US20080135774A1 - Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method - Google Patents

Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080135774A1
US20080135774A1 US11/635,787 US63578706A US2008135774A1 US 20080135774 A1 US20080135774 A1 US 20080135774A1 US 63578706 A US63578706 A US 63578706A US 2008135774 A1 US2008135774 A1 US 2008135774A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
focal plane
radiation
substrate
numerical aperture
detector
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/635,787
Inventor
Ronald Franciscus Herman Hugers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ASML Netherlands BV
Original Assignee
ASML Netherlands BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ASML Netherlands BV filed Critical ASML Netherlands BV
Priority to US11/635,787 priority Critical patent/US20080135774A1/en
Assigned to ASML NETHERLANDS B.V. reassignment ASML NETHERLANDS B.V. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HUGERS, RONALD FRANCISCUS HERMAN
Priority to SG200718147-2A priority patent/SG143215A1/en
Priority to IL211805A priority patent/IL211805A/en
Priority to IL187798A priority patent/IL187798A/en
Priority to JP2007309571A priority patent/JP4660533B2/en
Priority to US11/998,454 priority patent/US7630070B2/en
Priority to EP07254693.0A priority patent/EP1930774B1/en
Priority to KR1020070127150A priority patent/KR100954762B1/en
Priority to TW096146867A priority patent/TWI375131B/en
Priority to CN2007101988047A priority patent/CN101226340B/en
Publication of US20080135774A1 publication Critical patent/US20080135774A1/en
Priority to KR1020090023084A priority patent/KR100989377B1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F9/00Registration or positioning of originals, masks, frames, photographic sheets or textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. automatically
    • G03F9/70Registration or positioning of originals, masks, frames, photographic sheets or textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. automatically for microlithography
    • G03F9/7003Alignment type or strategy, e.g. leveling, global alignment
    • G03F9/7023Aligning or positioning in direction perpendicular to substrate surface
    • G03F9/7026Focusing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70483Information management; Active and passive control; Testing; Wafer monitoring, e.g. pattern monitoring
    • G03F7/70605Workpiece metrology
    • G03F7/70616Monitoring the printed patterns
    • G03F7/70625Dimensions, e.g. line width, critical dimension [CD], profile, sidewall angle or edge roughness
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70483Information management; Active and passive control; Testing; Wafer monitoring, e.g. pattern monitoring
    • G03F7/70605Workpiece metrology
    • G03F7/70616Monitoring the printed patterns
    • G03F7/70641Focus
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70691Handling of masks or workpieces
    • G03F7/70716Stages
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70691Handling of masks or workpieces
    • G03F7/70775Position control, e.g. interferometers or encoders for determining the stage position
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/708Construction of apparatus, e.g. environment aspects, hygiene aspects or materials
    • G03F7/7085Detection arrangement, e.g. detectors of apparatus alignment possibly mounted on wafers, exposure dose, photo-cleaning flux, stray light, thermal load

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of inspection usable, for example, in the manufacture of devices by a lithographic technique and to a method of manufacturing devices using a lithographic technique.
  • a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively patterned.
  • lithographic apparatus include so-called steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at one time, and so-called scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through a radiation beam in a given direction (the “scanning”-direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. It is also possible to transfer the pattern from the patterning device to the substrate by imprinting the pattern onto the substrate.
  • a beam is typically redirected off the surface of the substrate, for example at an alignment target, and an image is created on a camera of the redirected beam.
  • a property of the substrate may be determined. This can be done, for example, by comparing the redirected beam with data stored in a library of known measurements associated with a known substrate property.
  • the pattern When detecting features of a pattern, the pattern should be in the focal plane of the optics.
  • a method for determining whether a pattern on a substrate is in focus is the so-called “knife edge” method described in U.S. patent application publication no. US 2006-0066855, which document is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. However, this method may complicated and require complex parts.
  • a scatterometer configured to measure a property of a substrate, the apparatus comprising:
  • a high numerical aperture lens configured to project radiation onto the substrate and to project radiation redirected from the substrate towards a back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens or towards a conjugate of a front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens;
  • a first detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a first value
  • a second detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a second value
  • the first detector is arranged in front of the back focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the back focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the back focal plane, or the first detector is arranged in front of the conjugate of the front focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the conjugate of the front focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the conjugate of the front focal plane.
  • a lithographic apparatus comprising:
  • a substrate table configured to hold a substrate
  • a scatterometer configured to measure a property of a substrate, the apparatus comprising:
  • a focus analysis method for detecting whether a substrate is in the focal plane of a lens comprising:
  • a device manufacturing method comprising the focus control method described above.
  • the focus control method described above may be implemented using a control system.
  • FIG. 1 a depicts a lithographic apparatus
  • FIG. 1 b depicts a lithographic cell or cluster
  • FIG. 2 depicts a scatterometer
  • FIG. 3 depicts a further scatterometer and the general operating principle of measuring an angle resolved spectrum in the pupil plane of a high-NA lens
  • FIGS. 4 a and 4 b depict arrangements according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 depicts an further arrangement according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGS. 6A and 6C depicts patterns of radiation detected on the detector when the substrate is in and out of focus
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B depict detectors according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGS. 8 to 10 depict further detectors according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 1 a schematically depicts a lithographic apparatus.
  • the apparatus comprises:
  • the illumination system may include various types of optical components, such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling radiation.
  • optical components such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling radiation.
  • the support structure holds the patterning device in a manner that depends on the orientation of the patterning device, the design of the lithographic apparatus, and other conditions, such as for example whether or not the patterning device is held in a vacuum environment.
  • the support structure can use mechanical, vacuum, electrostatic or other clamping techniques to hold the patterning device.
  • the support structure may be a frame or a table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required.
  • the support structure may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device.”
  • patterning device used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the radiation beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate, for example if the pattern includes phase-shifting features or so called assist features. Generally, the pattern imparted to the radiation beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
  • the patterning device may be transmissive or reflective.
  • Examples of patterning devices include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels.
  • Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types.
  • An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions. The tilted mirrors impart a pattern in a radiation beam, which is reflected by the mirror matrix.
  • projection system used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing any type of projection system, including refractive, reflective, catadioptric, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical systems, or any combination thereof, as appropriate for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion liquid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “projection lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system”.
  • the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. employing a transmissive mask).
  • the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g. employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above, or employing a reflective mask).
  • the lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more support structures). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables and/or support structures may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables and/or support structures while one or more other tables and/or support structures are being used for exposure.
  • the illuminator IL receives a radiation beam from a radiation source SO.
  • the source and the lithographic apparatus may be separate entities, for example when the source is an excimer laser. In such cases, the source is not considered to form part of the lithographic apparatus and the radiation beam is passed from the source SO to the illuminator IL with the aid of a beam delivery system BD comprising, for example, suitable directing mirrors and/or a beam expander. In other cases the source may be an integral part of the lithographic apparatus, for example when the source is a mercury lamp.
  • the source SO and the illuminator IL, together with the beam delivery system BD if required, may be referred to as a radiation system.
  • the illuminator IL may comprise an adjuster AD for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the radiation beam.
  • an adjuster AD for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the radiation beam.
  • the illuminator IL may comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO.
  • the illuminator may be used to condition the radiation beam, to have a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
  • the radiation beam B is incident on the patterning device (e.g., mask) MA, which is held on the support structure (e.g., mask table) MT, and is patterned by the patterning device. Having traversed the patterning device MA, the radiation beam B passes through the projection system PL, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W.
  • the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the radiation beam B.
  • the first positioner PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in FIG.
  • the support structure MT can be used to accurately position the patterning device MA with respect to the path of the radiation beam B, e.g. after mechanical retrieval from a mask library, or during a scan.
  • movement of the support structure MT may be realized with the aid of a long-stroke module (coarse positioning) and a short-stroke module (fine positioning), which form part of the first positioner PM.
  • movement of the substrate table WT may be realized using a long-stroke module and a short-stroke module, which form part of the second positioner PW.
  • the support structure MT may be connected to a short-stroke actuator only, or may be fixed.
  • Patterning device MA and substrate W may be aligned using patterning device alignment marks M 1 ; M 2 and substrate alignment marks P 1 , P 2 .
  • the substrate alignment marks as illustrated occupy dedicated target portions, they may be located in spaces between target portions (these are known as scribe-lane alignment marks).
  • the patterning device alignment marks may be located between the dies.
  • step mode the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are kept essentially stationary, while an entire pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C at one time (i.e. a single static exposure).
  • the substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y direction so that a different target portion C can be exposed.
  • step mode the maximum size of the exposure field limits the size of the target portion C imaged in a single static exposure.
  • the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are scanned synchronously while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C (i.e. a single dynamic exposure).
  • the velocity and direction of the substrate table WT relative to the support structure MT may be determined by the (de-)magnification and image reversal characteristics of the projection system PL.
  • the maximum size of the exposure field limits the width (in the non-scanning direction) of the target portion in a single dynamic exposure, whereas the length of the scanning motion determines the height (in the scanning direction) of the target portion.
  • the support structure MT is kept essentially stationary holding a programmable patterning device, and the substrate table WT is moved or scanned while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C.
  • a pulsed radiation source is employed and the programmable patterning device is updated as required after each movement of the substrate table WT or in between successive radiation pulses during a scan.
  • This mode of operation can be readily applied to maskless lithography that utilizes programmable patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
  • An inspection apparatus is used to determine one or more properties of a substrate, and in particular, how one or more properties of different substrates or different layers of the same substrate vary from layer to layer and/or across a substrate.
  • the inspection apparatus may be integrated into the lithographic apparatus LA or the lithocell LC or may be a stand-alone device. To enable most rapid measurements, it is desirable that the inspection apparatus measure one or more properties in the exposed resist layer immediately after the exposure
  • the one or more properties of the surface of a substrate W may be determined using a sensor such as a scatterometer such as that depicted in FIG. 2 .
  • the scatterometer comprises a broadband (white light) radiation projector 2 which projects radiation onto a substrate W.
  • the reflected radiation is passed to a spectrometer detector 4 , which measures a spectrum 10 (i.e. a measurement of intensity as a function of wavelength) of the specular reflected radiation. From this data, the structure or profile giving rise to the detected spectrum may be reconstructed by a processing unit, e.g. by Rigorous Coupled Wave Analysis and non-linear regression or by comparison with a library of simulated spectra as shown at the bottom of FIG. 2 .
  • the general form of the structure is known and some parameters are assumed from knowledge of the process by which the structure was made, leaving only a few parameters of the structure to be determined from the scatterometry data.
  • a scatterometer may be configured as a normal-incidence scatterometer or an oblique-incidence scatterometer.
  • a variant of scatterometry may also be used in which the reflection is measured at a range of angles of a single wavelength, rather than the reflection at a single angle of a range of wavelengths.
  • a scatterometer for measuring one or more properties of a substrate may measure, in the pupil plane 11 of a high numerical aperture lens, the properties of an angle-resolved spectrum reflected from the substrate surface W at a plurality of angles and wavelengths as shown in FIG. 3 .
  • Such a scatterometer may comprise a radiation projector 2 configured to project radiation onto the substrate W and a detector 18 configured to detect the reflected spectra.
  • the pupil plane is the plane in which the radial position of radiation defines the angle of incidence and the angular position defines azimuth angle of the radiation.
  • the detector 14 is placed in the pupil plane of the high numerical aperture lens.
  • the numerical aperture of the lens may be high and desirably is at least 0.9 or at least 0.95.
  • An immersion scatterometer may even have a lens with a numerical aperture over 1.
  • a broadband radiation source i.e. one with a wide range of radiation frequencies or wavelengths—and therefore of colors
  • the plurality of wavelengths in the broadband desirably each has a bandwidth of ⁇ and a spacing of at least 2 ⁇ (i.e. twice the wavelength bandwidth).
  • sources may be different portions of an extended radiation source which have been split using, e.g., fiber bundles. In this way, angle resolved scatter spectra may be measured at multiple wavelengths in parallel.
  • a 3-D spectrum (wavelength and two different angles) may be measured, which contains more information than a 2-D spectrum. This allows more information to be measured which increases metrology process robustness. This is described in more detail in U.S. patent application publication no. US 2006-0066855, which document is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.
  • a scatterometer that may be used with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the radiation of the radiation projector 2 is collimated using lens system 12 through interference filter 13 and polarizer 17 , reflected by partially reflective surface 16 and is focused onto substrate W via a microscope objective lens 15 .
  • the reflected radiation is then transmitted through partially reflective surface 16 into a CCD detector 18 in the back projected pupil plane 11 in order to have the scatter spectrum detected.
  • the pupil plane 11 is at the focal length of the lens system 15 .
  • a detector and high aperture lens are placed at the pupil plane.
  • the pupil plane may be re-imaged with auxiliary optics since the pupil plane of a high-NA lens is usually located inside the lens.
  • a reference beam is often used, for example, to measure the intensity of the incident radiation. To do this, when the radiation beam is incident on the partially reflective surface 16 part of it is transmitted through the surface as a reference beam towards a reference mirror 14 . The reference beam is then projected onto a different part of the same detector 18 .
  • the pupil plane of the reflected radiation is imaged on the CCD detector, which may have an integration time of, for example, 40 milliseconds per frame. In this way, a two-dimensional angular scatter spectrum of the substrate target is imaged on the detector.
  • the detector may be, for example, an array of CCD or CMOS sensors.
  • the target on substrate W may be a grating which is printed such that after development, the bars are formed of solid resist lines.
  • the bars may alternatively be etched into the substrate.
  • the target pattern is chosen to be sensitive to a parameter of interest, such as focus, dose, overlay, chromatic aberration in the lithographic projection apparatus, etc., such that variation in the relevant parameter will manifest as variation in the printed target.
  • the target pattern may be sensitive to chromatic aberration in the lithographic projection apparatus, particularly the projection system PL, and illumination symmetry and the presence of such aberration will manifest itself in a variation in the printed target pattern.
  • the scatterometry data of the printed target pattern is used to reconstruct the target pattern.
  • the parameters of the target pattern such as line width and shape, may be input to the reconstruction process, performed by a processing unit, from knowledge of the printing step and/or other scatterometry processes.
  • the detectors are desirably arranged equidistant along the optical path from the back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens 15 or equidistant from a conjugate of the substrate plane, shown as the dashed line in FIG. 4 a .
  • the spot size Assuming no transmissive losses between the detectors, if the substrate is in focus the cross-sectional area of the radiation above a predetermined intensity level (the spot size) will be the same at both detectors, as shown in both columns in FIG. 6 a , and a simple comparator can be used to determine whether the substrate is in focus. However, if the substrate is out of focus by being too far from the high numerical aperture lens, the spot size will be greater in the first detector (shown in the left column in FIG.
  • the spot size in the second detector (shown in the right column in FIG. 6 c ) will be greater than that in the first detector (shown in the left column in FIG. 6 c ).
  • FIG. 4 b A further arrangement according to an embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 4 b .
  • a partially transmissive mirror 22 is placed in the path of the beam after the high numerical aperture lens 15 .
  • the partially transmissive mirror 22 deflects a portion of the radiation towards a focus branch which includes the focusing lens 21 together with first detector 30 and second detector 31 .
  • the first detector 30 and second detector 31 are placed either side and desirably equidistant of a conjugate of the substrate plane (a conjugate of the front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens).
  • the second detector need therefore not be partially transmissive.
  • a beam splitter could also be used.
  • the predetermined intensity levels measured on the first and second detectors may not be the same. For example, if there are transmissive losses between the first and second detectors, the predetermined intensity level above which radiation is measured may be greater for the first detector than the second detector. Some calibration may be required to determine the desired predetermined intensity levels.
  • FIGS. 7 a and 7 depict a first detector 30 and a second detector 31 , each of the first detector and second detector could be divided into a plurality of sub-detectors as shown in FIGS. 7 a and 7 .
  • FIG. 7 a depicts the first detector divided into a plurality of first sub-detectors
  • 32 , 33 , 34 depicts the second detector divided into a plurality of second sub-detectors 37 , 38 , 39 .
  • the focus area is then given by:
  • I 32 is the amount of radiation above a first predetermined intensity level incident on sub-detector 32
  • I 37 is the amount of radiation about a second predetermined intensity level incident on sub-detector 37 , etc.
  • FIGS. 7 a and 7 b depict the first and second detectors divided into sub-detectors along a horizontal direction
  • the detectors could be divided into sub-detectors in any number of ways.
  • FIG. 8 depicts a detector divided into sub-detectors 42 , 43 , 44 along a vertical direction.
  • FIG. 9 depicts a detector divided into sub-detectors 51 to 59 in a grid arrangement and
  • FIG. 10 depicts a detector divided into sub-detectors 62 , 63 , 64 in concentric circles.
  • FIG. 5 depicts a further arrangement of the detectors shown in FIG. 4 .
  • mirrors are used to project the radiation onto the detectors.
  • a partially reflective mirror 35 allows part of the radiation to pass through and onto first detector 30 while the remaining radiation reflects towards a second mirror 36 which reflects at least part of the radiation onto the second detector 31 .
  • the second mirror 36 may be either fully reflective or partially reflective and the second detector 31 may be transmissive to allow the radiation to be projected onto further optics.
  • the detectors are desirably arranged equidistant along the path of the radiation from the back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens 15 or equidistant from a conjugate of the substrate plane.
  • the detectors are desirably arranged equidistant along the path of the radiation from the back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens 15 or from a conjugate of the substrate plane, they need not be. If they are not equidistant from the back focal plane or a conjugate of the substrate plane, a calculation, rather than a simple comparison, may determine whether the relative spot sizes on the detectors indicate that the substrate is in focus or out of focus.
  • This method can be used in conjunction with an other, conventional focus detection method.
  • one or more different focus detection methods may occupy different optical branches.
  • lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs
  • the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, flat-panel displays, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin-film magnetic heads, etc.
  • LCDs liquid-crystal displays
  • any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion”, respectively.
  • the substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist), a metrology tool and/or an inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
  • imprint lithography a topography in a patterning device defines the pattern created on a substrate.
  • the topography of the patterning device may be pressed into a layer of resist supplied to the substrate whereupon the resist is cured by applying electromagnetic radiation, heat, pressure or a combination thereof.
  • the patterning device is moved out of the resist leaving a pattern in it after the resist is cured.
  • UV radiation e.g. having a wavelength of or about 365, 355, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm
  • EUV radiation e.g. having a wavelength in the range of 5-20 nm
  • particle beams such as ion beams or electron beams.
  • lens may refer to any one or combination of various types of optical components, including refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical components.
  • the invention may take the form of a computer program containing one or more sequences of machine-readable instructions describing a method as disclosed above, or a data storage medium (e.g. semiconductor memory, magnetic or optical disk) having such a computer program stored therein.
  • a data storage medium e.g. semiconductor memory, magnetic or optical disk

Abstract

To detect whether a substrate is in a focal plane of a scatterometer, a cross-sectional area of radiation above a certain intensity value is detected both in front of and behind a back focal plane of the optical system of the scatterometer. The detection positions in front of and behind the back focal plane should desirably be equidistant from the back focal plane along the path of the radiation redirected from the substrate so that a simple comparison may determine whether the substrate is in the focal plane of the scatterometer.

Description

    FIELD
  • The present invention relates to a method of inspection usable, for example, in the manufacture of devices by a lithographic technique and to a method of manufacturing devices using a lithographic technique.
  • BACKGROUND
  • A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a substrate, usually onto a target portion of the substrate. A lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In that instance, a patterning device, which is alternatively referred to as a mask or a reticle, may be used to generate a circuit pattern to be formed on an individual layer of the IC. This pattern can be transferred onto a target portion (e.g. comprising part of, one, or several dies) on a substrate (e.g. a silicon wafer). Transfer of the pattern is typically via imaging onto a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist) provided on the substrate. In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively patterned. Known lithographic apparatus include so-called steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at one time, and so-called scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through a radiation beam in a given direction (the “scanning”-direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. It is also possible to transfer the pattern from the patterning device to the substrate by imprinting the pattern onto the substrate.
  • To determine features of a substrate, such as its alignment, a beam is typically redirected off the surface of the substrate, for example at an alignment target, and an image is created on a camera of the redirected beam. By comparing a property of the beam before and after it has been redirected by the substrate, a property of the substrate may be determined. This can be done, for example, by comparing the redirected beam with data stored in a library of known measurements associated with a known substrate property.
  • SUMMARY
  • When detecting features of a pattern, the pattern should be in the focal plane of the optics. A method for determining whether a pattern on a substrate is in focus is the so-called “knife edge” method described in U.S. patent application publication no. US 2006-0066855, which document is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. However, this method may complicated and require complex parts.
  • It is desirable, for example, to provide a method and apparatus for detecting whether the substrate is in focus.
  • According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a scatterometer configured to measure a property of a substrate, the apparatus comprising:
  • a high numerical aperture lens configured to project radiation onto the substrate and to project radiation redirected from the substrate towards a back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens or towards a conjugate of a front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens;
  • a first detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a first value; and
  • a second detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a second value,
  • wherein the first detector is arranged in front of the back focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the back focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the back focal plane, or the first detector is arranged in front of the conjugate of the front focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the conjugate of the front focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the conjugate of the front focal plane.
  • According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic apparatus comprising:
  • a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;
  • a system configured to transfer a pattern onto the substrate; and
  • a scatterometer configured to measure a property of a substrate, the apparatus comprising:
      • a high numerical aperture lens configured to project radiation onto the substrate and to project radiation redirected from the substrate towards a back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens or towards a conjugate of a front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens,
      • a first detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a first value, and
      • a second detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a second value,
      • wherein the first detector is arranged in front of the back focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the back focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the back focal plane, or the first detector is arranged in front of the conjugate of the front focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the conjugate of the front focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the conjugate of the front focal plane.
  • According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a focus analysis method for detecting whether a substrate is in the focal plane of a lens, the method comprising:
      • projecting radiation through a high numerical aperture lens and onto the substrate;
      • detecting a first cross-sectional area of radiation redirected by the substrate and passing through the high numerical aperture lens, having an intensity above a first value, the detecting the first cross-sectional area of the redirection radiation occurring between the high numerical aperture lens and a back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens or between the high numerical aperture lens and a conjugate of a front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens; and
      • detecting a second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a second value, the detecting the second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation occurring, respectively to the first detector, behind the back focal plane or behind the conjugate of the front focal plane.
  • According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a device manufacturing method comprising the focus control method described above. The focus control method described above may be implemented using a control system.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
  • FIG. 1 a depicts a lithographic apparatus;
  • FIG. 1 b depicts a lithographic cell or cluster;
  • FIG. 2 depicts a scatterometer;
  • FIG. 3 depicts a further scatterometer and the general operating principle of measuring an angle resolved spectrum in the pupil plane of a high-NA lens;
  • FIGS. 4 a and 4 b depict arrangements according to an embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 5 depicts an further arrangement according to an embodiment of the invention;
  • FIGS. 6A and 6C depicts patterns of radiation detected on the detector when the substrate is in and out of focus;
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B depict detectors according to an embodiment of the invention; and
  • FIGS. 8 to 10 depict further detectors according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • FIG. 1 a schematically depicts a lithographic apparatus. The apparatus comprises:
      • an illumination system (illuminator) IL configured to condition a radiation beam B (e.g. UV radiation or EUV radiation);
      • a support structure (e.g. a mask table) MT constructed to support a patterning device (e.g. a mask) MA and connected to a first positioner PM configured to accurately position the patterning device in accordance with certain parameters;
      • a substrate table (e.g. a wafer table) WT constructed to hold a substrate (e.g. a resist-coated wafer) W and connected to a second positioner PW configured to accurately position the substrate in accordance with certain parameters; and
      • a projection system (e.g. a refractive projection lens system) PL configured to project a pattern imparted to the radiation beam B by patterning device MA onto a target portion C (e.g. comprising one or more dies) of the substrate W.
  • The illumination system may include various types of optical components, such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling radiation.
  • The support structure holds the patterning device in a manner that depends on the orientation of the patterning device, the design of the lithographic apparatus, and other conditions, such as for example whether or not the patterning device is held in a vacuum environment. The support structure can use mechanical, vacuum, electrostatic or other clamping techniques to hold the patterning device. The support structure may be a frame or a table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required. The support structure may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device.”
  • The term “patterning device” used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the radiation beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate, for example if the pattern includes phase-shifting features or so called assist features. Generally, the pattern imparted to the radiation beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
  • The patterning device may be transmissive or reflective. Examples of patterning devices include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels. Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions. The tilted mirrors impart a pattern in a radiation beam, which is reflected by the mirror matrix.
  • The term “projection system” used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing any type of projection system, including refractive, reflective, catadioptric, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical systems, or any combination thereof, as appropriate for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion liquid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “projection lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system”.
  • As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. employing a transmissive mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g. employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above, or employing a reflective mask).
  • The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more support structures). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables and/or support structures may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables and/or support structures while one or more other tables and/or support structures are being used for exposure.
  • The lithographic apparatus may also be of a type wherein at least a portion of the substrate may be covered by a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill a space between the projection system and the substrate. An immersion liquid may also be applied to other spaces in the lithographic apparatus, for example, between the mask and the projection system. Immersion techniques are well known in the art for increasing the numerical aperture of projection systems. The term “immersion” as used herein does not mean that a structure, such as a substrate, must be submerged in liquid, but rather only means that liquid is located between the projection system and the substrate during exposure.
  • Referring to FIG. 1 a, the illuminator IL receives a radiation beam from a radiation source SO. The source and the lithographic apparatus may be separate entities, for example when the source is an excimer laser. In such cases, the source is not considered to form part of the lithographic apparatus and the radiation beam is passed from the source SO to the illuminator IL with the aid of a beam delivery system BD comprising, for example, suitable directing mirrors and/or a beam expander. In other cases the source may be an integral part of the lithographic apparatus, for example when the source is a mercury lamp. The source SO and the illuminator IL, together with the beam delivery system BD if required, may be referred to as a radiation system.
  • The illuminator IL may comprise an adjuster AD for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the radiation beam. Generally, at least the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in a pupil plane of the illuminator can be adjusted. In addition, the illuminator IL may comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. The illuminator may be used to condition the radiation beam, to have a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
  • The radiation beam B is incident on the patterning device (e.g., mask) MA, which is held on the support structure (e.g., mask table) MT, and is patterned by the patterning device. Having traversed the patterning device MA, the radiation beam B passes through the projection system PL, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioner PW and position sensor IF (e.g. an interferometric device, linear encoder or capacitive sensor), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the radiation beam B. Similarly, the first positioner PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in FIG. 1 a) can be used to accurately position the patterning device MA with respect to the path of the radiation beam B, e.g. after mechanical retrieval from a mask library, or during a scan. In general, movement of the support structure MT may be realized with the aid of a long-stroke module (coarse positioning) and a short-stroke module (fine positioning), which form part of the first positioner PM. Similarly, movement of the substrate table WT may be realized using a long-stroke module and a short-stroke module, which form part of the second positioner PW. In the case of a stepper (as opposed to a scanner) the support structure MT may be connected to a short-stroke actuator only, or may be fixed. Patterning device MA and substrate W may be aligned using patterning device alignment marks M1; M2 and substrate alignment marks P1, P2. Although the substrate alignment marks as illustrated occupy dedicated target portions, they may be located in spaces between target portions (these are known as scribe-lane alignment marks). Similarly, in situations in which more than one die is provided on the patterning device MA, the patterning device alignment marks may be located between the dies.
  • The depicted apparatus could be used in at least one of the following modes:
  • 1. In step mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are kept essentially stationary, while an entire pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C at one time (i.e. a single static exposure). The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y direction so that a different target portion C can be exposed. In step mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the size of the target portion C imaged in a single static exposure.
  • 2. In scan mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are scanned synchronously while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C (i.e. a single dynamic exposure). The velocity and direction of the substrate table WT relative to the support structure MT may be determined by the (de-)magnification and image reversal characteristics of the projection system PL. In scan mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the width (in the non-scanning direction) of the target portion in a single dynamic exposure, whereas the length of the scanning motion determines the height (in the scanning direction) of the target portion.
  • 3. In another mode, the support structure MT is kept essentially stationary holding a programmable patterning device, and the substrate table WT is moved or scanned while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C. In this mode, generally a pulsed radiation source is employed and the programmable patterning device is updated as required after each movement of the substrate table WT or in between successive radiation pulses during a scan. This mode of operation can be readily applied to maskless lithography that utilizes programmable patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
  • Combinations and/or variations on the above described modes of use or entirely different modes of use may also be employed.
  • As shown in FIG. 1 b, the lithographic apparatus LA (controlled by a lithographic apparatus control unit LACU) forms part of a lithographic cell LC, also sometimes referred to as a lithocell or lithocluster, which also includes apparatus to perform one or more pre- and post-exposure processes on a substrate. Conventionally these include one or more spin coaters SC to deposit a resist layer, one or more developers DE to develop exposed resist, one or more chill plates CH and one or more bake plates BK. A substrate handler, or robot, RO picks up a substrate from input/output ports I/O1, I/O2, moves it between the different process devices and delivers it to the loading bay LB of the lithographic apparatus. These devices, which are often collectively referred to as the track, are under the control of a track control unit TCU which is itself controlled by the supervisory control system SCS, which also controls the lithographic apparatus via lithographic apparatus control unit LACU. Thus, the different apparatus may be operated to maximize throughput and processing efficiency.
  • In order that the substrate that is exposed by the lithographic apparatus is exposed correctly and consistently for each layer of resist, it is desirable to inspect an exposed substrate to measure one or more properties such as whether changes in alignment, rotation, etc., overlay error between subsequent layers, line thickness, critical dimension (CD), etc. If an error or change is detected, an adjustment may be made to an exposure of one or more subsequent substrates, especially if the inspection can be done soon and fast enough that another substrate of the same batch is still to be exposed. Also, an already exposed substrate may be stripped and reworked—to improve yield- or discarded—thereby avoiding performing an exposure on a substrate that is known to be faulty. In a case where only some target portions of a substrate are faulty, a further exposure may be performed only on those target portions which are good. Another possibility is to adapt a setting of a subsequent process step to compensate for the error, e.g. the time of a trim etch step can be adjusted to compensate for substrate-to-substrate CD variation resulting from the lithographic process step.
  • An inspection apparatus is used to determine one or more properties of a substrate, and in particular, how one or more properties of different substrates or different layers of the same substrate vary from layer to layer and/or across a substrate. The inspection apparatus may be integrated into the lithographic apparatus LA or the lithocell LC or may be a stand-alone device. To enable most rapid measurements, it is desirable that the inspection apparatus measure one or more properties in the exposed resist layer immediately after the exposure
  • The one or more properties of the surface of a substrate W may be determined using a sensor such as a scatterometer such as that depicted in FIG. 2. The scatterometer comprises a broadband (white light) radiation projector 2 which projects radiation onto a substrate W. The reflected radiation is passed to a spectrometer detector 4, which measures a spectrum 10 (i.e. a measurement of intensity as a function of wavelength) of the specular reflected radiation. From this data, the structure or profile giving rise to the detected spectrum may be reconstructed by a processing unit, e.g. by Rigorous Coupled Wave Analysis and non-linear regression or by comparison with a library of simulated spectra as shown at the bottom of FIG. 2. In general, for the reconstruction, the general form of the structure is known and some parameters are assumed from knowledge of the process by which the structure was made, leaving only a few parameters of the structure to be determined from the scatterometry data. Such a scatterometer may be configured as a normal-incidence scatterometer or an oblique-incidence scatterometer. A variant of scatterometry may also be used in which the reflection is measured at a range of angles of a single wavelength, rather than the reflection at a single angle of a range of wavelengths.
  • A scatterometer for measuring one or more properties of a substrate may measure, in the pupil plane 11 of a high numerical aperture lens, the properties of an angle-resolved spectrum reflected from the substrate surface W at a plurality of angles and wavelengths as shown in FIG. 3. Such a scatterometer may comprise a radiation projector 2 configured to project radiation onto the substrate W and a detector 18 configured to detect the reflected spectra. The pupil plane is the plane in which the radial position of radiation defines the angle of incidence and the angular position defines azimuth angle of the radiation. The detector 14 is placed in the pupil plane of the high numerical aperture lens. The numerical aperture of the lens may be high and desirably is at least 0.9 or at least 0.95. An immersion scatterometer may even have a lens with a numerical aperture over 1.
  • An angle-resolved scatterometer only measures the intensity of scattered radiation. However, a scatterometer may allow several wavelengths to be measured simultaneously at a range of angles. The properties measured by the scatterometer for different wavelengths and angles may be the intensity of transverse magnetic- and transverse electric-polarized radiation and/or the phase difference between the transverse magnetic- and transverse electric-polarized radiation.
  • Using a broadband radiation source (i.e. one with a wide range of radiation frequencies or wavelengths—and therefore of colors) is possible, which gives a large etendue, allowing the mixing of multiple wavelengths. The plurality of wavelengths in the broadband desirably each has a bandwidth of δλ and a spacing of at least 2δλ (i.e. twice the wavelength bandwidth). Several “sources” of radiation may be different portions of an extended radiation source which have been split using, e.g., fiber bundles. In this way, angle resolved scatter spectra may be measured at multiple wavelengths in parallel. A 3-D spectrum (wavelength and two different angles) may be measured, which contains more information than a 2-D spectrum. This allows more information to be measured which increases metrology process robustness. This is described in more detail in U.S. patent application publication no. US 2006-0066855, which document is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.
  • A scatterometer that may be used with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 3. The radiation of the radiation projector 2 is collimated using lens system 12 through interference filter 13 and polarizer 17, reflected by partially reflective surface 16 and is focused onto substrate W via a microscope objective lens 15. The reflected radiation is then transmitted through partially reflective surface 16 into a CCD detector 18 in the back projected pupil plane 11 in order to have the scatter spectrum detected. The pupil plane 11 is at the focal length of the lens system 15. A detector and high aperture lens are placed at the pupil plane. The pupil plane may be re-imaged with auxiliary optics since the pupil plane of a high-NA lens is usually located inside the lens.
  • A reference beam is often used, for example, to measure the intensity of the incident radiation. To do this, when the radiation beam is incident on the partially reflective surface 16 part of it is transmitted through the surface as a reference beam towards a reference mirror 14. The reference beam is then projected onto a different part of the same detector 18.
  • The pupil plane of the reflected radiation is imaged on the CCD detector, which may have an integration time of, for example, 40 milliseconds per frame. In this way, a two-dimensional angular scatter spectrum of the substrate target is imaged on the detector. The detector may be, for example, an array of CCD or CMOS sensors.
  • One or more interference filters 13 are available to select a wavelength of interest in the range of, say, 405-790 nm or even lower, such as 200-300 nm. The interference filter(s) may be tunable rather than comprising a set of different filters. A grating could be used instead of or in addition to one or more interference filters.
  • The target on substrate W may be a grating which is printed such that after development, the bars are formed of solid resist lines. The bars may alternatively be etched into the substrate. The target pattern is chosen to be sensitive to a parameter of interest, such as focus, dose, overlay, chromatic aberration in the lithographic projection apparatus, etc., such that variation in the relevant parameter will manifest as variation in the printed target. For example, the target pattern may be sensitive to chromatic aberration in the lithographic projection apparatus, particularly the projection system PL, and illumination symmetry and the presence of such aberration will manifest itself in a variation in the printed target pattern. Accordingly, the scatterometry data of the printed target pattern is used to reconstruct the target pattern. The parameters of the target pattern, such as line width and shape, may be input to the reconstruction process, performed by a processing unit, from knowledge of the printing step and/or other scatterometry processes.
  • FIG. 4 a depicts an arrangement according to an embodiment of the invention in which radiation is projected through the high numerical aperture lens 15 and through a focusing lens 21. The radiation is then projected onto a first detector 30 and a second detector 31. As described below, each of the detectors detects an amount (or cross-sectional area) of radiation above a predetermined intensity level. Each of the detectors may comprise one or more photodiodes, CCDs or CMOS. In this embodiment, the detectors are at least partially transmissive such that radiation is transmitted through the detectors and onto one or more further optical elements. The detectors are desirably arranged equidistant along the optical path from the back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens 15 or equidistant from a conjugate of the substrate plane, shown as the dashed line in FIG. 4 a. Assuming no transmissive losses between the detectors, if the substrate is in focus the cross-sectional area of the radiation above a predetermined intensity level (the spot size) will be the same at both detectors, as shown in both columns in FIG. 6 a, and a simple comparator can be used to determine whether the substrate is in focus. However, if the substrate is out of focus by being too far from the high numerical aperture lens, the spot size will be greater in the first detector (shown in the left column in FIG. 6 b) than the second detector (shown in the right column in FIG. 6 b). Conversely, if the substrate is out of focus by being to close to the high numerical aperture lens, the spot size in the second detector (shown in the right column in FIG. 6 c) will be greater than that in the first detector (shown in the left column in FIG. 6 c).
  • A further arrangement according to an embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 4 b. In this embodiment, a partially transmissive mirror 22 is placed in the path of the beam after the high numerical aperture lens 15. The partially transmissive mirror 22 deflects a portion of the radiation towards a focus branch which includes the focusing lens 21 together with first detector 30 and second detector 31. In this embodiment the first detector 30 and second detector 31 are placed either side and desirably equidistant of a conjugate of the substrate plane (a conjugate of the front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens). The second detector need therefore not be partially transmissive. As an alternative to the transmissive mirror, a beam splitter could also be used.
  • The predetermined intensity levels measured on the first and second detectors may not be the same. For example, if there are transmissive losses between the first and second detectors, the predetermined intensity level above which radiation is measured may be greater for the first detector than the second detector. Some calibration may be required to determine the desired predetermined intensity levels.
  • Although these examples have just a first detector 30 and a second detector 31, each of the first detector and second detector could be divided into a plurality of sub-detectors as shown in FIGS. 7 a and 7. FIG. 7 a depicts the first detector divided into a plurality of first sub-detectors, 32, 33, 34 and FIG. 7 b depicts the second detector divided into a plurality of second sub-detectors 37, 38, 39. The focus area is then given by:

  • (I32+I34+I38−(I33+I37+I39)
  • where I32 is the amount of radiation above a first predetermined intensity level incident on sub-detector 32, I37 is the amount of radiation about a second predetermined intensity level incident on sub-detector 37, etc.
  • Although FIGS. 7 a and 7 b depict the first and second detectors divided into sub-detectors along a horizontal direction, the detectors could be divided into sub-detectors in any number of ways. For example, FIG. 8 depicts a detector divided into sub-detectors 42, 43, 44 along a vertical direction. FIG. 9 depicts a detector divided into sub-detectors 51 to 59 in a grid arrangement and FIG. 10 depicts a detector divided into sub-detectors 62, 63, 64 in concentric circles.
  • FIG. 5 depicts a further arrangement of the detectors shown in FIG. 4. In this embodiment, mirrors are used to project the radiation onto the detectors. A partially reflective mirror 35 allows part of the radiation to pass through and onto first detector 30 while the remaining radiation reflects towards a second mirror 36 which reflects at least part of the radiation onto the second detector 31. The second mirror 36 may be either fully reflective or partially reflective and the second detector 31 may be transmissive to allow the radiation to be projected onto further optics. Again, the detectors are desirably arranged equidistant along the path of the radiation from the back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens 15 or equidistant from a conjugate of the substrate plane.
  • Although the detectors are desirably arranged equidistant along the path of the radiation from the back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens 15 or from a conjugate of the substrate plane, they need not be. If they are not equidistant from the back focal plane or a conjugate of the substrate plane, a calculation, rather than a simple comparison, may determine whether the relative spot sizes on the detectors indicate that the substrate is in focus or out of focus.
  • This method can be used in conjunction with an other, conventional focus detection method. For example, one or more different focus detection methods may occupy different optical branches.
  • Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs, it should be understood that the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, flat-panel displays, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion”, respectively. The substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist), a metrology tool and/or an inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
  • Although specific reference may have been made above to the use of embodiments of the invention in the context of optical lithography, it will be appreciated that the invention may be used in other applications, for example imprint lithography, and where the context allows, is not limited to optical lithography. In imprint lithography a topography in a patterning device defines the pattern created on a substrate. The topography of the patterning device may be pressed into a layer of resist supplied to the substrate whereupon the resist is cured by applying electromagnetic radiation, heat, pressure or a combination thereof. The patterning device is moved out of the resist leaving a pattern in it after the resist is cured.
  • The terms “radiation” and “beam” used herein encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength of or about 365, 355, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm) and extreme ultra-violet (EUV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength in the range of 5-20 nm), as well as particle beams, such as ion beams or electron beams.
  • The term “lens”, where the context allows, may refer to any one or combination of various types of optical components, including refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical components.
  • While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. For example, the invention may take the form of a computer program containing one or more sequences of machine-readable instructions describing a method as disclosed above, or a data storage medium (e.g. semiconductor memory, magnetic or optical disk) having such a computer program stored therein.
  • The descriptions above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Thus, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention as described without departing from the scope of the claims set out below.

Claims (20)

1. A scatterometer configured to measure a property of a substrate, the apparatus comprising:
a high numerical aperture lens configured to project radiation onto the substrate and to project radiation redirected from the substrate towards a back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens or towards a conjugate of a front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens;
a first detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a first value; and
a second detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a second value,
wherein the first detector is arranged in front of the back focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the back focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the back focal plane, or the first detector is arranged in front of the conjugate of the front focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the conjugate of the front focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the conjugate of the front focal plane.
2. The scatterometer of claim 2, further comprising an angle detector configured to detect an angle resolved spectrum of the redirected radiation.
3. The scatterometer of claim 1, wherein the first detector and the second detector are arranged equidistant from the back focal plane or the conjugate of the front focal plane along an optical path of the redirected radiation.
4. The scatterometer of claim 1, further comprising a comparator configured to comparing the cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above the first value detected by the first detector and the cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above the second value detected by the second detector.
5. The scatterometer of claim 1, further comprising a first reflector configured to reflect the redirected radiation towards the first detector.
6. The scatterometer of claim 5, wherein the first reflector comprises a partially reflective mirror.
7. The scatterometer of claim 1, further comprising a second reflector configured to reflect the redirected radiation towards the second detector.
8. The scatterometer of claim 7, wherein the second reflector comprises, a partially reflective mirror.
9. The scatterometer of claim 1, wherein the first detector comprises a plurality of first sub-detectors.
10. The scatterometer of claim 1, wherein the second detector comprises a plurality of second sub-detectors.
11. The scatterometer of claim 1, wherein the first value is the same as the second value.
12. The scatterometer of claim 1, wherein the first value is greater than the second value.
13. A lithographic apparatus comprising:
a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;
a system configured to transfer a pattern onto the substrate; and
a scatterometer configured to measure a property of a substrate, the apparatus comprising:
a high numerical aperture lens configured to project radiation onto the substrate and to project radiation redirected from the substrate towards a back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens or towards a conjugate of a front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens,
a first detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a first value, and
a second detector configured to detect a cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a second value,
wherein the first detector is arranged in front of the back focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the back focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the back focal plane, or the first detector is arranged in front of the conjugate of the front focal plane, between the high numerical aperture lens and the conjugate of the front focal plane, and the second detector is arranged behind the conjugate of the front focal plane.
14. A focus analysis method for detecting whether a substrate is in the focal plane of a lens, the method comprising:
projecting radiation through a high numerical aperture lens and onto the substrate;
detecting a first cross-sectional area of radiation redirected by the substrate and passing through the high numerical aperture lens, having an intensity above a first value, the detecting the first cross-sectional area of the redirection radiation occurring between the high numerical aperture lens and a back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens or between the high numerical aperture lens and a conjugate of a front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens; and
detecting a second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a second value, the detecting the second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation occurring, respectively to the first detector, behind the back focal plane or behind the conjugate of the front focal plane.
15. The method of claim 14, further comprising comparing the first cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation and the second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation.
16. The method of claim 14, further comprising detecting angles of a spectrum of redirected radiation.
17. A device manufacturing method, comprising:
projecting a patterned beam of radiation onto a substrate; and
detecting whether a substrate is in the focal plane of a lens, the detecting comprising:
projecting radiation through a high numerical aperture lens and onto the substrate,
detecting a first cross-sectional area of radiation redirected by the substrate and passing through the high numerical aperture lens, having an intensity above a first value, the detecting the first cross-sectional area of the redirection radiation occurring between the high numerical aperture lens and a back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens or between the high numerical aperture lens and a conjugate of a front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens, and
detecting a second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a second value, the detecting the second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation occurring, respectively to the first detector, behind the back focal plane or behind the conjugate of the front focal plane.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising comparing the first cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation and the second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation.
19. A control system configured to control a lithographic apparatus, the control system embodying executable instructions configured to carry out a focus analysis method for detecting whether a substrate is in the focal plane of a lens, the method comprising:
projecting radiation through a high numerical aperture lens and onto the substrate;
detecting a first cross-sectional area of radiation redirected by the substrate and passing through the high numerical aperture lens, having an intensity above a first value, the detecting the first cross-sectional area of the redirection radiation occurring between the high numerical aperture lens and a back focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens or between the high numerical aperture lens and a conjugate of a front focal plane of the high numerical aperture lens; and
detecting a second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation having an intensity above a second value, the detecting the second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation occurring, respectively to the first detector, behind the back focal plane or behind the conjugate of the front focal plane.
20. The control system of claim 19, wherein the method further comprises comparing the first cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation and the second cross-sectional area of the redirected radiation.
US11/635,787 2006-12-08 2006-12-08 Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method Abandoned US20080135774A1 (en)

Priority Applications (11)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/635,787 US20080135774A1 (en) 2006-12-08 2006-12-08 Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
SG200718147-2A SG143215A1 (en) 2006-12-08 2007-11-28 A scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
IL211805A IL211805A (en) 2006-12-08 2007-11-29 Measurement apparatus for measuring the height of a surface of a lithographic substrate
IL187798A IL187798A (en) 2006-12-08 2007-11-29 Scatterometer
US11/998,454 US7630070B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2007-11-30 Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
JP2007309571A JP4660533B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2007-11-30 Scatterometer and focus analysis method
EP07254693.0A EP1930774B1 (en) 2006-12-08 2007-12-04 Scatterometer and focus analysis method
KR1020070127150A KR100954762B1 (en) 2006-12-08 2007-12-07 A scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
TW096146867A TWI375131B (en) 2006-12-08 2007-12-07 A scatterometer and a focus analysis method
CN2007101988047A CN101226340B (en) 2006-12-08 2007-12-07 A scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
KR1020090023084A KR100989377B1 (en) 2006-12-08 2009-03-18 A scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/635,787 US20080135774A1 (en) 2006-12-08 2006-12-08 Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/998,454 Continuation-In-Part US7630070B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2007-11-30 Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080135774A1 true US20080135774A1 (en) 2008-06-12

Family

ID=39149380

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/635,787 Abandoned US20080135774A1 (en) 2006-12-08 2006-12-08 Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
US11/998,454 Active 2026-12-21 US7630070B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2007-11-30 Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/998,454 Active 2026-12-21 US7630070B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2007-11-30 Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US20080135774A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1930774B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4660533B2 (en)
KR (2) KR100954762B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101226340B (en)
IL (2) IL187798A (en)
SG (1) SG143215A1 (en)
TW (1) TWI375131B (en)

Cited By (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080065840A1 (en) * 2005-03-10 2008-03-13 Pope Steven L Data processing system with data transmit capability
US20080072236A1 (en) * 2005-03-10 2008-03-20 Pope Steven L Data processing system
US20080151228A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2008-06-26 Asml Netherlands B.V. Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
US20080244087A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2008-10-02 Steven Leslie Pope Data processing system with routing tables
US20100049876A1 (en) * 2005-04-27 2010-02-25 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Packet validation in virtual network interface architecture
US20100057932A1 (en) * 2006-07-10 2010-03-04 Solarflare Communications Incorporated Onload network protocol stacks
US20100333101A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2010-12-30 Solarflare Communications Inc. Virtualised receive side scaling
US20110023042A1 (en) * 2008-02-05 2011-01-27 Solarflare Communications Inc. Scalable sockets
US20110040897A1 (en) * 2002-09-16 2011-02-17 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Network interface and protocol
US20110087774A1 (en) * 2009-10-08 2011-04-14 Solarflare Communications Inc Switching api
US20110173514A1 (en) * 2003-03-03 2011-07-14 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data protocol
US20110261339A1 (en) * 2008-11-07 2011-10-27 Asml Netherlands B.V. Scatterometer and lithographic apparatus
US8447904B2 (en) 2008-12-18 2013-05-21 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Virtualised interface functions
US8533740B2 (en) 2005-03-15 2013-09-10 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data processing system with intercepting instructions
US8612536B2 (en) 2004-04-21 2013-12-17 Solarflare Communications, Inc. User-level stack
US8635353B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2014-01-21 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reception according to a data transfer protocol of data directed to any of a plurality of destination entities
US8737431B2 (en) 2004-04-21 2014-05-27 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Checking data integrity
US8743877B2 (en) 2009-12-21 2014-06-03 Steven L. Pope Header processing engine
US8763018B2 (en) 2011-08-22 2014-06-24 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Modifying application behaviour
US8817784B2 (en) 2006-02-08 2014-08-26 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for multicast packet reception
US8855137B2 (en) 2004-03-02 2014-10-07 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Dual-driver interface
US8959095B2 (en) 2005-10-20 2015-02-17 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Hashing algorithm for network receive filtering
US8996644B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2015-03-31 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Encapsulated accelerator
US9003053B2 (en) 2011-09-22 2015-04-07 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Message acceleration
US9008113B2 (en) 2010-12-20 2015-04-14 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Mapped FIFO buffering
US9077751B2 (en) 2006-11-01 2015-07-07 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Driver level segmentation
US9210140B2 (en) 2009-08-19 2015-12-08 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Remote functionality selection
US9258390B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2016-02-09 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reducing network latency
US9256560B2 (en) 2009-07-29 2016-02-09 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Controller integration
US9384071B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2016-07-05 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Epoll optimisations
US9600429B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2017-03-21 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Encapsulated accelerator
US9674318B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2017-06-06 Solarflare Communications, Inc. TCP processing for devices
US9686117B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2017-06-20 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Chimney onload implementation of network protocol stack
US9948533B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2018-04-17 Solarflare Communitations, Inc. Interrupt management
US10015104B2 (en) 2005-12-28 2018-07-03 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Processing received data
US10505747B2 (en) 2012-10-16 2019-12-10 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Feed processing
US10873613B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2020-12-22 Xilinx, Inc. TCP processing for devices

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2048543B1 (en) * 2007-10-09 2013-12-04 ASML Netherlands B.V. An optical focus sensor, an inspection apparatus and a lithographic apparatus
US8830447B2 (en) * 2009-05-12 2014-09-09 Asml Netherlands B.V. Inspection method for lithography
NL2004949A (en) * 2009-08-21 2011-02-22 Asml Netherlands Bv Inspection method and apparatus.
WO2011045125A1 (en) * 2009-10-13 2011-04-21 Asml Netherlands B.V. Inspection method and apparatus
EP3073323B1 (en) 2011-04-22 2021-03-03 ASML Netherlands B.V. Alignment sensor, lithography system for processing a target, such as a wafer, and method for operating a lithography system for processing a target, such as a wafer
CN103582848B (en) 2011-04-22 2018-05-08 迈普尔平版印刷Ip有限公司 Location determination in the etching system using the substrate for having part reflection position mark
JP5932023B2 (en) * 2011-05-13 2016-06-08 マッパー・リソグラフィー・アイピー・ビー.ブイ. Lithographic system for processing at least part of a target
CN103162831B (en) * 2011-12-19 2014-12-10 中国科学院微电子研究所 Broadband polarization spectrograph and optical measurement system
CN103454065A (en) * 2012-06-05 2013-12-18 上海微电子装备有限公司 Scattering measurement focusing device and method used for lithographic equipment
JP6353831B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2018-07-04 ケーエルエー−テンカー コーポレイション Algorithmic removal from scanning and diffraction optical measurements in angle-resolved reflectometry
CN105093479A (en) * 2014-04-30 2015-11-25 西门子医疗保健诊断公司 Automatic focusing method and device used for microscope
JP6496808B2 (en) * 2014-08-25 2019-04-10 エーエスエムエル ホールディング エヌ.ブイ. Measuring method, measuring apparatus, lithographic apparatus, and device manufacturing method
WO2016050453A1 (en) 2014-10-03 2016-04-07 Asml Netherlands B.V. Focus monitoring arrangement and inspection apparatus including such an arragnement
WO2017102428A1 (en) 2015-12-18 2017-06-22 Asml Netherlands B.V. Focus monitoring arrangement and inspection apparatus including such an arrangement
NL2017844A (en) 2015-12-22 2017-06-28 Asml Netherlands Bv Focus control arrangement and method
JP6742413B2 (en) * 2015-12-31 2020-08-19 エーエスエムエル ホールディング エヌ.ブイ. Focusing method and apparatus for inspection system
EP3203493B1 (en) * 2016-02-02 2018-10-03 FEI Company Charged-particle microscope with astigmatism compensation and energy-selection
CN106767529B (en) * 2016-12-14 2019-11-05 深圳奥比中光科技有限公司 The automatic focusing method and system of laser facula identification and laser-projector
EP3336606A1 (en) 2016-12-16 2018-06-20 ASML Netherlands B.V. Method for monitoring a characteristic of illumination from a metrology apparatus
WO2018203282A1 (en) 2017-05-05 2018-11-08 3M Innovative Properties Company Scatterometry system and method of using the same
EP3470924A1 (en) 2017-10-11 2019-04-17 ASML Netherlands B.V. Method of optimizing the position and/or size of a measurement illumination spot relative to a target on a substrate, and associated apparatus
EP3521930A1 (en) 2018-02-02 2019-08-07 ASML Netherlands B.V. Method of optimizing a metrology process
EP3705945A1 (en) * 2019-03-08 2020-09-09 ASML Netherlands B.V. Methods and apparatus for estimating substrate shape

Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3912922A (en) * 1973-03-19 1975-10-14 Thomson Brandt Optical sensor for determining the focussing error in an optical illumination system embodying a projection lens
US4577095A (en) * 1982-03-08 1986-03-18 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Automatic focusing apparatus for a semiconductor pattern inspection system
US4725722A (en) * 1985-04-12 1988-02-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Automatic focusing method and apparatus utilizing contrasts of projected pattern
US5245173A (en) * 1991-03-29 1993-09-14 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Automatic focal-point sensing apparatus sensing high and low magnification
US20030043372A1 (en) * 2001-08-30 2003-03-06 Bernd Schulz Apparatus for determining an overlay error and critical dimensions in a semiconductor structure by means of scatterometry
US6657216B1 (en) * 2002-06-17 2003-12-02 Nanometrics Incorporated Dual spot confocal displacement sensor
US6785638B2 (en) * 2001-08-06 2004-08-31 Timbre Technologies, Inc. Method and system of dynamic learning through a regression-based library generation process
US6813034B2 (en) * 2002-02-05 2004-11-02 Therma-Wave, Inc. Analysis of isolated and aperiodic structures with simultaneous multiple angle of incidence measurements
US6819426B2 (en) * 2001-02-12 2004-11-16 Therma-Wave, Inc. Overlay alignment metrology using diffraction gratings
US6856408B2 (en) * 2001-03-02 2005-02-15 Accent Optical Technologies, Inc. Line profile asymmetry measurement using scatterometry
US6919964B2 (en) * 2002-07-09 2005-07-19 Therma-Wave, Inc. CD metrology analysis using a finite difference method
US6928628B2 (en) * 2002-06-05 2005-08-09 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation Use of overlay diagnostics for enhanced automatic process control
US6972852B2 (en) * 2000-03-29 2005-12-06 Therma-Wave, Inc. Critical dimension analysis with simultaneous multiple angle of incidence measurements
US6974962B2 (en) * 2000-09-19 2005-12-13 Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. Lateral shift measurement using an optical technique
US6987572B2 (en) * 2000-05-04 2006-01-17 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for lithography process control
US7005641B2 (en) * 2001-06-15 2006-02-28 Ebara Corporation Electron beam apparatus and a device manufacturing method by using said electron beam apparatus
US20060066855A1 (en) * 2004-08-16 2006-03-30 Asml Netherlands B.V. Method and apparatus for angular-resolved spectroscopic lithography characterization
US7046376B2 (en) * 2002-07-05 2006-05-16 Therma-Wave, Inc. Overlay targets with isolated, critical-dimension features and apparatus to measure overlay
US7061627B2 (en) * 2002-03-13 2006-06-13 Therma-Wave, Inc. Optical scatterometry of asymmetric lines and structures
US7061623B2 (en) * 2003-08-25 2006-06-13 Spectel Research Corporation Interferometric back focal plane scatterometry with Koehler illumination
US7061615B1 (en) * 2001-09-20 2006-06-13 Nanometrics Incorporated Spectroscopically measured overlay target
US7068363B2 (en) * 2003-06-06 2006-06-27 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Systems for inspection of patterned or unpatterned wafers and other specimen

Family Cites Families (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2836428A1 (en) 1978-08-19 1980-03-06 Battelle Institut E V Automatic focussing system with light-sensitive CCD elements - compares illumination differences to form difference signal for controlling motor assigned to lens
JPS55101142A (en) * 1979-01-29 1980-08-01 Teac Co Focus detection unit of optical reproducing device
JPS5786710A (en) * 1980-11-19 1982-05-29 Yokogawa Hokushin Electric Corp Measuring device for three-dimensional configuration
JPS6473214A (en) * 1987-09-14 1989-03-17 Mitutoyo Corp Non-contact displacement meter
CN2038237U (en) * 1988-08-09 1989-05-24 中国船舶工业总公司国营中南光学仪器厂 Focus check apparatus
JPH0269927A (en) 1988-09-05 1990-03-08 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Aligning optical apparatus
US5202748A (en) 1991-06-07 1993-04-13 Litel Instruments In situ process control system for steppers
JP3300803B2 (en) * 1993-10-14 2002-07-08 株式会社キーエンス Displacement gauge, displacement measurement method, thickness gauge
US5703692A (en) 1995-08-03 1997-12-30 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Lens scatterometer system employing source light beam scanning means
GB9525867D0 (en) 1995-12-19 1996-02-21 Bio Rad Micromeasurements Ltd Dual beam automatic focus system
US5880838A (en) 1996-06-05 1999-03-09 California Institute Of California System and method for optically measuring a structure
US6545789B1 (en) 1997-04-25 2003-04-08 John J. Lemasters Device to improve Z-axis resolution in confocal microscopy
US5963329A (en) 1997-10-31 1999-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for measuring the profile of small repeating lines
US7098325B2 (en) * 1998-10-08 2006-08-29 Pierre Martin Process for the sulfurization of a phosphorus-containing compound
JP3544892B2 (en) 1999-05-12 2004-07-21 株式会社東京精密 Appearance inspection method and apparatus
JP2001166202A (en) * 1999-12-10 2001-06-22 Katsura Oputo System:Kk Focus detection method and focus detector
US6753961B1 (en) 2000-09-18 2004-06-22 Therma-Wave, Inc. Spectroscopic ellipsometer without rotating components
US6806951B2 (en) * 2000-09-20 2004-10-19 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for determining at least one characteristic of defects on at least two sides of a specimen
US6768983B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2004-07-27 Timbre Technologies, Inc. System and method for real-time library generation of grating profiles
US6515744B2 (en) 2001-02-08 2003-02-04 Therma-Wave, Inc. Small spot ellipsometer
US6699624B2 (en) 2001-02-27 2004-03-02 Timbre Technologies, Inc. Grating test patterns and methods for overlay metrology
US6704661B1 (en) 2001-07-16 2004-03-09 Therma-Wave, Inc. Real time analysis of periodic structures on semiconductors
JP3615181B2 (en) * 2001-11-06 2005-01-26 株式会社東芝 Inspection method for exposure apparatus, exposure method for correcting focus position, and method for manufacturing semiconductor device
US6608690B2 (en) 2001-12-04 2003-08-19 Timbre Technologies, Inc. Optical profilometry of additional-material deviations in a periodic grating
US6772084B2 (en) 2002-01-31 2004-08-03 Timbre Technologies, Inc. Overlay measurements using periodic gratings
US6721691B2 (en) 2002-03-26 2004-04-13 Timbre Technologies, Inc. Metrology hardware specification using a hardware simulator
US6775015B2 (en) * 2002-06-18 2004-08-10 Timbre Technologies, Inc. Optical metrology of single features
SG120958A1 (en) 2002-11-01 2006-04-26 Asml Netherlands Bv Inspection method and device manufacturing method
DE10319182B4 (en) * 2003-04-29 2008-06-12 Carl Zeiss Jena Gmbh Method and arrangement for determining the focus position when imaging a sample
US20050202748A1 (en) * 2004-03-11 2005-09-15 Beanhead Toys & Entertainment Freestanding, reconfigurable, disposable character form and kit for making same
US20060109463A1 (en) 2004-11-22 2006-05-25 Asml Netherlands B.V. Latent overlay metrology
US7453577B2 (en) 2004-12-14 2008-11-18 Asml Netherlands B.V. Apparatus and method for inspecting a patterned part of a sample
US7443486B2 (en) 2005-02-25 2008-10-28 Asml Netherlands B.V. Method for predicting a critical dimension of a feature imaged by a lithographic apparatus
WO2006091783A1 (en) 2005-02-25 2006-08-31 Accent Optical Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and method for enhanced critical dimension scatterometry
US20080135774A1 (en) 2006-12-08 2008-06-12 Asml Netherlands B.V. Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method

Patent Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3912922A (en) * 1973-03-19 1975-10-14 Thomson Brandt Optical sensor for determining the focussing error in an optical illumination system embodying a projection lens
US4577095A (en) * 1982-03-08 1986-03-18 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Automatic focusing apparatus for a semiconductor pattern inspection system
US4725722A (en) * 1985-04-12 1988-02-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Automatic focusing method and apparatus utilizing contrasts of projected pattern
US5245173A (en) * 1991-03-29 1993-09-14 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Automatic focal-point sensing apparatus sensing high and low magnification
US6972852B2 (en) * 2000-03-29 2005-12-06 Therma-Wave, Inc. Critical dimension analysis with simultaneous multiple angle of incidence measurements
US6987572B2 (en) * 2000-05-04 2006-01-17 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for lithography process control
US6974962B2 (en) * 2000-09-19 2005-12-13 Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. Lateral shift measurement using an optical technique
US6819426B2 (en) * 2001-02-12 2004-11-16 Therma-Wave, Inc. Overlay alignment metrology using diffraction gratings
US6856408B2 (en) * 2001-03-02 2005-02-15 Accent Optical Technologies, Inc. Line profile asymmetry measurement using scatterometry
US7005641B2 (en) * 2001-06-15 2006-02-28 Ebara Corporation Electron beam apparatus and a device manufacturing method by using said electron beam apparatus
US6785638B2 (en) * 2001-08-06 2004-08-31 Timbre Technologies, Inc. Method and system of dynamic learning through a regression-based library generation process
US20030043372A1 (en) * 2001-08-30 2003-03-06 Bernd Schulz Apparatus for determining an overlay error and critical dimensions in a semiconductor structure by means of scatterometry
US7061615B1 (en) * 2001-09-20 2006-06-13 Nanometrics Incorporated Spectroscopically measured overlay target
US6813034B2 (en) * 2002-02-05 2004-11-02 Therma-Wave, Inc. Analysis of isolated and aperiodic structures with simultaneous multiple angle of incidence measurements
US7061627B2 (en) * 2002-03-13 2006-06-13 Therma-Wave, Inc. Optical scatterometry of asymmetric lines and structures
US6928628B2 (en) * 2002-06-05 2005-08-09 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation Use of overlay diagnostics for enhanced automatic process control
US6657216B1 (en) * 2002-06-17 2003-12-02 Nanometrics Incorporated Dual spot confocal displacement sensor
US7046376B2 (en) * 2002-07-05 2006-05-16 Therma-Wave, Inc. Overlay targets with isolated, critical-dimension features and apparatus to measure overlay
US6919964B2 (en) * 2002-07-09 2005-07-19 Therma-Wave, Inc. CD metrology analysis using a finite difference method
US7068363B2 (en) * 2003-06-06 2006-06-27 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Systems for inspection of patterned or unpatterned wafers and other specimen
US7061623B2 (en) * 2003-08-25 2006-06-13 Spectel Research Corporation Interferometric back focal plane scatterometry with Koehler illumination
US20060066855A1 (en) * 2004-08-16 2006-03-30 Asml Netherlands B.V. Method and apparatus for angular-resolved spectroscopic lithography characterization

Cited By (86)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110219145A1 (en) * 2002-09-16 2011-09-08 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Network interface and protocol
US8954613B2 (en) 2002-09-16 2015-02-10 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Network interface and protocol
US9112752B2 (en) 2002-09-16 2015-08-18 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Network interface and protocol
US20110040897A1 (en) * 2002-09-16 2011-02-17 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Network interface and protocol
US9043671B2 (en) 2003-03-03 2015-05-26 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data protocol
US20110173514A1 (en) * 2003-03-03 2011-07-14 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data protocol
US11182317B2 (en) 2004-03-02 2021-11-23 Xilinx, Inc. Dual-driver interface
US9690724B2 (en) 2004-03-02 2017-06-27 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Dual-driver interface
US11119956B2 (en) 2004-03-02 2021-09-14 Xilinx, Inc. Dual-driver interface
US8855137B2 (en) 2004-03-02 2014-10-07 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Dual-driver interface
US8737431B2 (en) 2004-04-21 2014-05-27 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Checking data integrity
US8612536B2 (en) 2004-04-21 2013-12-17 Solarflare Communications, Inc. User-level stack
US20080065840A1 (en) * 2005-03-10 2008-03-13 Pope Steven L Data processing system with data transmit capability
US8650569B2 (en) 2005-03-10 2014-02-11 Solarflare Communications, Inc. User-level re-initialization instruction interception
US9063771B2 (en) 2005-03-10 2015-06-23 Solarflare Communications, Inc. User-level re-initialization instruction interception
US20080072236A1 (en) * 2005-03-10 2008-03-20 Pope Steven L Data processing system
US8782642B2 (en) 2005-03-15 2014-07-15 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data processing system with data transmit capability
US8533740B2 (en) 2005-03-15 2013-09-10 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data processing system with intercepting instructions
US9552225B2 (en) 2005-03-15 2017-01-24 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data processing system with data transmit capability
US10397103B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2019-08-27 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data processing system with routing tables
US8868780B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2014-10-21 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data processing system with routing tables
US9729436B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2017-08-08 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data processing system with routing tables
US20080244087A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2008-10-02 Steven Leslie Pope Data processing system with routing tables
US9912665B2 (en) 2005-04-27 2018-03-06 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Packet validation in virtual network interface architecture
US8380882B2 (en) 2005-04-27 2013-02-19 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Packet validation in virtual network interface architecture
US10924483B2 (en) 2005-04-27 2021-02-16 Xilinx, Inc. Packet validation in virtual network interface architecture
US20100049876A1 (en) * 2005-04-27 2010-02-25 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Packet validation in virtual network interface architecture
US8645558B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2014-02-04 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reception according to a data transfer protocol of data directed to any of a plurality of destination entities for data extraction
US8635353B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2014-01-21 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reception according to a data transfer protocol of data directed to any of a plurality of destination entities
US9043380B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2015-05-26 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reception according to a data transfer protocol of data directed to any of a plurality of destination entities
US10055264B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2018-08-21 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reception according to a data transfer protocol of data directed to any of a plurality of destination entities
US10445156B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2019-10-15 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reception according to a data transfer protocol of data directed to any of a plurality of destination entities
US11210148B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2021-12-28 Xilinx, Inc. Reception according to a data transfer protocol of data directed to any of a plurality of destination entities
US9594842B2 (en) 2005-10-20 2017-03-14 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Hashing algorithm for network receive filtering
US8959095B2 (en) 2005-10-20 2015-02-17 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Hashing algorithm for network receive filtering
US10015104B2 (en) 2005-12-28 2018-07-03 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Processing received data
US10104005B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2018-10-16 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Data buffering
US9083539B2 (en) 2006-02-08 2015-07-14 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for multicast packet reception
US8817784B2 (en) 2006-02-08 2014-08-26 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for multicast packet reception
US9686117B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2017-06-20 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Chimney onload implementation of network protocol stack
US10382248B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2019-08-13 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Chimney onload implementation of network protocol stack
US9948533B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2018-04-17 Solarflare Communitations, Inc. Interrupt management
US8489761B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2013-07-16 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Onload network protocol stacks
US20100057932A1 (en) * 2006-07-10 2010-03-04 Solarflare Communications Incorporated Onload network protocol stacks
US9077751B2 (en) 2006-11-01 2015-07-07 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Driver level segmentation
US7630070B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2009-12-08 Asml Netherlands B.V. Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
US20080151228A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2008-06-26 Asml Netherlands B.V. Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
US8543729B2 (en) 2007-11-29 2013-09-24 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Virtualised receive side scaling
US20100333101A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2010-12-30 Solarflare Communications Inc. Virtualised receive side scaling
US20110023042A1 (en) * 2008-02-05 2011-01-27 Solarflare Communications Inc. Scalable sockets
US9304825B2 (en) 2008-02-05 2016-04-05 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Processing, on multiple processors, data flows received through a single socket
US20110261339A1 (en) * 2008-11-07 2011-10-27 Asml Netherlands B.V. Scatterometer and lithographic apparatus
US8994921B2 (en) * 2008-11-07 2015-03-31 Asml Netherlands B.V. Scatterometer and lithographic apparatus
US8447904B2 (en) 2008-12-18 2013-05-21 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Virtualised interface functions
US9256560B2 (en) 2009-07-29 2016-02-09 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Controller integration
US9210140B2 (en) 2009-08-19 2015-12-08 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Remote functionality selection
US20110087774A1 (en) * 2009-10-08 2011-04-14 Solarflare Communications Inc Switching api
US8423639B2 (en) 2009-10-08 2013-04-16 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Switching API
US8743877B2 (en) 2009-12-21 2014-06-03 Steven L. Pope Header processing engine
US9124539B2 (en) 2009-12-21 2015-09-01 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Header processing engine
US10572417B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2020-02-25 Xilinx, Inc. Encapsulated accelerator
US10515037B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2019-12-24 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Encapsulated accelerator
US9880964B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2018-01-30 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Encapsulated accelerator
US11876880B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2024-01-16 Xilinx, Inc. TCP processing for devices
US8996644B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2015-03-31 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Encapsulated accelerator
US9674318B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2017-06-06 Solarflare Communications, Inc. TCP processing for devices
US9600429B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2017-03-21 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Encapsulated accelerator
US11134140B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2021-09-28 Xilinx, Inc. TCP processing for devices
US11132317B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2021-09-28 Xilinx, Inc. Encapsulated accelerator
US10873613B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2020-12-22 Xilinx, Inc. TCP processing for devices
US9892082B2 (en) 2010-12-09 2018-02-13 Solarflare Communications Inc. Encapsulated accelerator
US9008113B2 (en) 2010-12-20 2015-04-14 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Mapped FIFO buffering
US9800513B2 (en) 2010-12-20 2017-10-24 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Mapped FIFO buffering
US9384071B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2016-07-05 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Epoll optimisations
US10671458B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2020-06-02 Xilinx, Inc. Epoll optimisations
US9258390B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2016-02-09 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reducing network latency
US9456060B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2016-09-27 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reducing network latency
US10425512B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2019-09-24 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reducing network latency
US10469632B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2019-11-05 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reducing network latency
US10021223B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2018-07-10 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Reducing network latency
US10713099B2 (en) 2011-08-22 2020-07-14 Xilinx, Inc. Modifying application behaviour
US8763018B2 (en) 2011-08-22 2014-06-24 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Modifying application behaviour
US11392429B2 (en) 2011-08-22 2022-07-19 Xilinx, Inc. Modifying application behaviour
US9003053B2 (en) 2011-09-22 2015-04-07 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Message acceleration
US10505747B2 (en) 2012-10-16 2019-12-10 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Feed processing
US11374777B2 (en) 2012-10-16 2022-06-28 Xilinx, Inc. Feed processing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20080053232A (en) 2008-06-12
IL211805A (en) 2013-10-31
IL187798A (en) 2014-06-30
US20080151228A1 (en) 2008-06-26
KR100989377B1 (en) 2010-10-25
US7630070B2 (en) 2009-12-08
SG143215A1 (en) 2008-06-27
TW200837507A (en) 2008-09-16
JP4660533B2 (en) 2011-03-30
EP1930774A1 (en) 2008-06-11
IL187798A0 (en) 2008-03-20
JP2008185581A (en) 2008-08-14
CN101226340B (en) 2010-08-25
CN101226340A (en) 2008-07-23
KR100954762B1 (en) 2010-04-28
EP1930774B1 (en) 2014-10-22
KR20090048552A (en) 2009-05-14
TWI375131B (en) 2012-10-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7630070B2 (en) Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
KR101129332B1 (en) Inspection apparatus, lithographic apparatus, lithographic processing cell and inspection method
US20240044639A1 (en) Inspection method and apparatus, lithographic apparatus, lithographic processing cell and device manufacturing method
US8724087B2 (en) Inspection apparatus for lithography
US8111398B2 (en) Method of measurement, an inspection apparatus and a lithographic apparatus
US8125615B2 (en) Optical focus sensor, an inspection apparatus and a lithographic apparatus
US7724370B2 (en) Method of inspection, a method of manufacturing, an inspection apparatus, a substrate, a mask, a lithography apparatus and a lithographic cell
US8994921B2 (en) Scatterometer and lithographic apparatus
KR100944511B1 (en) Angularly resolved scatterometer and inspection method
US20090073448A1 (en) Method of measuring the overlay error, an inspection apparatus and a lithographic apparatus
US20100315613A1 (en) Inspection Method and Apparatus, Lithographic Apparatus, Lithographic Processing Cell and Device Manufacturing Method
US20100296072A1 (en) Inspection Apparatus, Lithographic Apparatus and Method of Measuring a Property of a Substrate
US20110102774A1 (en) Focus Sensor, Inspection Apparatus, Lithographic Apparatus and Control System

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V., NETHERLANDS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HUGERS, RONALD FRANCISCUS HERMAN;REEL/FRAME:018809/0263

Effective date: 20070112

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION