US20100145836A1 - System and method of detecting fraud - Google Patents
System and method of detecting fraud Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100145836A1 US20100145836A1 US12/710,228 US71022810A US2010145836A1 US 20100145836 A1 US20100145836 A1 US 20100145836A1 US 71022810 A US71022810 A US 71022810A US 2010145836 A1 US2010145836 A1 US 2010145836A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- model
- data
- models
- fraud
- transacting entity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/067—Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/04—Payment circuits
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/08—Payment architectures
- G06Q20/10—Payment architectures specially adapted for electronic funds transfer [EFT] systems; specially adapted for home banking systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/08—Payment architectures
- G06Q20/10—Payment architectures specially adapted for electronic funds transfer [EFT] systems; specially adapted for home banking systems
- G06Q20/108—Remote banking, e.g. home banking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/40—Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/40—Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists
- G06Q20/401—Transaction verification
- G06Q20/4016—Transaction verification involving fraud or risk level assessment in transaction processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/40—Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists
- G06Q20/403—Solvency checks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/018—Certifying business or products
- G06Q30/0185—Product, service or business identity fraud
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/03—Credit; Loans; Processing thereof
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/08—Insurance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/12—Accounting
Definitions
- the present invention relates to detecting fraud in financial transactions.
- Fraud detection systems detect fraud in financial transactions.
- a payment card transaction fraud detection system may be configured to analyze transaction data to identify transactions that are fraudulent.
- Existing payment card fraud detection systems may use transaction data in addition to data related to the transacting entities to identify fraud. Such systems may operate in either batch (processing transactions as a group of files at periodic times during the day) or real time mode (processing transactions one at a time, as they enter the system).
- batch processing transactions as a group of files at periodic times during the day
- real time mode processing transactions one at a time, as they enter the system.
- the fraud detection capabilities of existing systems have not kept pace with either the types of payment card fraudulent activity that have evolved or increasing processing and storage capabilities of computing systems.
- Financial transactions and payment card transaction data may refer to transactions, authorization of transactions, external data and other activities such as non-monetary transactions, payments, postings or a voice response unit (VRU) events.
- payment card transaction data may include data derived from transactions using a physical payment card, e.g., with a magnetic stripe, and electronic transactions in which payment card data is used without the payment card being physically read or presented.
- Financial transactions can include credit or debit based transactions associated with, for example, a point of sale (POS) terminal or an automated teller machine (ATM). These transactions are often aggregated into databases from which an analysis can be performed for fraud.
- POS point of sale
- ATM automated teller machine
- One embodiment includes a computerized method of detecting fraud.
- the method includes receiving data associated with a financial transaction and at least one transacting entity.
- the data associated with the transacting entity comprises at least a portion of each of a plurality of historical transactions of the transacting entity.
- the method further includes applying the data to at least one first model.
- the method further includes generating a score based on the first model.
- the method further includes generating data indicative of fraud based at least partly on the score.
- One embodiment includes a system for detecting fraud.
- the system includes a storage configured to receive data associated with at least one transacting entity.
- the data associated with the transacting entity comprises at least a portion of each of a plurality of historical transactions of the transacting entity.
- the system further includes a processor configured to apply transaction data and the data associated with the at least one transacting entity to at least one first model, generate a score based on the first model, and generate data indicative of fraud based at least partly on the score.
- One embodiment includes a system for detecting fraud.
- the system includes means for receiving data associated with at least one transacting entity.
- the data associated with the transacting entity comprises at least a portion of each of a plurality of historical transactions of the transacting entity.
- the system further includes means for processing transaction data.
- the processing means is configured to apply transaction data and the data associated with the at least one transacting entity to at least one first model, generate a score based on the first model, and generate data indicative of fraud based at least partly on the score.
- FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram illustrating a fraud detection system such as for use with a payment card transaction processing or authorization system.
- FIG. 2 is a high level flowchart illustrating an example method of model generation and use according to one embodiment of the payment card fraud detection system of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram illustrating in further detail portions of the payment card fraud detection system of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a method of processing transaction data according to one embodiment of the payment card fraud detection system of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating in more detail one embodiment of a portion of the method illustrated in FIG. 4 .
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating in more detail one embodiment of a portion of the method illustrated in FIG. 4 .
- FIG. 7 is a functional block diagram illustrating portions of one embodiment of the payment card fraud detection system of FIG. 1 .
- payment card fraud detection can be improved by using stored past transaction data in place of, or in addition to, summarized forms of past transaction data.
- payment card fraud detection is improved by using statistical information that is stored according to groups of individuals that form clusters.
- fraud is identified with reference to deviation from identified clusters.
- embodiments of fraud detection systems may use data that is stored in association with one or more entities associated with the processing of the transaction such as a point of sale terminal, or an automated teller machine (ATM).
- ATM automated teller machine
- the entities may be real persons, particular instances of processing equipment, a particular merchant, or a chain or brand associated with the merchant.
- Fraud generally refers to any material misrepresentation associated with a transaction (or authorization of the transaction).
- fraud may refer to misrepresentations associated with the identity of the parties, misrepresentations associated with the authenticity or validity of a credit or debit card, misrepresentations associated with obtaining credit used in the transaction or misrepresentations regarding a purchaser's ability or likelihood of payment.
- various patterns may be detected from external sources, such as data available from a credit bureau or other data aggregator.
- FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram illustrating a fraud detection system 100 .
- the fraud detection system 100 may be configured to detect fraud in a “real time” mode, e.g., prior to, or as part of, the authorization process for the transaction.
- authorization of the transaction is based on data indicative of fraud provided by the fraud detection system 100 .
- the fraud detection system 100 may be configured to detect fraud in a batch mode, e.g., after the transaction has been completed.
- the data indicative of fraud generated by the system 100 may be used as part of the authorization process of subsequent transactions by the entities or account, to associate an indicator of fraud with one or more of the entities or an account associated with the transaction.
- the indicator of fraud may indicate that the entity or account is in a state indicative of fraud that can be used to indicate the need to take one or more actions such as contacting the entity, lock the account, point of sale terminal, or ATM associated with the transaction, or take any other suitable action.
- the system 100 includes an authorization/scoring driver 102 that provides transaction data for processing by a scorer 104 such as during authorization of the corresponding transaction.
- the transaction data is payment card transaction data.
- the scorer 104 applies the transaction data to one or more models 106 to generate data indicative of fraud associated with the transaction data.
- a batch driver 108 may also provide transaction data in a batch mode for processing by the scorer 104 .
- the batch driver 108 may also receive other transaction related data such as postings, payments, and non-monetary data from one or more databases 110 and provide that data to the scorer 104 for scoring of the associated entity or account, and/or for use in scoring transaction data.
- a risk triggers module 112 provides triggers to a triggers database 114 of the system 100 .
- Triggers may include relationships (e.g., a recent payment is more than the balance due) or rules that have been identified as being indicative of fraud.
- a third party or card issuer periodically provides triggers to the triggers database 114 .
- One or more models 106 of the scorer 104 may generate data indicative of fraud based on the triggers from the triggers database 114 .
- a credit bureau data module 116 receives data from one or more credit bureaus and provides that data to the scorer 104 .
- one or more of the models 106 provides the data indicative of fraud based on historical transactions of one or more transacting entities.
- the historical transactions associated with entities may include transaction records and integrated trend summaries (TRAITS).
- TRAITS integrated trend summaries
- a database 118 is configured to maintain the historical transactions of one or more transacting entities, including TRAITS data and provide that data to the scorer 104 .
- One embodiment includes a model updater 120 that generates new or updated models 106 and provides those models 106 to the scorer 104 .
- the model updater 120 may be configured to update one or more of the models 106 periodically, e.g., nightly or weekly.
- the model updater 120 may also update one or more of the models 106 to provide the system 100 with new models 106 as part of new system or software version deployments.
- FIG. 2 is a high level flowchart illustrating an example method 150 of model generation and use according to one embodiment of the fraud detection system 100 .
- the method 150 begins at a block 152 in which the models 106 are generated.
- the models 106 include supervised models that are generated based on training or data analysis that is based on historical transactions or applications that have been identified as fraudulent or non-fraudulent.
- the models 106 may include other types of learning based models including, for example, unsupervised learning models such as clustering (e.g., K-means or Mahalanobis distance based models), anomaly (or outlier) detection (e.g., principal components or compression neural networks), competitive Learning (e.g., Kohonen self-organizing maps) and one-class support vector machine (SVM).
- unsupervised learning models such as clustering (e.g., K-means or Mahalanobis distance based models), anomaly (or outlier) detection (e.g., principal components or compression neural networks), competitive Learning (e.g., Kohonen self-organizing maps) and one-class support vector machine (SVM).
- SVM support vector machine
- the model updater 120 updates models and related data at intervals that may vary depending upon the particular model 106 .
- TRAITS data in the database 118 may be updated in real time as new data arrives, while clustering based models are updated periodically, e.g., daily.
- Certain models may be updated manually or when new versions of software of the system 100 are released.
- FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram illustrating in further detail portions of the scorer 104 , including data flow between certain portions of the system 100 .
- the scorer 104 includes a data input manager 202 that receives transactions and data from various databases and applies that data to the models 106 , a model expert selector 204 that selects one or more of the models 106 to which transaction data is applied to generate data indicative of fraud, and a score summarizer 206 that receives data indicative of fraud, including scores, from one or more models and generates a combined data or score to associate with the transaction data.
- the scorer 104 may provide the score(s) to a real time authorization/decision referral module 212 that may be part of the system 100 or external to the system 100 .
- the scorer 104 may provide the score or other data indicative of fraud to a case management module 214 that manages a card issuer or other party's actions in response to the data indicative of fraud.
- the data input manager 202 may interface with a variety of data sources to provide data for use by the models 106 via an I/O interface modules 220 . In order to make the entire system 100 as platform and site independent as possible I/O calls may be performed through site-specific I/O modules 220 without customizing other system components. For example, in addition to credit bureau data 116 (shown on FIG. 1 ), the data input manager 202 may interface with expert model requirements data 222 , file format definitions 224 , historical transactions (e.g., TRAITS) data 118 , triggers 114 , and one or more client databases 226 that provides account and other entity related data. It is to be recognized that the client databases 226 may be external to the system 100 . The operation of the data input manager 202 may be data driven. For example, the data input manager 202 may select data to provide to particular models 106 based on data from the expert model requirements database 222 .
- the data input manager 202 may also be configured to access new or additional databases such as the client databases 226 based on file format definitions 224 .
- Each file format record has a first field that defines the format of the record (e.g., A101 for an authorization record, N101 for a nonmonetary record, P101 for a payment record, and so forth).
- A101 for an authorization record e.g., A101 for an authorization record
- N101 for a nonmonetary record e.g., N101 for a nonmonetary record
- P101 for a payment record
- the scorer 104 may include a model bus 216 that provides a configurable component interface to the models 106 that allows new models to be inserted or removed from the system independently (of the other models 106 ).
- the system 100 is easily modified to account for new types of fraud, additional models to better identify fraud, and models configured to identify fraud in particular types of transactions or contexts.
- new models 106 can be added and old models replaced without need to retrain or update existing models 106 . For example, if debit cards or business cards processing is added to a particular embodiment of the system 100 , models 106 can be trained on these types of cards, rather than having to rebuild and retrain the entire system 100 as might be the case if a single large monolithic model was used.
- the models 106 include one or more specialized models 106 that are directed to specific types of transactions or specific fraud patterns (e.g., foreign transactions, ATM transactions, fraud type specialists) to improve overall fraud detection performance.
- the models may also include “local expert” models that focus on particular risk factors such as high amounts or foreign transactions, particular fraud patterns such as application fraud, or one or more triggers such as a payment being larger than the balance due.
- Such component models 106 can be more compact, efficient, and focused, with, e.g. around 40 input values each, than large, monolithic models with hundreds of inputs. Desirably, use of a set of the models 106 has been found to reduce the amount of calculations needed to process a data set by comparison with typical large monolithic models configured to perform similar scoring. Such reduction in calculations by the models 106 tends to improve system throughput and reduce system latency.
- TRAITS data 118 that includes at least a portion of the data associated with one or more transactions desirably has been found to provide better predictive performance than merely using summarized or averaged data.
- TRAITS data for an entity or account comprises one or more fields from the actual transaction history for the entity or account into a data record for that entity or account.
- the data record is a single record in order to minimize database access and fetch time.
- Such TRAITS data records better encapsulate fine detail (e.g., the last 50 merchant category codes (MCCs) used by the cardholder) and allow actual time series data to be analyzed by the models 106 . For example, a particular model 106 may use link analysis as part of its score generation.
- MCCs merchant category codes
- models 106 may include cardholder clusters (generated, for example, using an unsupervised or clustering based algorithm) based on the corresponding TRAITS in order to capture spending habits by category and spending behavior within a cluster. Particular models 106 may identify transition of an account from cluster to cluster and take into account expected divergences from normal behavior due to life events (see table below). As illustrated in Table 1 below, TRAITS can help the models 106 identify how customers move from one “activity state” to another. The models 106 may generate scores based on whether the particular transitions are indicative of fraudulent account behavior.
- TRAITS can also be based on transaction history for entities such as Automated Teller Machines (ATMs), Point of Sale devices (POS), Merchants, Issuer Portfolio, Issuer BIN, and MCC code levels.
- ATMs Automated Teller Machines
- POS Point of Sale devices
- MCC code levels MCC code levels
- Supervised or unsupervised models 106 can be generated (e.g., trained) based on entity traits.
- the unsupervised models 106 can be trained to spot new and emerging fraud trends that are not in the training data.
- Unsupervised models can also identify divergences from legitimate behavior and classify them into more or less risky clusters. This allows the models 106 to maintain a high level of adaptability to changing conditions without the need for frequent retraining.
- At least a portion of the models 106 may be configured to define a “committee” or “panels of experts.”
- a committee comprises a group of the models 106 that are optimized in terms of input variables and TRAITS for a particular type of fraud detection, particular type of transaction, particular type of entity or entity state, or suitable for processing any other particular data configurations.
- each model 106 is configured to identify its area of expertise in terms of transaction or entity data to allow the model expert selector 204 to select the particular model 106 when suitable transaction data is being processed. By providing such configuration data, the system 100 can be configured more easily, with less configuration management, etc. to include new or different models 106 over time or in a particular instance of the system 100 .
- the models 106 may comprise models 106 configured to process foreign transactions, jewelry purchases, and or young accounts (“thin files”).
- a young account (thin file) transacting at a jewelry store outside the United States may employ all three of these example models 106 to score the transaction.
- Each model 106 may provide a score and confidence level to the score summarizer 206 to be combined to generate a combined score and appropriate risk indicators.
- Models 106 may be based on any suitable modeling technique including, for example, neural networks, cascades (which may significantly improve performance for real-time referrals if trained on fraud transaction tags (identifying training transactions as fraudulent) rather than fraud account tags (identifying accounts as being used fraudulently)), support vector machines (SVM), genetic algorithms (GA), fuzzy logic, fraud case-based reasoning, decision trees, na ⁇ ve Bayesian, logistic regression, and scorecards.
- neural networks cascades (which may significantly improve performance for real-time referrals if trained on fraud transaction tags (identifying training transactions as fraudulent) rather than fraud account tags (identifying accounts as being used fraudulently)
- SVM support vector machines
- GA genetic algorithms
- fuzzy logic fuzzy logic
- decision trees na ⁇ ve Bayesian
- logistic regression logistic regression
- the models 106 may be supervised (i.e., with fraud tagging of the training data) or unsupervised (i.e., without fraud tags).
- unsupervised models are used for models 106 that use as input data such as TRAITS built on portfolios of accounts, Bank Identification Number (BIN)—a unique series of numbers assigned by Visa/MasterCard to member institutions that identifies each institution in transaction processing, and merchant category codes (MCC).
- BIN Bank Identification Number
- MCC merchant category codes
- the unsupervised models 106 can help identify new fraud trends by identifying accounts and their TRAITS that are diverging from legitimate behavior, but that do not diverge in a way previously identified.
- the unsupervised models 106 may be based on one or more of clustering (e.g., K-means or Mahalanobis distance based models), anomaly (or outlier) detection (e.g., principal components or compression neural networks), competitive learning (e.g., Kohonen self-organizing maps) and one-class support vector machine (SVM).
- clustering e.g., K-means or Mahalanobis distance based models
- anomaly (or outlier) detection e.g., principal components or compression neural networks
- competitive learning e.g., Kohonen self-organizing maps
- SVM one-class support vector machine
- expert models 106 When such expert models 106 are small and have fewer inputs than typical monolithic models, they can be refreshed or retrained much more efficiently. If it is desirable to retrain a particular expert model 106 , such retraining can be performed without retraining the entire set of models.
- the use of smaller expert models 106 via the model bus 216 allows various models 106 to be easily retrained or updated on different cycles. For example, it has been found that a typical fraud detection model is desirably retrained on a 12-18 month interval. Performance tends to decay somewhat over the time the model package is deployed.
- the model 106 can be kept more up to date. For example, after the initial deployment of the models 106 , half of the expert's models may be retrained at the 6 month point, the remaining half at the 12 month point, and the original half at the 18 month point again, and so forth.
- the models 106 can be retrained more frequently than typical single-retrain model packages where the entire model is monolithically retrained.
- the model updater 120 may segment the data into subsets to better model input data. For example, if subsets of a data set are identified with significantly distinct behavior, special models designed especially for these subsets normally outperform a general fit-all model.
- a prior knowledge of data can be used to segment the data for generation or retraining of the models 106 .
- data is segregated geographically so that, for example, regional differences do not confound fraud detection.
- data driven techniques e.g., unsupervised techniques such as clustering, are used to identify data segments that may benefit from a separate supervised model.
- the models 106 may output various types of data indicative of fraud to the score summarize 206 .
- fraud scores in a particular range, e.g., 1-999
- secondary scores may be generated to provide additional ways of detecting or quantifying risks such as first-party fraud, identity theft, application fraud, and merchant risk.
- scores for the models 106 may depend on the characteristics of the transaction, any triggers in place for the account, and TRAITS of entities associated with particular transaction data.
- One or more of the models may also generate a “bust-out” score (e.g., in the range of 1-999) indicative of a cardholder who maintains good credit for a time period then suddenly begins spending larger amounts (without paying).
- Model scores may also include a point-of-sale (POS) Action Score (Refer Score) (1-999), for example, for real time identification and referral to the vendor or issuer of accounts or transactions that appear to be fraudulent prior to approval.
- POS point-of-sale
- Refer Score Refer Score
- One or more of the models 106 may generate fraud application risk scores for new accounts and balance transfer and convenience check related scores.
- one or more of the models 106 may predict fraud types including identity fraud.
- One or more of the models 106 may also generate loss estimates to allow an issuer or other user of the system 100 to identify and focus on accounts with potential large losses.
- Treatment or authorization scores may be generated to provide data indicative of how to treat or whether to authorize a transaction.
- a chargeback status may be generated based on Issuer rules or on a success probability generated by the particular model 106 . Scores may also be generated that are associated with various entities to the transaction such as the merchant, the transacting POS, or the transacting ATM.
- One or more of the models 106 may also be configured to read in data files of account numbers (e.g., for mass compromises) and output various severity indicators to incorporate with the fraud score for special handling (e.g., identify cases for follow-up at lower scores, refer at lower scores, etc.)
- account numbers e.g., for mass compromises
- severity indicators e.g., identify cases for follow-up at lower scores, refer at lower scores, etc.
- the model expert selector 204 may select one or more of the models 106 , e.g., a subset of the models 106 , for evaluating a particular set of transaction data based on one or more of the triggers 114 , the historical transaction and TRAITS database 118 , data associated with the type or amount of the transaction, and the entities involved.
- the score summarizer 206 assesses the confidence of each of the output of the selected models 106 and provides combined weight and treatment guidance, including a final score and risk indicators.
- the selected risk indicators may include explanations of potential types of frauds and recommendations for action.
- the score summarizer 106 may use a weighting to combine the scores of the selected models 106 .
- one or more of the models 106 provides weighting data.
- the score summarizer 106 combines the scores of each of the selected models 106 and provides a combined score along with data such as the risk indicators.
- the models 106 and/or the score summarizer 206 may be configured to provide the Issuer with customized, automatic, and dynamic calibration to control referral levels and case creation volumes.
- Such dynamic calibration may be based on the actual in-production score distributions so as to eliminate ad hoc or arbitrary Christmas or other seasonal calibration.
- Such dynamic calibration conveniently provides the issuer with the ability to modify score distributions during times of emergencies or unusual events, such as natural disasters.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a method 154 of processing transaction data according to one embodiment of the fraud detection system 100 .
- the data input manager 202 receives transaction data.
- the data input manager 202 receives, e.g., from I/O modules 220 , data associated with transacting entity and TRAITS data, e.g., historical transactions, from one or more databases.
- the model expert selector 204 may identify clusters associated with the transacting entity based on the historical transactions.
- the model expert selector 204 selects one or more of the models 106 , e.g., based on transaction data, transacting entity, clusters, and historical transactions.
- the data input manager 202 applies transaction data, transacting entity, and historical transactions to the selected models 106 to generate scores and risk indicators.
- the score summarizer 206 combines the model scores and reasons to generate a combined score and risk indicators.
- the system 100 may repeat the acts associated with the method 154 for multiple transactions, transactions authorizations, etc. in real time or in batch mode.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating in more detail an example of applying transaction data, transacting entity, and historical transactions to models to generate scores and risk indicators of the block 310 method 154 .
- FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a committee scoring model for combining outputs of several models 106 .
- the data input manager 202 FIG. 3
- the models 106 each generate score and reason data based on the feature vector.
- the score summarizer 206 applies mixture parameters to the score and reason data to generate a committee score for the group of the models 106 .
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating in more detail another example of applying transaction data, transacting entity, and historical transactions to models to generate scores and risk indicators of the block 310 of the method 154 .
- FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a scoring model in which two or more of the models 106 are used sequentially to generate score and risk indicator data.
- the data input manager 202 FIG. 3
- one of the models 106 generates score and reason data based on the feature vector.
- the score summarizer 206 compares the score and reason data to one or more selected or predetermined criteria.
- the method 310 proceeds back to the block 342 in which the feature vector (and/or additional or different data) are applied to another one of the models 106 .
- the decision block 348 if the criteria are not indicative of applying another model, it proceeds to the block 350 in which the scoring summarizer 206 generates score and reason data based on the data obtained at the block 346 .
- the committee score may be determined using one or more of the following models:
- N the number of scores
- N is the number of scores and ⁇ i is estimated based on how predictive scores i is;
- FIG. 7 is a functional block diagram illustrating portions of one embodiment of the fraud detection system 100 .
- FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a process model for the system 100 .
- the driver 102 comprises one or more processes or threads providing transaction data to the scorer 104 .
- the scorer 104 includes one or more processes 402 for executing the data input manager 202 ( FIG. 3 ).
- the data input manager processes 402 communicate via a shared memory 404 with one or more model execution processes 406 that execute the models 106 , one or more scoring cache processes 408 configured to updating and maintaining transaction scores, and one or more TRAITS I/O processes configured to communicate with the TRAITS database 118 .
- the processes 402 , 406 , 408 , and 410 may be executed on one or more processors (not shown). In one embodiment, the processes 402 , 406 , 408 , and 410 may be executed on one or more mainframe computer systems.
- DSP digital signal processor
- ASIC application specific integrated circuit
- FPGA field programmable gate array
- a general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine.
- a processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
- a software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art.
- An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium.
- the storage medium may be integral to the processor.
- the processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC.
- the ASIC may reside in a user terminal.
- the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/543,271, filed Oct. 3, 2006, which will issue on Feb. 23, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,668,769, and which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/723,405, filed Oct. 4, 2005, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to detecting fraud in financial transactions.
- 2. Description of the Related Technology
- Fraud detection systems detect fraud in financial transactions. For example, a payment card transaction fraud detection system may be configured to analyze transaction data to identify transactions that are fraudulent.
- Existing payment card fraud detection systems may use transaction data in addition to data related to the transacting entities to identify fraud. Such systems may operate in either batch (processing transactions as a group of files at periodic times during the day) or real time mode (processing transactions one at a time, as they enter the system). However, the fraud detection capabilities of existing systems have not kept pace with either the types of payment card fraudulent activity that have evolved or increasing processing and storage capabilities of computing systems.
- Financial transactions and payment card transaction data may refer to transactions, authorization of transactions, external data and other activities such as non-monetary transactions, payments, postings or a voice response unit (VRU) events. Moreover, payment card transaction data may include data derived from transactions using a physical payment card, e.g., with a magnetic stripe, and electronic transactions in which payment card data is used without the payment card being physically read or presented. Financial transactions can include credit or debit based transactions associated with, for example, a point of sale (POS) terminal or an automated teller machine (ATM). These transactions are often aggregated into databases from which an analysis can be performed for fraud.
- However, existing fraud detection systems have failed to keep pace with the dynamic nature of financial transactions and payment card fraud. Moreover, such systems have failed to take advantage of the increased capabilities of computer systems. Thus, a need exists for improved systems and methods of detecting payment card fraud.
- The system, method, and devices of the invention each have several aspects, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes. Without limiting the scope of this invention as expressed by the claims which follow, its more prominent features will now be discussed briefly. After considering this discussion, and particularly after reading the section entitled “Detailed Description of Certain Embodiments” one will understand how the features of this invention provide advantages that include improved and more accurate payment card fraud detection.
- One embodiment includes a computerized method of detecting fraud. The method includes receiving data associated with a financial transaction and at least one transacting entity. The data associated with the transacting entity comprises at least a portion of each of a plurality of historical transactions of the transacting entity. The method further includes applying the data to at least one first model. The method further includes generating a score based on the first model. The method further includes generating data indicative of fraud based at least partly on the score.
- One embodiment includes a system for detecting fraud. The system includes a storage configured to receive data associated with at least one transacting entity. The data associated with the transacting entity comprises at least a portion of each of a plurality of historical transactions of the transacting entity. The system further includes a processor configured to apply transaction data and the data associated with the at least one transacting entity to at least one first model, generate a score based on the first model, and generate data indicative of fraud based at least partly on the score.
- One embodiment includes a system for detecting fraud. The system includes means for receiving data associated with at least one transacting entity. The data associated with the transacting entity comprises at least a portion of each of a plurality of historical transactions of the transacting entity. The system further includes means for processing transaction data. The processing means is configured to apply transaction data and the data associated with the at least one transacting entity to at least one first model, generate a score based on the first model, and generate data indicative of fraud based at least partly on the score.
-
FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram illustrating a fraud detection system such as for use with a payment card transaction processing or authorization system. -
FIG. 2 is a high level flowchart illustrating an example method of model generation and use according to one embodiment of the payment card fraud detection system ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram illustrating in further detail portions of the payment card fraud detection system ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a method of processing transaction data according to one embodiment of the payment card fraud detection system ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating in more detail one embodiment of a portion of the method illustrated inFIG. 4 . -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating in more detail one embodiment of a portion of the method illustrated inFIG. 4 . -
FIG. 7 is a functional block diagram illustrating portions of one embodiment of the payment card fraud detection system ofFIG. 1 . - The following detailed description is directed to certain specific embodiments of the invention. However, the invention can be embodied in a multitude of different ways as defined and covered by the claims. In this description, reference is made to the drawings wherein like parts are designated with like numerals throughout.
- For example, it has been found that, as discussed below with reference to certain embodiments, payment card fraud detection can be improved by using stored past transaction data in place of, or in addition to, summarized forms of past transaction data. In addition, in one embodiment, payment card fraud detection is improved by using statistical information that is stored according to groups of individuals that form clusters. In one such embodiment, fraud is identified with reference to deviation from identified clusters. In one embodiment, in addition to data associated with the direct parties to a transaction (e.g., a credit or debit card user and a merchant), embodiments of fraud detection systems may use data that is stored in association with one or more entities associated with the processing of the transaction such as a point of sale terminal, or an automated teller machine (ATM). The entities may be real persons, particular instances of processing equipment, a particular merchant, or a chain or brand associated with the merchant. Fraud generally refers to any material misrepresentation associated with a transaction (or authorization of the transaction). For example, fraud may refer to misrepresentations associated with the identity of the parties, misrepresentations associated with the authenticity or validity of a credit or debit card, misrepresentations associated with obtaining credit used in the transaction or misrepresentations regarding a purchaser's ability or likelihood of payment. In addition to data associated with transactions and the entities, various patterns may be detected from external sources, such as data available from a credit bureau or other data aggregator.
-
FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram illustrating afraud detection system 100. Thefraud detection system 100 may be configured to detect fraud in a “real time” mode, e.g., prior to, or as part of, the authorization process for the transaction. In one embodiment, authorization of the transaction is based on data indicative of fraud provided by thefraud detection system 100. Alternatively, or in addition, thefraud detection system 100 may be configured to detect fraud in a batch mode, e.g., after the transaction has been completed. The data indicative of fraud generated by thesystem 100 may be used as part of the authorization process of subsequent transactions by the entities or account, to associate an indicator of fraud with one or more of the entities or an account associated with the transaction. The indicator of fraud may indicate that the entity or account is in a state indicative of fraud that can be used to indicate the need to take one or more actions such as contacting the entity, lock the account, point of sale terminal, or ATM associated with the transaction, or take any other suitable action. - The
system 100 includes an authorization/scoring driver 102 that provides transaction data for processing by ascorer 104 such as during authorization of the corresponding transaction. In one embodiment, the transaction data is payment card transaction data. Thescorer 104 applies the transaction data to one ormore models 106 to generate data indicative of fraud associated with the transaction data. Abatch driver 108 may also provide transaction data in a batch mode for processing by thescorer 104. Thebatch driver 108 may also receive other transaction related data such as postings, payments, and non-monetary data from one ormore databases 110 and provide that data to thescorer 104 for scoring of the associated entity or account, and/or for use in scoring transaction data. - In one embodiment, a risk triggers
module 112 provides triggers to atriggers database 114 of thesystem 100. Triggers may include relationships (e.g., a recent payment is more than the balance due) or rules that have been identified as being indicative of fraud. In one embodiment, a third party or card issuer periodically provides triggers to thetriggers database 114. One ormore models 106 of thescorer 104 may generate data indicative of fraud based on the triggers from thetriggers database 114. A creditbureau data module 116 receives data from one or more credit bureaus and provides that data to thescorer 104. - In one embodiment, one or more of the
models 106 provides the data indicative of fraud based on historical transactions of one or more transacting entities. The historical transactions associated with entities may include transaction records and integrated trend summaries (TRAITS). In one embodiment, adatabase 118 is configured to maintain the historical transactions of one or more transacting entities, including TRAITS data and provide that data to thescorer 104. - One embodiment includes a
model updater 120 that generates new or updatedmodels 106 and provides thosemodels 106 to thescorer 104. Themodel updater 120 may be configured to update one or more of themodels 106 periodically, e.g., nightly or weekly. Themodel updater 120 may also update one or more of themodels 106 to provide thesystem 100 withnew models 106 as part of new system or software version deployments. -
FIG. 2 is a high level flowchart illustrating anexample method 150 of model generation and use according to one embodiment of thefraud detection system 100. Themethod 150 begins at ablock 152 in which themodels 106 are generated. In one embodiment, themodels 106 include supervised models that are generated based on training or data analysis that is based on historical transactions or applications that have been identified as fraudulent or non-fraudulent. Themodels 106 may include other types of learning based models including, for example, unsupervised learning models such as clustering (e.g., K-means or Mahalanobis distance based models), anomaly (or outlier) detection (e.g., principal components or compression neural networks), competitive Learning (e.g., Kohonen self-organizing maps) and one-class support vector machine (SVM). Moving to ablock 154, thesystem 100 applies transaction data tomodels 106. The functions ofblock 154 may be repeated for each transaction, approval, or other unit of data that is to be processed. Further detail of applying data to the models is described with reference toFIG. 4 . Proceeding to ablock 156, themodel updater 120 updates models and related data at intervals that may vary depending upon theparticular model 106. For example, in one embodiment, TRAITS data in thedatabase 118 may be updated in real time as new data arrives, while clustering based models are updated periodically, e.g., daily. Certain models may be updated manually or when new versions of software of thesystem 100 are released. -
FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram illustrating in further detail portions of thescorer 104, including data flow between certain portions of thesystem 100. Thescorer 104 includes adata input manager 202 that receives transactions and data from various databases and applies that data to themodels 106, amodel expert selector 204 that selects one or more of themodels 106 to which transaction data is applied to generate data indicative of fraud, and ascore summarizer 206 that receives data indicative of fraud, including scores, from one or more models and generates a combined data or score to associate with the transaction data. Thescorer 104 may provide the score(s) to a real time authorization/decision referral module 212 that may be part of thesystem 100 or external to thesystem 100. Depending on the mode of operation, e.g., real time or batch operation, thescorer 104 may provide the score or other data indicative of fraud to acase management module 214 that manages a card issuer or other party's actions in response to the data indicative of fraud. - The
data input manager 202 may interface with a variety of data sources to provide data for use by themodels 106 via an I/O interface modules 220. In order to make theentire system 100 as platform and site independent as possible I/O calls may be performed through site-specific I/O modules 220 without customizing other system components. For example, in addition to credit bureau data 116 (shown onFIG. 1 ), thedata input manager 202 may interface with expertmodel requirements data 222,file format definitions 224, historical transactions (e.g., TRAITS)data 118, triggers 114, and one ormore client databases 226 that provides account and other entity related data. It is to be recognized that theclient databases 226 may be external to thesystem 100. The operation of thedata input manager 202 may be data driven. For example, thedata input manager 202 may select data to provide toparticular models 106 based on data from the expertmodel requirements database 222. - The
data input manager 202 may also be configured to access new or additional databases such as theclient databases 226 based onfile format definitions 224. Each file format record has a first field that defines the format of the record (e.g., A101 for an authorization record, N101 for a nonmonetary record, P101 for a payment record, and so forth). When new fields or record types are added, the new format template with a new ID is added to theformat database 224. - In one embodiment, the
scorer 104 may include amodel bus 216 that provides a configurable component interface to themodels 106 that allows new models to be inserted or removed from the system independently (of the other models 106). Desirably, thesystem 100 is easily modified to account for new types of fraud, additional models to better identify fraud, and models configured to identify fraud in particular types of transactions or contexts. Moreover,new models 106 can be added and old models replaced without need to retrain or update existingmodels 106. For example, if debit cards or business cards processing is added to a particular embodiment of thesystem 100,models 106 can be trained on these types of cards, rather than having to rebuild and retrain theentire system 100 as might be the case if a single large monolithic model was used. In one embodiment, themodels 106 include one or morespecialized models 106 that are directed to specific types of transactions or specific fraud patterns (e.g., foreign transactions, ATM transactions, fraud type specialists) to improve overall fraud detection performance. The models may also include “local expert” models that focus on particular risk factors such as high amounts or foreign transactions, particular fraud patterns such as application fraud, or one or more triggers such as a payment being larger than the balance due. -
Such component models 106 can be more compact, efficient, and focused, with, e.g. around 40 input values each, than large, monolithic models with hundreds of inputs. Desirably, use of a set of themodels 106 has been found to reduce the amount of calculations needed to process a data set by comparison with typical large monolithic models configured to perform similar scoring. Such reduction in calculations by themodels 106 tends to improve system throughput and reduce system latency. - The use of transaction records and integrated trend summaries (TRAITS)
data 118 that includes at least a portion of the data associated with one or more transactions desirably has been found to provide better predictive performance than merely using summarized or averaged data. In one embodiment, TRAITS data for an entity or account comprises one or more fields from the actual transaction history for the entity or account into a data record for that entity or account. In one embodiment, the data record is a single record in order to minimize database access and fetch time. Such TRAITS data records better encapsulate fine detail (e.g., the last 50 merchant category codes (MCCs) used by the cardholder) and allow actual time series data to be analyzed by themodels 106. For example, aparticular model 106 may use link analysis as part of its score generation. - In one embodiment,
models 106 may include cardholder clusters (generated, for example, using an unsupervised or clustering based algorithm) based on the corresponding TRAITS in order to capture spending habits by category and spending behavior within a cluster.Particular models 106 may identify transition of an account from cluster to cluster and take into account expected divergences from normal behavior due to life events (see table below). As illustrated in Table 1 below, TRAITS can help themodels 106 identify how customers move from one “activity state” to another. Themodels 106 may generate scores based on whether the particular transitions are indicative of fraudulent account behavior. -
TABLE 1 Example of TRAITS changing from one cluster to another Move From To Domestic Spender Foreign Spender Dormant Active Non-Holiday Holiday Non-Traveler Traveler Threw Card Away Reissue (cardholder begins using card again) Stable Residence Just Moved - TRAITS can also be based on transaction history for entities such as Automated Teller Machines (ATMs), Point of Sale devices (POS), Merchants, Issuer Portfolio, Issuer BIN, and MCC code levels.
- Supervised or
unsupervised models 106 can be generated (e.g., trained) based on entity traits. Theunsupervised models 106 can be trained to spot new and emerging fraud trends that are not in the training data. Unsupervised models can also identify divergences from legitimate behavior and classify them into more or less risky clusters. This allows themodels 106 to maintain a high level of adaptability to changing conditions without the need for frequent retraining. - In one embodiment, at least a portion of the
models 106 may be configured to define a “committee” or “panels of experts.” A committee comprises a group of themodels 106 that are optimized in terms of input variables and TRAITS for a particular type of fraud detection, particular type of transaction, particular type of entity or entity state, or suitable for processing any other particular data configurations. In one embodiment, eachmodel 106 is configured to identify its area of expertise in terms of transaction or entity data to allow themodel expert selector 204 to select theparticular model 106 when suitable transaction data is being processed. By providing such configuration data, thesystem 100 can be configured more easily, with less configuration management, etc. to include new ordifferent models 106 over time or in a particular instance of thesystem 100. - For example, the
models 106 may comprisemodels 106 configured to process foreign transactions, jewelry purchases, and or young accounts (“thin files”). Thus, a young account (thin file) transacting at a jewelry store outside the United States may employ all three of theseexample models 106 to score the transaction. Eachmodel 106 may provide a score and confidence level to thescore summarizer 206 to be combined to generate a combined score and appropriate risk indicators. -
Models 106 may be based on any suitable modeling technique including, for example, neural networks, cascades (which may significantly improve performance for real-time referrals if trained on fraud transaction tags (identifying training transactions as fraudulent) rather than fraud account tags (identifying accounts as being used fraudulently)), support vector machines (SVM), genetic algorithms (GA), fuzzy logic, fraud case-based reasoning, decision trees, naïve Bayesian, logistic regression, and scorecards. - The
models 106 may be supervised (i.e., with fraud tagging of the training data) or unsupervised (i.e., without fraud tags). In one embodiment, unsupervised models are used formodels 106 that use as input data such as TRAITS built on portfolios of accounts, Bank Identification Number (BIN)—a unique series of numbers assigned by Visa/MasterCard to member institutions that identifies each institution in transaction processing, and merchant category codes (MCC). Theunsupervised models 106 can help identify new fraud trends by identifying accounts and their TRAITS that are diverging from legitimate behavior, but that do not diverge in a way previously identified. Theunsupervised models 106 may be based on one or more of clustering (e.g., K-means or Mahalanobis distance based models), anomaly (or outlier) detection (e.g., principal components or compression neural networks), competitive learning (e.g., Kohonen self-organizing maps) and one-class support vector machine (SVM). - When
such expert models 106 are small and have fewer inputs than typical monolithic models, they can be refreshed or retrained much more efficiently. If it is desirable to retrain aparticular expert model 106, such retraining can be performed without retraining the entire set of models. - Desirably, the use of
smaller expert models 106 via themodel bus 216 allowsvarious models 106 to be easily retrained or updated on different cycles. For example, it has been found that a typical fraud detection model is desirably retrained on a 12-18 month interval. Performance tends to decay somewhat over the time the model package is deployed. By retraining only a subset of theexpert models 106 at different time points (e.g., a staggered retrain), themodel 106 can be kept more up to date. For example, after the initial deployment of themodels 106, half of the expert's models may be retrained at the 6 month point, the remaining half at the 12 month point, and the original half at the 18 month point again, and so forth. Thus, themodels 106 can be retrained more frequently than typical single-retrain model packages where the entire model is monolithically retrained. - In one embodiment, the
model updater 120 may segment the data into subsets to better model input data. For example, if subsets of a data set are identified with significantly distinct behavior, special models designed especially for these subsets normally outperform a general fit-all model. In one embodiment, a prior knowledge of data can be used to segment the data for generation or retraining of themodels 106. For example, in one embodiment, data is segregated geographically so that, for example, regional differences do not confound fraud detection. In other embodiments, data driven techniques, e.g., unsupervised techniques such as clustering, are used to identify data segments that may benefit from a separate supervised model. - In one embodiment, the
models 106 may output various types of data indicative of fraud to the score summarize 206. In addition to fraud scores in a particular range, e.g., 1-999, secondary scores may be generated to provide additional ways of detecting or quantifying risks such as first-party fraud, identity theft, application fraud, and merchant risk. Such scores for themodels 106 may depend on the characteristics of the transaction, any triggers in place for the account, and TRAITS of entities associated with particular transaction data. One or more of the models may also generate a “bust-out” score (e.g., in the range of 1-999) indicative of a cardholder who maintains good credit for a time period then suddenly begins spending larger amounts (without paying). One or more of the models may also generate a “mass compromise” score (e.g., in the range of 1-999) indicative of a multi-account compromise. It has been found that the use of TRAITS for groups of accountholders or a portfolio of accounts desirably improves the detection of mass compromise events by themodels 106. Model scores may also include a point-of-sale (POS) Action Score (Refer Score) (1-999), for example, for real time identification and referral to the vendor or issuer of accounts or transactions that appear to be fraudulent prior to approval. One or more of themodels 106 may generate fraud application risk scores for new accounts and balance transfer and convenience check related scores. In addition, one or more of themodels 106 may predict fraud types including identity fraud. One or more of themodels 106 may also generate loss estimates to allow an issuer or other user of thesystem 100 to identify and focus on accounts with potential large losses. Treatment or authorization scores may be generated to provide data indicative of how to treat or whether to authorize a transaction. A chargeback status may be generated based on Issuer rules or on a success probability generated by theparticular model 106. Scores may also be generated that are associated with various entities to the transaction such as the merchant, the transacting POS, or the transacting ATM. - One or more of the
models 106 may also be configured to read in data files of account numbers (e.g., for mass compromises) and output various severity indicators to incorporate with the fraud score for special handling (e.g., identify cases for follow-up at lower scores, refer at lower scores, etc.) - The
model expert selector 204 may select one or more of themodels 106, e.g., a subset of themodels 106, for evaluating a particular set of transaction data based on one or more of thetriggers 114, the historical transaction andTRAITS database 118, data associated with the type or amount of the transaction, and the entities involved. - The
score summarizer 206 assesses the confidence of each of the output of the selectedmodels 106 and provides combined weight and treatment guidance, including a final score and risk indicators. The selected risk indicators may include explanations of potential types of frauds and recommendations for action. The score summarizer 106 may use a weighting to combine the scores of the selectedmodels 106. In one embodiment, one or more of themodels 106 provides weighting data. Thescore summarizer 106 combines the scores of each of the selectedmodels 106 and provides a combined score along with data such as the risk indicators. - The
models 106 and/or thescore summarizer 206 may be configured to provide the Issuer with customized, automatic, and dynamic calibration to control referral levels and case creation volumes. Such dynamic calibration may be based on the actual in-production score distributions so as to eliminate ad hoc or arbitrary Christmas or other seasonal calibration. Such dynamic calibration conveniently provides the issuer with the ability to modify score distributions during times of emergencies or unusual events, such as natural disasters. -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an example of amethod 154 of processing transaction data according to one embodiment of thefraud detection system 100. At ablock 302, thedata input manager 202 receives transaction data. Next at ablock 304, thedata input manager 202 receives, e.g., from I/O modules 220, data associated with transacting entity and TRAITS data, e.g., historical transactions, from one or more databases. Next at ablock 306, themodel expert selector 204 may identify clusters associated with the transacting entity based on the historical transactions. Proceeding to ablock 308, themodel expert selector 204 selects one or more of themodels 106, e.g., based on transaction data, transacting entity, clusters, and historical transactions. Next at ablock 310, thedata input manager 202 applies transaction data, transacting entity, and historical transactions to the selectedmodels 106 to generate scores and risk indicators. Moving to ablock 312, thescore summarizer 206 combines the model scores and reasons to generate a combined score and risk indicators. Thesystem 100 may repeat the acts associated with themethod 154 for multiple transactions, transactions authorizations, etc. in real time or in batch mode. -
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating in more detail an example of applying transaction data, transacting entity, and historical transactions to models to generate scores and risk indicators of theblock 310method 154.FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a committee scoring model for combining outputs ofseveral models 106. At ablock 332, the data input manager 202 (FIG. 3 ) applies a feature vector including one or more of transaction, transacting entity, cluster, and historical transactions to one ormore models 106 to generate scores and risk indicators. Next at ablock 334, themodels 106 each generate score and reason data based on the feature vector. Moving to ablock 336, thescore summarizer 206 applies mixture parameters to the score and reason data to generate a committee score for the group of themodels 106. -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating in more detail another example of applying transaction data, transacting entity, and historical transactions to models to generate scores and risk indicators of theblock 310 of themethod 154.FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a scoring model in which two or more of themodels 106 are used sequentially to generate score and risk indicator data. At ablock 342, the data input manager 202 (FIG. 3 ) applies a feature vector including one or more of transaction, transacting entity, cluster, and historical transactions to one ormore models 106 to generate scores and risk indicators. Next at ablock 344, one of themodels 106 generates score and reason data based on the feature vector. Moving to ablock 346, thescore summarizer 206 compares the score and reason data to one or more selected or predetermined criteria. Next at adecision block 348, if the comparison of the criteria with the score and reason data is indicative of applying an additional model, themethod 310 proceeds back to theblock 342 in which the feature vector (and/or additional or different data) are applied to another one of themodels 106. Returning to thedecision block 348, if the criteria are not indicative of applying another model, it proceeds to theblock 350 in which thescoring summarizer 206 generates score and reason data based on the data obtained at theblock 346. - In one embodiment, the committee score may be determined using one or more of the following models:
-
- an equal weight average:
-
- where N is the number of scores;
-
- a weighted average:
-
- where N is the number of scores and αi is estimated based on how predictive scores i is;
-
- a competitive committee:
-
- where siε (set of largest M scores); and
-
- a neural network-based committee score.
-
FIG. 7 is a functional block diagram illustrating portions of one embodiment of thefraud detection system 100. In particular,FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a process model for thesystem 100. Thedriver 102 comprises one or more processes or threads providing transaction data to thescorer 104. Thescorer 104 includes one ormore processes 402 for executing the data input manager 202 (FIG. 3 ). The data input manager processes 402 communicate via a sharedmemory 404 with one or more model execution processes 406 that execute themodels 106, one or more scoring cache processes 408 configured to updating and maintaining transaction scores, and one or more TRAITS I/O processes configured to communicate with theTRAITS database 118. Theprocesses processes - It is to be recognized that depending on the embodiment, certain acts or events of any of the methods described herein can be performed in a different sequence, may be added, merged, or left out all together (e.g., not all described acts or events are necessary for the practice of the method). Moreover, in certain embodiments, acts or events may be performed concurrently, e.g., through multi-threaded processing, interrupt processing, or multiple processors, rather than sequentially.
- Those of skill will recognize that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
- The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
- The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
- While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features of the invention as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. As will be recognized, the present invention may be embodied within a form that does not provide all of the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features may be used or practiced separately from others. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Claims (28)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/710,228 US20100145836A1 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2010-02-22 | System and method of detecting fraud |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US72340505P | 2005-10-04 | 2005-10-04 | |
US11/543,271 US7668769B2 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2006-10-03 | System and method of detecting fraud |
US12/710,228 US20100145836A1 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2010-02-22 | System and method of detecting fraud |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/543,271 Continuation US7668769B2 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2006-10-03 | System and method of detecting fraud |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100145836A1 true US20100145836A1 (en) | 2010-06-10 |
Family
ID=37684426
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/543,271 Active 2026-12-15 US7668769B2 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2006-10-03 | System and method of detecting fraud |
US12/710,228 Abandoned US20100145836A1 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2010-02-22 | System and method of detecting fraud |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/543,271 Active 2026-12-15 US7668769B2 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2006-10-03 | System and method of detecting fraud |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7668769B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007041709A1 (en) |
Cited By (111)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090129377A1 (en) * | 2007-11-19 | 2009-05-21 | Simon Chamberlain | Service for mapping ip addresses to user segments |
US20100106629A1 (en) * | 2006-06-13 | 2010-04-29 | First American Real Estate Tax Service, Llc. | Automatic delinquency item processing with customization for lenders |
US20100250469A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2010-09-30 | Megdal Myles G | Computer-Based Modeling of Spending Behaviors of Entities |
US7975299B1 (en) | 2007-04-05 | 2011-07-05 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Child identity monitor |
US7991689B1 (en) * | 2008-07-23 | 2011-08-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting bust out fraud using credit data |
US8024264B2 (en) | 2007-04-12 | 2011-09-20 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining thin-file records and determining thin-file risk levels |
US8036979B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2011-10-11 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US20120101930A1 (en) * | 2010-10-21 | 2012-04-26 | Caiwei Li | Software and Methods for Risk and Fraud Mitigation |
US20120109821A1 (en) * | 2010-10-29 | 2012-05-03 | Jesse Barbour | System, method and computer program product for real-time online transaction risk and fraud analytics and management |
US8214262B1 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2012-07-03 | Lower My Bills, Inc. | System and method of enhancing leads |
US8301574B2 (en) | 2007-09-17 | 2012-10-30 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Multimedia engagement study |
WO2012121983A3 (en) * | 2011-03-04 | 2012-12-06 | Brighterion, Inc. | Systems and methods for adaptive identification of sources of fraud |
US8355967B2 (en) | 2008-06-18 | 2013-01-15 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Personal finance integration system and method |
US8364588B2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2013-01-29 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for automated detection of never-pay data sets |
US8458074B2 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2013-06-04 | Corelogic Solutions, Llc. | Data analytics models for loan treatment |
US8600872B1 (en) * | 2007-07-27 | 2013-12-03 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | System and method for detecting account compromises |
US8606626B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2013-12-10 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a direct marketing campaign planning environment |
US8706587B1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2014-04-22 | Bank Of America Corporation | Statistical prioritization and detection of potential financial crime events |
US8781953B2 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2014-07-15 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card management system and method |
US20140214669A1 (en) * | 2013-01-29 | 2014-07-31 | Gravic, Inc. | Methods for Reducing the Merchant Chargeback Notification Time |
WO2014152419A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-25 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Transaction-history driven counterfeit fraud risk management solution |
US8914317B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2014-12-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting anomalies in real-time in multiple time series data with automated thresholding |
US8931058B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2015-01-06 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for permission arbitrated transaction services |
US9058627B1 (en) | 2002-05-30 | 2015-06-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Circular rotational interface for display of consumer credit information |
US20150262184A1 (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Two stage risk model building and evaluation |
US9147042B1 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2015-09-29 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
US9230283B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2016-01-05 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US9256904B1 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2016-02-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
US9336494B1 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2016-05-10 | Context Relevant, Inc. | Re-training a machine learning model |
US9342783B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2016-05-17 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
USD759689S1 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2016-06-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD759690S1 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2016-06-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD760256S1 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2016-06-28 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
US9406085B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-08-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting |
WO2016137443A1 (en) * | 2015-02-24 | 2016-09-01 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Using fuzzy inference to determine likelihood that financial account scenario is associated with illegal activity |
US9443268B1 (en) | 2013-08-16 | 2016-09-13 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Bill payment and reporting |
US9477737B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2016-10-25 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic access of multiple remote databases and synchronization of data based on user rules |
US9529851B1 (en) | 2013-12-02 | 2016-12-27 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Server architecture for electronic data quality processing |
US9536263B1 (en) | 2011-10-13 | 2017-01-03 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Debt services candidate locator |
US9542553B1 (en) | 2011-09-16 | 2017-01-10 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of identity protection and management |
US9558519B1 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2017-01-31 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Exposing reporting cycle information |
US9576030B1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2017-02-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Keeping up with the joneses |
US9595051B2 (en) | 2009-05-11 | 2017-03-14 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing anonymized user profile data |
US9607336B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2017-03-28 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Providing credit inquiry alerts |
US9633322B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-04-25 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Adjustment of knowledge-based authentication |
US9652802B1 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2017-05-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Indirect monitoring and reporting of a user's credit data |
US9654541B1 (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2017-05-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Aggregating user web browsing data |
US9679426B1 (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2017-06-13 | Bank Of America Corporation | Malfeasance detection based on identification of device signature |
US9690820B1 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2017-06-27 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Database system for triggering event notifications based on updates to database records |
US9697263B1 (en) | 2013-03-04 | 2017-07-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Consumer data request fulfillment system |
US20170195436A1 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2017-07-06 | Paypal, Inc. | Trust score determination using peer-to-peer interactions |
US20170195359A1 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2017-07-06 | Paypal, Inc. | Trust score investigation |
US9710852B1 (en) | 2002-05-30 | 2017-07-18 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit report timeline user interface |
US9721147B1 (en) | 2013-05-23 | 2017-08-01 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Digital identity |
US9830646B1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2017-11-28 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit score goals and alerts systems and methods |
US9853959B1 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2017-12-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Storage and maintenance of personal data |
US9870589B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-01-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit utilization tracking and reporting |
US9892457B1 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2018-02-13 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Providing credit data in search results |
US10075446B2 (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2018-09-11 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing an integrated identifier |
US10078868B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2018-09-18 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing an aggregation tool |
US10102570B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-10-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Account vulnerability alerts |
US10102536B1 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2018-10-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Micro-geographic aggregation system |
US10176233B1 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2019-01-08 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Lifescore |
CN109493065A (en) * | 2017-10-23 | 2019-03-19 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | A kind of fraudulent trading detection method of Behavior-based control incremental update |
US10242019B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | User behavior segmentation using latent topic detection |
US10255598B1 (en) | 2012-12-06 | 2019-04-09 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit card account data extraction |
US10262362B1 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2019-04-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automatic generation of code for attributes |
US10262364B2 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2019-04-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US10325314B1 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2019-06-18 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Payment reporting systems |
US10339527B1 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2019-07-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and architecture for electronic fraud detection |
US10373198B1 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2019-08-06 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of generating existing customer leads |
US10373131B2 (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2019-08-06 | Bank Of America Corporation | Recurring event analyses and data push |
US10373240B1 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2019-08-06 | Csidentity Corporation | Systems, methods and computer-program products for eligibility verification |
US10417704B2 (en) | 2010-11-02 | 2019-09-17 | Experian Technology Ltd. | Systems and methods of assisted strategy design |
US10453093B1 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2019-10-22 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of optimizing matching of leads |
US10586279B1 (en) | 2004-09-22 | 2020-03-10 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automated analysis of data to generate prospect notifications based on trigger events |
US10592982B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-03-17 | Csidentity Corporation | System and method for identifying related credit inquiries |
US10593004B2 (en) | 2011-02-18 | 2020-03-17 | Csidentity Corporation | System and methods for identifying compromised personally identifiable information on the internet |
US10614452B2 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2020-04-07 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for providing risk based decisioning service to a merchant |
US10621657B2 (en) | 2008-11-05 | 2020-04-14 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of credit information reporting |
US10664936B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-05-26 | Csidentity Corporation | Authentication systems and methods for on-demand products |
US10671749B2 (en) | 2018-09-05 | 2020-06-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Authenticated access and aggregation database platform |
US10678894B2 (en) | 2016-08-24 | 2020-06-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Disambiguation and authentication of device users |
US10685398B1 (en) | 2013-04-23 | 2020-06-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Presenting credit score information |
US10699028B1 (en) | 2017-09-28 | 2020-06-30 | Csidentity Corporation | Identity security architecture systems and methods |
US10735183B1 (en) | 2017-06-30 | 2020-08-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Symmetric encryption for private smart contracts among multiple parties in a private peer-to-peer network |
CN111566683A (en) * | 2017-11-08 | 2020-08-21 | 贝宝公司 | Robust and adaptive artificial intelligence modeling |
US10757154B1 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2020-08-25 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Real-time event-based notification system |
JP2020140454A (en) * | 2019-02-28 | 2020-09-03 | ゼネリックソリューション株式会社 | Sales support device and customer list generation device |
JP2020140686A (en) * | 2019-06-19 | 2020-09-03 | ゼネリックソリューション株式会社 | Sales support device and customer list generation device |
JP2020140687A (en) * | 2019-02-28 | 2020-09-03 | ゼネリックソリューション株式会社 | Sales support device, customer list generation device, business terminal, display program, and server device |
US10896472B1 (en) | 2017-11-14 | 2021-01-19 | Csidentity Corporation | Security and identity verification system and architecture |
US10911234B2 (en) | 2018-06-22 | 2021-02-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for a token gateway environment |
US10937090B1 (en) | 2009-01-06 | 2021-03-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Report existence monitoring |
US10956847B2 (en) | 2015-05-13 | 2021-03-23 | Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd. | Risk identification based on historical behavioral data |
US10963434B1 (en) | 2018-09-07 | 2021-03-30 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Data architecture for supporting multiple search models |
US11030562B1 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2021-06-08 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Pre-data breach monitoring |
US11106677B2 (en) | 2006-11-28 | 2021-08-31 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of removing duplicate user records |
US11151468B1 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2021-10-19 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Behavior analysis using distributed representations of event data |
US11157997B2 (en) | 2006-03-10 | 2021-10-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing data |
US11227001B2 (en) | 2017-01-31 | 2022-01-18 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Massive scale heterogeneous data ingestion and user resolution |
US11238656B1 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2022-02-01 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and method for an augmented reality experience via an artificial intelligence bot |
US11315179B1 (en) | 2018-11-16 | 2022-04-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for customized card recommendations |
WO2022150061A1 (en) * | 2021-01-08 | 2022-07-14 | Feedzai-Consultadoria e Inovação Tecnológica, S.A. | Generation of divergence distributions for automted data analysis |
US11531754B2 (en) | 2018-09-11 | 2022-12-20 | Mastercard Technologies Canada ULC | Transpiration of fraud detection rules to native language source code |
US11620403B2 (en) | 2019-01-11 | 2023-04-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for secure data aggregation and computation |
US20230177526A1 (en) * | 2017-07-27 | 2023-06-08 | Ripple Luxembourg S.A. | Electronic payment network security |
US11880377B1 (en) | 2021-03-26 | 2024-01-23 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for entity resolution |
US11941065B1 (en) | 2019-09-13 | 2024-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Single identifier platform for storing entity data |
US11954689B2 (en) * | 2019-02-19 | 2024-04-09 | Capital One Services, Llc | Updating a machine learning fraud model based on third party transaction information |
US11962681B2 (en) | 2023-04-04 | 2024-04-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Symmetric encryption for private smart contracts among multiple parties in a private peer-to-peer network |
Families Citing this family (243)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030222138A1 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2003-12-04 | Carole Oppenlander | System and method for authorizing transactions |
US8903859B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2014-12-02 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for generating hierarchical fused risk scores |
US8793131B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2014-07-29 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for determining fraud patterns and creating fraud behavioral models |
US8930261B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2015-01-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Method and system for generating a fraud risk score using telephony channel based audio and non-audio data |
US9113001B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2015-08-18 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for disambiguating call data to determine fraud |
US8924285B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2014-12-30 | Verint Americas Inc. | Building whitelists comprising voiceprints not associated with fraud and screening calls using a combination of a whitelist and blacklist |
US8073691B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2011-12-06 | Victrio, Inc. | Method and system for screening using voice data and metadata |
US20060248019A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-11-02 | Anthony Rajakumar | Method and system to detect fraud using voice data |
US8510215B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2013-08-13 | Victrio, Inc. | Method and system for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database |
US8639757B1 (en) | 2011-08-12 | 2014-01-28 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | User localization using friend location information |
US9571652B1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2017-02-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Enhanced diarization systems, media and methods of use |
US20120053939A9 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2012-03-01 | Victrio | Speaker verification-based fraud system for combined automated risk score with agent review and associated user interface |
US20070043577A1 (en) * | 2005-08-16 | 2007-02-22 | Sheldon Kasower | Apparatus and method of enabling a victim of identity theft to resolve and prevent fraud |
US20080243680A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2008-10-02 | Megdal Myles G | Method and apparatus for rating asset-backed securities |
US20080221971A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2008-09-11 | Megdal Myles G | Using commercial share of wallet to rate business prospects |
US20080221973A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2008-09-11 | Megdal Myles G | Using commercial share of wallet to rate investments |
US20080228540A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2008-09-18 | Megdal Myles G | Using commercial share of wallet to compile marketing company lists |
US20080228541A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2008-09-18 | Megdal Myles G | Using commercial share of wallet in private equity investments |
US8346638B2 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2013-01-01 | Capital One Financial Corporation | Systems and methods for processing transaction data to perform a merchant chargeback |
US8280805B1 (en) | 2006-01-10 | 2012-10-02 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented risk evaluation systems and methods |
US10127554B2 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2018-11-13 | Citibank, N.A. | Fraud early warning system and method |
US8567669B2 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2013-10-29 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Method and apparatus for a merchant profile builder |
US7912773B1 (en) * | 2006-03-24 | 2011-03-22 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented data storage systems and methods for use with predictive model systems |
US20070282617A1 (en) * | 2006-05-30 | 2007-12-06 | The Mitre Corporation | System, method, and computer program product for forensic auditing |
US8787633B2 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2014-07-22 | Purdue Research Foundation | System and method of organism identification |
US20090018940A1 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2009-01-15 | Liang Wang | Enhanced Fraud Detection With Terminal Transaction-Sequence Processing |
US8725597B2 (en) * | 2007-04-25 | 2014-05-13 | Google Inc. | Merchant scoring system and transactional database |
US20090089190A1 (en) * | 2007-09-27 | 2009-04-02 | Girulat Jr Rollin M | Systems and methods for monitoring financial activities of consumers |
US8666841B1 (en) | 2007-10-09 | 2014-03-04 | Convergys Information Management Group, Inc. | Fraud detection engine and method of using the same |
US10055698B2 (en) | 2008-02-11 | 2018-08-21 | Clearshift Corporation | Online work management system with job division support |
US10510025B2 (en) * | 2008-02-29 | 2019-12-17 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Adaptive fraud detection |
US8521631B2 (en) | 2008-05-29 | 2013-08-27 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented systems and methods for loan evaluation using a credit assessment framework |
US8041597B2 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2011-10-18 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Self-calibrating outlier model and adaptive cascade model for fraud detection |
US8805836B2 (en) * | 2008-08-29 | 2014-08-12 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Fuzzy tagging method and apparatus |
US9348499B2 (en) | 2008-09-15 | 2016-05-24 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Sharing objects that rely on local resources with outside servers |
US8762239B2 (en) * | 2009-01-12 | 2014-06-24 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Non-financial transactions in a financial transaction network |
US8924279B2 (en) | 2009-05-07 | 2014-12-30 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Risk assessment rule set application for fraud prevention |
US20100287093A1 (en) * | 2009-05-07 | 2010-11-11 | Haijian He | System and Method for Collections on Delinquent Financial Accounts |
US8204833B2 (en) * | 2009-05-27 | 2012-06-19 | Softroute Corporation | Method for fingerprinting and identifying internet users |
US8600873B2 (en) * | 2009-05-28 | 2013-12-03 | Visa International Service Association | Managed real-time transaction fraud analysis and decisioning |
US20100306029A1 (en) * | 2009-06-01 | 2010-12-02 | Ryan Jolley | Cardholder Clusters |
US20110004498A1 (en) * | 2009-07-01 | 2011-01-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and System for Identification By A Cardholder of Credit Card Fraud |
US20110016041A1 (en) * | 2009-07-14 | 2011-01-20 | Scragg Ernest M | Triggering Fraud Rules for Financial Transactions |
US20110016052A1 (en) * | 2009-07-16 | 2011-01-20 | Scragg Ernest M | Event Tracking and Velocity Fraud Rules for Financial Transactions |
US10438181B2 (en) * | 2009-07-22 | 2019-10-08 | Visa International Service Association | Authorizing a payment transaction using seasoned data |
US20110022518A1 (en) * | 2009-07-22 | 2011-01-27 | Ayman Hammad | Apparatus including data bearing medium for seasoning a device using data obtained from multiple transaction environments |
US9396465B2 (en) | 2009-07-22 | 2016-07-19 | Visa International Service Association | Apparatus including data bearing medium for reducing fraud in payment transactions using a black list |
US8620798B2 (en) * | 2009-09-11 | 2013-12-31 | Visa International Service Association | System and method using predicted consumer behavior to reduce use of transaction risk analysis and transaction denials |
US8924438B2 (en) * | 2009-11-12 | 2014-12-30 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Usage record enhancement and analysis |
US20110225076A1 (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2011-09-15 | Google Inc. | Method and system for detecting fraudulent internet merchants |
US20130117278A1 (en) * | 2010-03-12 | 2013-05-09 | David Martens | Methods, computer-accessible medium and systems for construction of and interference with networked data, for example, in a financial setting |
US8626663B2 (en) * | 2010-03-23 | 2014-01-07 | Visa International Service Association | Merchant fraud risk score |
US8725613B1 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2014-05-13 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for early account score and notification |
US8660954B2 (en) * | 2010-05-03 | 2014-02-25 | Fundacao CPQD—Centro de Pesquisa E Desenvolvimento em Telecommuncacoes | Fraud and events integrated management method and system |
US8296225B2 (en) * | 2010-05-20 | 2012-10-23 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Time-efficient and deterministic adaptive score calibration techniques for maintaining a predefined score distribution |
US20120158586A1 (en) * | 2010-12-16 | 2012-06-21 | Verizon Patent And Licensing, Inc. | Aggregating transaction information to detect fraud |
WO2012127023A1 (en) * | 2011-03-23 | 2012-09-27 | Detica Patent Limited | An automated fraud detection method and system |
AU2012242932A1 (en) | 2011-04-11 | 2013-10-31 | Visa International Service Association | Interoperable financial transactions via mobile devices |
US20120278249A1 (en) * | 2011-04-29 | 2012-11-01 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Generating an Identity Theft Score |
US9547693B1 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2017-01-17 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Periodic database search manager for multiple data sources |
US9514167B2 (en) * | 2011-08-01 | 2016-12-06 | Qatar Foundation | Behavior based record linkage |
US8732574B2 (en) | 2011-08-25 | 2014-05-20 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for parameterizing documents for automatic workflow generation |
WO2013082190A1 (en) * | 2011-11-28 | 2013-06-06 | Visa International Service Association | Transaction security graduated seasoning and risk shifting apparatuses, methods and systems |
US8478688B1 (en) * | 2011-12-19 | 2013-07-02 | Emc Corporation | Rapid transaction processing |
US10223710B2 (en) | 2013-01-04 | 2019-03-05 | Visa International Service Association | Wearable intelligent vision device apparatuses, methods and systems |
US8396935B1 (en) | 2012-04-10 | 2013-03-12 | Google Inc. | Discovering spam merchants using product feed similarity |
US10592978B1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2020-03-17 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Methods and apparatus for risk-based authentication between two servers on behalf of a user |
US8856923B1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2014-10-07 | Emc Corporation | Similarity-based fraud detection in adaptive authentication systems |
US9424612B1 (en) | 2012-08-02 | 2016-08-23 | Facebook, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing user reputations in social networking systems |
US20140040152A1 (en) * | 2012-08-02 | 2014-02-06 | Jing Fang | Methods and systems for fake account detection by clustering |
US9368116B2 (en) | 2012-09-07 | 2016-06-14 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Speaker separation in diarization |
US9348677B2 (en) | 2012-10-22 | 2016-05-24 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for batch evaluation programs |
US10531251B2 (en) | 2012-10-22 | 2020-01-07 | United States Cellular Corporation | Detecting and processing anomalous parameter data points by a mobile wireless data network forecasting system |
US9953321B2 (en) * | 2012-10-30 | 2018-04-24 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Card fraud detection utilizing real-time identification of merchant test sites |
US10134400B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2018-11-20 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using acoustic labeling |
WO2014111540A1 (en) | 2013-01-21 | 2014-07-24 | Ides Technologies Sa | System and method for characterizing financial messages |
US20140214504A1 (en) * | 2013-01-31 | 2014-07-31 | Sony Corporation | Virtual meeting lobby for waiting for online event |
CN103209174B (en) * | 2013-03-12 | 2016-03-30 | 华为技术有限公司 | A kind of data prevention method, Apparatus and system |
US10140664B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-11-27 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Resolving similar entities from a transaction database |
US8909656B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-12-09 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Filter chains with associated multipath views for exploring large data sets |
US8788405B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-07-22 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Generating data clusters with customizable analysis strategies |
US9965937B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-05-08 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | External malware data item clustering and analysis |
US8868486B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-10-21 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Time-sensitive cube |
US10275778B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2019-04-30 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic and interactive investigation based on automatic malfeasance clustering of related data in various data structures |
US9811830B2 (en) | 2013-07-03 | 2017-11-07 | Google Inc. | Method, medium, and system for online fraud prevention based on user physical location data |
US9460722B2 (en) | 2013-07-17 | 2016-10-04 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US9984706B2 (en) | 2013-08-01 | 2018-05-29 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Voice activity detection using a soft decision mechanism |
US8938686B1 (en) | 2013-10-03 | 2015-01-20 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing performance of an entity |
US9116975B2 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2015-08-25 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic and interactive simultaneous querying of multiple data stores |
US9105000B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2015-08-11 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US10579647B1 (en) | 2013-12-16 | 2020-03-03 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Methods and systems for analyzing entity performance |
US9747419B2 (en) | 2013-12-18 | 2017-08-29 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Privacy-compliant analysis of health by transaction data |
US20150178825A1 (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2015-06-25 | Citibank, N.A. | Methods and Apparatus for Quantitative Assessment of Behavior in Financial Entities and Transactions |
US10356032B2 (en) | 2013-12-26 | 2019-07-16 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for detecting confidential information emails |
US8832832B1 (en) | 2014-01-03 | 2014-09-09 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | IP reputation |
US20150039512A1 (en) * | 2014-08-08 | 2015-02-05 | Brighterion, Inc. | Real-time cross-channel fraud protection |
US9779407B2 (en) | 2014-08-08 | 2017-10-03 | Brighterion, Inc. | Healthcare fraud preemption |
US8935201B1 (en) | 2014-03-18 | 2015-01-13 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Determining and extracting changed data from a data source |
US9836580B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2017-12-05 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Provider portal |
US20150269346A1 (en) * | 2014-03-24 | 2015-09-24 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Mining transaction data for healthiness index |
US20180053114A1 (en) | 2014-10-23 | 2018-02-22 | Brighterion, Inc. | Artificial intelligence for context classifier |
US10896421B2 (en) | 2014-04-02 | 2021-01-19 | Brighterion, Inc. | Smart retail analytics and commercial messaging |
US9996837B2 (en) * | 2014-06-06 | 2018-06-12 | Visa International Service Association | Integration of secure protocols into a fraud detection system |
US9535974B1 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2017-01-03 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying key phrase clusters within documents |
US9619557B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2017-04-11 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for key phrase characterization of documents |
US10783520B2 (en) * | 2014-07-02 | 2020-09-22 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Fraud detection |
US9202249B1 (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2015-12-01 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Data item clustering and analysis |
US9256664B2 (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2016-02-09 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for news events detection and visualization |
US20150339673A1 (en) | 2014-10-28 | 2015-11-26 | Brighterion, Inc. | Method for detecting merchant data breaches with a computer network server |
US20150066771A1 (en) | 2014-08-08 | 2015-03-05 | Brighterion, Inc. | Fast access vectors in real-time behavioral profiling |
US20150032589A1 (en) | 2014-08-08 | 2015-01-29 | Brighterion, Inc. | Artificial intelligence fraud management solution |
US20160055427A1 (en) | 2014-10-15 | 2016-02-25 | Brighterion, Inc. | Method for providing data science, artificial intelligence and machine learning as-a-service |
US9280661B2 (en) | 2014-08-08 | 2016-03-08 | Brighterion, Inc. | System administrator behavior analysis |
US20210097589A1 (en) * | 2014-09-25 | 2021-04-01 | Tongji University | System and Method for Authenticating Network Transaction |
US10546099B2 (en) | 2014-10-15 | 2020-01-28 | Brighterion, Inc. | Method of personalizing, individualizing, and automating the management of healthcare fraud-waste-abuse to unique individual healthcare providers |
US20160071017A1 (en) | 2014-10-15 | 2016-03-10 | Brighterion, Inc. | Method of operating artificial intelligence machines to improve predictive model training and performance |
US20160063502A1 (en) | 2014-10-15 | 2016-03-03 | Brighterion, Inc. | Method for improving operating profits with better automated decision making with artificial intelligence |
US11080709B2 (en) | 2014-10-15 | 2021-08-03 | Brighterion, Inc. | Method of reducing financial losses in multiple payment channels upon a recognition of fraud first appearing in any one payment channel |
US20160078367A1 (en) | 2014-10-15 | 2016-03-17 | Brighterion, Inc. | Data clean-up method for improving predictive model training |
US10671980B2 (en) | 2014-10-20 | 2020-06-02 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for detecting potentially compromised payment cards |
US10290001B2 (en) | 2014-10-28 | 2019-05-14 | Brighterion, Inc. | Data breach detection |
US9043894B1 (en) | 2014-11-06 | 2015-05-26 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Malicious software detection in a computing system |
US10362133B1 (en) | 2014-12-22 | 2019-07-23 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Communication data processing architecture |
US9348920B1 (en) | 2014-12-22 | 2016-05-24 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Concept indexing among database of documents using machine learning techniques |
US10552994B2 (en) | 2014-12-22 | 2020-02-04 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and interactive user interfaces for dynamic retrieval, analysis, and triage of data items |
US9367872B1 (en) | 2014-12-22 | 2016-06-14 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic and interactive investigation of bad actor behavior based on automatic clustering of related data in various data structures |
US9817563B1 (en) | 2014-12-29 | 2017-11-14 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method of generating data points from one or more data stores of data items for chart creation and manipulation |
US11302426B1 (en) | 2015-01-02 | 2022-04-12 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Unified data interface and system |
US20160196615A1 (en) * | 2015-01-06 | 2016-07-07 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Cross-channel fraud detection |
US9875742B2 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2018-01-23 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Word-level blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US10103953B1 (en) | 2015-05-12 | 2018-10-16 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Methods and systems for analyzing entity performance |
US9665460B2 (en) | 2015-05-26 | 2017-05-30 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Detection of abnormal resource usage in a data center |
US10528948B2 (en) | 2015-05-29 | 2020-01-07 | Fair Isaac Corporation | False positive reduction in abnormality detection system models |
US9727869B1 (en) | 2015-06-05 | 2017-08-08 | Square, Inc. | Expedited point-of-sale merchant payments |
US10628834B1 (en) | 2015-06-16 | 2020-04-21 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Fraud lead detection system for efficiently processing database-stored data and automatically generating natural language explanatory information of system results for display in interactive user interfaces |
US9418337B1 (en) | 2015-07-21 | 2016-08-16 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and models for data analytics |
US9392008B1 (en) | 2015-07-23 | 2016-07-12 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying information related to payment card breaches |
US9454785B1 (en) | 2015-07-30 | 2016-09-27 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for holistic, data-driven investigation of bad actor behavior based on clustering and scoring of related data |
US10671915B2 (en) | 2015-07-31 | 2020-06-02 | Brighterion, Inc. | Method for calling for preemptive maintenance and for equipment failure prevention |
US9456000B1 (en) | 2015-08-06 | 2016-09-27 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems, methods, user interfaces, and computer-readable media for investigating potential malicious communications |
US10489391B1 (en) | 2015-08-17 | 2019-11-26 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for grouping and enriching data items accessed from one or more databases for presentation in a user interface |
US9485265B1 (en) | 2015-08-28 | 2016-11-01 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Malicious activity detection system capable of efficiently processing data accessed from databases and generating alerts for display in interactive user interfaces |
US10235720B2 (en) * | 2015-10-23 | 2019-03-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Merchant identification and expense item classification from a mobile device capture of an event receipt |
US10628826B2 (en) * | 2015-11-24 | 2020-04-21 | Vesta Corporation | Training and selection of multiple fraud detection models |
US10489786B2 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2019-11-26 | Vesta Corporation | Optimization of fraud detection model in real time |
US10510078B2 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2019-12-17 | Vesta Corporation | Anomaly detection in groups of transactions |
US10496992B2 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2019-12-03 | Vesta Corporation | Exclusion of nodes from link analysis |
US10223429B2 (en) | 2015-12-01 | 2019-03-05 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Entity data attribution using disparate data sets |
US9792020B1 (en) | 2015-12-30 | 2017-10-17 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems for collecting, aggregating, and storing data, generating interactive user interfaces for analyzing data, and generating alerts based upon collected data |
US10438209B2 (en) | 2016-02-10 | 2019-10-08 | Bank Of America Corporation | System for secure routing of data to various networks from a process data network |
GB2556314A (en) * | 2016-02-22 | 2018-05-30 | Niedermeier Lars | Financial data encoder for spiking neural networks |
US20210264458A1 (en) | 2016-03-25 | 2021-08-26 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Preempting or resolving fraud disputes relating to introductory offer expirations |
US20170316506A1 (en) * | 2016-04-27 | 2017-11-02 | Intuit Inc. | Detection of aggregation failures from correlation of change point across independent feeds |
US10062078B1 (en) * | 2016-06-14 | 2018-08-28 | Square, Inc. | Fraud detection and transaction review |
US10068235B1 (en) * | 2016-06-14 | 2018-09-04 | Square, Inc. | Regulating fraud probability models |
US10412099B2 (en) * | 2016-06-22 | 2019-09-10 | Paypal, Inc. | System security configurations based on assets associated with activities |
US11430070B1 (en) | 2017-07-31 | 2022-08-30 | Block, Inc. | Intelligent application of reserves to transactions |
US20180060839A1 (en) * | 2016-08-25 | 2018-03-01 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for predicting chargeback stages |
US10318630B1 (en) | 2016-11-21 | 2019-06-11 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Analysis of large bodies of textual data |
US9842338B1 (en) | 2016-11-21 | 2017-12-12 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System to identify vulnerable card readers |
US11250425B1 (en) | 2016-11-30 | 2022-02-15 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Generating a statistic using electronic transaction data |
US9886525B1 (en) | 2016-12-16 | 2018-02-06 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Data item aggregate probability analysis system |
US10620618B2 (en) | 2016-12-20 | 2020-04-14 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for determining relationships between defects |
US10728262B1 (en) | 2016-12-21 | 2020-07-28 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Context-aware network-based malicious activity warning systems |
US10721262B2 (en) | 2016-12-28 | 2020-07-21 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Resource-centric network cyber attack warning system |
US10325224B1 (en) | 2017-03-23 | 2019-06-18 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for selecting machine learning training data |
US10606866B1 (en) | 2017-03-30 | 2020-03-31 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Framework for exposing network activities |
US10984340B2 (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2021-04-20 | Intuit Inc. | Composite machine-learning system for label prediction and training data collection |
US10726501B1 (en) | 2017-04-25 | 2020-07-28 | Intuit Inc. | Method to use transaction, account, and company similarity clusters derived from the historic transaction data to match new transactions to accounts |
US10235461B2 (en) | 2017-05-02 | 2019-03-19 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Automated assistance for generating relevant and valuable search results for an entity of interest |
US10482382B2 (en) | 2017-05-09 | 2019-11-19 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing manufacturing failure rates |
US20180336555A1 (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2018-11-22 | Bank Of America Corporation | System for providing real time tracking of individual resource items to identify unauthorized resource transfers |
US10515518B2 (en) | 2017-05-18 | 2019-12-24 | Bank Of America Corporation | System for providing on-demand resource delivery to resource dispensers |
EP3416123A1 (en) | 2017-06-16 | 2018-12-19 | KBC Groep NV | System for identification of fraudulent transactions |
US10915900B1 (en) | 2017-06-26 | 2021-02-09 | Square, Inc. | Interchange action delay based on refund prediction |
US11216762B1 (en) | 2017-07-13 | 2022-01-04 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Automated risk visualization using customer-centric data analysis |
US11250517B1 (en) * | 2017-07-20 | 2022-02-15 | American Express Kabbage Inc. | System to automatically categorize |
US20180365065A1 (en) | 2017-07-31 | 2018-12-20 | Seematics Systems Ltd | System and method for estimating required processing resources for machine learning tasks |
US11494773B2 (en) * | 2017-09-22 | 2022-11-08 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for integrating cyber fraud intelligence and payment risk decisions |
US10956986B1 (en) | 2017-09-27 | 2021-03-23 | Intuit Inc. | System and method for automatic assistance of transaction sorting for use with a transaction management service |
SG10201708440TA (en) * | 2017-10-12 | 2019-05-30 | Mastercard International Inc | Computer system and computer-implemented method for processing payment card transactions |
CA2982930A1 (en) | 2017-10-18 | 2019-04-18 | Kari Saarenvirta | System and method for selecting promotional products for retail |
US11151573B2 (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2021-10-19 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Intelligent chargeback processing platform |
US10977653B2 (en) | 2017-12-15 | 2021-04-13 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for cross-border ATM fraud detection |
US10838987B1 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2020-11-17 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Adaptive and transparent entity screening |
US10769647B1 (en) * | 2017-12-21 | 2020-09-08 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Divergent trend detection and mitigation computing system |
CN110097191B (en) * | 2018-01-29 | 2024-02-27 | 松下电器(美国)知识产权公司 | Information processing method and information processing system |
US10586280B2 (en) | 2018-01-30 | 2020-03-10 | PointPredictive Inc. | Risk-based machine learning classsifier |
US10956075B2 (en) | 2018-02-02 | 2021-03-23 | Bank Of America Corporation | Blockchain architecture for optimizing system performance and data storage |
US11176101B2 (en) | 2018-02-05 | 2021-11-16 | Bank Of America Corporation | System and method for decentralized regulation and hierarchical control of blockchain architecture |
JP7020156B2 (en) * | 2018-02-06 | 2022-02-16 | オムロン株式会社 | Evaluation device, motion control device, evaluation method, and evaluation program |
US10776462B2 (en) * | 2018-03-01 | 2020-09-15 | Bank Of America Corporation | Dynamic hierarchical learning engine matrix |
US10805297B2 (en) | 2018-03-09 | 2020-10-13 | Bank Of America Corporation | Dynamic misappropriation decomposition vector assessment |
US10877654B1 (en) | 2018-04-03 | 2020-12-29 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Graphical user interfaces for optimizations |
US20190342297A1 (en) | 2018-05-01 | 2019-11-07 | Brighterion, Inc. | Securing internet-of-things with smart-agent technology |
US10754946B1 (en) | 2018-05-08 | 2020-08-25 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for implementing a machine learning approach to modeling entity behavior |
US11538128B2 (en) | 2018-05-14 | 2022-12-27 | Verint Americas Inc. | User interface for fraud alert management |
US11119630B1 (en) | 2018-06-19 | 2021-09-14 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Artificial intelligence assisted evaluations and user interface for same |
US11916917B2 (en) | 2018-07-31 | 2024-02-27 | Visa International Service Association | Pre-authorization access request screening |
US11182756B2 (en) * | 2018-08-21 | 2021-11-23 | Capital One Services, Llc | Categorization of non-contiguous transactions |
US11250501B2 (en) | 2018-08-21 | 2022-02-15 | Capital One Services, Llc | Scalable architecture for managing transactions |
US10482466B1 (en) | 2018-08-24 | 2019-11-19 | Capital One Services, Llc | Methods and arrangements to distribute a fraud detection model |
US11080707B2 (en) * | 2018-08-24 | 2021-08-03 | Capital One Services, Llc | Methods and arrangements to detect fraudulent transactions |
US20200118136A1 (en) * | 2018-10-16 | 2020-04-16 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for monitoring machine learning systems |
US10887452B2 (en) | 2018-10-25 | 2021-01-05 | Verint Americas Inc. | System architecture for fraud detection |
US10896430B1 (en) | 2018-11-21 | 2021-01-19 | Coupa Software Incorporated | Detecting supplier fraud from digital transactional data |
US11321632B2 (en) * | 2018-11-21 | 2022-05-03 | Paypal, Inc. | Machine learning based on post-transaction data |
US11836739B2 (en) * | 2018-12-05 | 2023-12-05 | Consilient, Inc. | Adaptive transaction processing system |
US11200607B2 (en) | 2019-01-28 | 2021-12-14 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Methods and apparatus for anomaly detections |
US20200286095A1 (en) * | 2019-03-07 | 2020-09-10 | Sony Corporation | Method, apparatus and computer programs for generating a machine-learning system and for classifying a transaction as either fraudulent or genuine |
US11748757B1 (en) | 2019-04-19 | 2023-09-05 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Network security systems and methods for detecting fraud |
US11610205B1 (en) | 2019-05-21 | 2023-03-21 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Machine learning based detection of fraudulent acquirer transactions |
US11803852B1 (en) | 2019-05-31 | 2023-10-31 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Detection and intervention for anomalous transactions |
IL288671B1 (en) | 2019-06-20 | 2024-02-01 | Verint Americas Inc | Systems and methods for authentication and fraud detection |
US11218494B2 (en) * | 2019-07-26 | 2022-01-04 | Raise Marketplace, Llc | Predictive fraud analysis system for data transactions |
US20210065183A1 (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2021-03-04 | Bank Of America Corporation | Coercion-resistant digital transaction architecture with feedback-based propagation |
US11188927B2 (en) * | 2019-10-16 | 2021-11-30 | Capital One Services, Llc | Initiating cardswap based on analytic model indicating third party card reissuance |
CN114787846A (en) * | 2019-10-31 | 2022-07-22 | 维萨国际服务协会 | Method and system for assessing reputation of merchant |
US11475468B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2022-10-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for unsupervised abstraction of sensitive data for detection model sharing across entities |
US11488172B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2022-11-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent agent to simulate financial transactions |
US11461793B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2022-10-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Identification of behavioral pattern of simulated transaction data |
US11556734B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2023-01-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for unsupervised abstraction of sensitive data for realistic modeling |
US11475467B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2022-10-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for unsupervised abstraction of sensitive data for realistic modeling |
US11842357B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2023-12-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent agent to simulate customer data |
US11494835B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2022-11-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent agent to simulate financial transactions |
US11461728B2 (en) * | 2019-11-05 | 2022-10-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for unsupervised abstraction of sensitive data for consortium sharing |
US11488185B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2022-11-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for unsupervised abstraction of sensitive data for consortium sharing |
US11599884B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2023-03-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Identification of behavioral pattern of simulated transaction data |
US11676218B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2023-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent agent to simulate customer data |
US11868453B2 (en) | 2019-11-07 | 2024-01-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for customer authentication based on audio-of-interest |
US11797868B1 (en) * | 2019-12-05 | 2023-10-24 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Computer-based systems having computer engines and data structures configured for machine learning data insight prediction and methods of use thereof |
US11470143B2 (en) | 2020-01-23 | 2022-10-11 | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | Systems and methods for real-time transfer failure detection and notification |
US11887138B2 (en) | 2020-03-03 | 2024-01-30 | Daisy Intelligence Corporation | System and method for retail price optimization |
US11687936B2 (en) * | 2020-04-27 | 2023-06-27 | SOURCE Ltd. | System and method for managing chargeback risk |
US11451562B2 (en) * | 2020-05-01 | 2022-09-20 | Mastercard Technologies Canada ULC | Recommending signals to monitor in a fraud prevention application |
CN113723950B (en) * | 2020-05-21 | 2024-03-05 | 同济大学 | Fraud transaction identification method, system and device based on dynamic weighted information entropy |
CN114282924A (en) * | 2020-09-28 | 2022-04-05 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Account identification method, device, equipment and storage medium |
EP3975092A1 (en) * | 2020-09-29 | 2022-03-30 | MasterCard International Incorporated | Method and system for detecting fraudulent transactions |
US11783338B2 (en) | 2021-01-22 | 2023-10-10 | Daisy Intelligence Corporation | Systems and methods for outlier detection of transactions |
US11094135B1 (en) | 2021-03-05 | 2021-08-17 | Flyreel, Inc. | Automated measurement of interior spaces through guided modeling of dimensions |
US20220309507A1 (en) * | 2021-03-24 | 2022-09-29 | Paypal, Inc. | Machine learning system for automated recommendations of evidence during dispute resolution |
US11943259B2 (en) * | 2021-09-22 | 2024-03-26 | Bank Of America Corporation | System and method for security management of application information |
WO2023128865A2 (en) * | 2021-12-29 | 2023-07-06 | Gp Network Asia Pte. Ltd. | A communications server, a method, a user device, and system |
Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3603143A (en) * | 1968-05-25 | 1971-09-07 | Licentia Gmbh | Apparatus for testing the vane anchorage of turbine vanes |
US3690160A (en) * | 1969-04-09 | 1972-09-12 | Licentia Gmbh | Apparatus for testing the blade anchorage of turbine blades |
US5819226A (en) * | 1992-09-08 | 1998-10-06 | Hnc Software Inc. | Fraud detection using predictive modeling |
US6134532A (en) * | 1997-11-14 | 2000-10-17 | Aptex Software, Inc. | System and method for optimal adaptive matching of users to most relevant entity and information in real-time |
US6250166B1 (en) * | 1999-06-04 | 2001-06-26 | General Electric Company | Simulated dovetail testing |
US6430539B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2002-08-06 | Hnc Software | Predictive modeling of consumer financial behavior |
US20020133371A1 (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2002-09-19 | Cole James A. | Automated mortgage fraud prevention method and system |
US20020133721A1 (en) * | 2001-03-15 | 2002-09-19 | Akli Adjaoute | Systems and methods for dynamic detection and prevention of electronic fraud and network intrusion |
US20020194119A1 (en) * | 2001-05-30 | 2002-12-19 | William Wright | Method and apparatus for evaluating fraud risk in an electronic commerce transaction |
US20030093366A1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-05-15 | Halper Steven C. | Automated loan risk assessment system and method |
US6728695B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2004-04-27 | Burning Glass Technologies, Llc | Method and apparatus for making predictions about entities represented in documents |
US20050108025A1 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2005-05-19 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method for mortgage fraud detection |
US20050252304A1 (en) * | 2004-05-17 | 2005-11-17 | Woodward Colin J | Apparatus and method for fatigue testing |
US20050276401A1 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2005-12-15 | Madill Robert P Jr | Systems and methods for assessing the potential for fraud in business transactions |
US7933762B2 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2011-04-26 | Fortelligent, Inc. | Predictive model generation |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4734564A (en) | 1985-05-02 | 1988-03-29 | Visa International Service Association | Transaction system with off-line risk assessment |
US5058179A (en) | 1990-01-31 | 1991-10-15 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Hierarchical constrained automatic learning network for character recognition |
US5177342A (en) | 1990-11-09 | 1993-01-05 | Visa International Service Association | Transaction approval system |
US7263506B2 (en) | 2000-04-06 | 2007-08-28 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Identification and management of fraudulent credit/debit card purchases at merchant ecommerce sites |
EP1450321A1 (en) | 2003-02-21 | 2004-08-25 | Swisscom Mobile AG | Method and system for detecting possible fraud in paying transactions |
-
2006
- 2006-10-03 US US11/543,271 patent/US7668769B2/en active Active
- 2006-10-03 WO PCT/US2006/039132 patent/WO2007041709A1/en active Application Filing
-
2010
- 2010-02-22 US US12/710,228 patent/US20100145836A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3603143A (en) * | 1968-05-25 | 1971-09-07 | Licentia Gmbh | Apparatus for testing the vane anchorage of turbine vanes |
US3690160A (en) * | 1969-04-09 | 1972-09-12 | Licentia Gmbh | Apparatus for testing the blade anchorage of turbine blades |
US5819226A (en) * | 1992-09-08 | 1998-10-06 | Hnc Software Inc. | Fraud detection using predictive modeling |
US6330546B1 (en) * | 1992-09-08 | 2001-12-11 | Hnc Software, Inc. | Risk determination and management using predictive modeling and transaction profiles for individual transacting entities |
US6134532A (en) * | 1997-11-14 | 2000-10-17 | Aptex Software, Inc. | System and method for optimal adaptive matching of users to most relevant entity and information in real-time |
US6839682B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2005-01-04 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Predictive modeling of consumer financial behavior using supervised segmentation and nearest-neighbor matching |
US6430539B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2002-08-06 | Hnc Software | Predictive modeling of consumer financial behavior |
US7165037B2 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2007-01-16 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Predictive modeling of consumer financial behavior using supervised segmentation and nearest-neighbor matching |
US6250166B1 (en) * | 1999-06-04 | 2001-06-26 | General Electric Company | Simulated dovetail testing |
US6728695B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2004-04-27 | Burning Glass Technologies, Llc | Method and apparatus for making predictions about entities represented in documents |
US20020133371A1 (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2002-09-19 | Cole James A. | Automated mortgage fraud prevention method and system |
US20020133721A1 (en) * | 2001-03-15 | 2002-09-19 | Akli Adjaoute | Systems and methods for dynamic detection and prevention of electronic fraud and network intrusion |
US20020194119A1 (en) * | 2001-05-30 | 2002-12-19 | William Wright | Method and apparatus for evaluating fraud risk in an electronic commerce transaction |
US20030093366A1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-05-15 | Halper Steven C. | Automated loan risk assessment system and method |
US20050276401A1 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2005-12-15 | Madill Robert P Jr | Systems and methods for assessing the potential for fraud in business transactions |
US20050108025A1 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2005-05-19 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method for mortgage fraud detection |
US7933762B2 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2011-04-26 | Fortelligent, Inc. | Predictive model generation |
US20050252304A1 (en) * | 2004-05-17 | 2005-11-17 | Woodward Colin J | Apparatus and method for fatigue testing |
Cited By (258)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9710852B1 (en) | 2002-05-30 | 2017-07-18 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit report timeline user interface |
US9058627B1 (en) | 2002-05-30 | 2015-06-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Circular rotational interface for display of consumer credit information |
US9400589B1 (en) | 2002-05-30 | 2016-07-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Circular rotational interface for display of consumer credit information |
US8781953B2 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2014-07-15 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card management system and method |
US10586279B1 (en) | 2004-09-22 | 2020-03-10 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automated analysis of data to generate prospect notifications based on trigger events |
US11861756B1 (en) | 2004-09-22 | 2024-01-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automated analysis of data to generate prospect notifications based on trigger events |
US11373261B1 (en) | 2004-09-22 | 2022-06-28 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automated analysis of data to generate prospect notifications based on trigger events |
US11562457B2 (en) | 2004-09-22 | 2023-01-24 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automated analysis of data to generate prospect notifications based on trigger events |
US20100250469A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2010-09-30 | Megdal Myles G | Computer-Based Modeling of Spending Behaviors of Entities |
US11157997B2 (en) | 2006-03-10 | 2021-10-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing data |
US8224745B2 (en) | 2006-06-13 | 2012-07-17 | Corelogic Tax Services, Llc | Automatic delinquency item processing with customization for lenders |
US20100106629A1 (en) * | 2006-06-13 | 2010-04-29 | First American Real Estate Tax Service, Llc. | Automatic delinquency item processing with customization for lenders |
US11631129B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2023-04-18 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US8626646B2 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2014-01-07 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US10121194B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2018-11-06 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US9563916B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2017-02-07 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US8315943B2 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2012-11-20 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US8036979B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2011-10-11 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US10963961B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2021-03-30 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US11954731B2 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2024-04-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US11106677B2 (en) | 2006-11-28 | 2021-08-31 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of removing duplicate user records |
US8214262B1 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2012-07-03 | Lower My Bills, Inc. | System and method of enhancing leads |
US10255610B1 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2019-04-09 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of enhancing leads |
US10977675B2 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2021-04-13 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of enhancing leads |
US10891691B2 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2021-01-12 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing an aggregation tool |
US8606626B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2013-12-10 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a direct marketing campaign planning environment |
US11443373B2 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2022-09-13 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing an aggregation tool |
US10692105B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2020-06-23 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a direct marketing campaign planning environment |
US9916596B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2018-03-13 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a direct marketing campaign planning environment |
US11803873B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2023-10-31 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a direct marketing campaign planning environment |
US10078868B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2018-09-18 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing an aggregation tool |
US11176570B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2021-11-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a direct marketing campaign planning environment |
US9508092B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2016-11-29 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a direct marketing campaign planning environment |
US10402901B2 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2019-09-03 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing an aggregation tool |
US10650449B2 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2020-05-12 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing an aggregation tool |
US10311466B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2019-06-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a direct marketing campaign planning environment |
US11908005B2 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2024-02-20 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing an aggregation tool |
US11308170B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2022-04-19 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
US10437895B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2019-10-08 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
US9342783B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2016-05-17 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
US7975299B1 (en) | 2007-04-05 | 2011-07-05 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Child identity monitor |
US8024264B2 (en) | 2007-04-12 | 2011-09-20 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining thin-file records and determining thin-file risk levels |
US8738515B2 (en) | 2007-04-12 | 2014-05-27 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining thin-file records and determining thin-file risk levels |
US8271378B2 (en) | 2007-04-12 | 2012-09-18 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining thin-file records and determining thin-file risk levels |
US9251541B2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2016-02-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for automated detection of never-pay data sets |
US8364588B2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2013-01-29 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for automated detection of never-pay data sets |
US8600872B1 (en) * | 2007-07-27 | 2013-12-03 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | System and method for detecting account compromises |
US8612340B1 (en) * | 2007-07-27 | 2013-12-17 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | System and method for detecting account compromises |
US8301574B2 (en) | 2007-09-17 | 2012-10-30 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Multimedia engagement study |
US9690820B1 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2017-06-27 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Database system for triggering event notifications based on updates to database records |
US11347715B2 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2022-05-31 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Database system for triggering event notifications based on updates to database records |
US11954089B2 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2024-04-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Database system for triggering event notifications based on updates to database records |
US10528545B1 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2020-01-07 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Database system for triggering event notifications based on updates to database records |
US9058340B1 (en) | 2007-11-19 | 2015-06-16 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Service for associating network users with profiles |
US8533322B2 (en) | 2007-11-19 | 2013-09-10 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Service for associating network users with profiles |
US20090129377A1 (en) * | 2007-11-19 | 2009-05-21 | Simon Chamberlain | Service for mapping ip addresses to user segments |
US7996521B2 (en) | 2007-11-19 | 2011-08-09 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Service for mapping IP addresses to user segments |
US11379916B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2022-07-05 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US10614519B2 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2020-04-07 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US10262364B2 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2019-04-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US9542682B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2017-01-10 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US9767513B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2017-09-19 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US10878499B2 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2020-12-29 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US9230283B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2016-01-05 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US8706587B1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2014-04-22 | Bank Of America Corporation | Statistical prioritization and detection of potential financial crime events |
US11704693B2 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2023-07-18 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of generating existing customer leads |
US10565617B2 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2020-02-18 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of generating existing customer leads |
US10373198B1 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2019-08-06 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of generating existing customer leads |
US8355967B2 (en) | 2008-06-18 | 2013-01-15 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Personal finance integration system and method |
US10075446B2 (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2018-09-11 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing an integrated identifier |
US11157872B2 (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2021-10-26 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Llc | Systems and methods for providing an integrated identifier |
US11769112B2 (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2023-09-26 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Llc | Systems and methods for providing an integrated identifier |
US8001042B1 (en) * | 2008-07-23 | 2011-08-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting bust out fraud using credit data |
US20120158574A1 (en) * | 2008-07-23 | 2012-06-21 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting bust out fraud using credit data |
US7991689B1 (en) * | 2008-07-23 | 2011-08-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting bust out fraud using credit data |
US10650448B1 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2020-05-12 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
US9256904B1 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2016-02-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
US11004147B1 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2021-05-11 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
US10115155B1 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2018-10-30 | Experian Information Solution, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
US9792648B1 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2017-10-17 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
US11636540B1 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2023-04-25 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
US9489694B2 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2016-11-08 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
US10621657B2 (en) | 2008-11-05 | 2020-04-14 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of credit information reporting |
US10937090B1 (en) | 2009-01-06 | 2021-03-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Report existence monitoring |
US9595051B2 (en) | 2009-05-11 | 2017-03-14 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing anonymized user profile data |
US10909617B2 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2021-02-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Indirect monitoring and reporting of a user's credit data |
US9652802B1 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2017-05-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Indirect monitoring and reporting of a user's credit data |
US10453093B1 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2019-10-22 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of optimizing matching of leads |
US8458074B2 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2013-06-04 | Corelogic Solutions, Llc. | Data analytics models for loan treatment |
US8775300B2 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2014-07-08 | Corelogic Solutions, Llc | Data analytics models for loan treatment |
US11430009B2 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2022-08-30 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of optimizing matching of leads |
US8931058B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2015-01-06 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for permission arbitrated transaction services |
US8666861B2 (en) * | 2010-10-21 | 2014-03-04 | Visa International Service Association | Software and methods for risk and fraud mitigation |
US20120101930A1 (en) * | 2010-10-21 | 2012-04-26 | Caiwei Li | Software and Methods for Risk and Fraud Mitigation |
US20120109821A1 (en) * | 2010-10-29 | 2012-05-03 | Jesse Barbour | System, method and computer program product for real-time online transaction risk and fraud analytics and management |
WO2012058066A1 (en) * | 2010-10-29 | 2012-05-03 | Q2 Software, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for real-time online transaction risk and fraud analytics and management |
US20220188918A1 (en) * | 2010-10-29 | 2022-06-16 | Q2 Software, Inc. | System and method for network security based on a user's computer network activity data |
US10417704B2 (en) | 2010-11-02 | 2019-09-17 | Experian Technology Ltd. | Systems and methods of assisted strategy design |
US9147042B1 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2015-09-29 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
US9684905B1 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2017-06-20 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
US10593004B2 (en) | 2011-02-18 | 2020-03-17 | Csidentity Corporation | System and methods for identifying compromised personally identifiable information on the internet |
WO2012121983A3 (en) * | 2011-03-04 | 2012-12-06 | Brighterion, Inc. | Systems and methods for adaptive identification of sources of fraud |
US8458069B2 (en) | 2011-03-04 | 2013-06-04 | Brighterion, Inc. | Systems and methods for adaptive identification of sources of fraud |
US11861691B1 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2024-01-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Exposing reporting cycle information |
US9558519B1 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2017-01-31 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Exposing reporting cycle information |
US10719873B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2020-07-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Providing credit inquiry alerts |
US10685336B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2020-06-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Authentication alerts |
US9607336B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2017-03-28 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Providing credit inquiry alerts |
US11954655B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2024-04-09 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Authentication alerts |
US11232413B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2022-01-25 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Authentication alerts |
US10115079B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2018-10-30 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Authentication alerts |
US9665854B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2017-05-30 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Authentication alerts |
US10798197B2 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2020-10-06 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Lifescore |
US10176233B1 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2019-01-08 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Lifescore |
US11665253B1 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2023-05-30 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | LifeScore |
US11087022B2 (en) | 2011-09-16 | 2021-08-10 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of identity protection and management |
US9542553B1 (en) | 2011-09-16 | 2017-01-10 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of identity protection and management |
US11790112B1 (en) | 2011-09-16 | 2023-10-17 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of identity protection and management |
US10642999B2 (en) | 2011-09-16 | 2020-05-05 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of identity protection and management |
US10061936B1 (en) | 2011-09-16 | 2018-08-28 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of identity protection and management |
US11200620B2 (en) | 2011-10-13 | 2021-12-14 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Debt services candidate locator |
US9536263B1 (en) | 2011-10-13 | 2017-01-03 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Debt services candidate locator |
US9972048B1 (en) | 2011-10-13 | 2018-05-15 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Debt services candidate locator |
US11030562B1 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2021-06-08 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Pre-data breach monitoring |
US11568348B1 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2023-01-31 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Pre-data breach monitoring |
US11356430B1 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2022-06-07 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Storage and maintenance of personal data |
US9853959B1 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2017-12-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Storage and maintenance of personal data |
US8924333B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2014-12-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting anomalies in real-time in multiple time series data with automated thresholding |
US8914317B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2014-12-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting anomalies in real-time in multiple time series data with automated thresholding |
US9336494B1 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2016-05-10 | Context Relevant, Inc. | Re-training a machine learning model |
US11863310B1 (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2024-01-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Aggregating user web browsing data |
US10277659B1 (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2019-04-30 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Aggregating user web browsing data |
US9654541B1 (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2017-05-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Aggregating user web browsing data |
US11012491B1 (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2021-05-18 | ConsumerInfor.com, Inc. | Aggregating user web browsing data |
US10366450B1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2019-07-30 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit data analysis |
US11651426B1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2023-05-16 | Consumerlnfo.com, Inc. | Credit score goals and alerts systems and methods |
US9830646B1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2017-11-28 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit score goals and alerts systems and methods |
US11308551B1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2022-04-19 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit data analysis |
US11132742B1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2021-09-28 | Consumerlnfo.com, Inc. | Credit score goals and alerts systems and methods |
US10963959B2 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2021-03-30 | Consumerinfo. Com, Inc. | Presentation of credit score factors |
US10255598B1 (en) | 2012-12-06 | 2019-04-09 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit card account data extraction |
US20140214669A1 (en) * | 2013-01-29 | 2014-07-31 | Gravic, Inc. | Methods for Reducing the Merchant Chargeback Notification Time |
US9697263B1 (en) | 2013-03-04 | 2017-07-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Consumer data request fulfillment system |
US11514519B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2022-11-29 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting |
US10929925B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2021-02-23 | Consumerlnfo.com, Inc. | System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting |
US11113759B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2021-09-07 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Account vulnerability alerts |
US10592982B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-03-17 | Csidentity Corporation | System and method for identifying related credit inquiries |
US9697568B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-07-04 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting |
US10043214B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-08-07 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting |
US9870589B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-01-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit utilization tracking and reporting |
US9406085B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-08-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting |
US10102570B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-10-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Account vulnerability alerts |
US11769200B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2023-09-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Account vulnerability alerts |
US10664936B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-05-26 | Csidentity Corporation | Authentication systems and methods for on-demand products |
US9747644B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-08-29 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Transaction-history driven counterfeit fraud risk management solution |
US11775979B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2023-10-03 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Adjustment of knowledge-based authentication |
US10460397B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2019-10-29 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Transaction-history driven counterfeit fraud risk management solution |
US11164271B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-11-02 | Csidentity Corporation | Systems and methods of delayed authentication and billing for on-demand products |
US11288677B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2022-03-29 | Consumerlnfo.com, Inc. | Adjustment of knowledge-based authentication |
US9633322B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-04-25 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Adjustment of knowledge-based authentication |
US10740762B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-08-11 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Adjustment of knowledge-based authentication |
US10169761B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2019-01-01 | ConsumerInfo.com Inc. | Adjustment of knowledge-based authentication |
WO2014152419A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-25 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Transaction-history driven counterfeit fraud risk management solution |
US11790473B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2023-10-17 | Csidentity Corporation | Systems and methods of delayed authentication and billing for on-demand products |
US10685398B1 (en) | 2013-04-23 | 2020-06-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Presenting credit score information |
US11120519B2 (en) | 2013-05-23 | 2021-09-14 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Digital identity |
US9721147B1 (en) | 2013-05-23 | 2017-08-01 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Digital identity |
US11803929B1 (en) | 2013-05-23 | 2023-10-31 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Digital identity |
US10453159B2 (en) | 2013-05-23 | 2019-10-22 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Digital identity |
US9443268B1 (en) | 2013-08-16 | 2016-09-13 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Bill payment and reporting |
US10580025B2 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2020-03-03 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Micro-geographic aggregation system |
US10102536B1 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2018-10-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Micro-geographic aggregation system |
US10269065B1 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2019-04-23 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Bill payment and reporting |
US10325314B1 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2019-06-18 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Payment reporting systems |
US10025842B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2018-07-17 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic access of multiple remote databases and synchronization of data based on user rules |
US9477737B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2016-10-25 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic access of multiple remote databases and synchronization of data based on user rules |
US11461364B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2022-10-04 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic access of multiple remote databases and synchronization of data based on user rules |
US10628448B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2020-04-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic access of multiple remote databases and synchronization of data based on user rules |
US9529851B1 (en) | 2013-12-02 | 2016-12-27 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Server architecture for electronic data quality processing |
US10262362B1 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2019-04-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automatic generation of code for attributes |
US11847693B1 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2023-12-19 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automatic generation of code for attributes |
US11107158B1 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2021-08-31 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automatic generation of code for attributes |
US20150262184A1 (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Two stage risk model building and evaluation |
USD760256S1 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2016-06-28 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD759689S1 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2016-06-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD759690S1 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2016-06-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
US10482532B1 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2019-11-19 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Providing credit data in search results |
US9892457B1 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2018-02-13 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Providing credit data in search results |
US11074641B1 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2021-07-27 | Csidentity Corporation | Systems, methods and computer-program products for eligibility verification |
US11587150B1 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2023-02-21 | Csidentity Corporation | Systems and methods for eligibility verification |
US10373240B1 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2019-08-06 | Csidentity Corporation | Systems, methods and computer-program products for eligibility verification |
US9576030B1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2017-02-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Keeping up with the joneses |
US10936629B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2021-03-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Keeping up with the joneses |
US11620314B1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2023-04-04 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | User rating based on comparing groups |
US10019508B1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2018-07-10 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Keeping up with the joneses |
US11501286B2 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2022-11-15 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for providing fraud indicator data within an authentication protocol |
US10657521B2 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2020-05-19 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for determining fraudulent transactions using digital wallet data |
US10614452B2 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2020-04-07 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for providing risk based decisioning service to a merchant |
US11941635B1 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2024-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and architecture for electronic fraud detection |
US10339527B1 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2019-07-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and architecture for electronic fraud detection |
US10990979B1 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2021-04-27 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and architecture for electronic fraud detection |
US11436606B1 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2022-09-06 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and architecture for electronic fraud detection |
US10445152B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-10-15 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for dynamic report generation based on automatic modeling of complex data structures |
US10242019B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | User behavior segmentation using latent topic detection |
US11010345B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2021-05-18 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | User behavior segmentation using latent topic detection |
WO2016137443A1 (en) * | 2015-02-24 | 2016-09-01 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Using fuzzy inference to determine likelihood that financial account scenario is associated with illegal activity |
US10909540B2 (en) | 2015-02-24 | 2021-02-02 | Micro Focus Llc | Using fuzzy inference to determine likelihood that financial account scenario is associated with illegal activity |
US10956847B2 (en) | 2015-05-13 | 2021-03-23 | Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd. | Risk identification based on historical behavioral data |
US11151468B1 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2021-10-19 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Behavior analysis using distributed representations of event data |
US11159593B1 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2021-10-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Real-time event-based notification system |
US10757154B1 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2020-08-25 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Real-time event-based notification system |
US11729230B1 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2023-08-15 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Real-time event-based notification system |
US20170195436A1 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2017-07-06 | Paypal, Inc. | Trust score determination using peer-to-peer interactions |
US10127501B2 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2018-11-13 | Paypal, Inc. | Trust score determination using peer-to-peer interactions |
US20170195359A1 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2017-07-06 | Paypal, Inc. | Trust score investigation |
US10200394B2 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2019-02-05 | Paypal, Inc. | Trust score investigation |
US20200012413A1 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2020-01-09 | Paypal, Inc. | Trust Score Investigation |
US10809897B2 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2020-10-20 | Paypal, Inc. | Trust score investigation |
US11644958B2 (en) | 2015-12-30 | 2023-05-09 | Paypal, Inc. | Trust score investigation |
US10373131B2 (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2019-08-06 | Bank Of America Corporation | Recurring event analyses and data push |
US9679426B1 (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2017-06-13 | Bank Of America Corporation | Malfeasance detection based on identification of device signature |
US11100478B2 (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2021-08-24 | Bank Of America Corporation | Recurring event analyses and data push |
US11550886B2 (en) | 2016-08-24 | 2023-01-10 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Disambiguation and authentication of device users |
US10678894B2 (en) | 2016-08-24 | 2020-06-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Disambiguation and authentication of device users |
US11227001B2 (en) | 2017-01-31 | 2022-01-18 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Massive scale heterogeneous data ingestion and user resolution |
US11681733B2 (en) | 2017-01-31 | 2023-06-20 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Massive scale heterogeneous data ingestion and user resolution |
US10735183B1 (en) | 2017-06-30 | 2020-08-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Symmetric encryption for private smart contracts among multiple parties in a private peer-to-peer network |
US11652607B1 (en) | 2017-06-30 | 2023-05-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Symmetric encryption for private smart contracts among multiple parties in a private peer-to-peer network |
US20230177526A1 (en) * | 2017-07-27 | 2023-06-08 | Ripple Luxembourg S.A. | Electronic payment network security |
US11580259B1 (en) | 2017-09-28 | 2023-02-14 | Csidentity Corporation | Identity security architecture systems and methods |
US11157650B1 (en) | 2017-09-28 | 2021-10-26 | Csidentity Corporation | Identity security architecture systems and methods |
US10699028B1 (en) | 2017-09-28 | 2020-06-30 | Csidentity Corporation | Identity security architecture systems and methods |
CN109493065A (en) * | 2017-10-23 | 2019-03-19 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | A kind of fraudulent trading detection method of Behavior-based control incremental update |
CN111566683A (en) * | 2017-11-08 | 2020-08-21 | 贝宝公司 | Robust and adaptive artificial intelligence modeling |
US10896472B1 (en) | 2017-11-14 | 2021-01-19 | Csidentity Corporation | Security and identity verification system and architecture |
US11588639B2 (en) | 2018-06-22 | 2023-02-21 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for a token gateway environment |
US10911234B2 (en) | 2018-06-22 | 2021-02-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for a token gateway environment |
US10880313B2 (en) | 2018-09-05 | 2020-12-29 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Database platform for realtime updating of user data from third party sources |
US11399029B2 (en) | 2018-09-05 | 2022-07-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Database platform for realtime updating of user data from third party sources |
US10671749B2 (en) | 2018-09-05 | 2020-06-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Authenticated access and aggregation database platform |
US11265324B2 (en) | 2018-09-05 | 2022-03-01 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | User permissions for access to secure data at third-party |
US11734234B1 (en) | 2018-09-07 | 2023-08-22 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Data architecture for supporting multiple search models |
US10963434B1 (en) | 2018-09-07 | 2021-03-30 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Data architecture for supporting multiple search models |
US11645389B2 (en) * | 2018-09-11 | 2023-05-09 | Mastercard Technologies Canada ULC | Optimized execution of fraud detection rules |
US11531754B2 (en) | 2018-09-11 | 2022-12-20 | Mastercard Technologies Canada ULC | Transpiration of fraud detection rules to native language source code |
US11315179B1 (en) | 2018-11-16 | 2022-04-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for customized card recommendations |
US11620403B2 (en) | 2019-01-11 | 2023-04-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for secure data aggregation and computation |
US11954689B2 (en) * | 2019-02-19 | 2024-04-09 | Capital One Services, Llc | Updating a machine learning fraud model based on third party transaction information |
US11842454B1 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2023-12-12 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and method for an augmented reality experience via an artificial intelligence bot |
US11238656B1 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2022-02-01 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and method for an augmented reality experience via an artificial intelligence bot |
JP2020140454A (en) * | 2019-02-28 | 2020-09-03 | ゼネリックソリューション株式会社 | Sales support device and customer list generation device |
JP2020140687A (en) * | 2019-02-28 | 2020-09-03 | ゼネリックソリューション株式会社 | Sales support device, customer list generation device, business terminal, display program, and server device |
JP7352240B2 (en) | 2019-02-28 | 2023-09-28 | ゼネリックソリューション株式会社 | Sales support equipment |
JP2020140686A (en) * | 2019-06-19 | 2020-09-03 | ゼネリックソリューション株式会社 | Sales support device and customer list generation device |
US11941065B1 (en) | 2019-09-13 | 2024-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Single identifier platform for storing entity data |
WO2022150061A1 (en) * | 2021-01-08 | 2022-07-14 | Feedzai-Consultadoria e Inovação Tecnológica, S.A. | Generation of divergence distributions for automted data analysis |
US11880377B1 (en) | 2021-03-26 | 2024-01-23 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for entity resolution |
US11962681B2 (en) | 2023-04-04 | 2024-04-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Symmetric encryption for private smart contracts among multiple parties in a private peer-to-peer network |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2007041709A1 (en) | 2007-04-12 |
US20070106582A1 (en) | 2007-05-10 |
US7668769B2 (en) | 2010-02-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7668769B2 (en) | System and method of detecting fraud | |
US8612340B1 (en) | System and method for detecting account compromises | |
Paleologo et al. | Subagging for credit scoring models | |
US7788195B1 (en) | Computer-implemented predictive model generation systems and methods | |
US7912773B1 (en) | Computer-implemented data storage systems and methods for use with predictive model systems | |
Krivko | A hybrid model for plastic card fraud detection systems | |
AU2012230299B2 (en) | An automated fraud detection method and system | |
US20150142713A1 (en) | Real-Time Adaptive Decision System And Method Using Predictive Modeling | |
US11250444B2 (en) | Identifying and labeling fraudulent store return activities | |
US20090222308A1 (en) | Detecting first party fraud abuse | |
US20150227935A1 (en) | Payment authorization data processing system for optimizing profits otherwise lost in false positives | |
US20220366493A1 (en) | Artificial intelligence based methods and systems for predicting overall account-level risks of cardholders | |
US11403645B2 (en) | Systems and methods for cross-border ATM fraud detection | |
US11288571B1 (en) | Neural network learning for the prevention of false positive authorizations | |
US20210125179A1 (en) | Payment Authorization via Machine Learning | |
US10445838B2 (en) | Automatic determination of periodic payments based on transaction information | |
US20210312452A1 (en) | Systems and methods real-time institution analysis based on message traffic | |
Mittal et al. | Computational techniques for real-time credit card fraud detection | |
US11410178B2 (en) | Systems and methods for message tracking using real-time normalized scoring | |
US20220138754A1 (en) | Systems and methods for detecting suspect activity over a computer network | |
US20220414662A1 (en) | Computer-implemented method, system, and computer program product for detecting collusive transaction fraud | |
Richhariya et al. | Evaluating and emerging payment card fraud challenges and resolution | |
US20230385839A1 (en) | Methods and systems for reducing false positives for financial transaction fraud monitoring using artificial intelligence | |
Dhanalakshmi et al. | Finding Credit Card Fraud By Using Adaboost Concept And Majority Voting | |
Muchiri | A Model for predicting credit card loan defaulting using cardholder characteristics and account transaction activities |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.,CALIFORNIA Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:BASEPOINT ANALYTICS LLC;REEL/FRAME:024278/0261 Effective date: 20090731 Owner name: FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:BASEPOINT ANALYTICS LLC;REEL/FRAME:024278/0261 Effective date: 20090731 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT,TEX Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024529/0157 Effective date: 20100602 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, TE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024529/0157 Effective date: 20100602 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025095/0907 Effective date: 20100820 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NORTH Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026499/0118 Effective date: 20110523 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CORELOGIC DORADO, LLC (F/K/A CORELOGIC DORADO CORP Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033034/0292 Effective date: 20140404 Owner name: CORELOGIC INFORMATION RESOURCES, LLC (F/K/A CORELO Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033034/0292 Effective date: 20140404 Owner name: CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC (F/K/A MARKETLINX, INC. A Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033034/0292 Effective date: 20140404 Owner name: CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033034/0292 Effective date: 20140404 Owner name: CORELOGIC, INC. (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN CORPORATION) Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033034/0292 Effective date: 20140404 Owner name: CORELOGIC VALUATION SERVICES, LLC (F/K/A EAPPRAISE Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033034/0292 Effective date: 20140404 Owner name: CORELOGIC REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC (F Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033034/0292 Effective date: 20140404 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC (F/K/A MARKETLINX, INC. A Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE FROM 04/04/2014 TO 04/09/2014 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033034 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033198/0553 Effective date: 20140409 Owner name: CORELOGIC REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC (F Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE FROM 04/04/2014 TO 04/09/2014 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033034 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033198/0553 Effective date: 20140409 Owner name: CORELOGIC INFORMATION RESOURCES, LLC (F/K/A CORELO Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE FROM 04/04/2014 TO 04/09/2014 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033034 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033198/0553 Effective date: 20140409 Owner name: CORELOGIC DORADO, LLC (F/K/A CORELOGIC DORADO CORP Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE FROM 04/04/2014 TO 04/09/2014 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033034 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033198/0553 Effective date: 20140409 Owner name: CORELOGIC, INC. (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN CORPORATION) Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE FROM 04/04/2014 TO 04/09/2014 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033034 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033198/0553 Effective date: 20140409 Owner name: CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE FROM 04/04/2014 TO 04/09/2014 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033034 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033198/0553 Effective date: 20140409 Owner name: CORELOGIC VALUATION SERVICES, LLC (F/K/A EAPPRAISE Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE FROM 04/04/2014 TO 04/09/2014 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033034 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:033198/0553 Effective date: 20140409 |