450 and constraints 460 in a database, the specific details of a particular market may be easily changed or augmented. This database design along with the partitioning of services into general and market specific services allows greater flexibility in creating a new market and in modifying an existing market.
  • Market global data 470 is used to retain global market state data for access or modification by any of the services 420 and 430 .
  • the specification of the market type is initially retained in the global data 470 .
  • Activity log 480 is a sequential repository for storage of market and system parameters, timing information, and transaction information with which the detailed operation and status of the market may be monitored or re-created.
  • Results data 490 is used to retain the final results and parameters for a specific market.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the relationship of the various tiers of the system to each other and in relation to a legacy system 138 .
  • FIG. 7 outlines the use case view of the system, as generated by a conventional modeling tool.
  • the present invention is used by a variety of different types of actors. These types of actors are described as follows:
  • Trader The system of the present invention was built to serve traders (sellers and bidders). A trader interacts with the system through the submission of a trade (either a Bid or a Query). The system is trade-centric; each submitted trade is assigned a processing flow that consists of a partially ordered sequence of services 310 that the trade must go through, and the dynamic constraints with which the trade must comply. At each processing step, the trader is notified of the progress of the bid. This notification is described in more detail below in connection with the description of the graphical user interface. In addition, the trader is notified of general market events.
  • Market Creator allows a market creator to define all the administrative data, activity parameters, processing constraints, and general rules that make the market (e.g. number and names of auctions, clearing-price rules, names and access authorizations of traders, inter-processing dependencies, bid flow constraints, etc.). These settings are provided to the system through the Graphical User Interface.
  • the legacy system is a conventional system and typically an auction-specific system that retrieves statistics and results of auctions from the present invention.
  • Logger The logger logs (with time stamps) and maintains and all trading events and market statistics for later analysis, auditing, and publication.
  • Auditor/Observer The auditor submits global queries, monitors the market, and receives online and offline global information
  • the present invention is used to perform various basic functions for setting up and operating a market.
  • the following section along with the diagram illustrated in FIG. 7, describes some of these basic use functions and relationships.
  • Set market rules Initiated by a market creator to set the rules of the market.
  • Bid/query is assigned with a service flow that determines its processing cycle. Bids may be rejected, change the Market State, or have no influence on the market.
  • Handle Event Initiated by the system.
  • the market creator determines which events are the significant events (e.g., sudden shift of eligibility from one action within a group to another, a close of an auction, sudden global price drop in the market, significant change in trading volume, etc.).
  • the logger logs all events.
  • Validate/Authorize user Initiated by a trader/auditor/creator to get permission to interact with the system. Subject to changes by the market creator.
  • the graphical user interface (GUI) of the present invention allows users, either auction administration staff or bidders, to view the results for a desired auction round and to create custom file formats of the results for downloading.
  • the GUI runs on the client computer system 114 .
  • the GUI provides screens that display the results of each round as well as auction administration screens that display real-time bidding activity.
  • the GUI software allows the auctioneer's administration staff to post general announcements concerning the auction in real-time (e.g., the auction schedule) and to post urgent messages to all bidders (e.g., a round has been extended).
  • the GUI software allows users to submit a report of all suggestions for the auction administration staff to review.
  • Any trading step that occurs in the system (e.g., login of the trader, approval of a query, change of clearing price, reduced eligibility, etc.) is time-stamped and logged in activity log 480 .
  • the system maintains a special database 490 for storing the final results and parameters for each auction.
  • the system supports an on-line display of global cross auction activities and statistics. This functionality provides a wide variety of reports for the various phases of the trading process.
  • Auction reports include all bids in the round, the high bids at the end of the round, the withdrawn bids, the maximum eligibility amounts for each bidder, and the minimum accepted bid amounts for the next round.

Abstract

A method and an apparatus for a universal auction specification system is disclosed. The universal auction specification system comprises a network accessible set of trading primitives. A script generator is used for combining the set of trading primitives into a temporal protocol script representing a particular auction specification.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the use of networked computer systems for the design and deployment of an on-line trading market.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The Backdrop of Electronic Commerce
Technological advances in electronic commerce (e-commerce) solutions have revolutionized the way business is conducted. The popular explosion of the Internet, the ubiquity of the browser, the network infrastructure and the e-commerce solutions that glue these technologies together, have led to several developments:
new channels for buying and selling have emerged over the Internet,
buyers and sellers are more accessible to each other then ever before,
commodities as well as non-commodities can now be bought and sold at variable prices, determined by the buyer's willingness to pay and the seller's willingness to accept.
These dynamics are driving towards the creation of new and more efficient online markets that employ auction methodologies. The design, implementation and maintenance of auction solutions for these markets require sophisticated software technology.
Background on Auction Theory and Practice
The following is a brief introduction to various conventional auction settings and methods, starting with “low-end” auctions and concluding with “high-end” ones.
(1) Setting: Single seller, multiple buyers. Methods: The four well-known basic types are English auction, Dutch auction, first price sealed-bid auction, and second-price sealed-bid auction. These auctions and related ones have been well studied and continue to be so.
(2) Setting: Single seller, multiple units of goods. Methods: Auctions for such situations are only slightly more complex, but essentially are a natural generalization of the first kinds of auction.
(3)Setting: Multiple buyers and sellers. Methods: Variety of double auctions. In some cases the previous methods extend well, in others not at all (see below).
(4) Setting: Multiple buyers and sellers interacting repeatedly. Methods: Continuous Double Auctions, prime examples of which are the financial and commodity exchanges.
(5) Setting: Multiple goods with complementarities and substitutabilities. Methods: Vary. In any of the above settings, if multiple goods are sold whose values interact (i.e., if the value of a bundle of goods is not equal to the sum of the values of the individual goods), the auction design can be challenging. Known theoretical solutions, such as the Generalized Vuckrey Auction or the Clark-Grove tax mechanism, are not applicable in practice. Some pragmatic alternatives that have been experimented with include menu bidding and the simultaneous ascending bid auction with activity rules.
(6) Setting: Extra-economical constraints. Method: Activity rules. Often the auction is conducted within a business context that prescribes or precludes certain actions. A typical example is presented by regulatory constraints, that preclude selling certain goods to buyers with excessive market power.
The above is only a synopsis of the space of auction types. It is possible to enumerate many dozens of other auctions and variants thereof. In addition to these codified auctions, but which we mean types of auction that are well established, deployed, and studied, there exist essentially an infinite space of possible auctions, each defined by particular idiosyncratic rules and parameters.
A good example of idiosyncrasy of high-end auctions is the design of the California Power Exchange (the CalPX, or simply PX). The PX is a double auction in which buyers and sellers of electrical power trade on a daily basis. The PX is designed to support at least two kinds of market—the day ahead market and the hour ahead market. In the day-ahead market twenty-four different auctions take place in parallel, one each for an hour of the next day. The rules for participation in each auction are complex, but here is a flavor. The bidding proceeds in rounds. In any given round a seller may offer to sell a certain quantity at a certain price, and a buyer may submit a similar buy bids. The price in the round is selected so that supply equals demand (the “clearing price”). In the next round, a seller may only decrease his bid, and a buyer may only increase it (in both cases there is a minimum change required). In addition to these rather simple rules, there is an additional rule, which is designed to encourage bidders to bid meaningfully rather than wait to the last round before doing so. According to this “activity rule”, a seller whose price exceeded the clearing price in the previous round must improve his/her bid, or forever lose the right to do so (a similar rule applies to buyers). Finally, in addition to this activity rule, bidders may (irrevocably) withdraw bids.
The reasons for this particular design are too complex to go into, and irrelevant to the current invention. The point of this example is that in that particular context there was a need to design a novel auction mechanism, different from any that existed previously. Similar phenomena have occurred in national spectrum auction designs (for example in the US, New Zealand, Australia, Mexico, and other locations), other energy auctions, offshore oil drilling rights, and many other settings.
Despite the in-principle infinite span of possible auctions, the set of primitives underlying the various auctions is relatively small. It is this observation that underlies the present inventions, and which allows the construction a universal engine for the rapid creation and deployment of an essentially unlimited number of auction types.
Background on Internet-based Auctions
While thousands of auctions take place today on the Internet, they are consumer oriented, and by necessity of the low-end variety. Such auctions are conducted by online auction services, such as Onsale.com, eBay.com, and Priceline.com. In addition the technology developed by such firms in-house, several toolkits exist in the prior art with which to construct and run simple auctions. Examples include Opensite and Bonsai Software, as briefly described below. The auctions supported by these systems are low-end ones, though a certain degree of customization is allowed (for example, specifying the duration of the auction or selecting among several simple auction formats). Following is a brief discussion of some of these technologies.
The products of OpenSite, Inc. and Bonsai, Inc. represent well the state of the art in Internet-based auction toolkits and solutions. OpenSite offers solutions for hosting online, interactive Internet auctions. OpenSite sells three types of auction software solutions, which correspond to small, medium and large businesses. Opensite offers four different types of auctions. The additional configuration of the product to the customer's environment is extremely limited, and thus the software cannot be applied universally to a wide range of different types of customers. Similarly, Bonsai builds custom online auctions for particular applications. Its core product, EasyAuction, is very basic auction system. To implement specific auction types, Bonsai must resort to standard, labor-intensive custom software development.
The product of Moai, Inc. typifies products that are not auction products in themselves but rather specific software solutions, which embody auction technology. Moai builds software for creating online auctioning solutions for manufacturers or resellers, to sell surplus-goods and excess inventories. While Moai's software solution can be tailored to meet the needs of the customer, the auction style and mechanism do not change from one environment to the other. In that respect, the type of customers that Moai can cater to are limited by the applicability of the specific auction type that Moai uses.
Onsale, Inc. and Priceline, Inc. are the best representatives of Internet-based auction houses procure goods. Both have developed in-house software with which to conduct auctions. These home-brew systems were designed to the specific needs of the companies, and do not have the universal functionality to be modified readily, to be deployed in a completely different business context that may require auction solutions. The software is not available for easy deployment as a package, without massive customization, to other environments that require auctioning solutions.
The Industrywide Mortgage Exchange (IMX), FastParts, and the National Transportation Exchange (NTE) are good representatives of industry-wide online auctions. In each case one or more standardized goods (mortgages, DRAM chips, trucking capacity) are bought and sold on an open exchange, much like the securities on the financial exchanges. Again, these systems are without exception built specifically for a particular type of market and cannot be easily or economically re-configured for other types of markets.
When one moves from the low-end of auctions to the high end, the custom-building approach is particularly apparent. Auction systems have been built in a one-off fashion, costing many millions of dollars and taking a very long time to build. These auctions are always suited only for the particular applications for which they were designed. Examples include the software developed for financial exchanges such as the London Stock Exchange and NASDAQ, the California Power Exchange, and the software developed for Federal Communications Commission (FCC) spectrum auction. Each of these systems was developed over many months and typically over years, and has cost from several million dollars to several hundred million dollars. These systems are also quite inflexible, constituting systems suitable for a particular application and not adaptable for the general case. A good example is provides by the CalPX). Its development cost upward of $50M, and it has proved frustrating to introduce even minor modifications to the system; these have tended to entail major surgeries on the system as a whole. Indeed, the very initial design was not implemented initially, since the software could not accommodate iterations.
In summary, to date any would-be online market creator has had two options—develop the software from scratch (either in-house or by outsourcing), or use one of several extremely limited toolkits. In all cases, the resulting software has taken a long time to develop, and the end results proved to be very difficult to modify or augment. The latter property has been particularly limiting, since it is a consistent experience with exchanges that the initial rules must be modified, either because the market designers had not design the best rules in the first place, or because the market requirements had changed.
Closest to filling this gap has been AuctionBot, a software system built by Dr. Michael Wellman and his colleagues at the University of Michigan. AuctionBot is a service that allows a party to start one of several kinds of auction, and then proceeds to run and manage the auction—accepting bids, notifying bidders of auction results, et cetera. It is to our knowledge the most versatile such service. The auctions it supports include Mth and M+1st price auction (which are generalizations of st- and 2nd-price auction, respectively, to the case in which multiple units of good are being sold, possibly by multiple sellers), English auction. However, AuctionBot too suffers an inherent shortcoming—while it supports a broader set of auctions than other services, there is nothing universal or extensible about that set. In particular, if one wishes to add a new auction type to AuctionBot, for all intents and purposes one must write a brand-new program. In particular, AuctionBot cannot support activity rules of the sort encountered in industrial markets such as the FCC spectrum auction and the CalPX.
What has been missing is a highly versatile toolkit with which to quickly define and deploy a wide range of online markets, in particular markets in the medium to high end, and be able to modify the rules of these market on the fly without needing to engage in a lengthy software development process and service disruption.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a method and apparatus for designing and deploying an interactive, real-time, universal on-line trading market system serving traders communicating via the Internet.
The present invention is a method and apparatus that can be used to build any type of online auction using building blocks of its software technology. It includes a generic toolkit that can be used to build auction solutions ranging from simple to very complex and sophisticated auctions.
The invention includes a universal auction specification system including a network accessible set of trading primitives and a script generator for combining the set of primitives into a temporal protocol script representing a particular auction specification. The system also includes a script interpreter for interpreting a temporal protocol script representing a particular auction specification, the script including references to at least a portion of the set of trading primitives.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a system block diagram showing the components of the preferred embodiment.
FIG. 2 illustrates a three-tier specific embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 illustrates the front end architecture of the preferred embodiment.
FIG. 4 illustrates the back end architecture of the preferred embodiment.
FIG. 5 illustrates a detailed block diagram of the application and databases.
FIG. 6 illustrates the relationship of the various tiers of the system to each other and in relation to a legacy system.
FIG. 7 outlines the use case view of the system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention is a method and apparatus for designing and deploying a universal, interactive, real-time, on-line trading market system serving traders communicating via the Internet and similar networks. In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 1, the present invention includes the following primary components:
1. A Market-Specification Console (MSC) 110. This component consists of a computer running a program with which a market designer may specify any of an infinite number of possible market protocols, and then submit (“upload”) the defined market to the Programmable Auction Server (PAS) 140 for execution. These markets can be as simple as English or Dutch auction with some parameters filled in, or an arbitrary novel design never encountered before.
2. A Programmable Auction Server (PAS) 140. This component consists of a computer running a program, which can accept multiple market, protocols submitted to it from market-specification consoles, and executes those protocols as prescribed. Such execution includes, but is not limited to, opening auctions, accepting bids, clearing prices, notifying traders of market events, and closing auctions.
3. A Universal Trading Console (UTC) 120. This component consists of a computer running a program, which enables a trader to trade in any market protocol executing on the PAS 140. The UTC 120 presents to the trader information in a way that automatically adapts to the specific market protocol executing, and allows the trader to participate in the trading.
4. A Universal Surveillance Console (USC) 130. This component consists of a computer running a program which enables a surveillance body—such as a regulatory agency or and independent audit firm—to monitor the operation of the markets executing on the PAS 140, ascertain that the execution conforms to norms, and optionally intervene in the market when deviations are detected.
5. A Market Administration Console (MAC) 150. This component consists of a computer running a program which enables a market operator, an entity housing the PAS 140 and responsible for its operation, to monitor the execution of various markets operating on the PAS 140 and troubleshoot the system in real time.
6. A communication network 160 linking the various components.
In the preferred embodiment, the various components are organized into a complete system via a 3-tier architecture bounded by double firewalls as depicted in FIG. 1. The 3-tier architecture is described in more detail in a later section of this document. We now describe the various components in more detail.
The Market-Specification Console (MSC)
The role of the Market-Specification Console (MSC) 110 is to make to the market designer available the full spectrum of market protocols, and available in an intuitive fashion. These market protocols range from simple auctions such as English, Dutch, 1st and 2nd price auctions, to highly complex auctions such as those conducted on the trading floors of financial exchanges and the CalPX. The repertoire of auctions includes, but is not limited to, the ones provided and classified in Table 1 below.
Table 1
1. Multiple items, single seller:
A. Divisible shares of a homogenous commodity:
 These are classified in terms of the pricing rule (uniform price [lowest accepted or highest rejected], or pay-your-bid, or Vickrey rule), static or dynamic (sealed bid versus ascending prices), and the dynamic ones are further classified as follows:
Auctioneer asks whether there are new bids
Iterations with a required minimum bid increment
Price rises continuously until demand=supply
Vickrey: price differentially to make revelation a dominant strategy
B. Heterogeneous items: Same options as above, plus Simultaneous, iterative, ascending price (e.g., FCC spectrum auction) Generalized Vickrey auction
2. Multiple homogeneous items, multiple buyers and sellers:
A. Exchanges (no intermediary market makers):
Call market [static, uniform pricing]
Tatonnement [dynamic, uniform pricing] (e.g., power exchange)
Bid-ask bilateral market [dynamic, differing prices]
Double Dutch [dynamic, uniform price]
UPDA [dynamic, bilateral, uniform price, different activity rules]
B. Brokered markets:
Specialist market [bilaterally cross orders from a book]
Dealer market [continually post best bid and ask prices]
There are two ways in which a market designer defines a market. The first is by selecting among one of the market protocols already residing on the PAS 140, and specifying the values of the relevant parameters in that protocol. For example, specifying the minimum increment and start time in an English auction. However, this method alone is inherently flawed, since the space of possible market designs is infinite, and any fixed repertoire of built-in auctions, rich as it may be, is guaranteed to fall short. The crux of the present invention is the ability to define novel market protocols suited to any given situation.
An extreme approach to achieving versatility is to allow the market designer to write an arbitrary computer program. As discussed, this cumbersome method is prone to all the pitfalls of software developments, including requirement of highly skilled software personnel, long development time, long testing and validation time, and high cost. The key to achieving such versatility while avoiding these pitfalls is to recognize that, while the number of possible market protocols in infinite, the set of principles involved is circumscribed. In particular, any given market protocol can be broken down into three ingredients:
1. The set of entities allowed to participate in the market;
2. A set of basic Trading Primitives (TPs) involved in the market; and
3. A time line, specifying the times and conditions under which each entity either may or must execute a TP.
The market entities include sellers, buyers, an auctioneer, dealers, specialists, settlement agencies, accreditation bodies, and other entities.
The set of primitives is more involved. There is in fact no unique set of primitives, but rather several such sets can be created. Together with the gluing mechanism discussed below, the richness of the set of TPs defines the space of market protocols. A representative set of TPs is provided in Table 2. It is to be understood that each such primitive is implementable as a method in an object oriented setting, and as such possesses additional structure not depicted in the table (including, for example, the number of arguments and their types).
TABLE 2
Entity with
Permission Primitive Description
Market Define trade items Specify goods to be traded
Operator
Market Define bid format Self-explanatory
Operator
Market Define disclosed Self-explanatory
Operator information format
Market Define pricing rule Self-explanatory
Operator
Market Define allocation rule Self-explanatory
Operator
Market Disclose information Self-explanatory
Operator requested by an
individual
Market Broadcast unsolicited Self-explanatory
Operator information
Market Start negotiation phase Self-explanatory
Operator
Market Conclude negotiation Self-explanatory
Operator phase
Market Close market protocol Self-explanatory
Operator
Market Announce market Self-explanatory
Operator protocol results
Trader Register item for sale Self-explanatory
Trader Post security in escrow Self-explanatory
account
Trader Submit bid Self-explanatory
Trader Withdraw bid Self-explanatory
Trader Make bilateral offer Self-explanatory
Trader Request information Self-explanatory
Market Define Simple Bid Examples:
Operator restrictions Minimum bid intervals
(bids must be in even $1
quantities for example)
Permitted currencies for bids
(dollars, yen, . . .)
Market Define Market Based Examples:
Operator Restrictions No one is permitted to bid on
good A and good B.
More generally no one is
permitted to bid on
specified combinations of
goods.
Market Define Trader Specific Examples:
Operator Restrictions Trader A is not permitted to bid
on good P.
Trader B is not permitted to bid
more than a total of X
dollars.
Market Define Trader Eligibility A specialization of Trader
Operator Restrictions Restrictions that is common
enough to warrant its own
category.
Example:
Trader A may not bid fewer $
than in a previous stage of
the auction.
Market Define Trader Activity Another specialization of Trader
Operator Restrictions Restrictions that is common
and warrants its own
category.
Example:
Trader A must submit a winning
bid every Z hours to
continue participating in the
auction.
Market Define Dynamic Dynamic in the sense that the
Operator Restrictions of the above restriction becomes active
types. based on some event in the
market.
Example:
If trader A modifies a bid by
more than Z % then close
access to the market for
trader A and investigate for
gaming behavior.
Market Define Information These rights define what
Operator Access Rights information is available to
which participants. For
example, buyers, sellers,
observers, and auditors may
have very different permissions.
Market Define Logging Structure The system is very modular and
Operator allows flexible logging.
For example a market operator
may specify that bids should be
logged after specific stages
(after entry into system, after
passing restriction checks, after
auction processing, . . .)
The detail of the log
information will also be
controllable.
Market Define Bid Priority Rules Bid A is Better than Bid B if:
Operator 1) the price in A is greater than
the price in B,
2) Or, if equal prices then if
time of bid A is earlier than
time for B, . . .
Trader Register May be extensive and involve
financial deposits, or could be
quick involving identification
only.
Trader Receive Confirmations Auction may send
confirmations of bids,
information requests, trades, . . .
Settlement Receive Trade Details Describes what goods and funds
Agency must be transferred between
traders.
Finally, there is a gradation of methods with which to specify a time line, ranging from simple and limited in expressiveness to complex and highly expressive.
A simple way to specify a time line is to list the steps exhaustively, and tag each step for the time at which, and conditions under which, the step is taken. The time can refer to absolute time or to time relative to other events in the execution stream (“after five minutes of inactivity close the auction”). Conditions can refer to any information that is part of the execution, and in particular the termination conditions of other steps (“if the last bid was for $x, then set the minimum next bid at $x+10”).
For a number of reasons, exhaustively enumerating all the steps is limiting. At a minimum, for the system to have any generality, one must allow for iteration (“repeat until there is no bid increment for five minutes: <. . . >”). These may be introduced as a special aggregate TP, or as part of a “scripting” tool for the market. Indeed, the most general method of specifying a time line is to invoke the full power of a scripting language, such as TCL/TK, JavaScript, or any number of other scripting languages, so long as they (a) have access to a time-of-day clock, and (b) can call the TPs. In the preferred embodiment of the invention utilizes such a conventional scripting language applied to a novel use with TPs, which we shall call generically CommerceScript, understanding the term as a placeholder rather than a proper name. In FIG. 1, script generator 121 is used to generate a CommerceScript in the preferred embodiment in the manner described above.
The temporal nature of CommerceScript enables an additional level of convenience in market specification. Rather than restrict the market designer to textual scripting, the system of the present invention can present to the designer a visual scripting option. In this option, the designer can graphically draw a time line, and place along the time line various trading primitives. Each TP is annotated with relevant information, including the market entity executing the TP, whether this execution is mandatory or merely permissible, and what preconditions must precede this step in addition to the temporal precondition. The output of the visual specification component is identical to that of a textual specification component. It is noted that various visual programming tools exist in the prior art, however, such tools have not been applied to the creation of a trading market specification. One key novel element in the visual specification component of the present invention is the annotation of processing steps as “mandatory” or “permissible”, which is unique to the commerce application.
The Programmable Auction Server (PAS)
The extreme versatility of the MSC 110 calls for commensurate versatility on the part of the Programmable Auction Server (PAS) 140. Indeed, at the core of the PAS 140 is an interpreter for CommerceScript, a built-in implementation of the TPs, and a built-in set of market protocols. The script interpreter 141 is illustrated in FIG. 1. Importantly, the PAS 140 is extensible. Both the built-in set of TPs and the built-in set of market protocols can be enriched by a market designer submitted a new ones. Each augmented market protocol is called a Trading Cartridge; there is in principle no bound on the range of allowable Trading Cartridges, other than the pragmatic limitations of the PAS 140 in terms of computer memory and other computational resources. In the preferred embodiment, the set of TPs is augmentable in a more cautious way for security and robustness reasons. We discussed this topic next.
In a trading system, it is extremely important to manage the permissions granted to the various market entities. Such permissions start with simple matters such as registering as a trader to registering an item for sale, continue with securing rights to trade on the system and within certain limits, and (very importantly) include specification of access rights to trading information. A critical feature of the PAS 140 is its generic way of handling permissions regardless of the particular market protocol executing. Each step in the execution of the protocol is gated by the type of the trading primitive being executed, its particular instantiation (in particular, the value of the arguments), and the entity attempting to execute it.
In industrial applications it is as important to ensure robust system behavior—including fault tolerance, defense again malicious infiltrators, as well as against incompetent market entities. For this reason, in the preferred embodiment, many components are added to ensure robust behavior. This robust behavior is supported in the preferred embodiment by the 3-tier system architecture described in detail in a later section of this document.
An important feature of the PAS 140 in the preferred embodiment is that it logs every activity that takes place on the system. This creates a perfect audit trail, which is usually expected by the market participants, and sometimes required by regulation. Of particular importance is the trade registration module. This module is responsible for recording all consummated trades and the obligations incurred as a result. This stands in contrast to usual practice on financial exchanges, where the registration and settlement services are provided from outside the trading system, usually by investment banks. Here too, it is possible for third parties to provide the registration service, but from the technical point of view this module is an integral part of the system.
Finally, in the preferred embodiment the PAS 140 possesses a rich set of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) 510. The purpose of the APIs is to turn the system from a closed one, which one can use in totality or not at all, into an open system that one may add components or services to and have these additions integrate seamlessly with the existing components. For example, the APIs allow integration of PAS 140 with legacy software, with accreditation agencies, and most importantly, with programs performing trades which bypass the Universal Trading Console 120 discussed below.
The Universal Trading Console (UTC)
The UTC 120 offers the trader two functionalities—display of information, and bid input. The information displayed to the user is of kinds: 1) activities on the PAS 140, and 2) ancillary information. PAS 140 activities are in principle any event logged by the PAS 140, such as the start of an auction, the bids placed, and the prices cleared. Actual information displayed will vary dramatically from one market to another, reflecting the different market designs. In particular, the amount of information displayed may vary. For example, two Simultaneous Ascending Bids auctions may vary on the information disclosure policy, with the one auction releasing after each round the entire list of bidders and their bid in that round, whereas another might release only the aggregate bids supplied with no bidder-specific information. Ancillary information may be any information that is relevant to making trade decisions but that is not inherent in the market activity. For example, in energy markets as well as many other futures markets weather forecasts turn out to be quite important.
The bids entered by the trader are entered in one of two ways—direct bidding, or proxy bidding. In direct bidding the bidder manually selects an auction and enters a bid using the computer keyboard and mouse. In proxy bidding, the user defines a script that bids on his or her behalf in one or more auctions running on the PAS 140. As part of the proxy bid, the trader also specifies whether the script is to run on the trader's machine (i.e. proxy bidder 509), or be transmitted to the PAS 140 and run there (i.e. proxy bidder 508).
The challenge in delivering these two functionalities—information dissemination and bidding collection—is the wide variance in the format of both the information and the bids among different types of auctions. In the preferred embodiment, this diversity is accommodated by introducing a database layer between the PAS 140 and the UTC 120. For each auction type, several specific database schemas must be introduced. The PAS 140 populates the database with specific data and that data is displayed in the UTC 120 automatically using dynamic HTML. The key feature of this design is that while the database tables in the PAS 140 must be created specifically for the particular auction, the UTC 120 requires no modification.
The Universal Surveillance Console (USC)
Every professional trading market is associate with one or more surveillance bodies, whose job it is to monitor the trading activities and ensure that they adhere to certain standards. Such monitoring is essential to ensure that traders have continued faith in the operation of the market, and that applicable laws and regulations are observed. Such monitoring bodies can be federal agencies such as the SEC in financial markets, the FCC in telecommunication, or FERC in energy; State agencies such as the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC); internal monitoring departments of exchanges, and external private audit agencies. The USC 130 is much like the UTC 120, in that it presents to the surveillance agency information from the marketplace. The primary difference is that the USC 130 does not provide for ways in which to trade in the market, but on the other hand does provide market controls that are not provided to traders. Examples of such controls are broadcasting messages that appear on all UTCs 120, and halting trading activity.
Three-Tier Architecture of the Preferred Embodiment
The system of the present invention is designed to adapt to the needs of a variety of different types of trading markets. Operating on a wide range of hardware, from single-user personal computers (PCs) to integrated, client/server based platforms; the system of the present invention is well suited to a small number of users and to a market with thousands of users. The system may be field-modified to handle an increasing number of users as market requirements mature and change. FIG. 2 shows a particular three-tiered architecture that supports this scalability in the preferred embodiment. Note that other equivalent system architectures may be implemented.
Referring to FIG. 2, the first tier 110 includes a front-end database 112 and Web applications running on Web server(s) 111 that constitute the interface between the users 114 and the back-end 116 of the system. Authorized users may access the system through a web browser. The Graphical User Interface (GUI) may be run either as a Java Applet or as a common HTML (depending on the user's choice and browser version). The Java and HTML programming languages are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. To secure the system, the Web application is surrounded by a firewall 122 in a DMZ (Demilitarized Zone) configuration making it almost impossible to penetrate the application server(s) 120. The application's logic constitutes the second tier 115. The middleware 130 environment is component-based allowing high-availability and scalability. The third tier 133 contains the database 136 and the interface 138 to a market administrator's legacy systems. Note that because the output of the auctioning process is being polled by a legacy system, the full security of the legacy environment is assured at all times. This will be described in more detail below.
FIG. 3 illustrates a more detailed description of the front-end 110; all users 114 may log on to the system over the Internet 113. Once connected, the browser running in user computer 114 shifts to a conventional Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) mode to secure the session data. After the user is authorized, a connection is established with a cluster of Web servers 111 through a firewall 122. Each Web server 111 uses a front-end database 112 to communicate with the application 210 running in the second tier 115. Queries and bids stored in the front-end database 112 are being polled by the application 210 in the second tier 115 to further secure the application 210. Communication to the application 210 running in the second tier 115 is monitored by another leg of the firewall 122 as yet another measure of security adds an additional layer of security. Each web server 111 is coupled with an application server 120 as to maintain sessions over a connectionless protocol.
Referring to FIG. 4, the processing logic of the present invention resides in a cluster of application servers 120. The application 210 includes software components that interact through a “named service” paradigm; the basic re-usable logical market components have been synthesized and distributed among the application servers 120 as services 310. These basic market components 310 will be described in more detail below. Once created, each bid, query or market event is assigned a sequence of services 310 to perform in order to fully process the bid, query, or market event. To process complex auction rules and market constraints, these services 310 share a cluster of databases 136 which maintain an updated replication of data at all times. The databases 136 that store a sequential log of the trading activity and the results data bases are accessible for inquires by the legacy system.
This logical and physical distribution of the present invention provides the necessary scalability, high-availability, reliability, and configurability (i.e. the universal functionality) of the system as illustrated in this description of the preferred embodiment.
The application software 210 of the present invention provides all the capabilities necessary to support multiple auctions simultaneously, with the inherent flexibility to conform to the unique requirements and environment of each auction mechanism. The underlying structure of the software of the present invention makes it easy to define the rules of the auction (e.g., minimum accepted bids, bidding increments and length of rounds, etc), sequences of activity, required data elements, critical events, activity and flow requirements. This universal configurability is described in more detail below.
Referring now to FIG. 5, a block diagram illustrates the application architecture of the present invention in more detail. The application 210 includes a transaction monitor and controller 410. The transaction monitor 410 receives requests from a client 114 and other system events via interface 412. Interface 412 may be implemented using any of a variety of conventional protocols. The requests thus received by transaction monitor 410 may represent the invocation of particular functions made available by the GUI on the client 114. In other cases, system and market events may cause a communication with transaction monitor 410. In the context of the present invention, the client requests typically correspond to a request for a specific market related action or query. For example, such requests could be the submittal or confirmation of a bid, a request for information related to traders or goods, or a request for market or trader specific constraints. Note that in prior art systems, these market specific requests are typically handled by custom logic hard-coded into the client or server software. In contrast, the present invention employs a more flexible architecture. In the preferred embodiment, the transaction monitor 410 is insulated from the details of the specific market for which it has been installed. The transaction monitor 410 receives the client requests/system events and activates a corresponding service or set of services configured to handle the request/event. These services are illustrated in FIG. 5 as general services 420 and market specific services 430.
General services 420 represent the services common to all supported market types. These services may include, for example, bid time-stamping or bid logging. The market specific services 430 represent services specific to a particular type of market or a specific individual market. For example, a service supporting a request to submit a bid for multiple goods in a single round would not be appropriate in an English auction. By partitioning the services into a general or market specific type, the present invention allows a new market type to be supported by substituting the market specific services 430 of the new market type for the market specific services of the old market type. The transaction monitor 410 and the general services 420 can remain intact. In this manner, new markets may be quickly and inexpensively created or modified.
The market specific services 430 may be implemented as Java applets or dynamic link library (DLL) modules. The services 430 may thereby be easily installed and uninstalled depending upon the market type implementation. Once installed, the service 430 registers itself with the transaction monitor 410 and identifies the client requests/system events the installed service can process. When the identified request/event is received by transaction monitor 410 through interface 412, the appropriate installed market specific service 430 is activated to process the request/event.
It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that this architecture permits a first service to activate a second or other subsequent services to handle a particular request/event. As long as a service is a general service 420 (always installed) or an installed market specific service 430, the service may be used by other services without an explicit request from the client 114. In this manner, a single client request/system event my cause a cascade of services 420 and 430 to be activated.
It is also the case that particular market or system conditions may cause a particular service to respond differently to a similar request/event. The particular market and system conditions are embodied in rules 450, constraints 460, market global data 470, activity log 480, and results data 490 retained in databases 136. Rules 450 represent the particular manner in which a specific market of a particular type is to be administered. Rules 450 include, for example, the specification of minimum accepted bids, bidding increments and length of rounds. Constraints 460 represent boundary conditions that limit certain actions to a defined domain. For example, constraints 460 may include price restrictions, quantity restrictions, and/or trader limits. The rules 450 and constraints 460 are used by the services 430 to determine the manner in which a particular request/event is to be handled for a specific market. By maintaining the rules 450 and constraints 460 in a database, the specific details of a particular market may be easily changed or augmented. This database design along with the partitioning of services into general and market specific services allows greater flexibility in creating a new market and in modifying an existing market.
Market global data 470 is used to retain global market state data for access or modification by any of the services 420 and 430. The specification of the market type is initially retained in the global data 470. Activity log 480 is a sequential repository for storage of market and system parameters, timing information, and transaction information with which the detailed operation and status of the market may be monitored or re-created. Results data 490 is used to retain the final results and parameters for a specific market.
FIG. 6 illustrates the relationship of the various tiers of the system to each other and in relation to a legacy system 138.
FIG. 7 outlines the use case view of the system, as generated by a conventional modeling tool. The present invention is used by a variety of different types of actors. These types of actors are described as follows:
Actors:
Trader—The system of the present invention was built to serve traders (sellers and bidders). A trader interacts with the system through the submission of a trade (either a Bid or a Query). The system is trade-centric; each submitted trade is assigned a processing flow that consists of a partially ordered sequence of services 310 that the trade must go through, and the dynamic constraints with which the trade must comply. At each processing step, the trader is notified of the progress of the bid. This notification is described in more detail below in connection with the description of the graphical user interface. In addition, the trader is notified of general market events.
Market Creator—The present invention allows a market creator to define all the administrative data, activity parameters, processing constraints, and general rules that make the market (e.g. number and names of auctions, clearing-price rules, names and access authorizations of traders, inter-processing dependencies, bid flow constraints, etc.). These settings are provided to the system through the Graphical User Interface.
Legacy—The legacy system is a conventional system and typically an auction-specific system that retrieves statistics and results of auctions from the present invention.
Logger—The logger logs (with time stamps) and maintains and all trading events and market statistics for later analysis, auditing, and publication.
Auditor/Observer—The auditor submits global queries, monitors the market, and receives online and offline global information
Given these actors as described above, the present invention is used to perform various basic functions for setting up and operating a market. The following section, along with the diagram illustrated in FIG. 7, describes some of these basic use functions and relationships.
Use Cases:
Set market rules—Initiated by a market creator to set the rules of the market.
Process a Bid/Process a Query—Initiated by a trader—allows a trader to submit a bid/query and accept a confirmation. Bid/query is assigned with a service flow that determines its processing cycle. Bids may be rejected, change the Market State, or have no influence on the market.
Handle Event—Initiated by the system. The market creator determines which events are the significant events (e.g., sudden shift of eligibility from one action within a group to another, a close of an auction, sudden global price drop in the market, significant change in trading volume, etc.). The logger logs all events.
Validate/Authorize user—Initiated by a trader/auditor/creator to get permission to interact with the system. Subject to changes by the market creator.
Maintain results—Initiated by the legacy system to get auction results.
The graphical user interface (GUI) of the present invention allows users, either auction administration staff or bidders, to view the results for a desired auction round and to create custom file formats of the results for downloading. The GUI runs on the client computer system 114. The GUI provides screens that display the results of each round as well as auction administration screens that display real-time bidding activity. The GUI software allows the auctioneer's administration staff to post general announcements concerning the auction in real-time (e.g., the auction schedule) and to post urgent messages to all bidders (e.g., a round has been extended). In addition, the GUI software allows users to submit a report of all suggestions for the auction administration staff to review.
Any trading step that occurs in the system (e.g., login of the trader, approval of a query, change of clearing price, reduced eligibility, etc.) is time-stamped and logged in activity log 480. In addition, the system maintains a special database 490 for storing the final results and parameters for each auction. The system supports an on-line display of global cross auction activities and statistics. This functionality provides a wide variety of reports for the various phases of the trading process. Auction reports include all bids in the round, the high bids at the end of the round, the withdrawn bids, the maximum eligibility amounts for each bidder, and the minimum accepted bid amounts for the next round.
Thus, a method and apparatus for designing and deploying a universal, interactive, real-time, on-line trading market system serving traders communicating via the Internet is disclosed. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications and augmentations may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the following claims.

Claims (13)

What is claimed is:
1. A universal auction specification system comprising:
a market-specification console configured to receive at least one market protocol, the market-specification console submits a market defined by the at least one market protocol to a programmable auction server;
the programmable auction server executes at least one built-in trading primitive and at least one network augmented nonstandard trading primitive; and
a script generator for combining the set of trading primitives into a temporal protocol script representing a particular auction specification.
2. The universal auction specification system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the scripting generator is a graphical user interface based tool.
3. A programmable auction server comprising:
a network accessible set of built-in trading primitives and network augmented nonstandard trading primitives; and
a script interpreter for interpreting a temporal protocol script representing a particular auction specification, the script including references to at least a portion of the set of trading primitives.
4. The programmable auction server as claimed in claim 3 further including:
means for receiving a client market request via a network;
means for associating the client request with at least one market specific service, said service being independently installable;
means for accessing market specific information, said market specific information being independently stored; and
means for processing the client market request to produce a result.
5. The programmable auction server as claimed in claim 4 wherein said market specific information further includes rules and constraints.
6. The programmable auction server as claimed in claim 3 further including:
a dual firewall front end.
7. The programmable auction server as claimed in claim 3 further including a registration component which registers all trades in specified markets, whether consummated on a local server or other servers.
8. The programmable auction server as claimed in claim 3 further including a set of application program interfaces for program trading over the network.
9. The programmable auction server as claimed in claim 3 further including a market administration console.
10. A universal trading console comprising:
means for determining a market type;
means for transmitting a client market request via a network wherein the market type uses a network accessible set of built-in trading primitives and network augmented nonstandard trading primitives, said client market request being consistent with said market type;
means for receiving a response to said client market request and means for displaying information related the response; and
means for displaying collateral information related to the response.
11. The universal trading console as claimed in claim 10 further including: means for submitting a bid.
12. The universal trading console as claimed in claim 10 further including: means for programming automated bidding agents.
13. A universal surveillance console comprising:
means for determining a market type wherein the market type uses a network accessible set of built-in trading primitives and network augmented nonstandard trading primitives;
means for transmitting a client market request via a network, said client market request being consistent with said market type;
means for receiving a response to said client market request and means for displaying information related to the response;
means for displaying collateral information related to the response; and
means interrupting normal operation of a market.
US09/131,048 1998-08-07 1998-08-07 Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system Expired - Lifetime US6285989B1 (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/131,048 US6285989B1 (en) 1998-08-07 1998-08-07 Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system
JP2000564145A JP2002526820A (en) 1998-08-07 1999-07-29 Method and apparatus for a system for designing and developing an integrated trading market
BR9912851-9A BR9912851A (en) 1998-08-07 1999-07-29 Process and apparatus for a universal business exchange project and distribution system
CA002349913A CA2349913A1 (en) 1998-08-07 1999-07-29 A method and an apparatus for a universal trading market design and deployment system
EP99937641A EP1101180A4 (en) 1998-08-07 1999-07-29 A method and an apparatus for a universal trading market design and deployment system
AU52433/99A AU5243399A (en) 1998-08-07 1999-07-29 A method and an apparatus for a universal trading market design and deployment system
KR1020017001663A KR20010079626A (en) 1998-08-07 1999-07-29 A method and an apparatus for a universal trading market design and deployment system
PCT/US1999/017248 WO2000008578A1 (en) 1998-08-07 1999-07-29 A method and an apparatus for a universal trading market design and deployment system
US09/410,856 US7558752B1 (en) 1998-08-07 1999-10-01 Method and an apparatus for a trading market design and deployment system
US11/982,306 US20080162331A1 (en) 1998-08-07 2007-10-31 Method and apparatus for a trading market design and deployment system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/131,048 US6285989B1 (en) 1998-08-07 1998-08-07 Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US33932599A Continuation-In-Part 1998-08-07 1999-06-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US6285989B1 true US6285989B1 (en) 2001-09-04

Family

ID=22447617

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/131,048 Expired - Lifetime US6285989B1 (en) 1998-08-07 1998-08-07 Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US6285989B1 (en)

Cited By (189)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010021923A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2001-09-13 Atkinson Scott W. Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds
US20010027434A1 (en) * 1999-05-14 2001-10-04 Free Markets Online, Inc. Method and system for conducting electronic auctions
US20010032173A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2001-10-18 Freemarkets Online, Inc. Method and system for dynamically controlling overtime in electronic auctions
US20010037490A1 (en) * 2000-03-17 2001-11-01 Hiang-Swee Chiang Web application generator
US20010042039A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2001-11-15 Rupp William D. Method and apparatus for configurably adjusting a bid in an online auction
US20010042040A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2001-11-15 Christopher Keith Routing control for orders eligible for multiple markets
US20010044770A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2001-11-22 Christopher Keith Platform for market programs and trading programs
US20010051909A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2001-12-13 Christopher Keith Market program for interacting with trading programs on a platform
US20020013763A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2002-01-31 Harris Scott C. Real time auction with end game
US20020029185A1 (en) * 2000-09-05 2002-03-07 Teruo Tanaka Method and apparatus for providing broker service to auctions
US20020032579A1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2002-03-14 Mahesh Harpale Intermediary driven electronic marketplace for cross-market trading
WO2002023451A1 (en) * 2000-09-18 2002-03-21 Vert Tech Llc Apparatus, system and method for forming resulting transaction profiles
US20020069125A1 (en) * 2000-05-30 2002-06-06 Bruck Jeremy Alan Information transfer between or among commodity businesses
US20020077959A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2002-06-20 Marc Alaia Method and system for using line item bid limits in electonic auctions
US20020091617A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2002-07-11 Christopher Keith Trading program for interacting with market programs on a platform
US20020107764A1 (en) * 2000-12-07 2002-08-08 Mccoy Mary Kay Method and product for calculating a net operating income audit and for enabling substantially identical audit practices among a plurality of audit firms
US20020116280A1 (en) * 2001-02-20 2002-08-22 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus, system, method and computer program product for aggregating marketplaces
US20020147675A1 (en) * 2001-04-10 2002-10-10 Ibm Corporation Automated bidding agent for electronic auctions
US20020173815A1 (en) * 1998-05-13 2002-11-21 Michael Hogendijk Apparatus and methods for reducing embolization during treatment of carotid artery disease
US20020174052A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2002-11-21 Kemal Guler Automated decision support system for designing auctions
WO2002101603A1 (en) * 2001-06-08 2002-12-19 G H Michell & Sons Australia P Wool tender selling system
WO2002103477A2 (en) * 2001-06-19 2002-12-27 Cariocas, Inc. Enhanced auction mechanism for online transactions
US20030004858A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-02 Schmitz David J. Automated execution system having participation
US20030018562A1 (en) * 2001-07-10 2003-01-23 Kemal Guler Method and system for selecting an optimal auction format
US20030041009A1 (en) * 2001-08-22 2003-02-27 William Grey System and method for personalized dynamic pricing
US20030093357A1 (en) * 2001-09-10 2003-05-15 Kemal Guler Method and system for automated bid advice for auctions
WO2003052615A1 (en) * 2001-12-18 2003-06-26 Ebay Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US6609112B1 (en) * 1999-05-20 2003-08-19 Dovebid, Inc. System and method for providing proxy-based online Dutch auction services
US20030225678A1 (en) * 1999-05-10 2003-12-04 Edeposit Corporation Web-based account management for hold and release of funds
US20030236739A1 (en) * 1999-12-23 2003-12-25 Quoteship.Com Bid positioning system
US20040015415A1 (en) * 2000-04-21 2004-01-22 International Business Machines Corporation System, program product, and method for comparison shopping with dynamic pricing over a network
US20040015433A1 (en) * 1997-02-24 2004-01-22 Geophonic Networks, Inc. Bidding for energy supply to resellers and their customers
US20040015427A1 (en) * 2002-07-09 2004-01-22 Brian Camelio Methods and apparatuses for financing and marketing a creative work
US20040024731A1 (en) * 2002-08-05 2004-02-05 Microsoft Corporation Coordinating transactional web services
US20040024713A1 (en) * 2002-07-25 2004-02-05 Moore Daniel F. Monitoring market participant responses
US20040024610A1 (en) * 1998-01-26 2004-02-05 Sergey Fradkov Transaction execution system interface and enterprise system architecture thereof
US20040039685A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2004-02-26 W.R. Hambrecht + Co., A California Corporation Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation
US20040073866A1 (en) * 2002-10-10 2004-04-15 Bhk Systems L.P. Automated system and method for dynamically generating customized typeset question-based documents
US20040103050A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2004-05-27 Long Catherine C. Fixed income securities ratings visualization
US20040128224A1 (en) * 2002-12-31 2004-07-01 Autotrader.Com, Llc Efficient online auction style listings that encourage out-of-channel negotiation
US6813612B1 (en) 2000-05-25 2004-11-02 Nancy J. Rabenold Remote bidding supplement for traditional live auctions
US20040230512A1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2004-11-18 Vialogy Corp. Method and system for facilitating opportunistic transactions
US6834272B1 (en) * 1999-08-10 2004-12-21 Yeda Research And Development Company Ltd. Privacy preserving negotiation and computation
US6847939B1 (en) * 1999-11-18 2005-01-25 Olsale.Com Ltd. System and method of conducting on-line auctions
US20050033648A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2005-02-10 Hua-Ming Jin Automated listing management
US20050039787A1 (en) * 2003-08-20 2005-02-24 New Energy Options, Inc. Method and system for predicting solar energy production
US20050080709A1 (en) * 2003-10-10 2005-04-14 Kemal Guler Method and system for controlling feedback for an online auction
US20050086537A1 (en) * 2003-10-17 2005-04-21 Alex Johnson Methods and system for replicating and securing process control data
US20050091144A1 (en) * 2003-10-28 2005-04-28 Robert Longman Buyer's offer auctions for goods & services, rights or properties
US20050137960A1 (en) * 2003-11-26 2005-06-23 Brann John E.T. Protocol-independent asset trading system and methods
US6952682B1 (en) 1999-07-02 2005-10-04 Ariba, Inc. System and method for matching multi-attribute auction bids
WO2005098651A1 (en) * 2004-03-22 2005-10-20 Bhk Systems, L.P. Automated system and method for dynamically generating customized typeset question-based documents
US20050234804A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Yue Fang Method and system for auto-mapping to network-based auctions
US20050240507A1 (en) * 2004-04-26 2005-10-27 William Galen Methods and apparatus for an auction system with interactive bidding
US20050246187A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Reed Maltzman System and method to facilitate differentiated levels of service in a network-based marketplace
US20050256797A1 (en) * 2004-05-13 2005-11-17 Scottrade, Inc. Method and apparatus for user-interactive financial instrument trading
US20050273420A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-12-08 Lenin Subramanian Method and system for customizable homepages for network-based auctions
US20050283428A1 (en) * 2001-06-05 2005-12-22 Carlton Bartels Systems and methods for electronic trading of carbon dioxide equivalent emission
US20060004647A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2006-01-05 Guruprasad Srinivasamurthy Method and system for configurable options in enhanced network-based auctions
US20060004649A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2006-01-05 Narinder Singh Method and system for a failure recovery framework for interfacing with network-based auctions
US20060041502A1 (en) * 2004-08-21 2006-02-23 Blair William R Cost management file translation methods, systems, and apparatuses for extended commerce
US20060047581A1 (en) * 2000-08-18 2006-03-02 Pierfrancesco La Mura Enhanced auction mechanism for online transactions
US20060069639A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Kalt David S System and methods for prioritized management of financial instruments
US20060085321A1 (en) * 2004-07-20 2006-04-20 Staib William E Simulation auction for public offering
US20060129476A1 (en) * 2000-10-11 2006-06-15 Ebay Inc. Sales system with buyer price selection
US20060150216A1 (en) * 1994-11-29 2006-07-06 Frederick Herz System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US20060149562A1 (en) * 2003-01-09 2006-07-06 Nobuo Oyama Management system for business invenstment
US7085739B1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2006-08-01 Accenture Llp Method and system for facilitating, coordinating and managing a competitive marketplace
US20060206409A1 (en) * 2005-03-14 2006-09-14 Elbert Harris Bid system
US7149718B1 (en) * 1999-12-21 2006-12-12 Ebay Inc. Method and system for the creation and communication of notes concerning an auction participant or item within a network-based auction facility
US7152042B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2006-12-19 Hinda, Inc. Incentive points redemption program carried out via an on-line auction
US20070055578A1 (en) * 2000-05-22 2007-03-08 Commonwealth Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc. Internet and wireless integrated virtual presence
US20070078745A1 (en) * 2005-10-05 2007-04-05 Kalt David S System and methods for facilitating informed trading of financial instruments
US20070083457A1 (en) * 2000-03-08 2007-04-12 Evelyn Michael H System and methods for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
US20070106595A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-10 Sap Ag Monitoring tool for integrated product ordering/fulfillment center and auction system
US20070106596A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-10 Sap Ag Method and system for implementing multiple auctions for a product on a seller's e-commerce site
US20070130616A1 (en) * 2005-12-06 2007-06-07 Oracle International Corporation Dynamic constraints for query operations
US20070143205A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-06-21 Sap Ag Method and system for implementing configurable order options for integrated auction services on a seller's e-commerce site
US20070150406A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-06-28 Sap Ag Bidder monitoring tool for integrated auction and product ordering system
US7240198B1 (en) * 2000-08-08 2007-07-03 Yeda Research & Development Co., Ltd. Honesty preserving negotiation and computation
US20070179881A1 (en) * 2006-02-02 2007-08-02 Volatility Managers, Llc System, method, and apparatus for trading in a decentralized market
US20070185777A1 (en) * 2006-02-06 2007-08-09 Autotrader.Com, Llc Structured computer-assisted method and apparatus for filtering information presentation
US7277863B1 (en) * 2000-06-13 2007-10-02 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Electronic marketplace communication system
US20070255642A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2007-11-01 Christopher Keith Trading system with elfs and umpires
US20080059327A1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2008-03-06 Bloomfield Mark C Methods & systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management
US7346568B1 (en) 2000-01-26 2008-03-18 Robert Cadoux Serially staged, initial public stock offering method
US7356498B2 (en) 1999-12-30 2008-04-08 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading exchange system having integrated quote risk monitoring and integrated quote modification services
US7376612B1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2008-05-20 Khai Hee Kwan System and method for conducting an electronic financial asset deposit auction over computer network
US7383220B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2008-06-03 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated short term option order processing
US7392210B1 (en) 2000-04-07 2008-06-24 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Workflow management system and method
US7398244B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2008-07-08 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated order book with crowd price improvement
US7415436B1 (en) * 2000-03-08 2008-08-19 W. R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc System and method for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
US20080262959A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2008-10-23 Bruce Tupper Electronic trading confirmation system
US20090037289A1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2009-02-05 Supply Chain Connect, Llc Method for facilitating chemical supplier transactions
US7496533B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2009-02-24 Stikine Technology, Llc Decision table for order handling
US20090070252A1 (en) * 2001-08-21 2009-03-12 Carlton Bartels Electronic trading system for simulating the trading of carbon dioxide equivalent emission reductions and methods of use
US20090083115A1 (en) * 2007-09-24 2009-03-26 Pearson Gregory A Interactive networking systems
US20090112650A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Iwane Donna S Online method of procuring mortgage loans
US20090111594A1 (en) * 2007-10-29 2009-04-30 Spence Charles H Billiards practice device
US7539638B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2009-05-26 Stikine Technology, Llc Representation of order in multiple markets
US20090138381A1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2009-05-28 Bloomfield Mark C Methods and systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management
US7552083B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2009-06-23 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Hybrid trading system for concurrently trading through both electronic and open-outcry trading mechanisms
US7558752B1 (en) 1998-08-07 2009-07-07 Ariba, Inc. Method and an apparatus for a trading market design and deployment system
US7567928B1 (en) 2005-09-12 2009-07-28 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Total fair value swap
US20090240628A1 (en) * 2008-03-20 2009-09-24 Co-Exprise, Inc. Method and System for Facilitating a Negotiation
US7596526B2 (en) 2001-04-16 2009-09-29 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for managing a series of overnight financing trades
US7610217B1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2009-10-27 Hitachi, Ltd. Automatic auction method and system on server-client system
US7613650B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2009-11-03 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Hybrid trading system for concurrently trading securities or derivatives through both electronic and open-outcry trading mechanisms
US7613647B1 (en) * 2000-01-19 2009-11-03 Itg Software Solutions, Inc. System and method for executing strategy security trading
US7620578B1 (en) 2006-05-01 2009-11-17 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Volatility derivative financial product
US7630986B1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2009-12-08 Pinpoint, Incorporated Secure data interchange
US7634435B2 (en) 2003-05-13 2009-12-15 Jp Morgan Chase Bank Diversified fixed income product and method for creating and marketing same
US7634439B1 (en) * 2000-11-14 2009-12-15 Ariba, Inc. Method and apparatus to perform buy versus leasing transformational bidding
US7647268B1 (en) 2006-05-04 2010-01-12 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for implementing a recurrent bidding process
US7653588B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2010-01-26 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for providing order routing to a virtual crowd in a hybrid trading system
US7676397B2 (en) * 2003-12-03 2010-03-09 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for predicting the outcome of an online auction
US7676421B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2010-03-09 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for providing an automated auction for internalization and complex orders in a hybrid trading system
US7680731B1 (en) 2000-06-07 2010-03-16 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for executing deposit transactions over the internet
US7698173B1 (en) 1996-05-29 2010-04-13 Aol Inc. Method and medium for customizing the presentation of content displayed to a user
US7716107B1 (en) 2006-02-03 2010-05-11 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Earnings derivative financial product
US7765141B1 (en) * 2001-05-30 2010-07-27 Tommaso Innocenti Online auction system facilitating flexible terms commodity trading
US7770184B2 (en) 2003-06-06 2010-08-03 Jp Morgan Chase Bank Integrated trading platform architecture
US7774246B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2010-08-10 Christopher Keith Automated price setting for paired orders
US7783561B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2010-08-24 Christopher Keith Automated synchronization of orders represented in multiple markets
US7792713B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2010-09-07 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for disguised price bidding in online auctions
US7809629B2 (en) 2005-04-07 2010-10-05 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Market participant issue selection system and method
US7813966B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2010-10-12 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime interval in electronic auctions
US7813991B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2010-10-12 Christopher Keith Automated trading negotiation protocols
US7818238B1 (en) 2005-10-11 2010-10-19 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Upside forward with early funding provision
US7822682B2 (en) 2005-06-08 2010-10-26 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for enhancing supply chain transactions
US7827096B1 (en) 2006-11-03 2010-11-02 Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Special maturity ASR recalculated timing
US7835977B2 (en) * 2005-11-03 2010-11-16 Sap Ag Method and system for generating an auction using a template in an integrated internal auction system
US7890410B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2011-02-15 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated trial order processing
US7890407B2 (en) 2000-11-03 2011-02-15 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for estimating conduit liquidity requirements in asset backed commercial paper
US20110040665A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2011-02-17 Multiple-Markets Fixed income securities ratings visualization
US7899737B2 (en) * 1999-09-02 2011-03-01 Walker Digital, Llc Method, system and computer program product for facilitating an auction behavior and automatic bidding in an auction
US7908198B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2011-03-15 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated preferences for market participants
US20110087555A1 (en) * 2009-10-12 2011-04-14 Jeffrey Brian Gray Computer Implemented Continuous Dual Auction System
US7945960B2 (en) 2005-12-06 2011-05-17 Oracle International Corporation Dynamic conditional security policy extensions
US7966234B1 (en) 1999-05-17 2011-06-21 Jpmorgan Chase Bank. N.A. Structured finance performance analytics system
US7970688B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2011-06-28 Jp Morgan Chase Bank Method for pricing a trade
US7970722B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2011-06-28 Aloft Media, Llc System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US8027904B2 (en) 2005-05-04 2011-09-27 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating and trading corporate debt security derivative investment instruments
US8036950B1 (en) 2002-02-20 2011-10-11 Emptoris, Inc. Auction management with business-volume discount
US20110283257A1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2011-11-17 Borland Software Corporation Supporting and deploying distributed computing components
US8069138B2 (en) 2003-10-22 2011-11-29 Scottrade, Inc. Database migration in an automated financial instrument brokerage system
US8090639B2 (en) 2004-08-06 2012-01-03 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Method and system for creating and marketing employee stock option mirror image warrants
US8095428B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2012-01-10 Sap Ag Method, system, and medium for winning bid evaluation in an auction
US8095449B2 (en) 2005-11-03 2012-01-10 Sap Ag Method and system for generating an auction using a product catalog in an integrated internal auction system
US8131630B2 (en) 2005-06-07 2012-03-06 Bgc Partners, Inc. Trading order routing
US8140425B2 (en) 2006-11-13 2012-03-20 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for generating and trading derivative investment instruments based on a volatility arbitrage benchmark index
US8165953B2 (en) 2007-09-04 2012-04-24 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for creating and trading a derivative investment instrument over a range of index values
US8170924B1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2012-05-01 Harris Technology, Llc Real time auction with end game
US8249975B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2012-08-21 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated first look at market events
US8249972B2 (en) 2007-11-09 2012-08-21 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating a volatility benchmark index
US8321322B2 (en) 2009-09-28 2012-11-27 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating a spot price tracker index
US8326716B2 (en) 2005-05-04 2012-12-04 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating and trading derivative investment products based on a statistical property reflecting the variance of an underlying asset
US8326715B2 (en) 2005-05-04 2012-12-04 Chicago Board Operations Exchange, Incorporated Method of creating and trading derivative investment products based on a statistical property reflecting the variance of an underlying asset
US8346653B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2013-01-01 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading system for routing and matching orders
US8352354B2 (en) 2010-02-23 2013-01-08 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for optimizing order execution
US8392317B2 (en) 2010-11-09 2013-03-05 Ariba, Inc. Facilitating electronic auction of prepayment of an invoice
US8407116B1 (en) * 1999-09-23 2013-03-26 The Nasdaq Omx Group, Inc. Quote/order processing in electronic market system
US8423447B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2013-04-16 Jp Morgan Chase Bank System and method for allocating nominal and cash amounts to trades in a netted trade
US8484122B2 (en) 2005-08-04 2013-07-09 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for apportioning trading orders based on size of displayed quantities
US8489489B2 (en) 2005-05-05 2013-07-16 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for trading derivatives in penny increments while disseminating quotes for derivatives in nickel/dime increments
US8494951B2 (en) 2005-08-05 2013-07-23 Bgc Partners, Inc. Matching of trading orders based on priority
US8548886B1 (en) 2002-05-31 2013-10-01 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Account opening system, method and computer program product
US8560423B1 (en) 1999-05-10 2013-10-15 Edeposit Corporation Web-based account management
US8612300B2 (en) 2006-09-08 2013-12-17 Ariba, Inc. Buyer/supplier network that aids supplier enablement through collaboration between buyers and suppliers
US20140046864A1 (en) * 2012-08-10 2014-02-13 Kiindly, LLC Virtual Funding Campaign Methodology
US8688537B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2014-04-01 Ariba, Inc. Maintenance of a company profile of a company associated with a supplier/buyer commerce network
US8688569B1 (en) 2005-03-23 2014-04-01 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for post closing and custody services
US8732036B2 (en) 2010-05-07 2014-05-20 Ariba, Inc. Supplier/buyer network that provides catalog updates
US8738498B2 (en) * 2004-01-29 2014-05-27 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for routing a trading order
US8738514B2 (en) 2010-02-18 2014-05-27 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for providing borrow coverage services to short sell securities
US8775294B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2014-07-08 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated linked order processing
US8788381B2 (en) 2008-10-08 2014-07-22 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for creating and trading a digital derivative investment instrument
US20140304100A1 (en) * 2000-05-25 2014-10-09 Xcira, Inc Live auction participation utilizing a coupled bidding device
US9135656B2 (en) 2011-08-24 2015-09-15 Strategic Acquisitions, Inc. Method and system for auction information management
US9607333B2 (en) 1999-11-16 2017-03-28 Ebay Inc. Network-based sales system with a customizable user interface
US9727916B1 (en) 1999-12-30 2017-08-08 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading exchange system having integrated quote risk monitoring and integrated quote modification services
US9811868B1 (en) 2006-08-29 2017-11-07 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Systems and methods for integrating a deal process
US9836773B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2017-12-05 Ariba, Inc. Evaluation and selection of quotes of a commerce network
US9990634B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2018-06-05 Ariba, Inc. Managing an experience of a member organization of a collaborative commerce community through a network
US10304097B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2019-05-28 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for controlling the disclosure of a trading order
US10510112B2 (en) 2009-10-12 2019-12-17 Jeffrey Brian Gray Computer implemented continuous dual auction system
US10515371B2 (en) 2007-09-24 2019-12-24 Gregory A. Pearson, Inc. Interactive networking systems with user classes
US11010834B2 (en) 2006-04-04 2021-05-18 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for optimizing execution of trading orders
US11017410B2 (en) 2006-12-30 2021-05-25 Cfph, Llc Methods and systems for managing and trading using a shared order book as internal exchange

Citations (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3581072A (en) 1968-03-28 1971-05-25 Frederick Nymeyer Auction market computation system
US4789928A (en) 1986-02-17 1988-12-06 Flex Japan Inc. Auction information transmission processing
US5101353A (en) 1989-05-31 1992-03-31 Lattice Investments, Inc. Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets
US5136501A (en) 1989-05-26 1992-08-04 Reuters Limited Anonymous matching system
JPH07296082A (en) 1994-04-27 1995-11-10 N T T Data Tsushin Kk On-line bidding method and bidding system
US5603034A (en) * 1992-09-08 1997-02-11 International Business Machines Corporation Graphical resource editor for software customization
US5689652A (en) 1995-04-27 1997-11-18 Optimark Technologies, Inc. Crossing network utilizing optimal mutual satisfaction density profile
US5727165A (en) 1990-12-17 1998-03-10 Reuters Limited Offer matching system having timed match acknowledgment
US5745765A (en) * 1995-10-23 1998-04-28 Calico Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic and interactive configuration of custom products
US5774873A (en) 1996-03-29 1998-06-30 Adt Automotive, Inc. Electronic on-line motor vehicle auction and information system
US5794207A (en) 1996-09-04 1998-08-11 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers
US5794219A (en) * 1996-02-20 1998-08-11 Health Hero Network, Inc. Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling
US5799284A (en) 1996-03-13 1998-08-25 Roy E. Bourquin Software and hardware for publishing and viewing products and services for sale
US5812668A (en) 1996-06-17 1998-09-22 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for verifying the operation of a remote transaction clearance system utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US5812572A (en) * 1996-07-01 1998-09-22 Pacific Fiberoptics, Inc. Intelligent fiberoptic transmitters and methods of operating and manufacturing the same
US5835896A (en) * 1996-03-29 1998-11-10 Onsale, Inc. Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
US5845266A (en) 1995-12-12 1998-12-01 Optimark Technologies, Inc. Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features
US5844554A (en) * 1996-09-17 1998-12-01 Bt Squared Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for user interfaces and constraint handling configurations software
US5862223A (en) 1996-07-24 1999-01-19 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce
US5890137A (en) 1995-12-15 1999-03-30 Kabushiki Kaisha N.K. Kikaku On-line shopping system and the method of payment settlement
US5890138A (en) 1996-08-26 1999-03-30 Bid.Com International Inc. Computer auction system
US5905975A (en) * 1996-01-04 1999-05-18 Ausubel; Lawrence M. Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions
US5913210A (en) 1998-03-27 1999-06-15 Call; Charles G. Methods and apparatus for disseminating product information via the internet
US5950001A (en) * 1997-06-03 1999-09-07 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for customizing a software component
US5966699A (en) * 1996-10-11 1999-10-12 Zandi; Richard System and method for conducting loan auction over computer network
US6014643A (en) 1996-06-28 2000-01-11 Minton; Vernon F. Interactive securities trading system
US6055518A (en) 1996-02-01 2000-04-25 At&T Corporation Secure auction systems

Patent Citations (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3581072A (en) 1968-03-28 1971-05-25 Frederick Nymeyer Auction market computation system
US4789928A (en) 1986-02-17 1988-12-06 Flex Japan Inc. Auction information transmission processing
US5136501A (en) 1989-05-26 1992-08-04 Reuters Limited Anonymous matching system
US5101353A (en) 1989-05-31 1992-03-31 Lattice Investments, Inc. Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets
US5727165A (en) 1990-12-17 1998-03-10 Reuters Limited Offer matching system having timed match acknowledgment
US5603034A (en) * 1992-09-08 1997-02-11 International Business Machines Corporation Graphical resource editor for software customization
JPH07296082A (en) 1994-04-27 1995-11-10 N T T Data Tsushin Kk On-line bidding method and bidding system
US5689652A (en) 1995-04-27 1997-11-18 Optimark Technologies, Inc. Crossing network utilizing optimal mutual satisfaction density profile
US5745765A (en) * 1995-10-23 1998-04-28 Calico Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic and interactive configuration of custom products
US5845266A (en) 1995-12-12 1998-12-01 Optimark Technologies, Inc. Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features
US5890137A (en) 1995-12-15 1999-03-30 Kabushiki Kaisha N.K. Kikaku On-line shopping system and the method of payment settlement
US5905975A (en) * 1996-01-04 1999-05-18 Ausubel; Lawrence M. Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions
US6055518A (en) 1996-02-01 2000-04-25 At&T Corporation Secure auction systems
US5794219A (en) * 1996-02-20 1998-08-11 Health Hero Network, Inc. Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling
US5799284A (en) 1996-03-13 1998-08-25 Roy E. Bourquin Software and hardware for publishing and viewing products and services for sale
US5835896A (en) * 1996-03-29 1998-11-10 Onsale, Inc. Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
US5774873A (en) 1996-03-29 1998-06-30 Adt Automotive, Inc. Electronic on-line motor vehicle auction and information system
US5812668A (en) 1996-06-17 1998-09-22 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for verifying the operation of a remote transaction clearance system utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US6014643A (en) 1996-06-28 2000-01-11 Minton; Vernon F. Interactive securities trading system
US5812572A (en) * 1996-07-01 1998-09-22 Pacific Fiberoptics, Inc. Intelligent fiberoptic transmitters and methods of operating and manufacturing the same
US5862223A (en) 1996-07-24 1999-01-19 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce
US5890138A (en) 1996-08-26 1999-03-30 Bid.Com International Inc. Computer auction system
US5794207A (en) 1996-09-04 1998-08-11 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers
US5844554A (en) * 1996-09-17 1998-12-01 Bt Squared Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for user interfaces and constraint handling configurations software
US5966699A (en) * 1996-10-11 1999-10-12 Zandi; Richard System and method for conducting loan auction over computer network
US5950001A (en) * 1997-06-03 1999-09-07 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for customizing a software component
US5913210A (en) 1998-03-27 1999-06-15 Call; Charles G. Methods and apparatus for disseminating product information via the internet

Non-Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Auctions for business, Wilder, Clinton, Information Week, Mar. 16, 1998, Issue 673, p90, 2/3p, 1c.*
Current Catalog, Christmas Wishes, 1991, 4 pages.
Emaze Software offers WebThread, ScriptWizard on BuyDirect.com, Business Wire Page: 12120089, Dec. 12, 1996.*
Going . . . Going . . . Gone!(FairMarket's Web Auction site, and Emaze Software's Emaze Auction Web auction software), Cohen, Emily, PC Magazine, vol. v17 Issue n15, Sep. 1, 1998, May 1998.*
Legacy data links shrink costs, Millman, Howard, Info World, Jan. 5, 1998, vol. 20 Issue 1, p51, 2p, 1 chart, 1c.*
Moai intros auction software, Trommer, Diane, Electronic Buyer's News, Mar. 23, 1998, Issue 1101, p78, 1/4p.*
ONSALE, About ONSALE, 1996, 2 pages.
ONSALE, Auction Formats, 1996, 2 pages.
ONSALE, Auction Supersite, Sep. 8, 1997, 7 pages.
ONSALE, ONSALE Home, Sep. 8, 1997, 4 pages.
OpenSite Technologies Introduces Innovative Web Auction Partner Program, Business Wire Page: 08041472, Aug. 4, 1998.*
Packaged apps give auctioneers rich new options, Frook, John Evan, Internetweek, May 25, 1998, Issue 716, p 14, 4/7p, 2 graphs.*
Scripting method based on temporal intervals for designing interactive systems, Mase, K.; Pinhanez, C.S.; Bobick, A.F., Transactions of the Information Processing Society of Japan, May 1, 1998, vol. 39 Issue 5 p 1403-13.*
Search Report for PCT/US/00/015982, mailed Aug. 23, 2000, 2 pages.
Search Report for PCT/US00/17449, mailed Nov. 14, 2000, 1 page.

Cited By (368)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7853600B2 (en) 1994-11-29 2010-12-14 Pinpoint, Incorporated System and method for providing access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US20060150216A1 (en) * 1994-11-29 2006-07-06 Frederick Herz System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US8056100B2 (en) 1994-11-29 2011-11-08 Pinpoint, Incorporated System and method for providing access to data using customer profiles
US7698173B1 (en) 1996-05-29 2010-04-13 Aol Inc. Method and medium for customizing the presentation of content displayed to a user
US7848963B2 (en) 1996-09-04 2010-12-07 Hitachi, Ltd. Automatic auction method and system on server-client system
US7610217B1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2009-10-27 Hitachi, Ltd. Automatic auction method and system on server-client system
US20100030658A1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2010-02-04 Masakatsu Mori Automatic auction method and system on server-client system
US20040015433A1 (en) * 1997-02-24 2004-01-22 Geophonic Networks, Inc. Bidding for energy supply to resellers and their customers
US8504463B2 (en) 1997-02-24 2013-08-06 Geophonic Networks, Inc. Bidding for energy supply
US8527389B2 (en) 1997-02-24 2013-09-03 Geophonic Networks, Inc. Bidding for energy supply to resellers and their customers
US20080010182A2 (en) * 1997-02-24 2008-01-10 Geophonic Networks, Inc. Bidding for Energy Supply to Resellers and Their Customers
US20080271048A1 (en) * 1998-01-26 2008-10-30 Sergey Fradkov Transaction Execution System Interface and Enterprise System Architecture Thereof
US20040024610A1 (en) * 1998-01-26 2004-02-05 Sergey Fradkov Transaction execution system interface and enterprise system architecture thereof
US7415715B2 (en) * 1998-01-26 2008-08-19 Simplexity, Llc C/O Versa Capital Management, Inc. Transaction execution system interface and enterprise system architecture thereof
US20020173815A1 (en) * 1998-05-13 2002-11-21 Michael Hogendijk Apparatus and methods for reducing embolization during treatment of carotid artery disease
US7558752B1 (en) 1998-08-07 2009-07-07 Ariba, Inc. Method and an apparatus for a trading market design and deployment system
US20080133377A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2008-06-05 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime interval in electronic auctions
US7813966B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2010-10-12 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime interval in electronic auctions
US7792707B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2010-09-07 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime interval in electronic auctions
US20010042039A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2001-11-15 Rupp William D. Method and apparatus for configurably adjusting a bid in an online auction
US20020077959A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2002-06-20 Marc Alaia Method and system for using line item bid limits in electonic auctions
US7395238B2 (en) 1999-02-19 2008-07-01 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for controlling an electronic auction during the transition to a closed state
US7558746B2 (en) 1999-02-19 2009-07-07 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for dynamically controlling overtime in electronic auctions
US20010021923A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2001-09-13 Atkinson Scott W. Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds
US7499876B2 (en) 1999-02-19 2009-03-03 Ariba, Inc. Method and apparatus for configurably adjusting a bid in an online auction
US20020046148A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2002-04-18 Freemarkets Online, Inc. Method and system for controlling an electronic auction during the transition to a closed state
US20060271471A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2006-11-30 Marc Alaia Method and system for dynamically controlling overtime in electronic auctions
US7152043B2 (en) 1999-02-19 2006-12-19 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for dynamically controlling overtime in electronic auctions
US20010032173A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2001-10-18 Freemarkets Online, Inc. Method and system for dynamically controlling overtime in electronic auctions
US7599878B2 (en) 1999-02-19 2009-10-06 Ariba, Inc. Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds
US20040230512A1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2004-11-18 Vialogy Corp. Method and system for facilitating opportunistic transactions
US7092904B1 (en) * 1999-05-10 2006-08-15 Edeposit Corporation Web-based account management for hold and release of funds
US7165047B2 (en) 1999-05-10 2007-01-16 Edeposit Corporation Web-based account management for hold and release of funds
US20030225678A1 (en) * 1999-05-10 2003-12-04 Edeposit Corporation Web-based account management for hold and release of funds
US8560423B1 (en) 1999-05-10 2013-10-15 Edeposit Corporation Web-based account management
US8655772B2 (en) 1999-05-10 2014-02-18 Edeposit Corporation Web-based account management
US7283980B2 (en) 1999-05-14 2007-10-16 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime intervals in electronic auctions
US20010027434A1 (en) * 1999-05-14 2001-10-04 Free Markets Online, Inc. Method and system for conducting electronic auctions
US7966234B1 (en) 1999-05-17 2011-06-21 Jpmorgan Chase Bank. N.A. Structured finance performance analytics system
US6609112B1 (en) * 1999-05-20 2003-08-19 Dovebid, Inc. System and method for providing proxy-based online Dutch auction services
US7587358B2 (en) 1999-06-15 2009-09-08 W. R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation
US20040039685A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2004-02-26 W.R. Hambrecht + Co., A California Corporation Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation
US20100017344A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2010-01-21 W.R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc Auction System and Method for Pricing and Allocation During Capital Formation
US8117112B2 (en) * 1999-06-15 2012-02-14 Hambrecht William R Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation
US6952682B1 (en) 1999-07-02 2005-10-04 Ariba, Inc. System and method for matching multi-attribute auction bids
US6834272B1 (en) * 1999-08-10 2004-12-21 Yeda Research And Development Company Ltd. Privacy preserving negotiation and computation
US8548895B2 (en) * 1999-09-02 2013-10-01 Walker Digital, Llc Method, system and computer program product for facilitating an auction behavior and automatic bidding in an auction
US20110131111A1 (en) * 1999-09-02 2011-06-02 Walker Digital, Llc Method, system and computer program product for facilitating an auction behavior and automatic bidding in an auction
US20140032355A1 (en) * 1999-09-02 2014-01-30 Walker Digital Holdings, LLC Method, system and computer program product for facilitating an auction behavior and automatic bidding in an auction
US7899737B2 (en) * 1999-09-02 2011-03-01 Walker Digital, Llc Method, system and computer program product for facilitating an auction behavior and automatic bidding in an auction
US8407116B1 (en) * 1999-09-23 2013-03-26 The Nasdaq Omx Group, Inc. Quote/order processing in electronic market system
US20110283257A1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2011-11-17 Borland Software Corporation Supporting and deploying distributed computing components
US7152042B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2006-12-19 Hinda, Inc. Incentive points redemption program carried out via an on-line auction
US20070118461A1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2007-05-24 Hinda, Inc. Incentive points redemption program carried out via an on-line auction
US8458048B2 (en) 1999-10-08 2013-06-04 Hinda, Inc. Points redemption program carried out via an on-line auction
US7085739B1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2006-08-01 Accenture Llp Method and system for facilitating, coordinating and managing a competitive marketplace
US20060265323A1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2006-11-23 Accenture Llp Method and system for facilitating, coordinating and managing a competitive marketplace
US8032461B2 (en) 1999-10-20 2011-10-04 Accenture Global Services Limited Method and system for facilitating, coordinating and managing a competitive marketplace
US20090187501A1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2009-07-23 Winter Larry A Method and system for facilitating, coordinating and managing a competitive marketplace
US7630986B1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2009-12-08 Pinpoint, Incorporated Secure data interchange
US8160988B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2012-04-17 Aloft Media, Llc System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US8005777B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2011-08-23 Aloft Media, Llc System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US7970722B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2011-06-28 Aloft Media, Llc System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US9607333B2 (en) 1999-11-16 2017-03-28 Ebay Inc. Network-based sales system with a customizable user interface
US6847939B1 (en) * 1999-11-18 2005-01-25 Olsale.Com Ltd. System and method of conducting on-line auctions
US8423416B2 (en) * 1999-12-08 2013-04-16 Advanced Auctions, Llc Real time auction with end game
US20090281913A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2009-11-12 Harris Technology, Llc Real time auction with end game
US20020013763A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2002-01-31 Harris Scott C. Real time auction with end game
US8266000B1 (en) 1999-12-08 2012-09-11 Harris Technology, Inc. Real time auction with end game
US8170924B1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2012-05-01 Harris Technology, Llc Real time auction with end game
US7756776B2 (en) 1999-12-21 2010-07-13 Ebay Inc. Administrative notes in network-based commerce facility
US20070055681A1 (en) * 1999-12-21 2007-03-08 Ebay Inc. Administrative notes in network-based commerce facility
US7149718B1 (en) * 1999-12-21 2006-12-12 Ebay Inc. Method and system for the creation and communication of notes concerning an auction participant or item within a network-based auction facility
US8050981B2 (en) 1999-12-21 2011-11-01 Ebay Inc Administrative notes in network-based commerce facility
US20050091149A1 (en) * 1999-12-23 2005-04-28 Gregg Borgeson Bid positioning system
US7644020B2 (en) 1999-12-23 2010-01-05 Manhattan Associates, Inc. Bid positioning system
US7565314B2 (en) 1999-12-23 2009-07-21 Manhattan Associates, Inc. Bid positioning system
US20030236739A1 (en) * 1999-12-23 2003-12-25 Quoteship.Com Bid positioning system
US8266044B2 (en) 1999-12-30 2012-09-11 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading exchange system having integrated quote risk monitoring and integrated quote modification services
US7356498B2 (en) 1999-12-30 2008-04-08 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading exchange system having integrated quote risk monitoring and integrated quote modification services
US9727916B1 (en) 1999-12-30 2017-08-08 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading exchange system having integrated quote risk monitoring and integrated quote modification services
US20080208734A1 (en) * 1999-12-30 2008-08-28 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated Trading Exchange System Having Integrated Quote Risk Monitoring And Integrated Quote Modification Services
US9928550B2 (en) 1999-12-30 2018-03-27 Cboe Exchange, Inc. Automated trading exchange system having integrated quote risk monitoring and integrated quote modification services
US7980457B2 (en) 1999-12-30 2011-07-19 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading exchange system having integrated quote risk monitoring and integrated quote modification services
US7983982B2 (en) 2000-01-19 2011-07-19 Itg Software Solutions, Inc. System and method for executing strategy security trading
US8751363B2 (en) 2000-01-19 2014-06-10 Itg Software Solutions, Inc. System and method for executing strategy security trading
US20100121754A1 (en) * 2000-01-19 2010-05-13 Itg Software Solutions, Inc. System and method for executing strategy security trading
US7613647B1 (en) * 2000-01-19 2009-11-03 Itg Software Solutions, Inc. System and method for executing strategy security trading
US7792713B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2010-09-07 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for disguised price bidding in online auctions
US7346568B1 (en) 2000-01-26 2008-03-18 Robert Cadoux Serially staged, initial public stock offering method
US20110145095A1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2011-06-16 Supply Chain Connect, Llc Order Fulfillment Method
US20090037289A1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2009-02-05 Supply Chain Connect, Llc Method for facilitating chemical supplier transactions
US7945498B2 (en) 2000-01-28 2011-05-17 Supply Chain Connect, Llc Method for facilitating chemical supplier transactions
US20110184835A1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2011-07-28 Supply Chain Connect, Llc Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce Clearinghouse
US20070083457A1 (en) * 2000-03-08 2007-04-12 Evelyn Michael H System and methods for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
US7644034B2 (en) * 2000-03-08 2010-01-05 W.R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc System and method for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
US7647270B2 (en) * 2000-03-08 2010-01-12 W.R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc System and methods for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
US7415436B1 (en) * 2000-03-08 2008-08-19 W. R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc System and method for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
US20080306865A1 (en) * 2000-03-08 2008-12-11 W.R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc System and Method for Pricing and Allocation of Commodities or Securities
US8397223B2 (en) * 2000-03-17 2013-03-12 Gutenberg Printing Llc Web application generator
US20010037490A1 (en) * 2000-03-17 2001-11-01 Hiang-Swee Chiang Web application generator
US20060294500A1 (en) * 2000-03-17 2006-12-28 Gutenberg Printing Llc Web application generator
US8402427B2 (en) 2000-03-17 2013-03-19 Gutenberg Printing Llc Web application generator
US7376612B1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2008-05-20 Khai Hee Kwan System and method for conducting an electronic financial asset deposit auction over computer network
US7392210B1 (en) 2000-04-07 2008-06-24 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Workflow management system and method
US7539638B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2009-05-26 Stikine Technology, Llc Representation of order in multiple markets
US7398244B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2008-07-08 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated order book with crowd price improvement
US20070255642A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2007-11-01 Christopher Keith Trading system with elfs and umpires
US7908198B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2011-03-15 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated preferences for market participants
US7769672B2 (en) 2000-04-10 2010-08-03 Christopher Keith Routing control for orders eligible for multiple markets
US7774246B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2010-08-10 Christopher Keith Automated price setting for paired orders
US8775294B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2014-07-08 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated linked order processing
US7783561B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2010-08-24 Christopher Keith Automated synchronization of orders represented in multiple markets
US7644027B2 (en) * 2000-04-10 2010-01-05 Christopher Keith Market program for interacting with trading programs on a platform
US7792733B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2010-09-07 Christopher Keith Automated synchronization of orders represented in multiple markets
US8799138B2 (en) 2000-04-10 2014-08-05 Stikine Technology, Llc Routing control for orders eligible for multiple markets
US20010042040A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2001-11-15 Christopher Keith Routing control for orders eligible for multiple markets
US7890410B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2011-02-15 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated trial order processing
US8380609B2 (en) 2000-04-10 2013-02-19 Stikine Technology, Llc Trading system with ELFs and umpires
US7383220B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2008-06-03 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated short term option order processing
US7383222B2 (en) 2000-04-10 2008-06-03 Stikine Technology, Llc Routing control for orders eligible for multiple markets
US20010044770A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2001-11-22 Christopher Keith Platform for market programs and trading programs
US20070005487A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2007-01-04 Chistopher Keith Routing control for orders eligible for multiple markets
US7574398B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2009-08-11 Christopher Keith Platform for market programs and trading programs
US20010051909A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2001-12-13 Christopher Keith Market program for interacting with trading programs on a platform
US20070005488A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2007-01-04 Chistopher Keith Routing control for orders eligible for multiple markets
US20020091617A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2002-07-11 Christopher Keith Trading program for interacting with market programs on a platform
US8296215B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2012-10-23 Stikine Technology, Llc Trading system with elfs and umpires
US7496533B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2009-02-24 Stikine Technology, Llc Decision table for order handling
US7890415B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2011-02-15 Christopher Keith Representation of order in multiple markets
US8249975B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2012-08-21 Stikine Technology, Llc Automated first look at market events
US7813991B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2010-10-12 Christopher Keith Automated trading negotiation protocols
US7835975B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2010-11-16 Christopher Keith Automated synchronization of orders represented in multiple markets
US7882007B2 (en) 2000-04-10 2011-02-01 Christopher Keith Platform for market programs and trading programs
US7472087B2 (en) * 2000-04-10 2008-12-30 Stikine Technology, Llc Trading program for interacting with market programs on a platform
US20040015415A1 (en) * 2000-04-21 2004-01-22 International Business Machines Corporation System, program product, and method for comparison shopping with dynamic pricing over a network
US20070055578A1 (en) * 2000-05-22 2007-03-08 Commonwealth Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc. Internet and wireless integrated virtual presence
US20070055577A1 (en) * 2000-05-22 2007-03-08 Commonwealth Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc. Internet and wireless integrated virtual presence
US6813612B1 (en) 2000-05-25 2004-11-02 Nancy J. Rabenold Remote bidding supplement for traditional live auctions
US9037497B2 (en) * 2000-05-25 2015-05-19 Xcira, Inc. Live auction participation utilizing a coupled bidding device
US20140304100A1 (en) * 2000-05-25 2014-10-09 Xcira, Inc Live auction participation utilizing a coupled bidding device
US7716090B1 (en) 2000-05-25 2010-05-11 Auction Management Solutions, Inc. Integrated on-line and on-site auctioning system including audio and/or video capabilities
US20020069125A1 (en) * 2000-05-30 2002-06-06 Bruck Jeremy Alan Information transfer between or among commodity businesses
US7680732B1 (en) 2000-06-07 2010-03-16 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for executing deposit transactions over the internet
US7680731B1 (en) 2000-06-07 2010-03-16 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for executing deposit transactions over the internet
US7277863B1 (en) * 2000-06-13 2007-10-02 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Electronic marketplace communication system
US7240198B1 (en) * 2000-08-08 2007-07-03 Yeda Research & Development Co., Ltd. Honesty preserving negotiation and computation
US7058602B1 (en) 2000-08-18 2006-06-06 Luckysurf.Com, Inc. Enhanced auction mechanism for online transactions
US20040039677A1 (en) * 2000-08-18 2004-02-26 Commerce Games, Inc. Enhanced auction mechanism for online transactions
US20060047581A1 (en) * 2000-08-18 2006-03-02 Pierfrancesco La Mura Enhanced auction mechanism for online transactions
US20020029185A1 (en) * 2000-09-05 2002-03-07 Teruo Tanaka Method and apparatus for providing broker service to auctions
US7222089B2 (en) 2000-09-11 2007-05-22 Mahesh Harpale Intermediary driven electronic marketplace for cross-market trading
US20020032579A1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2002-03-14 Mahesh Harpale Intermediary driven electronic marketplace for cross-market trading
WO2002023451A1 (en) * 2000-09-18 2002-03-21 Vert Tech Llc Apparatus, system and method for forming resulting transaction profiles
US7860776B1 (en) 2000-10-11 2010-12-28 Ebay Inc. Sales system with buyer price selection
US20060129476A1 (en) * 2000-10-11 2006-06-15 Ebay Inc. Sales system with buyer price selection
US8108277B2 (en) 2000-10-11 2012-01-31 Ebay Inc. Sales system with buyer price selection
US7890407B2 (en) 2000-11-03 2011-02-15 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for estimating conduit liquidity requirements in asset backed commercial paper
US7634439B1 (en) * 2000-11-14 2009-12-15 Ariba, Inc. Method and apparatus to perform buy versus leasing transformational bidding
US7805497B2 (en) 2000-12-07 2010-09-28 General Electric Capital Corporation Method and product for calculating a net operating income audit and for enabling substantially identical audit practices among a plurality of audit firms
US20020107764A1 (en) * 2000-12-07 2002-08-08 Mccoy Mary Kay Method and product for calculating a net operating income audit and for enabling substantially identical audit practices among a plurality of audit firms
US7353228B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2008-04-01 General Electric Capital Corporation Method and product for calculating a net operating income audit and for enabling substantially identical audit practices among a plurality of audit firms
US20020116280A1 (en) * 2001-02-20 2002-08-22 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus, system, method and computer program product for aggregating marketplaces
US20020147675A1 (en) * 2001-04-10 2002-10-10 Ibm Corporation Automated bidding agent for electronic auctions
US7596526B2 (en) 2001-04-16 2009-09-29 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for managing a series of overnight financing trades
US7742968B2 (en) * 2001-05-15 2010-06-22 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Automated decision support system for designing auctions
US20020174052A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2002-11-21 Kemal Guler Automated decision support system for designing auctions
US7765141B1 (en) * 2001-05-30 2010-07-27 Tommaso Innocenti Online auction system facilitating flexible terms commodity trading
US20050283428A1 (en) * 2001-06-05 2005-12-22 Carlton Bartels Systems and methods for electronic trading of carbon dioxide equivalent emission
WO2002101603A1 (en) * 2001-06-08 2002-12-19 G H Michell & Sons Australia P Wool tender selling system
WO2002103477A2 (en) * 2001-06-19 2002-12-27 Cariocas, Inc. Enhanced auction mechanism for online transactions
WO2002103477A3 (en) * 2001-06-19 2003-12-11 Cariocas Inc Enhanced auction mechanism for online transactions
US20030004858A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-02 Schmitz David J. Automated execution system having participation
US7653584B2 (en) 2001-06-29 2010-01-26 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated execution system having participation
US7627514B2 (en) * 2001-07-10 2009-12-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for selecting an optimal auction format
US20030018562A1 (en) * 2001-07-10 2003-01-23 Kemal Guler Method and system for selecting an optimal auction format
US7883002B2 (en) 2001-07-20 2011-02-08 Ebay Inc. Automated listing management
US20110191201A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2011-08-04 Ebay Inc. Automated listing management
US20050033648A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2005-02-10 Hua-Ming Jin Automated listing management
US9704123B2 (en) 2001-07-20 2017-07-11 Ebay Inc. Automated listing management
US8386328B2 (en) 2001-07-20 2013-02-26 Ebay, Inc. Automated listing management
US20090070252A1 (en) * 2001-08-21 2009-03-12 Carlton Bartels Electronic trading system for simulating the trading of carbon dioxide equivalent emission reductions and methods of use
US7529705B1 (en) * 2001-08-21 2009-05-05 Cantorco2E, Llc Electronic trading system for simulating the trading of carbon dioxide equivalent emission reductions and methods of use
US20030041009A1 (en) * 2001-08-22 2003-02-27 William Grey System and method for personalized dynamic pricing
US20030093357A1 (en) * 2001-09-10 2003-05-15 Kemal Guler Method and system for automated bid advice for auctions
US7536338B2 (en) * 2001-09-10 2009-05-19 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for automated bid advice for auctions
US10923912B2 (en) 2001-11-13 2021-02-16 Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. Electronic trading confirmation system
US20080262959A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2008-10-23 Bruce Tupper Electronic trading confirmation system
US9935460B2 (en) 2001-11-13 2018-04-03 Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. Electronic trading confirmation system
US8005743B2 (en) 2001-11-13 2011-08-23 Intercontinentalexchange, Inc. Electronic trading confirmation system
US20040133478A1 (en) * 2001-12-18 2004-07-08 Scott Leahy Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US8918505B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2014-12-23 Ebay Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US8108518B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2012-01-31 Ebay Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
CN100428213C (en) * 2001-12-18 2008-10-22 电子湾有限公司 Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US9508094B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2016-11-29 Paypal, Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US9589289B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2017-03-07 Paypal, Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US8793375B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2014-07-29 Ebay Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US20080046279A1 (en) * 2001-12-18 2008-02-21 Ebay Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US9626705B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2017-04-18 Paypal, Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US9679323B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2017-06-13 Paypal, Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US8239533B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2012-08-07 Ebay Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
WO2003052615A1 (en) * 2001-12-18 2003-06-26 Ebay Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US7305469B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2007-12-04 Ebay Inc. Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site
US8548885B2 (en) 2002-02-14 2013-10-01 Multiple-Markets Fixed income securities ratings visualization
US20110040665A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2011-02-17 Multiple-Markets Fixed income securities ratings visualization
US20040103050A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2004-05-27 Long Catherine C. Fixed income securities ratings visualization
US7827080B2 (en) 2002-02-14 2010-11-02 Multiple-Markets Fixed income securities ratings visualization
US8036950B1 (en) 2002-02-20 2011-10-11 Emptoris, Inc. Auction management with business-volume discount
US8548886B1 (en) 2002-05-31 2013-10-01 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Account opening system, method and computer program product
US7885887B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2011-02-08 Artistshare, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for financing and marketing a creative work
US20040015427A1 (en) * 2002-07-09 2004-01-22 Brian Camelio Methods and apparatuses for financing and marketing a creative work
US20110167005A1 (en) * 2002-07-09 2011-07-07 Artistshare, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for financing and marketing a creative work
US20040024713A1 (en) * 2002-07-25 2004-02-05 Moore Daniel F. Monitoring market participant responses
US7310620B2 (en) * 2002-07-25 2007-12-18 The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. Monitoring market participant responses
US20060136427A1 (en) * 2002-08-05 2006-06-22 Microsoft Corporation Coordinating transactional web services
US7370053B2 (en) 2002-08-05 2008-05-06 Microsoft Corporation Coordinating transactional web services
US7047243B2 (en) * 2002-08-05 2006-05-16 Microsoft Corporation Coordinating transactional web services
US20040024731A1 (en) * 2002-08-05 2004-02-05 Microsoft Corporation Coordinating transactional web services
US20040073866A1 (en) * 2002-10-10 2004-04-15 Bhk Systems L.P. Automated system and method for dynamically generating customized typeset question-based documents
US7318191B2 (en) * 2002-10-10 2008-01-08 Bhk Systems, L.P. Automated system and method for dynamically generating customized typeset question-based documents
US20040128224A1 (en) * 2002-12-31 2004-07-01 Autotrader.Com, Llc Efficient online auction style listings that encourage out-of-channel negotiation
US7921052B2 (en) 2002-12-31 2011-04-05 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Efficient online auction style listings that encourage out-of-channel negotiation
US20060149562A1 (en) * 2003-01-09 2006-07-06 Nobuo Oyama Management system for business invenstment
US11151650B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2021-10-19 Cboe Exchange, Inc. Hybrid trading system for concurrently trading securities or derivatives through both electronic and open-outcry trading mechanisms
US7676421B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2010-03-09 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for providing an automated auction for internalization and complex orders in a hybrid trading system
US10614521B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2020-04-07 Cboe Exchange, Inc. Method and system for providing an automated auction for internalization and complex orders in a hybrid trading system
US7653588B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2010-01-26 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for providing order routing to a virtual crowd in a hybrid trading system
US8296218B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2012-10-23 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for providing an automated auction for internalization and complex orders in a hybrid trading system
US7552083B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2009-06-23 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Hybrid trading system for concurrently trading through both electronic and open-outcry trading mechanisms
US8346653B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2013-01-01 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading system for routing and matching orders
US8346652B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2013-01-01 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Hybrid trading system for concurrently trading securities or derivatives through both electronic and open-outcry trading mechanisms
US7613650B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2009-11-03 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Hybrid trading system for concurrently trading securities or derivatives through both electronic and open-outcry trading mechanisms
US10417708B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2019-09-17 Cboe Exchange, Inc. Hybrid trading system for concurrently trading securities or derivatives through both electronic and open-outcry trading mechanisms
US7634435B2 (en) 2003-05-13 2009-12-15 Jp Morgan Chase Bank Diversified fixed income product and method for creating and marketing same
US7770184B2 (en) 2003-06-06 2010-08-03 Jp Morgan Chase Bank Integrated trading platform architecture
US7970688B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2011-06-28 Jp Morgan Chase Bank Method for pricing a trade
US8527398B2 (en) 2003-08-20 2013-09-03 Neo Virtus Engineering, Inc. Method and system for predicting solar energy production
US8280799B2 (en) 2003-08-20 2012-10-02 New Virtus Engineering, Inc. Method and systems for predicting solar energy production
US7580817B2 (en) 2003-08-20 2009-08-25 New Energy Options, Inc. Method and system for predicting solar energy production
US20050039787A1 (en) * 2003-08-20 2005-02-24 New Energy Options, Inc. Method and system for predicting solar energy production
US20100017341A1 (en) * 2003-08-20 2010-01-21 Bing James M Method and systems for predicting solar energy production
US20050080709A1 (en) * 2003-10-10 2005-04-14 Kemal Guler Method and system for controlling feedback for an online auction
US7831499B2 (en) 2003-10-10 2010-11-09 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for controlling feedback for an online auction
US20050086537A1 (en) * 2003-10-17 2005-04-21 Alex Johnson Methods and system for replicating and securing process control data
US8069138B2 (en) 2003-10-22 2011-11-29 Scottrade, Inc. Database migration in an automated financial instrument brokerage system
US8612321B2 (en) 2003-10-22 2013-12-17 Scottrade, Inc. System and method for the automated brokerage of financial instruments
US8756130B2 (en) 2003-10-22 2014-06-17 Scottrade, Inc. System and method for the automated brokerage of financial instruments
US8655755B2 (en) 2003-10-22 2014-02-18 Scottrade, Inc. System and method for the automated brokerage of financial instruments
US8615454B2 (en) 2003-10-22 2013-12-24 Scottrade, Inc. System and method for the automated brokerage of financial instruments
US8170940B2 (en) 2003-10-22 2012-05-01 Scottrade, Inc. System and method for the automated brokerage of financial instruments
US20050091144A1 (en) * 2003-10-28 2005-04-28 Robert Longman Buyer's offer auctions for goods & services, rights or properties
US7536343B2 (en) * 2003-11-26 2009-05-19 Fx Alliance, Llc Protocol-independent asset trading system and methods
US20050137960A1 (en) * 2003-11-26 2005-06-23 Brann John E.T. Protocol-independent asset trading system and methods
US7676397B2 (en) * 2003-12-03 2010-03-09 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for predicting the outcome of an online auction
US10304097B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2019-05-28 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for controlling the disclosure of a trading order
US11244365B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2022-02-08 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for controlling the disclosure of a trading order
US8738498B2 (en) * 2004-01-29 2014-05-27 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for routing a trading order
WO2005098651A1 (en) * 2004-03-22 2005-10-20 Bhk Systems, L.P. Automated system and method for dynamically generating customized typeset question-based documents
US8423447B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2013-04-16 Jp Morgan Chase Bank System and method for allocating nominal and cash amounts to trades in a netted trade
US20060004649A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2006-01-05 Narinder Singh Method and system for a failure recovery framework for interfacing with network-based auctions
US20050234804A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Yue Fang Method and system for auto-mapping to network-based auctions
US7788160B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2010-08-31 Sap Ag Method and system for configurable options in enhanced network-based auctions
US20060004647A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2006-01-05 Guruprasad Srinivasamurthy Method and system for configurable options in enhanced network-based auctions
US20050273420A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-12-08 Lenin Subramanian Method and system for customizable homepages for network-based auctions
US7860749B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2010-12-28 Sap Ag Method, medium and system for customizable homepages for network-based auctions
US7877313B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2011-01-25 Sap Ag Method and system for a failure recovery framework for interfacing with network-based auctions
US7457769B2 (en) 2004-04-26 2008-11-25 Emptoris, Inc. Methods and apparatus for an auction system with interactive bidding
US20050240507A1 (en) * 2004-04-26 2005-10-27 William Galen Methods and apparatus for an auction system with interactive bidding
US20050246187A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Reed Maltzman System and method to facilitate differentiated levels of service in a network-based marketplace
US20050256797A1 (en) * 2004-05-13 2005-11-17 Scottrade, Inc. Method and apparatus for user-interactive financial instrument trading
US20060085321A1 (en) * 2004-07-20 2006-04-20 Staib William E Simulation auction for public offering
US8204821B2 (en) 2004-07-20 2012-06-19 Well Auctioned, Llc Simulation auction for public offering
US20110196780A1 (en) * 2004-07-20 2011-08-11 Well Auctioned, Llc Simulation auction for public offering
US8090639B2 (en) 2004-08-06 2012-01-03 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Method and system for creating and marketing employee stock option mirror image warrants
US7810025B2 (en) 2004-08-21 2010-10-05 Co-Exprise, Inc. File translation methods, systems, and apparatuses for extended commerce
US8712858B2 (en) 2004-08-21 2014-04-29 Directworks, Inc. Supplier capability methods, systems, and apparatuses for extended commerce
US8170946B2 (en) 2004-08-21 2012-05-01 Co-Exprise, Inc. Cost management file translation methods, systems, and apparatuses for extended commerce
US20060041518A1 (en) * 2004-08-21 2006-02-23 Blair William R Supplier capability methods, systems, and apparatuses for extended commerce
US20060041503A1 (en) * 2004-08-21 2006-02-23 Blair William R Collaborative negotiation methods, systems, and apparatuses for extended commerce
US20060041840A1 (en) * 2004-08-21 2006-02-23 Blair William R File translation methods, systems, and apparatuses for extended commerce
US20100088239A1 (en) * 2004-08-21 2010-04-08 Co-Exprise, Inc. Collaborative Negotiation Methods, Systems, and Apparatuses for Extended Commerce
US20060041502A1 (en) * 2004-08-21 2006-02-23 Blair William R Cost management file translation methods, systems, and apparatuses for extended commerce
US20060069639A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Kalt David S System and methods for prioritized management of financial instruments
US20060206409A1 (en) * 2005-03-14 2006-09-14 Elbert Harris Bid system
US8688569B1 (en) 2005-03-23 2014-04-01 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for post closing and custody services
US8209255B2 (en) 2005-04-07 2012-06-26 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Market participant issue selection system and method
US7809629B2 (en) 2005-04-07 2010-10-05 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Market participant issue selection system and method
US8484125B1 (en) 2005-04-07 2013-07-09 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Market participant issue selection system and method
US8326715B2 (en) 2005-05-04 2012-12-04 Chicago Board Operations Exchange, Incorporated Method of creating and trading derivative investment products based on a statistical property reflecting the variance of an underlying asset
US8326716B2 (en) 2005-05-04 2012-12-04 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating and trading derivative investment products based on a statistical property reflecting the variance of an underlying asset
US8027904B2 (en) 2005-05-04 2011-09-27 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating and trading corporate debt security derivative investment instruments
US8489489B2 (en) 2005-05-05 2013-07-16 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for trading derivatives in penny increments while disseminating quotes for derivatives in nickel/dime increments
US10817938B2 (en) 2005-06-07 2020-10-27 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for routing trading orders
US11625777B2 (en) 2005-06-07 2023-04-11 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for routing a trading order based upon quantity
US8583540B2 (en) 2005-06-07 2013-11-12 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for routing trading orders
US8131630B2 (en) 2005-06-07 2012-03-06 Bgc Partners, Inc. Trading order routing
US7822682B2 (en) 2005-06-08 2010-10-26 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for enhancing supply chain transactions
US8484122B2 (en) 2005-08-04 2013-07-09 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for apportioning trading orders based on size of displayed quantities
US10395310B2 (en) 2005-08-04 2019-08-27 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for apportioning trading orders based on size of displayed quantities
US11094004B2 (en) 2005-08-04 2021-08-17 Espeed, Inc. System and method for apportioning trading orders based on size of displayed quantities
US10424015B2 (en) 2005-08-05 2019-09-24 Bgc Partners, Inc. Managing trading orders based on priority
US8494951B2 (en) 2005-08-05 2013-07-23 Bgc Partners, Inc. Matching of trading orders based on priority
US11030693B2 (en) 2005-08-05 2021-06-08 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for matching trading orders based on priority
US7567928B1 (en) 2005-09-12 2009-07-28 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Total fair value swap
US8650112B2 (en) 2005-09-12 2014-02-11 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Total Fair Value Swap
US20070078745A1 (en) * 2005-10-05 2007-04-05 Kalt David S System and methods for facilitating informed trading of financial instruments
US8577779B2 (en) 2005-10-05 2013-11-05 Optionsxpress Holdings, Inc. System and methods for facilitating informed trading of financial instruments
US7818238B1 (en) 2005-10-11 2010-10-19 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Upside forward with early funding provision
US8095428B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2012-01-10 Sap Ag Method, system, and medium for winning bid evaluation in an auction
US20070106595A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-10 Sap Ag Monitoring tool for integrated product ordering/fulfillment center and auction system
US20070150406A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-06-28 Sap Ag Bidder monitoring tool for integrated auction and product ordering system
US7895115B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2011-02-22 Sap Ag Method and system for implementing multiple auctions for a product on a seller's E-commerce site
US20070143205A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-06-21 Sap Ag Method and system for implementing configurable order options for integrated auction services on a seller's e-commerce site
US20070106596A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-10 Sap Ag Method and system for implementing multiple auctions for a product on a seller's e-commerce site
US8095449B2 (en) 2005-11-03 2012-01-10 Sap Ag Method and system for generating an auction using a product catalog in an integrated internal auction system
US7835977B2 (en) * 2005-11-03 2010-11-16 Sap Ag Method and system for generating an auction using a template in an integrated internal auction system
US7945960B2 (en) 2005-12-06 2011-05-17 Oracle International Corporation Dynamic conditional security policy extensions
US8635660B2 (en) * 2005-12-06 2014-01-21 Oracle International Corporation Dynamic constraints for query operations
US20070130616A1 (en) * 2005-12-06 2007-06-07 Oracle International Corporation Dynamic constraints for query operations
US8510204B2 (en) 2006-02-02 2013-08-13 Privatemarkets, Inc. System, method, and apparatus for trading in a decentralized market
WO2007092761A3 (en) * 2006-02-02 2008-07-24 Volatility Managers Llc System, method, and apparatus for trading in a decentralized market
US20070179881A1 (en) * 2006-02-02 2007-08-02 Volatility Managers, Llc System, method, and apparatus for trading in a decentralized market
US8280794B1 (en) 2006-02-03 2012-10-02 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association Price earnings derivative financial product
US8412607B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2013-04-02 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association Price earnings derivative financial product
US7716107B1 (en) 2006-02-03 2010-05-11 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Earnings derivative financial product
US9600822B2 (en) 2006-02-06 2017-03-21 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Structured computer-assisted method and apparatus for filtering information presentation
US20070185777A1 (en) * 2006-02-06 2007-08-09 Autotrader.Com, Llc Structured computer-assisted method and apparatus for filtering information presentation
US11010834B2 (en) 2006-04-04 2021-05-18 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for optimizing execution of trading orders
US7620578B1 (en) 2006-05-01 2009-11-17 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Volatility derivative financial product
US7647268B1 (en) 2006-05-04 2010-01-12 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for implementing a recurrent bidding process
US9811868B1 (en) 2006-08-29 2017-11-07 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Systems and methods for integrating a deal process
US20090138381A1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2009-05-28 Bloomfield Mark C Methods and systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management
US20080059327A1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2008-03-06 Bloomfield Mark C Methods & systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management
US8180685B2 (en) 2006-09-05 2012-05-15 Ip Investments Holding Llc Methods and systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management
US7865406B2 (en) 2006-09-05 2011-01-04 IP Investments Holding, LLC Methods and systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management
US20100145829A1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2010-06-10 Bloomfield Mark C Methods and systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management
US7664682B2 (en) * 2006-09-05 2010-02-16 Ip Investments Holding Llc Methods and systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management
US20090182681A1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2009-07-16 Bloomfield Mark C Methods and systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management
US8612300B2 (en) 2006-09-08 2013-12-17 Ariba, Inc. Buyer/supplier network that aids supplier enablement through collaboration between buyers and suppliers
US7827096B1 (en) 2006-11-03 2010-11-02 Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Special maturity ASR recalculated timing
US8533091B2 (en) 2006-11-13 2013-09-10 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for generating and trading derivative investment instruments based on a volatility arbitrage benchmark index
US8140425B2 (en) 2006-11-13 2012-03-20 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for generating and trading derivative investment instruments based on a volatility arbitrage benchmark index
US11017410B2 (en) 2006-12-30 2021-05-25 Cfph, Llc Methods and systems for managing and trading using a shared order book as internal exchange
US8719145B2 (en) 2007-09-04 2014-05-06 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for creating and trading a derivative investment instrument over a range of index values
US8165953B2 (en) 2007-09-04 2012-04-24 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for creating and trading a derivative investment instrument over a range of index values
US10515371B2 (en) 2007-09-24 2019-12-24 Gregory A. Pearson, Inc. Interactive networking systems with user classes
US10284718B2 (en) 2007-09-24 2019-05-07 Gregory A. Pearson, Inc. Methods for interactively exchanging graphical objects between networked users
US20090083115A1 (en) * 2007-09-24 2009-03-26 Pearson Gregory A Interactive networking systems
US20090111594A1 (en) * 2007-10-29 2009-04-30 Spence Charles H Billiards practice device
US20100274709A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2010-10-28 Iwane Donna S Online method of procuring mortgage loans
US20090112650A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Iwane Donna S Online method of procuring mortgage loans
US8694407B2 (en) 2007-11-09 2014-04-08 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating a volatility benchmark index
US8249972B2 (en) 2007-11-09 2012-08-21 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating a volatility benchmark index
US20090240628A1 (en) * 2008-03-20 2009-09-24 Co-Exprise, Inc. Method and System for Facilitating a Negotiation
US8788381B2 (en) 2008-10-08 2014-07-22 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for creating and trading a digital derivative investment instrument
US8321322B2 (en) 2009-09-28 2012-11-27 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating a spot price tracker index
US20110087555A1 (en) * 2009-10-12 2011-04-14 Jeffrey Brian Gray Computer Implemented Continuous Dual Auction System
US10510112B2 (en) 2009-10-12 2019-12-17 Jeffrey Brian Gray Computer implemented continuous dual auction system
US8738514B2 (en) 2010-02-18 2014-05-27 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for providing borrow coverage services to short sell securities
US8352354B2 (en) 2010-02-23 2013-01-08 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for optimizing order execution
US8732036B2 (en) 2010-05-07 2014-05-20 Ariba, Inc. Supplier/buyer network that provides catalog updates
US8392317B2 (en) 2010-11-09 2013-03-05 Ariba, Inc. Facilitating electronic auction of prepayment of an invoice
US9836773B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2017-12-05 Ariba, Inc. Evaluation and selection of quotes of a commerce network
US8688537B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2014-04-01 Ariba, Inc. Maintenance of a company profile of a company associated with a supplier/buyer commerce network
US9990634B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2018-06-05 Ariba, Inc. Managing an experience of a member organization of a collaborative commerce community through a network
US10614516B2 (en) 2011-08-24 2020-04-07 Strategic Acquisitions, Inc. Method and system for auction information management
US9135656B2 (en) 2011-08-24 2015-09-15 Strategic Acquisitions, Inc. Method and system for auction information management
US20140046864A1 (en) * 2012-08-10 2014-02-13 Kiindly, LLC Virtual Funding Campaign Methodology

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6285989B1 (en) Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system
US8548898B2 (en) Electronic securities marketplace having integration with order management systems
US7949589B2 (en) System and method for evaluating and managing participatory real estate investments and transactions
US6338050B1 (en) System and method for providing and updating user supplied context for a negotiations system
US8095449B2 (en) Method and system for generating an auction using a product catalog in an integrated internal auction system
US8311920B2 (en) Electronic securities marketplace having integration with order management systems
US20030018561A1 (en) Single party buying and selling commodities with multiple counterparties
US20080140557A1 (en) On-line auction system and method
US20050187866A1 (en) Method and system for executing financial transactions via a communication medium
US20020116281A1 (en) Internet-based systems and methods for reallocating and selling used industrial equipment and machinery
US20070083457A1 (en) System and methods for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
JP2003533793A (en) System and method for electronically executing a derivative transaction
WO2001073659A2 (en) Systems and methods for correcting supply/demand imbalances in multi-tier exchanges
US7835977B2 (en) Method and system for generating an auction using a template in an integrated internal auction system
US8055583B2 (en) Shared online auction provisioning
US20120047060A1 (en) Computerized Moniker-Based Equity Trading System and Method of Creation
Wurman Online auction site management
EP1264246A1 (en) System and method for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
KR20010008020A (en) Security Transactions Method For Investing Fund Of Real Estate Development Project
US20220237722A1 (en) Anonymous price and progressive display execution apparatus, system and method
Dignum et al. Software agents and e-business, Hype and Reality
JP2004527020A (en) Apparatus and method for facilitating online financial transactions
WO2001018713A1 (en) Electronic commodity exchange system having dynamic transaction filters
WO2001044994A2 (en) Transaction method, system, and apparatus
Klingemann Revising concepts for interfirm collaboration: A case-based approach

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TRADING DYNAMICS INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SHOHAM, YOAV;REEL/FRAME:009471/0591

Effective date: 19980911

AS Assignment

Owner name: TRADING DYNAMICS, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SHOHAM, YOAV;EPHRATI, EITHAN Y.;REEL/FRAME:009945/0500

Effective date: 19990503

AS Assignment

Owner name: ARIBA, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:TRADINGDYNAMICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:011310/0942

Effective date: 20000120

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12