US20100283858A1 - Test device, display device, and method for checking a validity of display signals - Google Patents

Test device, display device, and method for checking a validity of display signals Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100283858A1
US20100283858A1 US12/734,051 US73405108A US2010283858A1 US 20100283858 A1 US20100283858 A1 US 20100283858A1 US 73405108 A US73405108 A US 73405108A US 2010283858 A1 US2010283858 A1 US 2010283858A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
test value
display
test
image
image data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/734,051
Other versions
US8543349B2 (en
Inventor
Igor Katchan
Markus Lindner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Assigned to ROBERT BOSCH GMBH reassignment ROBERT BOSCH GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KATCHAN, IGOR, LINDNER, MARKUS
Publication of US20100283858A1 publication Critical patent/US20100283858A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8543349B2 publication Critical patent/US8543349B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01DMEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D3/00Indicating or recording apparatus with provision for the special purposes referred to in the subgroups
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/22Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing
    • G06F11/2205Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing using arrangements specific to the hardware being tested
    • G06F11/2221Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing using arrangements specific to the hardware being tested to test input/output devices or peripheral units
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G5/00Control arrangements or circuits for visual indicators common to cathode-ray tube indicators and other visual indicators
    • G09G5/003Details of a display terminal, the details relating to the control arrangement of the display terminal and to the interfaces thereto
    • G09G5/006Details of the interface to the display terminal
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/14Digital output to display device ; Cooperation and interconnection of the display device with other functional units
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2320/00Control of display operating conditions
    • G09G2320/08Arrangements within a display terminal for setting, manually or automatically, display parameters of the display terminal
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2330/00Aspects of power supply; Aspects of display protection and defect management
    • G09G2330/12Test circuits or failure detection circuits included in a display system, as permanent part thereof
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2370/00Aspects of data communication
    • G09G2370/04Exchange of auxiliary data, i.e. other than image data, between monitor and graphics controller
    • G09G2370/045Exchange of auxiliary data, i.e. other than image data, between monitor and graphics controller using multiple communication channels, e.g. parallel and serial
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G3/00Control arrangements or circuits, of interest only in connection with visual indicators other than cathode-ray tubes
    • G09G3/006Electronic inspection or testing of displays and display drivers, e.g. of LED or LCD displays
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G5/00Control arrangements or circuits for visual indicators common to cathode-ray tube indicators and other visual indicators
    • G09G5/003Details of a display terminal, the details relating to the control arrangement of the display terminal and to the interfaces thereto
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N17/00Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to a test device, a display device, and a method for checking a validity of display signals.
  • a method and a device for checking signals of an LCD interface are known from Japanese Patent Publication JP 09-288136 A Abstract. To check whether the display signal is correct, both the clock signal and the synchronization signals are measured and compared with stored values for these control variables. If they coincide with the stored values, the image signal is considered correct.
  • the test device has the advantage over the related art that only those data of the display signals are taken into account which are relevant for the image display as such.
  • a check is advantageously performed in a simple manner in that a test value is formed from these image data according to a given formula.
  • the test value for all the image data, for an entire image to be displayed, or for a defined partial area of a total image must result in a test value that may be determined and stored for the image in advance. It is thus possible to check the correctness of the displayed image itself.
  • the check is not instructed to evaluate the additional control signals, but may evaluate the image content itself.
  • the computing complexity may also be kept very low due to the formation of the test value for all the data, for example, via summation or a cyclic redundancy check.
  • test device has an interface for transmitting at least one additional test value. Test values for additional images to be tested may thus be transmitted to the test device.
  • a display device which has a test device according to the present invention is advantageous. Due to the fact that a test device of this type is provided in a display device, the correctness of image data of the display device may be checked in a simple manner and without great complexity. This is important in particular in a safety-relevant environment in which the display device must always output correct image data. In addition, in particular in the case where an image is generated remotely from the display device, it is made possible, in a simple manner, to check the correctness of the transport of the display signals and thus to also ensure that correct image data are output or, otherwise, a user is given a warning, for example. Accordingly, it is advantageous to provide an interface via which a particular test value of an image shown in the display is transmitted to the test device, which then may compare the calculated test value with the transmitted test value.
  • the test device advantageously accesses the data link between the graphic controller and the display device, in particular on the side of the data link facing the display. This makes it possible in particular to also easily detect an overload of a data link.
  • a memory module in which at least one test value is stored, for easily providing a test value. This allows the stored test value to be directly used in an initializing mode of the display device and compared with a test value of a test image preferably provided by the display device itself. Furthermore, in the case of an unchanging image, a test value may be stored and compared with a subsequently determined test value for the same image content.
  • a display device may be advantageously used in a motor vehicle, in particular to display driving-relevant data, in which case a validity check of the display signals according to the present invention ensures that a correct image is output in the display device. A driver may thus be reliably informed about the driving-relevant data of his vehicle.
  • test value is advantageously calculated by taking into account the bit value of a pixel associated with a cycle in calculating the test value.
  • the test value is ascertained in a particularly reliable manner by also including a polynomial division in the determination of the test values.
  • the cyclic redundancy check (CRC) is one such method.
  • the CRC method may be applied continuously to the data stream of the image data signals.
  • FIG. 1 shows a display device and a test device according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a test device according to the present invention in detail.
  • FIG. 3 shows a first representation of display signals for carrying out the method according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows another exemplary embodiment of display signals for carrying out the method according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows an exemplary embodiment of a method sequence according to the present invention.
  • the test device may be used for checking any display signals.
  • it may be integrated into a display device to provide information of whether the display signal provided for the display is valid. If the signal is valid, it may be assumed that the display also represents a correct, expected image. Image errors caused by display signals may thus be ruled out.
  • it is, however, also possible to connect the test device only to a source of the display signals, for example, an output of a graphic controller or a data line, which conduct the display signals from a graphic controller. An actually present display unit is then not required for checking the validity of the display signals. In this way, not only the function of the graphic controller, but additionally also the function of the data transmission line for the display signals may be checked.
  • the present invention is elucidated using the example of a display in a vehicle in which the display signals are checked according to the present invention.
  • display signal is to be understood as the totality of those signals which are output by a graphic controller to a display for displaying an image.
  • the display signals are configured for direct reproduction by the display device itself.
  • the display signals thus have both image content, which is present in an RGB data format, for example, and control signals such as, for example, a clock signal, a horizontal synchronization signal, a vertical synchronization signal, and an enable signal.
  • image data is to be understood as a set of individual digital data values which each specify image values for individual pixels of a display. In the RGB format, this would be a set of data which define a brightness value for the individual colors. These image data are digitally encoded. For example, a pixel is described by an RGB color value composed of three times six bits.
  • FIG. 1 shows a display device 1 , which has a graphic unit 2 and a display unit 3 .
  • Graphic unit 2 has a graphic controller 4 .
  • graphic controller 4 processes image information which is supplied to graphic unit 2 via an input 5 .
  • graphic unit 2 may also have an arithmetic unit 6 , which calculates display signals and relays them to graphic controller 4 for display.
  • further control information may be relayed from a data bus 8 to graphic controller 4 via a terminal 7 .
  • Graphic controller 4 converts the appropriate image data into display signals for display unit 3 according to appropriate specifications adapted to display unit 3 .
  • the display signals are adapted, for example, to the number of pixels of display unit 3 , for example, 800 ⁇ 600 pixels.
  • the display signals are transmitted from graphic controller 4 to display unit 3 via a preferably multi-wire data line 9 .
  • the display signals are converted directly in display 10 .
  • Display 10 is designed, for example, as a liquid crystal display.
  • the image data are written line by line into the display matrix of the liquid crystal display according to the control signals.
  • the lines and the image are wrapped via the control data.
  • the input of the image data is controlled by a clock signal, which is also transmitted via data link 9 .
  • test device 11 is connected inside the display device between an input 12 of display unit 3 and display 10 .
  • Test device 11 checks the validity of the display signals which are supplied to display unit 3 via input 12 .
  • test device 11 performs this check automatically when display device 1 is switched on.
  • an appropriate request may be given to display unit 3 via a terminal 13 of the display device, also via data bus 8 .
  • the display signals are always passed through test device 11 .
  • test device 11 picks up the signals from the connection between input 12 and display 10 , so that the display signals are conducted along dashed line 14 directly from input 12 to display 10 .
  • the result of the validity check is output by test device 11 .
  • the result is output to data bus 8 via terminal 13 .
  • the test result is thus available both to graphic unit 2 and to other devices connected to data bus 8 .
  • a warning device connected to data bus 8 for example, an acoustic signaling device, may output a warning signal to a user of the display.
  • test device 11 may be situated, for example, on a central display of a vehicle, to which image information and control signals are supplied from different image sources.
  • the display in the vehicle may have a terminal via which test device 11 may be connected, for example, during manufacture in the factory or in the repair shop. Furthermore, test device 11 may also be integrated into the display in the vehicle.
  • FIG. 2 shows the operation of test device 11 in detail.
  • Test device 11 which is implemented, for example, as an FPGA, has a control unit 20 , to which the horizontal synchronization signal is supplied via a first input 21 , the vertical synchronization signal is supplied via a second input 22 , and the enable signal is supplied via a third input 23 .
  • control unit 20 has a fourth input 24 , which is controlled, for example, from data bus 8 via terminal 13 of display unit 3 .
  • a test may be caused to start via fourth input 24 .
  • test device 11 has a memory 25 , in which at least one test value for carrying out the validity check of the display signals is stored.
  • At least one further test value may be saved in memory 25 via a fifth input 26 .
  • the test value stored in memory 25 is read by a comparator unit 27 .
  • a test value may also be relayed directly to a comparator unit 27 via fifth input 26 .
  • Fifth input 26 may be designed as a UART, an SBI, or an I2C interface, for example.
  • only one test value of an image may also be calculated and saved in a first step. If immediately thereafter, continuously, or at a later point in time, the same image is transmitted, the test value determination is repeated. If the test value calculated later and the stored test value do not coincide, at least in one case no valid data have been supplied.
  • memory 25 may also be designed for storing image data of one or more test images which may be read for test value determination.
  • test device 11 has an arithmetic unit 28 , which is used for calculating the test value.
  • the image data are supplied to arithmetic unit 28 via an input 29 .
  • the clock signal is also transmitted to arithmetic unit 28 via an input 30 .
  • the image data are, for example, RGB data, which have a color depth of 16, 18, or even 24 bits.
  • the RGB data of a pixel are read by arithmetic unit 28 according to a clock signal.
  • the data available via input 29 are read only if control unit 20 provides an appropriate start signal via an interface 31 .
  • An enable signal that has been set and is conducted from third input 23 via control unit 20 to arithmetic unit 28 via an interface 32 is also required for reading the data.
  • a stop signal is output by control unit 20 to arithmetic unit 28 via interface 33 .
  • the stop signal is also similarly relayed to comparator unit 27 .
  • Comparator unit 27 now reads the calculated test value from arithmetic unit 28 . It compares this value with the value saved in memory 25 . If the two values coincide, a corresponding signal is output via an output 34 of test device 11 . If the two values do not coincide, an error signal is output.
  • the signal at output 34 may be set at “high” or “low” as appropriate.
  • the bit values may be added as the formula for determining the test value.
  • the transmitted data may be simply added up.
  • the data stream is decomposed into packets of a predefined length, for example, 18 bits, and the individual data sets thus obtained are added up.
  • more complex formulas are used for determining the test value in order to achieve a higher degree of reliability. It is thus possible, for example, to additionally multiply the individual data blocks obtained by decomposing the data stream by a constant and then to add them up.
  • a particularly reliable recognition is achieved by using a cyclic redundancy test in which a polynomial division is performed instead of a simple addition.
  • the incoming data are divided by a certain polynomial and the rest of the division is considered as the test value.
  • the CRC32 test algorithm is such a method, for example, which may also be used for a data stream, here a data stream of the valid image data.
  • each image may be used for such a test. It is, however, advantageous to provide a predefined test image, which is stored in the display device, for example, for a certain display, and, by requesting a test to be performed, the system may thus test itself without need for operating the display itself. Furthermore, no dedicated video input or output is needed, since the test may be easily integrated into the display device itself.
  • special test images may also be used, thus, for example, images having vertical black and white lines in which errors may occur, while in standard test images showing only RGB color variations no errors occur in such cases.
  • special test images In order to thus reliably establish a mode of operation of the display device, not only a single test image, but a sequence of specially provided test images are run through to check the operation of the display device in different load situations.
  • FIG. 3 shows an exemplary embodiment of signals during the check by the test device.
  • a first signal 41 is a regular clock signal which defines the reading rate for the image data.
  • Second signal 42 is the enable signal. While it is set at “low,” the data are not incorporated in the test value; if it is set at “high,” the corresponding image data, namely the digital values of each transmitted pixel, which are represented in third signal 43 , are incorporated in the test value calculation according to the predefined test formula. A calculation is thus carried out between first point in time 44 and second point in time 45 . Image data possibly transmitted subsequently or previously are not incorporated in the test value determination.
  • FIG. 4 Another example embodiment in which readout is further refined is illustrated in FIG. 4 .
  • the clock signal is again represented in first line 51 .
  • the vertical synchronization signal is represented in second line 52 and the horizontal synchronization signal is represented in fourth line 54 .
  • Third line 53 here also designates the enable signal.
  • the start signal which resets the counter at the beginning and subsequently makes it possible to calculate the test value, is represented in sixth line 56 .
  • Stop signal 47 which stops the calculation of the test value, is represented in the seventh line.
  • the image data are incorporated only if the VSYNC signal, the enable signal, and the HSYNC signal are set.
  • first point in time 58 and second point in time 59 are not always incorporated in the test value calculation, but only when these three conditions are met. This ensures that all, and preferably only, the useful image data are detected among the display signals and supplied to the test value. After the stop signal is reset at third point in time 60 , the next image may be transmitted.
  • all the image data of an image content are detected.
  • it is also possible to define a certain cutout portion of the image for example, the upper left corner of the image, using a pixel frame of approximately 100 ⁇ 200 pixels or a cutout image portion in the middle of the image.
  • the validity check may thus be restricted to a smaller portion of the image, which has special image dynamics or a particularly high relevance regarding the displayed contents.
  • a corresponding control signal would have to be provided by the control unit, so that it is checked whether or not a pixel is contained in the target area which is to be checked and thus is to be incorporated in the test value calculation.
  • clock signal 51 is not directly monitored, errors in the clock signal may also be ascertained. If a cycle is omitted or the cycle is not synchronous with the transmitted image signals, this also results in an error in forming the test value, since in that case a value is either not incorporated or incorporated twice in calculating the test value. Errors in the clock signal may thus be detected indirectly in that also such an error results in an erroneous test value.
  • FIG. 5 shows a sequence of the method according to the present invention for checking validity.
  • a check of the subsequent display signals is initiated.
  • a counter for the test value from the image data is set to zero.
  • a first check step 71 a check is made as to whether all conditions for the possible presence of valid image data are met. For example, the presence of the enable signal and the correct status of the synchronization signals are checked. If no appropriate conditions are present, it is assumed that no valid image data are being applied to input 29 of test device 11 . In this case the program branches back and first test step 71 is performed again. In contrast, if all conditions for valid image data are present, the program branches further to a detection step 72 .
  • the image data applied to input 29 are appended to the test value according to the given formula, for example, additively.
  • the program then branches further to a second check step 73 .
  • second check step 73 a check is made as to whether all predefined image frames have been processed. If this is not the case, the program branches back to detection step 72 and the next image data set predefined by the clock signal is read and incorporated in the test value calculation. If the end of the predefined image frame is reached, the program branches further to comparison step 74 , in which comparator unit 27 compares the calculated test value with the predefined test value.
  • the program then branches further to a third check step 75 .
  • test device 11 If both values coincide, valid image data are present, and the program branches further to an end step 76 , in which the validity is confirmed and test device 11 outputs a corresponding signal. If the calculated test value does not coincide with the stored test value, the program branches further to an end step 77 , in which, however, test device 11 outputs an error signal.

Abstract

A test device for checking the validity of display signals pertaining to a predefined image includes a device for ascertaining image data from the display signals, device for determining a test value of the image data, and a comparator unit for comparing the ascertained test value with a stored test value pertaining to the image, a validity of the display signals being established in the case where the two test values coincide.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention is directed to a test device, a display device, and a method for checking a validity of display signals.
  • 2. Description of Related Art
  • A method and a device for checking signals of an LCD interface are known from Japanese Patent Publication JP 09-288136 A Abstract. To check whether the display signal is correct, both the clock signal and the synchronization signals are measured and compared with stored values for these control variables. If they coincide with the stored values, the image signal is considered correct.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The test device according to the present invention has the advantage over the related art that only those data of the display signals are taken into account which are relevant for the image display as such. A check is advantageously performed in a simple manner in that a test value is formed from these image data according to a given formula. The test value for all the image data, for an entire image to be displayed, or for a defined partial area of a total image must result in a test value that may be determined and stored for the image in advance. It is thus possible to check the correctness of the displayed image itself. The check is not instructed to evaluate the additional control signals, but may evaluate the image content itself. The computing complexity may also be kept very low due to the formation of the test value for all the data, for example, via summation or a cyclic redundancy check.
  • It is thus advantageous that the test device has an interface for transmitting at least one additional test value. Test values for additional images to be tested may thus be transmitted to the test device.
  • In particular, a display device which has a test device according to the present invention is advantageous. Due to the fact that a test device of this type is provided in a display device, the correctness of image data of the display device may be checked in a simple manner and without great complexity. This is important in particular in a safety-relevant environment in which the display device must always output correct image data. In addition, in particular in the case where an image is generated remotely from the display device, it is made possible, in a simple manner, to check the correctness of the transport of the display signals and thus to also ensure that correct image data are output or, otherwise, a user is given a warning, for example. Accordingly, it is advantageous to provide an interface via which a particular test value of an image shown in the display is transmitted to the test device, which then may compare the calculated test value with the transmitted test value.
  • To check a data link between the graphic controller and the display, the test device advantageously accesses the data link between the graphic controller and the display device, in particular on the side of the data link facing the display. This makes it possible in particular to also easily detect an overload of a data link.
  • It is furthermore advantageous to provide, in the display device, a memory module in which at least one test value is stored, for easily providing a test value. This allows the stored test value to be directly used in an initializing mode of the display device and compared with a test value of a test image preferably provided by the display device itself. Furthermore, in the case of an unchanging image, a test value may be stored and compared with a subsequently determined test value for the same image content.
  • A display device according to the present invention may be advantageously used in a motor vehicle, in particular to display driving-relevant data, in which case a validity check of the display signals according to the present invention ensures that a correct image is output in the display device. A driver may thus be reliably informed about the driving-relevant data of his vehicle.
  • Similar advantages result for a method according to the present invention for checking a validity of display signals. The test value is advantageously calculated by taking into account the bit value of a pixel associated with a cycle in calculating the test value.
  • Those image data whose validity has been established due to the enable signal are advantageously evaluated. This ensures that the test value is formed only from valid image data.
  • The test value is ascertained in a particularly reliable manner by also including a polynomial division in the determination of the test values. The cyclic redundancy check (CRC) is one such method. The CRC method may be applied continuously to the data stream of the image data signals.
  • Furthermore, it is advantageous in the case of an unchanging image to initially determine and store a test value and to repeat the test value calculation in a subsequent retransmission of the same image. If the image data are valid in both cases, the same test value must always result. If this is not the case, at least in one case there are no valid image data.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING
  • FIG. 1 shows a display device and a test device according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a test device according to the present invention in detail.
  • FIG. 3 shows a first representation of display signals for carrying out the method according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows another exemplary embodiment of display signals for carrying out the method according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows an exemplary embodiment of a method sequence according to the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The test device according to the present invention may be used for checking any display signals. In a first specific embodiment, it may be integrated into a display device to provide information of whether the display signal provided for the display is valid. If the signal is valid, it may be assumed that the display also represents a correct, expected image. Image errors caused by display signals may thus be ruled out. In another specific embodiment, it is, however, also possible to connect the test device only to a source of the display signals, for example, an output of a graphic controller or a data line, which conduct the display signals from a graphic controller. An actually present display unit is then not required for checking the validity of the display signals. In this way, not only the function of the graphic controller, but additionally also the function of the data transmission line for the display signals may be checked. In the following, the present invention is elucidated using the example of a display in a vehicle in which the display signals are checked according to the present invention.
  • In the present case, “display signal” is to be understood as the totality of those signals which are output by a graphic controller to a display for displaying an image. The display signals are configured for direct reproduction by the display device itself. The display signals thus have both image content, which is present in an RGB data format, for example, and control signals such as, for example, a clock signal, a horizontal synchronization signal, a vertical synchronization signal, and an enable signal. The term “image data” is to be understood as a set of individual digital data values which each specify image values for individual pixels of a display. In the RGB format, this would be a set of data which define a brightness value for the individual colors. These image data are digitally encoded. For example, a pixel is described by an RGB color value composed of three times six bits.
  • FIG. 1 shows a display device 1, which has a graphic unit 2 and a display unit 3. Graphic unit 2 has a graphic controller 4. In a first specific embodiment, graphic controller 4 processes image information which is supplied to graphic unit 2 via an input 5. In another specific embodiment, graphic unit 2 may also have an arithmetic unit 6, which calculates display signals and relays them to graphic controller 4 for display. In addition, further control information may be relayed from a data bus 8 to graphic controller 4 via a terminal 7. Graphic controller 4 converts the appropriate image data into display signals for display unit 3 according to appropriate specifications adapted to display unit 3. The display signals are adapted, for example, to the number of pixels of display unit 3, for example, 800×600 pixels. The display signals are transmitted from graphic controller 4 to display unit 3 via a preferably multi-wire data line 9. In display unit 3, the display signals are converted directly in display 10. Display 10 is designed, for example, as a liquid crystal display. The image data are written line by line into the display matrix of the liquid crystal display according to the control signals. The lines and the image are wrapped via the control data. The input of the image data is controlled by a clock signal, which is also transmitted via data link 9. In one specific embodiment, it is possible, for example, to have data link 9 designed as an LVDS interface. If errors occur in the LVDS interface, for example, in the event of overload, they may be recognized with the aid of a test device according to the present invention.
  • In a first example embodiment, test device 11 is connected inside the display device between an input 12 of display unit 3 and display 10. Test device 11 checks the validity of the display signals which are supplied to display unit 3 via input 12. In a first specific embodiment, test device 11 performs this check automatically when display device 1 is switched on. In another specific embodiment, an appropriate request may be given to display unit 3 via a terminal 13 of the display device, also via data bus 8. Furthermore, it is also possible to transmit, to test device 11, via data bus 8 and terminal 13, a test value for the image being output by graphic controller 4 to display unit 3.
  • In a first example embodiment, the display signals are always passed through test device 11. In another specific embodiment, test device 11 picks up the signals from the connection between input 12 and display 10, so that the display signals are conducted along dashed line 14 directly from input 12 to display 10.
  • The result of the validity check is output by test device 11. In the specific embodiment shown, the result is output to data bus 8 via terminal 13. The test result is thus available both to graphic unit 2 and to other devices connected to data bus 8. For example, if the display does not work or works incorrectly, a warning device connected to data bus 8, for example, an acoustic signaling device, may output a warning signal to a user of the display.
  • In one example embodiment, test device 11 may be situated, for example, on a central display of a vehicle, to which image information and control signals are supplied from different image sources.
  • The display in the vehicle may have a terminal via which test device 11 may be connected, for example, during manufacture in the factory or in the repair shop. Furthermore, test device 11 may also be integrated into the display in the vehicle.
  • FIG. 2 shows the operation of test device 11 in detail. Test device 11, which is implemented, for example, as an FPGA, has a control unit 20, to which the horizontal synchronization signal is supplied via a first input 21, the vertical synchronization signal is supplied via a second input 22, and the enable signal is supplied via a third input 23. Furthermore, control unit 20 has a fourth input 24, which is controlled, for example, from data bus 8 via terminal 13 of display unit 3. A test may be caused to start via fourth input 24. In a first specific embodiment, test device 11 has a memory 25, in which at least one test value for carrying out the validity check of the display signals is stored. In another specific embodiment, at least one further test value may be saved in memory 25 via a fifth input 26. The test value stored in memory 25 is read by a comparator unit 27. In another specific embodiment, a test value may also be relayed directly to a comparator unit 27 via fifth input 26. Fifth input 26 may be designed as a UART, an SBI, or an I2C interface, for example.
  • In another example embodiment, only one test value of an image may also be calculated and saved in a first step. If immediately thereafter, continuously, or at a later point in time, the same image is transmitted, the test value determination is repeated. If the test value calculated later and the stored test value do not coincide, at least in one case no valid data have been supplied.
  • Alternatively or in addition, in another example embodiment, memory 25 may also be designed for storing image data of one or more test images which may be read for test value determination.
  • Furthermore, test device 11 has an arithmetic unit 28, which is used for calculating the test value. For this purpose, the image data are supplied to arithmetic unit 28 via an input 29. Furthermore, the clock signal is also transmitted to arithmetic unit 28 via an input 30. The image data are, for example, RGB data, which have a color depth of 16, 18, or even 24 bits. The RGB data of a pixel are read by arithmetic unit 28 according to a clock signal. However, the data available via input 29 are read only if control unit 20 provides an appropriate start signal via an interface 31. An enable signal that has been set and is conducted from third input 23 via control unit 20 to arithmetic unit 28 via an interface 32 is also required for reading the data. As long as the enable signal is suitably set, image data are incorporated in the test value calculation in arithmetic unit 28 according to a predefined formula. If a transmission of the image is completed, at the latest when vertical synchronization signal 22 is set, a stop signal is output by control unit 20 to arithmetic unit 28 via interface 33. The stop signal is also similarly relayed to comparator unit 27. Comparator unit 27 now reads the calculated test value from arithmetic unit 28. It compares this value with the value saved in memory 25. If the two values coincide, a corresponding signal is output via an output 34 of test device 11. If the two values do not coincide, an error signal is output. In the simplest manner, the signal at output 34 may be set at “high” or “low” as appropriate.
  • In a first example embodiment, the bit values may be added as the formula for determining the test value. In one specific embodiment, the transmitted data may be simply added up. For this purpose, the data stream is decomposed into packets of a predefined length, for example, 18 bits, and the individual data sets thus obtained are added up. However, more complex formulas are used for determining the test value in order to achieve a higher degree of reliability. It is thus possible, for example, to additionally multiply the individual data blocks obtained by decomposing the data stream by a constant and then to add them up. A particularly reliable recognition is achieved by using a cyclic redundancy test in which a polynomial division is performed instead of a simple addition. In this case, the incoming data are divided by a certain polynomial and the rest of the division is considered as the test value. The CRC32 test algorithm is such a method, for example, which may also be used for a data stream, here a data stream of the valid image data.
  • In principle, each image may be used for such a test. It is, however, advantageous to provide a predefined test image, which is stored in the display device, for example, for a certain display, and, by requesting a test to be performed, the system may thus test itself without need for operating the display itself. Furthermore, no dedicated video input or output is needed, since the test may be easily integrated into the display device itself.
  • To ascertain special errors, for example, transmission errors due to a bad voltage supply, special test images may also be used, thus, for example, images having vertical black and white lines in which errors may occur, while in standard test images showing only RGB color variations no errors occur in such cases. In order to thus reliably establish a mode of operation of the display device, not only a single test image, but a sequence of specially provided test images are run through to check the operation of the display device in different load situations.
  • FIG. 3 shows an exemplary embodiment of signals during the check by the test device. A first signal 41 is a regular clock signal which defines the reading rate for the image data. Second signal 42 is the enable signal. While it is set at “low,” the data are not incorporated in the test value; if it is set at “high,” the corresponding image data, namely the digital values of each transmitted pixel, which are represented in third signal 43, are incorporated in the test value calculation according to the predefined test formula. A calculation is thus carried out between first point in time 44 and second point in time 45. Image data possibly transmitted subsequently or previously are not incorporated in the test value determination.
  • Another example embodiment in which readout is further refined is illustrated in FIG. 4. The clock signal is again represented in first line 51. The vertical synchronization signal is represented in second line 52 and the horizontal synchronization signal is represented in fourth line 54. Third line 53 here also designates the enable signal. The start signal, which resets the counter at the beginning and subsequently makes it possible to calculate the test value, is represented in sixth line 56. Stop signal 47, which stops the calculation of the test value, is represented in the seventh line. However, in this case the image data are incorporated only if the VSYNC signal, the enable signal, and the HSYNC signal are set. Therefore, data between first point in time 58 and second point in time 59 are not always incorporated in the test value calculation, but only when these three conditions are met. This ensures that all, and preferably only, the useful image data are detected among the display signals and supplied to the test value. After the stop signal is reset at third point in time 60, the next image may be transmitted.
  • In the example embodiment shown here, all the image data of an image content are detected. However, in another specific embodiment it is also possible to define a certain cutout portion of the image, for example, the upper left corner of the image, using a pixel frame of approximately 100×200 pixels or a cutout image portion in the middle of the image. The validity check may thus be restricted to a smaller portion of the image, which has special image dynamics or a particularly high relevance regarding the displayed contents. A corresponding control signal would have to be provided by the control unit, so that it is checked whether or not a pixel is contained in the target area which is to be checked and thus is to be incorporated in the test value calculation.
  • Although clock signal 51 is not directly monitored, errors in the clock signal may also be ascertained. If a cycle is omitted or the cycle is not synchronous with the transmitted image signals, this also results in an error in forming the test value, since in that case a value is either not incorporated or incorporated twice in calculating the test value. Errors in the clock signal may thus be detected indirectly in that also such an error results in an erroneous test value.
  • FIG. 5 shows a sequence of the method according to the present invention for checking validity. Starting from initialization step 70, a check of the subsequent display signals is initiated. A counter for the test value from the image data is set to zero. In a first check step 71, a check is made as to whether all conditions for the possible presence of valid image data are met. For example, the presence of the enable signal and the correct status of the synchronization signals are checked. If no appropriate conditions are present, it is assumed that no valid image data are being applied to input 29 of test device 11. In this case the program branches back and first test step 71 is performed again. In contrast, if all conditions for valid image data are present, the program branches further to a detection step 72. The image data applied to input 29 are appended to the test value according to the given formula, for example, additively. The program then branches further to a second check step 73. In second check step 73, a check is made as to whether all predefined image frames have been processed. If this is not the case, the program branches back to detection step 72 and the next image data set predefined by the clock signal is read and incorporated in the test value calculation. If the end of the predefined image frame is reached, the program branches further to comparison step 74, in which comparator unit 27 compares the calculated test value with the predefined test value. The program then branches further to a third check step 75. If both values coincide, valid image data are present, and the program branches further to an end step 76, in which the validity is confirmed and test device 11 outputs a corresponding signal. If the calculated test value does not coincide with the stored test value, the program branches further to an end step 77, in which, however, test device 11 outputs an error signal.

Claims (13)

1-12. (canceled)
13. A test device for checking the validity of display signals corresponding to a predefined image, comprising:
a device configured to ascertain image data from the display signals;
a device configured to determine a test value from the image data; and
a comparator unit configured to compare the determined test value with a stored test value corresponding to the predefined image, wherein a validity of the display signals is established if the determined test value matches the stored test value.
14. The test device as recited in claim 13, further comprising:
an interface configured to transmit at least one further test value pertaining to at least one additional image.
15. A display device, comprising:
a display for displaying images;
a graphic controller for generating display signals used for generating an image on the display; and
a test device for checking the validity of display signals corresponding to a predefined image, wherein the test device includes:
a device configured to ascertain image data from the display signals;
a device configured to determine a test value from the image data; and
a comparator unit configured to compare the determined test value with a stored test value corresponding to the predefined image, wherein a validity of the display signals is established if the determined test value matches the stored test value.
16. The display device as recited in claim 15, further comprising:
an interface configured to transmit to the test device the test value corresponding to the predefined image.
17. The display device as recited in claim 16, further comprising:
a data link between the graphic controller and the display, wherein the test device accesses the display signals between the data link and the display.
18. The display device as recited in claim 16, further comprising:
a memory storing image data of at least one test image and at least one test value corresponding to the at least one test image.
19. The display device as recited in claim 16, wherein the display device is located in a motor vehicle.
20. A method for checking a validity of display signals generated from image data of a predefined image, comprising:
ascertaining a defined area of image data from the display signals;
generating a test value from the ascertained image data;
comparing the generated test value with a stored test value corresponding to the defined are of image data; and
establishing the validity of the display signals only if the generated test value matches the stored test value.
21. The method as recited in claim 20, wherein the status of an enable signal is evaluated for ascertaining the defined area of image data.
22. The method as recited in claim 20, wherein, in generating the test value, bit values from display signals are selected in accordance with a predefined clock cycle.
23. The method as recited in claim 20, wherein the generation of the test value includes a polynomial division.
24. The method as recited in claim 20, wherein the stored test value is determined from ascertained image data of the predefined image.
US12/734,051 2007-10-10 2008-10-09 Test device, display device, and method for checking a validity of display signals Active 2030-05-08 US8543349B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102007048608A DE102007048608A1 (en) 2007-10-10 2007-10-10 A test device, display device and method for checking validity of display signals
DE102007048608 2007-10-10
DE102007048608.3 2007-10-10
PCT/EP2008/063548 WO2009050106A1 (en) 2007-10-10 2008-10-09 Test device, display device and method for testing the validity of display signals

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100283858A1 true US20100283858A1 (en) 2010-11-11
US8543349B2 US8543349B2 (en) 2013-09-24

Family

ID=40210772

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/734,051 Active 2030-05-08 US8543349B2 (en) 2007-10-10 2008-10-09 Test device, display device, and method for checking a validity of display signals

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US8543349B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2198421A1 (en)
DE (1) DE102007048608A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2009050106A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120254664A1 (en) * 2011-04-04 2012-10-04 Agustawestland S.P.A. Automatic test system for digital display systems
US9164860B2 (en) 2009-07-06 2015-10-20 Deuta-Werke Gmbh Method for representation of safety-relevant information on a display and apparatus for the application of the method
CN107566760A (en) * 2016-06-30 2018-01-09 罗伯特·博世有限公司 Monitor and utilize the apparatus and method of the display of alternate image Data correction image
US20190139469A1 (en) * 2016-04-22 2019-05-09 Nec Display Solutions, Ltd. Video monitoring method, display device, and display system
CN109741698A (en) * 2019-01-04 2019-05-10 精电(河源)显示技术有限公司 Show data flaw detection method and device
US20190385561A1 (en) * 2017-01-24 2019-12-19 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Method and device for operating a display
US20200198466A1 (en) * 2018-12-19 2020-06-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Dynamically Re-Configurable Displays With Reconfigurable Regions Of Interest For Safety Critical Content
CN113077735A (en) * 2020-01-06 2021-07-06 广州汽车集团股份有限公司 Method, device and system for testing vehicle-mounted display equipment
US11429470B2 (en) * 2019-07-18 2022-08-30 Lapis Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Signal processing circuit

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2439722B1 (en) * 2010-09-20 2013-06-19 Pixy AG Method for inspecting pixel-formated display data for display on a screen of a display device in a vehicle
DE102012208481B4 (en) * 2012-05-21 2022-03-03 Beckhoff Automation Gmbh Method and device for operating a computer system
EP2779151B1 (en) 2013-03-11 2018-05-16 Renesas Electronics Europe Limited Video output checker
DE102013012679A1 (en) 2013-07-31 2015-02-05 Deuta-Werke Gmbh Method and device for displaying a safety-relevant state
CN103617772B (en) * 2013-11-12 2016-02-03 华映视讯(吴江)有限公司 Display panel and method of testing thereof
DE102015216574A1 (en) * 2015-08-31 2017-03-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A method of verifying the correctness of a representation of image data on a display means and display
DE102016200823A1 (en) 2016-01-21 2017-07-27 Robert Bosch Gmbh Apparatus and method for verifying validity of image data in a display device, including verification data
DE102016200826A1 (en) 2016-01-21 2017-07-27 Robert Bosch Gmbh Apparatus and method for checking validity of image data in a display device
DE102016217518A1 (en) 2016-09-14 2018-03-15 Robert Bosch Gmbh Device and method for monitoring a non-display of a predetermined image, in particular a warning symbol, in a display of a display device
DE102016225349A1 (en) 2016-12-16 2018-06-21 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for checking the validity of image data
DE102018222493A1 (en) 2018-12-20 2020-06-25 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method for validating environment image data, device, computer program and computer-readable storage medium
DE102021112394A1 (en) 2021-05-12 2022-11-17 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Method, device, vehicle, computer program, computer-readable storage medium for validating an image to be displayed

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6839055B1 (en) * 2000-01-25 2005-01-04 Dell Products L.P. Video data error detection
US7006117B1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2006-02-28 Ati International Srl Apparatus for testing digital display driver and method thereof
US7467028B2 (en) * 2004-06-15 2008-12-16 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for transferring information to a motor vehicle

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2885179B2 (en) 1996-04-24 1999-04-19 日本電気株式会社 LCD interface signal inspection method and device

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6839055B1 (en) * 2000-01-25 2005-01-04 Dell Products L.P. Video data error detection
US7006117B1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2006-02-28 Ati International Srl Apparatus for testing digital display driver and method thereof
US7467028B2 (en) * 2004-06-15 2008-12-16 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for transferring information to a motor vehicle

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9164860B2 (en) 2009-07-06 2015-10-20 Deuta-Werke Gmbh Method for representation of safety-relevant information on a display and apparatus for the application of the method
US9332252B2 (en) * 2011-04-04 2016-05-03 Agusta Westland S.P.A. Automatic test system for digital display systems
US20120254664A1 (en) * 2011-04-04 2012-10-04 Agustawestland S.P.A. Automatic test system for digital display systems
US10832604B2 (en) * 2016-04-22 2020-11-10 Nec Display Solutions, Ltd. Video monitoring method, display device, and display system
US20190139469A1 (en) * 2016-04-22 2019-05-09 Nec Display Solutions, Ltd. Video monitoring method, display device, and display system
CN107566760A (en) * 2016-06-30 2018-01-09 罗伯特·博世有限公司 Monitor and utilize the apparatus and method of the display of alternate image Data correction image
US20190385561A1 (en) * 2017-01-24 2019-12-19 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Method and device for operating a display
US20200198466A1 (en) * 2018-12-19 2020-06-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Dynamically Re-Configurable Displays With Reconfigurable Regions Of Interest For Safety Critical Content
US11001143B2 (en) * 2018-12-19 2021-05-11 Qualcomm Incorporated Dynamically re-configurable displays with reconfigurable regions of interest for safety critical content
WO2020140828A1 (en) * 2019-01-04 2020-07-09 精电(河源)显示技术有限公司 Display data defect detection method and device
CN109741698A (en) * 2019-01-04 2019-05-10 精电(河源)显示技术有限公司 Show data flaw detection method and device
US11429470B2 (en) * 2019-07-18 2022-08-30 Lapis Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Signal processing circuit
CN113077735A (en) * 2020-01-06 2021-07-06 广州汽车集团股份有限公司 Method, device and system for testing vehicle-mounted display equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2198421A1 (en) 2010-06-23
WO2009050106A1 (en) 2009-04-23
DE102007048608A1 (en) 2009-04-16
US8543349B2 (en) 2013-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8543349B2 (en) Test device, display device, and method for checking a validity of display signals
KR102163386B1 (en) Video output checker
JP4807996B2 (en) Determination apparatus and determination method
KR20070079831A (en) Display apparatus and control method thereof
US6999127B2 (en) Apparatus and method for image conversion and automatic error correction for digital television receiver
JP2006085708A (en) Control device and control method for console
JP6702602B2 (en) Self image diagnostic method, self image diagnostic program, display device, and self image diagnostic system
CN110827738B (en) Circuit device, display control system, electronic apparatus, and moving object
US11776096B2 (en) Image processing circuit, circuit device, and electronic apparatus
CN104065901B (en) Optical projection system, projector and its bearing calibration
JP2019219221A (en) Semiconductor integrated circuit, bridge chip, display system, and automobile
US11250808B2 (en) Display system and related vehicle and method
KR20130026756A (en) Apparatus and method diagnosing camera using for car using self-diagnosis image patern
US20220076600A1 (en) Method for validating environmental image data, apparatus, computer program, and computer-readable storage medium
JP7097507B2 (en) Semiconductor devices, in-vehicle display systems using them, electronic devices
US11495152B2 (en) Method for diagnosing display connection and operation
US20230237941A1 (en) Device and method for detecting screen freeze error of display of vehicle
US20180158433A1 (en) Display system and video data displaying method thereof
US20180145662A1 (en) Input/output system, input device, and control method of input/output system
US11176907B2 (en) Video data displaying device
KR20230082929A (en) System for verifying integrity of image
JP7317442B2 (en) Display device and icon failure determination method
US20150269909A1 (en) Display drive device, display drive system, integrated circuit device, and display drive method
JP2016225904A (en) Image signal processor
JP2021118436A (en) Image processing device and inspection method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KATCHAN, IGOR;LINDNER, MARKUS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100616 TO 20100621;REEL/FRAME:024628/0241

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8