US20070288444A1 - Web-based customer service interface - Google Patents

Web-based customer service interface Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070288444A1
US20070288444A1 US11/843,972 US84397207A US2007288444A1 US 20070288444 A1 US20070288444 A1 US 20070288444A1 US 84397207 A US84397207 A US 84397207A US 2007288444 A1 US2007288444 A1 US 2007288444A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
natural language
client
query
language query
web
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/843,972
Inventor
Yoram Nelken
Randy Jessee
Steve Kirshner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
International Business Machines Corp
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Business Machines Corp filed Critical International Business Machines Corp
Priority to US11/843,972 priority Critical patent/US20070288444A1/en
Publication of US20070288444A1 publication Critical patent/US20070288444A1/en
Priority to US14/935,174 priority patent/US10055501B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/245Query processing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/953Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
    • G06F16/9535Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/951Indexing; Web crawling techniques
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/245Query processing
    • G06F16/2457Query processing with adaptation to user needs
    • G06F16/24575Query processing with adaptation to user needs using context
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/245Query processing
    • G06F16/2457Query processing with adaptation to user needs
    • G06F16/24578Query processing with adaptation to user needs using ranking
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/28Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
    • G06F16/284Relational databases
    • G06F16/285Clustering or classification
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/33Querying
    • G06F16/332Query formulation
    • G06F16/3329Natural language query formulation or dialogue systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/33Querying
    • G06F16/3331Query processing
    • G06F16/334Query execution
    • G06F16/3344Query execution using natural language analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/953Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
    • G06F16/9538Presentation of query results
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/955Retrieval from the web using information identifiers, e.g. uniform resource locators [URL]
    • G06F16/9558Details of hyperlinks; Management of linked annotations

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to electronic communications and relates more particularly to a system and method for a web-based customer service interface.
  • communications with customers and others may occur via a variety of different channels.
  • customers may also communicate with an organization via electronic mail, facsimile, web-based forms, web-based chat, and wireless communication and voice.
  • An organization will most likely incorporate these and any other newly developed communication channels to allow customers to communicate in a way they find most convenient.
  • Agents typically must look to various sources to gather all of the information required to respond appropriately to a customer communication.
  • the information may be retrieved from a variety of sources, such as legacy systems, databases, back office systems, and front office systems. Each of these sources may store data in a unique structure or format.
  • An agent typically gathers and organizes the required information from one or more of these information sources and uses the information to compose an appropriate content-rich reply that is responsive to the customer's intent.
  • the system comprises a web server for transmitting a web form having at least one text field box for entering a natural language query to a client, and a language analysis server for analyzing the natural language query and optional meta-data received from the client to classify the natural language query into at least one predefined category based on information contained within a knowledge base.
  • the web server is further configured to selectively transmit a resource page to the client, where the resource page includes at least one suggested response and optionally other data corresponding to at least one predefined category.
  • the web server is further configured to receive a communicative action from the client after the resource page is transmitted, wherein the language analysis server may adapt the knowledge base in accordance with the communicative action.
  • the language analysis server classifies the natural language query into predefined categories based on computed match scores, where each match score corresponds to one of the predefined categories. Furthermore, each match score is representative of a confidence level that the natural language query is relevant to a corresponding predefined category.
  • the language analysis server calculates each match score based upon a comparison of concepts extracted from the natural language query to concepts associated with the predefined categories. Each match score is representative of a statistical likelihood of the natural language query being correctly classified to the corresponding predefined category
  • the language analysis server routes the natural language query to an agent based upon an analysis of the computed match scores according to a predetermined logic (e.g., if none of the computed match scores meet a predetermined threshold level).
  • the language analysis server transmits a solution page to the client based upon an analysis of the computed match scores according to the predetermined logic (e.g., if at least one match score meets a predetermined high-threshold level).
  • the method comprises transmitting a web page having at least one user-interactable element for entering a natural language query and optional meta-data to a client, receiving the natural language query and the optional meta-data, analyzing the natural language query to classify the natural language query into at least one predefined category using information contained within a knowledge base, and selectively transmitting a resource page to the client.
  • the resource page includes at least one suggested response and optionally other data corresponding to at least one predefined category.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary block diagram of a customer service network for processing an electronic query, according to one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary embodiment of the customer service interface illustrated in FIG. 1 , according to one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a contact-us page, according to the invention
  • FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the drop-down box component illustrated in FIG. 3A , according to one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 3C illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the text field box illustrated in FIG. 3A , according to one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of the language analysis server illustrated in FIG. 2 , according to one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary communication-flow diagram for processing an electronic query as implemented by the customer service network illustrated in FIG. 1 , according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary method steps for processing an electronic query, according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary block diagram of a customer service network 100 for processing an electronic query, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the customer service network 100 comprises a client 105 , a network 110 (e.g., the Internet), and a customer service interface 115 .
  • the client 105 may comprise a browser 120 for browsing Internet web sites.
  • the customer service interface 115 receives, classifies, and automatically responds to electronic queries submitted by the client 105 via the network 110 .
  • the customer service interface 115 is discussed further below in conjunction with FIG. 2 .
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary embodiment of the customer service interface 115 illustrated in FIG. 1 , according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the customer service interface 115 comprises a server 205 , a language analysis server 210 , and a knowledge base 215 .
  • the language analysis server 210 and the knowledge base 215 may be integrated in a single module.
  • the server 205 preferably comprises a web-server 220 for providing web services to the client 105 ( FIG. 1 ).
  • the web-server 220 may submit a contact-us page to the client 105 .
  • the contact-us page allows a user to address an electronic query to the customer service interface 115 , and is discussed further below in conjunction with FIGS. 3A-3C .
  • the server 205 utilizes a script 225 for processing communications (i.e., queries) from the client 105 .
  • the script 205 may be any configurable or non-configurable mechanism for routing information between various components of the customer service interface 115 .
  • the communications received by the server 205 contain data or information that is structured and unstructured in nature. For example, the communications typically contain unstructured information expressed in natural language. Each individual client correspondent may compose a communication in a unique way, even when requesting the same type of information from the customer service interface 115 .
  • the communications may contain structured information, such as meta-data associated with the communication, and queries in which the client correspondent selects structured text displayed in drop-down menu boxes.
  • Meta-data may additionally include, for example, information not explicitly provided by the client correspondent, and information regarding client correspondent attributes accessible to the customer service interface 115 .
  • the script 225 parses the received communications, and sends the parsed information to the language analysis server 210 for further analysis.
  • the language analysis server 210 analyzes and classifies the electronic query comprising any combination of natural language text, structured text, and structured data (e.g., meta-data) into predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215 , based upon linguistic modeling rules and concepts associated with the predefined categories.
  • the language analysis server 210 linguistically analyzes the query based upon content and context of the query, and classifies the query to one or more of the predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215 based upon a match score derived from a statistical comparison of concepts extracted from the query to concepts associated with the one or more predefined categories.
  • the language analysis server 210 analyzes the query (i.e., extracts concepts from the query) to match the query to the one or more predefined categories using standard search techniques. The language analysis server 210 is discussed further below in conjunction with FIG. 4 .
  • the knowledge base 215 is a branching network of nodes arranged in a vertically structured hierarchy (i.e., tree hierarchy) that represent the various predefined categories. Logically related predefined categories are associated with a branch, which in turn may be associated with a branch of larger scope. Creation of the hierarchies can be either manual (via a configuration tool or an API), automatic by monitoring feedback received via the client 105 or an agent, or a combination, whereby an automatic tool displays suggestions according to performance of the customer service interface 115 . A user may then create the hierarchies based upon the suggestions.
  • the knowledge base 215 may also include flat hierarchies as a special case of tree hierarchies. An embodiment of the language analysis server 210 and the knowledge base 215 are discussed in more detail in patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled, “System and Method for Electronic Communication Management,” herein incorporated by reference, filed on an even date herewith.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a contact-us page 310 , as composed by the customer service interface 115 ( FIG. 2 ) and transmitted to the client 105 ( FIG. 1 ) via the network 110 ( FIG. 1 ).
  • the contact-us page 310 may include a selectable text box 320 and a text field box 330 for insertion of natural language text. In other embodiments, the contact-us page 310 comprises multiple fields.
  • FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the selectable text box 320 illustrated in FIG. 3A , according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the selectable text box 320 may include a plurality of drop-down boxes 322 that comprise predefined questions or statements, selectable by a user. For example, if the customer service interface 1 15 services a financial institution, then the drop-down boxes 322 may include statements corresponding to customer service issues such as loans, new accounts, PIN numbers, monetary transfers, among others.
  • FIG. 3C illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the text field box 330 illustrated in FIG. 3A , according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the text field box 330 comprises a selectable area in which the user may compose a natural language message to the customer service interface 115 .
  • the user may not be able to access an electronic application for financial aid, partially completed and saved on a server of the financial institution during a previous session.
  • the user may compose a message in the text field box 330 , comprising, for example, “A PIN number was sent to me when I electronically applied for financial aid. However, that PIN number does not allow me access to my financial aid account. Can you please rectify the situation?”
  • the customer service interface 115 classifies and responds to the message, either via a list of suggested responses, a direct link to a “solutions page,” or a confirmation page to the client that the query is being routed to an agent for further analysis.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of the language analysis server 210 as illustrated in FIG. 2 , according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the language analysis server 210 comprises a modeling application 410 and a language modeling engine 415 .
  • the modeling application serves as an interface to the server 205 for receiving and transmitting communications.
  • the modeling application 410 may compare match scores (computed by the language modeling engine 415 in classifying the query to predefined categories) with various predefined threshold scores to determine the nature of the automated response to the client 105 .
  • match scores computed by the language modeling engine 415 in classifying the query to predefined categories
  • predefined threshold scores to determine the nature of the automated response to the client 105 .
  • the basis of the automated response to the client's query is discussed below in further detail in association with FIGS. 5-6 .
  • the language modeling engine 415 analyzes and classifies natural language text, structured text, and meta-data into predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215 . For example, the language modeling engine 415 analyzes the text and the meta-data by application of linguistic and morphological models to extract concepts. The language modeling engine 415 then computes match scores based upon a comparison of the extracted concepts with rules and concepts associated with the predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215 . The computation of the match scores and further details of the knowledge base 215 are discussed below in conjunction with FIGS. 5-6 .
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary communication-flow diagram for processing an electronic query as implemented by the customer service network 100 illustrated in FIG. 1 , according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the web-server 220 serves a contact-us page 310 ( FIG. 3A ) to the client 105 ( FIG. 1 ) via a communication 510 .
  • the client 105 responds to the contact-us page 310 via a communication 512 .
  • the client 105 may respond to the contact-us page 310 (hereinafter referred to as a client query, or simply a query) by selecting specific choices displayed in the drop-down boxes 322 ( FIG. 3B ), by composing a natural language text in the text field box 330 ( FIG. 3C ), or both.
  • the web-server 220 receives the client query and routes the query to the script 225 ( FIG. 2 ).
  • the script 225 processes the query, and routes the query to the language analysis server 210 ( FIG. 2 ) via a communication 514 .
  • the language analysis server 210 linguistically and/or morphologically analyzes the query based upon content and context of the query, and classifies the query to one or more of the predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215 ( FIG. 2 ) via a communication 516 .
  • the language analysis server 210 classifies the query into the one or more predefined categories based upon a match score derived from a statistical comparison of concepts extracted from the query to concepts associated with the one or more predefined categories.
  • the language analysis server 210 may utilize meta-data in addition to conceptual data extracted from the query to classify the query to the one or more predefined categories.
  • meta-data includes peripheral data not typically associated with content of the query (i.e., with the natural language text and/or drop-down box selections).
  • the customer service interface 115 FIG. 2
  • the peripheral data may include user name, user account number, or customer service plan afforded the user.
  • the language analysis server 210 comprises classification techniques as disclosed in patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled, “System and Method for Electronic Communication Management,” herein incorporated by reference, filed on an even date herewith.
  • the scope of the present invention covers standard classification techniques well known in the art.
  • the language analysis server 210 computes, for each predefined category, a match score based upon concepts associated with the predefined categories, concepts extracted from the query, and metadata.
  • the customer service interface 115 services a motorcycle parts and equipment distribution house.
  • the knowledge base 215 has the following three predefined categories: a first predefined category entitled “new parts order,” a second predefined category entitled “complaints,” and a third predefined category entitled “suggestions.”
  • a client correspondent submits to the server 205 a query comprising a natural language text that states, for example, “I am unhappy with the head gasket that you shipped me for my 1955 BMW R50/2.
  • the language analysis server 210 computes a first, a second, and a third match score in classifying the query to the first, the second, and the third predefined categories, respectively, where the second match score is greater than the first match score, and the first match score is greater than the third match score.
  • the second match score may be 95
  • the first match score may be 42
  • the third match score may be 16.
  • each of the predefined categories has a corresponding resource, or linked suggested response in the knowledge base 215
  • the relative values of the computed match scores are indicative of a level of confidence of the corresponding suggested responses to answer the query or of the relevancy of the resource to the query.
  • the second match score of 95 indicates that the query is more likely to be resolved by the suggested response associated with the second predefined category than the suggested responses associated with the first or third predefined categories.
  • the language analysis server 210 sends the suggested responses and corresponding match scores to the server 205 via a communication 518 .
  • the customer service interface 115 is configured to respond to the communication 518 via either a first set of communications (i.e., communications 520 , 522 , and 524 ) or a second set of communications initiated by a communication 526 , depending upon the corresponding match scores as described below.
  • the customer service interface 115 responds via the first set of communications.
  • the predetermined logic includes any functional analysis of the match scores, exemplary embodiments of which include, but are not limited to, computations of an average match score, a median match score, a match score standard deviation, or other types of statistical and/or numerical functional analyses.
  • the server 205 sends a confirmation page to the client 105 via a communication 520 .
  • the confirmation page informs the client 105 that the query will be routed to an agent for further analysis.
  • the communication 520 may comprise additional information such as when the client 105 may expect to receive a reply from the agent, for example.
  • the language analysis server 210 routes the query to the agent for further analysis via a communication 522 .
  • the agent may then reply to the client's query, preferably via an electronic message.
  • the agent may also respond to the query via alternate communication channels, such as a telephone, a Web-based reply, or other means of electronic communication.
  • the language analysis server 210 may analyze the agent's reply, and, based upon the analysis, update the knowledge base 215 via a communication 524 .
  • the customer service interface 115 responds with the communication 526 .
  • the communication 526 comprises a solution page.
  • the communication 526 comprises a solution page when at least one of the computed match scores has a very high value.
  • the customer service interface 115 may respond with the communication 526 that comprises the solution page based upon an analysis of the match scores according to the predetermined logic as described above.
  • a client correspondent may submit a query to the server 205 via the communication 512 that recites, “I want to change my password.”
  • the customer service interface 115 classifies the query to a “change password” predefined category with a high degree of certainty (e.g., the customer service interface 115 classifies the query to the “change password” predefined category with a match score the meets a predetermined high-threshold score)
  • the server 205 sends the client 105 a “password changing” web page (i.e., the solution page).
  • the server 205 re-directs the client 105 to the solution page corresponding to the “password changing” web page.
  • the client 105 may then utilize the solution page to resolve the query.
  • the communication 526 may comprise a resource page.
  • the server 205 sends the resource page to the client 105 comprising the suggested responses having corresponding match scores greater than or equal to the predetermined threshold level via the communication 526 .
  • the resource page may also comprise other data (such as links to web resources) having corresponding match scores greater than or equal to the predetermined threshold level.
  • the client 105 may utilize one of several communicative actions (i.e., communicative actions 528 , 534 , or 540 ) to respond to the resource page.
  • the client 105 may select a suggested response on the resource page, respond to an embedded form on the resource page, or click on a link to a web resource, via a first communicative action 528 .
  • the first communicative action 528 is received and processed by the server 205 , and the server 205 then routes the processed first communicative action to the language analysis server 210 for linguistic analysis via a communication 530 .
  • the language analysis server 210 may optionally update the knowledge base 215 via a communication 532 based upon the linguistic analysis of the first communicative action 528 .
  • the client 105 may respond to the resource page via a second communicative action 534 .
  • the second communicative action 534 comprises a non-response to the resource page. More specifically, the client 105 does not respond to the resource page (i.e., the client is non-responsive). For example, in one embodiment of the invention, if the client 105 does not respond to the resource page within a given time limit, or if the client 105 disconnects from the server 205 , for example, the second communicative action 534 comprising a non-response is sent to the server 205 . The server 205 then sends a communication 536 to the language analysis server 210 indicating the non-response. The language analysis server 210 may update the knowledge base 215 based upon the non-responsiveness of the client 105 via an optional communication 538 .
  • the client 105 may respond to the resource page via a third communicative action 540 comprising a communicative escalation.
  • the client 105 may select (e.g., by mouse-clicking) a “request for help” button embedded in the resource page, or request more information regarding a particular suggested response.
  • the server 205 receives the third communicative action 540 comprising the communicative escalation, and routes the communicative escalation to the language analysis server 210 via a communication 542 .
  • the language analysis server 210 then sends the communicative escalation to the agent for further analysis via a communication 544 .
  • the language analysis server 210 may optionally update the knowledge base 215 based upon the agent's reply to the communicative escalation via a communication 546 .
  • FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary method steps for processing an electronic query, according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the client 105 submits an electronic query to a web-site.
  • the query may be in response to a page served to the client 105 by the web-server 220 ( FIG. 2 ) associated with the web site.
  • the client 105 may be running the browser 120 ( FIG. 1 ) to view the page served by the web-server 220 .
  • the server 205 FIG. 2
  • the server 205 may run the script 225 ( FIG. 2 ) that processes the query and routes the processed query to the language analysis server 210 ( FIG. 2 ).
  • the language analysis server 210 analyzes the query using the language modeling engine 415 ( FIG. 4 ) and the knowledge base 215 ( FIG. 2 ) to compute match scores and classify the query to predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215 based upon the match scores, where each predefined category is associated with a suggested response.
  • the knowledge base 215 is configured as a rule-oriented/concept-oriented database.
  • the knowledge base 215 may comprise a plurality of nodes configured in a hierarchically structured branching network, where each node is configured as either a rule-oriented or a concept-oriented node. Each concept-oriented node is typically associated with a predefined category.
  • the language analysis server 210 utilizes a statistical process to compute the match scores.
  • the language modeling engine 415 analyzes the natural language text of the query to generate concepts associated with the query.
  • the language modeling engine 415 then statistically compares the query-derived concepts with rules associated with the rule-oriented nodes and with concepts associated with the concept-oriented nodes stored in the knowledge base 215 .
  • the language modeling engine 415 then computes a match score for one or more concept-oriented nodes (i.e., for one or more predefined categories).
  • a high match score for a particular predefined category indicates that a suggested response corresponding to the predefined category is more likely to be a correct response than a suggested response corresponding to a predefined category with a low match score.
  • the modeling application 410 determines if the query meets any of the predetermined threshold levels for an automated response.
  • the modeling application 410 routes the query to an agent for further analysis.
  • the agent is a human agent.
  • the agent may be an automated service, such as an automated phone service or an automated computer system.
  • the server 205 sends the client 105 a confirmation page.
  • the confirmation page comprises a communication confirming that the client's query is being routed to the agent for further analysis.
  • the agent replies to the query.
  • the agent replies to the client 105 via an electronic mail system.
  • the scope of the present invention covers alternate agent-reply methods, such as web-based, telephonic, or facsimile methods.
  • the language analysis server 210 processes the agent's reply to the client to generate agent-based feedback.
  • the language analysis server 210 may then update the knowledge base 215 based upon the agent-based feedback.
  • the agent-based feedback may comprise positive or negative feedback.
  • the language analysis server 210 uses the feedback to modify the knowledge base.
  • the language analysis server 210 may modify concepts, add new concepts, eliminate concepts, or modify weights assigned to different concepts associated with concept-oriented nodes.
  • the language analysis server 210 may also modify relationships between nodes, such as structural relationships defined by branching structures, for example.
  • the language analysis server 210 may modify classification rules associated with rule-oriented nodes stored in the knowledge base 215 .
  • the server 205 submits a resource page to the client 105 .
  • the resource page may comprise a suggested response page, where each suggested response corresponds to a predefined category with an associated match score greater than or equal to the corresponding threshold level.
  • a suggested response may include a message that recites, for example, “no response was found.”
  • the resource page comprises a solution page that provides either a link or a web page to the client 105 that may directly resolve the query.
  • Each predefined category may have different threshold levels and high-threshold levels.
  • the client 105 responds to the resource page and the server 205 determines whether the client query is resolved based upon the client response. In one embodiment of the invention, the query is not resolved if the client 105 escalates (e.g., the client 105 responds with a request for help), and the process then continues at step 625 .
  • the language analysis server 210 receives client-based feedback (i.e., feedback based upon the client's response).
  • client-based feedback i.e., feedback based upon the client's response.
  • the query is considered resolved if the client 105 selects a suggested response, or if the client 105 does not select any response (i.e., the client 105 is non-responsive).
  • the language analysis server 210 updates. the knowledge base 215 based upon the client-based feedback. For example, a selection of a suggested response corresponding to a high match score generates a positive client-based feedback that may strengthen the concept-oriented nodes of the knowledge base 215 that generated the suggested responses. In one embodiment of the invention, a concept-oriented node may be strengthened by redistributing weights assigned to concepts associated with the node. However, if the client 105 selects a suggested response corresponding to a low match score, then the client 105 generates negative client-based feedback that may modify the concept-oriented nodes and branching structures that generated the selected suggested response.

Abstract

A system and method for processing a web-based query is provided. The system comprises a web server for transmitting a web form having a text field box for entering a natural language query, and a language analysis server for extracting concepts from the natural language query and classifying the natural language query into predefined categories via computed match scores based upon the extracted concepts and information contained within an adaptable knowledge base. In various embodiments, the web server selectively transmits either a resource page or a confirmation page to the client, based upon the match scores. The resource page may comprise at least one suggested response corresponding to at least one predefined category. The language analysis server may adapt the knowledge base in accordance with a communicative action received from the client after the resource page is transmitted.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application claims the priority and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/468,576 entitled “Web-Based Customer Service Interface,” filed on May 6, 2003, which is hereby incorporated by reference. This application is related to patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled, “System and Method for Electronic Communication Management,” herein incorporated by reference, filed on an even date herewith.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates generally to electronic communications and relates more particularly to a system and method for a web-based customer service interface.
  • 2. Description of the Background Art
  • In a typical organization, communications with customers and others may occur via a variety of different channels. In addition to traditional channels such as letters and telephone calls, customers may also communicate with an organization via electronic mail, facsimile, web-based forms, web-based chat, and wireless communication and voice. An organization will most likely incorporate these and any other newly developed communication channels to allow customers to communicate in a way they find most convenient.
  • Many of the communication channels mentioned above contain information that is unstructured in nature, usually expressed in natural language. Different customers may make identical requests each in a unique way, using different communication channels, different words and expressions, or both. Human agents are usually required to review each natural language communication to evaluate the customer's intent, and to determine what information or action would be responsive to that intent.
  • Agents typically must look to various sources to gather all of the information required to respond appropriately to a customer communication. The information may be retrieved from a variety of sources, such as legacy systems, databases, back office systems, and front office systems. Each of these sources may store data in a unique structure or format. An agent typically gathers and organizes the required information from one or more of these information sources and uses the information to compose an appropriate content-rich reply that is responsive to the customer's intent.
  • Utilizing people to respond to customer communications is often inefficient. In addition, an increase in the number of communications received by an organization typically requires an even larger increase in the number of people required to provide an acceptable level of customer service.
  • Several types of automatic systems exist for responding to customer communications. Rule-based systems, keyword-based systems, and statistical systems typically do not perform with the necessary accuracy to substantially automate business processes, such as responding to customer inquiries, and require a large investment in resources to keep them up-to-date. Many learning systems utilize a training set of data that is a poor representation of the system's world, which reduces the accuracy of the system and makes the process of updating the system very cumbersome.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a system and method for processing a web-based query. In one embodiment of the invention, the system comprises a web server for transmitting a web form having at least one text field box for entering a natural language query to a client, and a language analysis server for analyzing the natural language query and optional meta-data received from the client to classify the natural language query into at least one predefined category based on information contained within a knowledge base. The web server is further configured to selectively transmit a resource page to the client, where the resource page includes at least one suggested response and optionally other data corresponding to at least one predefined category. In addition, the web server is further configured to receive a communicative action from the client after the resource page is transmitted, wherein the language analysis server may adapt the knowledge base in accordance with the communicative action.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the language analysis server classifies the natural language query into predefined categories based on computed match scores, where each match score corresponds to one of the predefined categories. Furthermore, each match score is representative of a confidence level that the natural language query is relevant to a corresponding predefined category. The language analysis server calculates each match score based upon a comparison of concepts extracted from the natural language query to concepts associated with the predefined categories. Each match score is representative of a statistical likelihood of the natural language query being correctly classified to the corresponding predefined category
  • In another embodiment of the invention, the language analysis server routes the natural language query to an agent based upon an analysis of the computed match scores according to a predetermined logic (e.g., if none of the computed match scores meet a predetermined threshold level). In yet another embodiment, the language analysis server transmits a solution page to the client based upon an analysis of the computed match scores according to the predetermined logic (e.g., if at least one match score meets a predetermined high-threshold level).
  • In accordance with the invention, the method comprises transmitting a web page having at least one user-interactable element for entering a natural language query and optional meta-data to a client, receiving the natural language query and the optional meta-data, analyzing the natural language query to classify the natural language query into at least one predefined category using information contained within a knowledge base, and selectively transmitting a resource page to the client. The resource page includes at least one suggested response and optionally other data corresponding to at least one predefined category.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary block diagram of a customer service network for processing an electronic query, according to one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary embodiment of the customer service interface illustrated in FIG. 1, according to one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a contact-us page, according to the invention;
  • FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the drop-down box component illustrated in FIG. 3A, according to one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 3C illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the text field box illustrated in FIG. 3A, according to one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of the language analysis server illustrated in FIG. 2, according to one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary communication-flow diagram for processing an electronic query as implemented by the customer service network illustrated in FIG. 1, according to one embodiment of the invention; and
  • FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary method steps for processing an electronic query, according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary block diagram of a customer service network 100 for processing an electronic query, according to one embodiment of the present invention. The customer service network 100 comprises a client 105, a network 110 (e.g., the Internet), and a customer service interface 115. The client 105 may comprise a browser 120 for browsing Internet web sites. According to one embodiment of the invention, the customer service interface 115 receives, classifies, and automatically responds to electronic queries submitted by the client 105 via the network 110. The customer service interface 115 is discussed further below in conjunction with FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary embodiment of the customer service interface 115 illustrated in FIG. 1, according to one embodiment of the invention. The customer service interface 115 comprises a server 205, a language analysis server 210, and a knowledge base 215. In an alternate embodiment, the language analysis server 210 and the knowledge base 215 may be integrated in a single module. The server 205 preferably comprises a web-server 220 for providing web services to the client 105 (FIG. 1). For example, the web-server 220 may submit a contact-us page to the client 105. The contact-us page allows a user to address an electronic query to the customer service interface 115, and is discussed further below in conjunction with FIGS. 3A-3C. In addition, the server 205 utilizes a script 225 for processing communications (i.e., queries) from the client 105. The script 205 may be any configurable or non-configurable mechanism for routing information between various components of the customer service interface 115. The communications received by the server 205 contain data or information that is structured and unstructured in nature. For example, the communications typically contain unstructured information expressed in natural language. Each individual client correspondent may compose a communication in a unique way, even when requesting the same type of information from the customer service interface 115. In addition, the communications may contain structured information, such as meta-data associated with the communication, and queries in which the client correspondent selects structured text displayed in drop-down menu boxes. Meta-data may additionally include, for example, information not explicitly provided by the client correspondent, and information regarding client correspondent attributes accessible to the customer service interface 115. In one embodiment of the invention, the script 225 parses the received communications, and sends the parsed information to the language analysis server 210 for further analysis.
  • The language analysis server 210 analyzes and classifies the electronic query comprising any combination of natural language text, structured text, and structured data (e.g., meta-data) into predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215, based upon linguistic modeling rules and concepts associated with the predefined categories. In one embodiment, the language analysis server 210 linguistically analyzes the query based upon content and context of the query, and classifies the query to one or more of the predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215 based upon a match score derived from a statistical comparison of concepts extracted from the query to concepts associated with the one or more predefined categories. In another embodiment, the language analysis server 210 analyzes the query (i.e., extracts concepts from the query) to match the query to the one or more predefined categories using standard search techniques. The language analysis server 210 is discussed further below in conjunction with FIG. 4.
  • The knowledge base 215 is a branching network of nodes arranged in a vertically structured hierarchy (i.e., tree hierarchy) that represent the various predefined categories. Logically related predefined categories are associated with a branch, which in turn may be associated with a branch of larger scope. Creation of the hierarchies can be either manual (via a configuration tool or an API), automatic by monitoring feedback received via the client 105 or an agent, or a combination, whereby an automatic tool displays suggestions according to performance of the customer service interface 115. A user may then create the hierarchies based upon the suggestions. The knowledge base 215 may also include flat hierarchies as a special case of tree hierarchies. An embodiment of the language analysis server 210 and the knowledge base 215 are discussed in more detail in patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled, “System and Method for Electronic Communication Management,” herein incorporated by reference, filed on an even date herewith.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a contact-us page 310, as composed by the customer service interface 115 (FIG. 2) and transmitted to the client 105 (FIG. 1) via the network 110 (FIG. 1). The contact-us page 310 may include a selectable text box 320 and a text field box 330 for insertion of natural language text. In other embodiments, the contact-us page 310 comprises multiple fields.
  • FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the selectable text box 320 illustrated in FIG. 3A, according to one embodiment of the invention. The selectable text box 320 may include a plurality of drop-down boxes 322 that comprise predefined questions or statements, selectable by a user. For example, if the customer service interface 1 15 services a financial institution, then the drop-down boxes 322 may include statements corresponding to customer service issues such as loans, new accounts, PIN numbers, monetary transfers, among others.
  • FIG. 3C illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the text field box 330 illustrated in FIG. 3A, according to one embodiment of the invention. The text field box 330 comprises a selectable area in which the user may compose a natural language message to the customer service interface 115. For example, the user may not be able to access an electronic application for financial aid, partially completed and saved on a server of the financial institution during a previous session. The user may compose a message in the text field box 330, comprising, for example, “A PIN number was sent to me when I electronically applied for financial aid. However, that PIN number does not allow me access to my financial aid account. Could you please rectify the situation?” As described in more detail below in conjunction with FIGS. 5-6, the customer service interface 115 classifies and responds to the message, either via a list of suggested responses, a direct link to a “solutions page,” or a confirmation page to the client that the query is being routed to an agent for further analysis.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of the language analysis server 210 as illustrated in FIG. 2, according to one embodiment of the invention. The language analysis server 210 comprises a modeling application 410 and a language modeling engine 415. The modeling application serves as an interface to the server 205 for receiving and transmitting communications. In addition, the modeling application 410 may compare match scores (computed by the language modeling engine 415 in classifying the query to predefined categories) with various predefined threshold scores to determine the nature of the automated response to the client 105. The basis of the automated response to the client's query is discussed below in further detail in association with FIGS. 5-6.
  • The language modeling engine 415 analyzes and classifies natural language text, structured text, and meta-data into predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215. For example, the language modeling engine 415 analyzes the text and the meta-data by application of linguistic and morphological models to extract concepts. The language modeling engine 415 then computes match scores based upon a comparison of the extracted concepts with rules and concepts associated with the predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215. The computation of the match scores and further details of the knowledge base 215 are discussed below in conjunction with FIGS. 5-6.
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary communication-flow diagram for processing an electronic query as implemented by the customer service network 100 illustrated in FIG. 1, according to one embodiment of the invention. First, the web-server 220 (FIG. 2) serves a contact-us page 310 (FIG. 3A) to the client 105 (FIG. 1) via a communication 510. The client 105 responds to the contact-us page 310 via a communication 512. For example, the client 105 may respond to the contact-us page 310 (hereinafter referred to as a client query, or simply a query) by selecting specific choices displayed in the drop-down boxes 322 (FIG. 3B), by composing a natural language text in the text field box 330 (FIG. 3C), or both. The web-server 220 receives the client query and routes the query to the script 225 (FIG. 2). The script 225 processes the query, and routes the query to the language analysis server 210 (FIG. 2) via a communication 514.
  • The language analysis server 210 linguistically and/or morphologically analyzes the query based upon content and context of the query, and classifies the query to one or more of the predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215 (FIG. 2) via a communication 516. In one embodiment of the invention, the language analysis server 210 classifies the query into the one or more predefined categories based upon a match score derived from a statistical comparison of concepts extracted from the query to concepts associated with the one or more predefined categories. The language analysis server 210 may utilize meta-data in addition to conceptual data extracted from the query to classify the query to the one or more predefined categories. For example, meta-data includes peripheral data not typically associated with content of the query (i.e., with the natural language text and/or drop-down box selections). For example, if the customer service interface 115 (FIG. 2) services a financial institution, then the peripheral data may include user name, user account number, or customer service plan afforded the user. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the language analysis server 210 comprises classification techniques as disclosed in patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled, “System and Method for Electronic Communication Management,” herein incorporated by reference, filed on an even date herewith. However, the scope of the present invention covers standard classification techniques well known in the art.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the language analysis server 210 computes, for each predefined category, a match score based upon concepts associated with the predefined categories, concepts extracted from the query, and metadata. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, suppose that the customer service interface 115 services a motorcycle parts and equipment distribution house. Additionally, suppose that the knowledge base 215 has the following three predefined categories: a first predefined category entitled “new parts order,” a second predefined category entitled “complaints,” and a third predefined category entitled “suggestions.” A client correspondent submits to the server 205 a query comprising a natural language text that states, for example, “I am unhappy with the head gasket that you shipped me for my 1955 BMW R50/2. The surface of the replacement gasket is cross-hatched (unlike the original), leading to reduced power and oil leakage. Please either refund my purchase, credit my account or send me the correct gasket.” In response to this query, the language analysis server 210 computes a first, a second, and a third match score in classifying the query to the first, the second, and the third predefined categories, respectively, where the second match score is greater than the first match score, and the first match score is greater than the third match score. For example, the second match score may be 95, the first match score may be 42, and the third match score may be 16.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, each of the predefined categories has a corresponding resource, or linked suggested response in the knowledge base 215, and the relative values of the computed match scores are indicative of a level of confidence of the corresponding suggested responses to answer the query or of the relevancy of the resource to the query. For example, the second match score of 95 (relative to the first and third match scores of 42 and 16, respectively) indicates that the query is more likely to be resolved by the suggested response associated with the second predefined category than the suggested responses associated with the first or third predefined categories.
  • Next, the language analysis server 210 sends the suggested responses and corresponding match scores to the server 205 via a communication 518. In one embodiment of the invention, the customer service interface 115 is configured to respond to the communication 518 via either a first set of communications (i.e., communications 520, 522, and 524) or a second set of communications initiated by a communication 526, depending upon the corresponding match scores as described below.
  • If each of the corresponding match scores is less than a predetermined threshold score (where each predefined category may have a different predetermined threshold score), or based upon an analysis of the match scores according to a predetermined logic, then the customer service interface 115 responds via the first set of communications. The predetermined logic includes any functional analysis of the match scores, exemplary embodiments of which include, but are not limited to, computations of an average match score, a median match score, a match score standard deviation, or other types of statistical and/or numerical functional analyses. In an exemplary embodiment of the first set of communications, the server 205 sends a confirmation page to the client 105 via a communication 520. The confirmation page informs the client 105 that the query will be routed to an agent for further analysis. The communication 520 may comprise additional information such as when the client 105 may expect to receive a reply from the agent, for example. In addition, the language analysis server 210 routes the query to the agent for further analysis via a communication 522. The agent may then reply to the client's query, preferably via an electronic message. However the agent may also respond to the query via alternate communication channels, such as a telephone, a Web-based reply, or other means of electronic communication. Optionally, the language analysis server 210 may analyze the agent's reply, and, based upon the analysis, update the knowledge base 215 via a communication 524.
  • If, however, at least one of the corresponding match scores received by the server 205 via the communication 518 is greater than or equal to the predetermined threshold score (also referred to as a predetermined threshold level), then the customer service interface 115 responds with the communication 526. In one embodiment of the invention, the communication 526 comprises a solution page. The communication 526 comprises a solution page when at least one of the computed match scores has a very high value. Alternatively, the customer service interface 115 may respond with the communication 526 that comprises the solution page based upon an analysis of the match scores according to the predetermined logic as described above. For example, if the customer service interface 115 services a financial institute, a client correspondent may submit a query to the server 205 via the communication 512 that recites, “I want to change my password.” If the customer service interface 115 classifies the query to a “change password” predefined category with a high degree of certainty (e.g., the customer service interface 115 classifies the query to the “change password” predefined category with a match score the meets a predetermined high-threshold score), then the server 205 sends the client 105 a “password changing” web page (i.e., the solution page). In another embodiment, the server 205 re-directs the client 105 to the solution page corresponding to the “password changing” web page. The client 105 may then utilize the solution page to resolve the query.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, the communication 526 may comprise a resource page. For example, the server 205 sends the resource page to the client 105 comprising the suggested responses having corresponding match scores greater than or equal to the predetermined threshold level via the communication 526. The resource page may also comprise other data (such as links to web resources) having corresponding match scores greater than or equal to the predetermined threshold level. In one embodiment of the invention, the client 105 may utilize one of several communicative actions (i.e., communicative actions 528, 534, or 540) to respond to the resource page.
  • For example, the client 105 may select a suggested response on the resource page, respond to an embedded form on the resource page, or click on a link to a web resource, via a first communicative action 528. The first communicative action 528 is received and processed by the server 205, and the server 205 then routes the processed first communicative action to the language analysis server 210 for linguistic analysis via a communication 530. The language analysis server 210 may optionally update the knowledge base 215 via a communication 532 based upon the linguistic analysis of the first communicative action 528.
  • Alternatively, the client 105 may respond to the resource page via a second communicative action 534. The second communicative action 534 comprises a non-response to the resource page. More specifically, the client 105 does not respond to the resource page (i.e., the client is non-responsive). For example, in one embodiment of the invention, if the client 105 does not respond to the resource page within a given time limit, or if the client 105 disconnects from the server 205, for example, the second communicative action 534 comprising a non-response is sent to the server 205. The server 205 then sends a communication 536 to the language analysis server 210 indicating the non-response. The language analysis server 210 may update the knowledge base 215 based upon the non-responsiveness of the client 105 via an optional communication 538.
  • As an additional alternative, the client 105 may respond to the resource page via a third communicative action 540 comprising a communicative escalation. For example, the client 105 may select (e.g., by mouse-clicking) a “request for help” button embedded in the resource page, or request more information regarding a particular suggested response. The server 205 receives the third communicative action 540 comprising the communicative escalation, and routes the communicative escalation to the language analysis server 210 via a communication 542. The language analysis server 210 then sends the communicative escalation to the agent for further analysis via a communication 544. The language analysis server 210 may optionally update the knowledge base 215 based upon the agent's reply to the communicative escalation via a communication 546.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary method steps for processing an electronic query, according to one embodiment of the invention. In step 610, the client 105 (FIG. 1) submits an electronic query to a web-site. In one embodiment, the query may be in response to a page served to the client 105 by the web-server 220 (FIG. 2) associated with the web site. The client 105 may be running the browser 120 (FIG. 1) to view the page served by the web-server 220. Next, in step 615, the server 205 (FIG. 2) intercepts and routes the query. For example, the server 205 may run the script 225 (FIG. 2) that processes the query and routes the processed query to the language analysis server 210 (FIG. 2).
  • In step 620, the language analysis server 210 analyzes the query using the language modeling engine 415 (FIG. 4) and the knowledge base 215 (FIG. 2) to compute match scores and classify the query to predefined categories stored in the knowledge base 215 based upon the match scores, where each predefined category is associated with a suggested response. In one embodiment of the invention, the knowledge base 215 is configured as a rule-oriented/concept-oriented database. For example, the knowledge base 215 may comprise a plurality of nodes configured in a hierarchically structured branching network, where each node is configured as either a rule-oriented or a concept-oriented node. Each concept-oriented node is typically associated with a predefined category. In one embodiment of the invention, the language analysis server 210 utilizes a statistical process to compute the match scores. For example, the language modeling engine 415 analyzes the natural language text of the query to generate concepts associated with the query. The language modeling engine 415 then statistically compares the query-derived concepts with rules associated with the rule-oriented nodes and with concepts associated with the concept-oriented nodes stored in the knowledge base 215. The language modeling engine 415 then computes a match score for one or more concept-oriented nodes (i.e., for one or more predefined categories). In one embodiment, a high match score for a particular predefined category indicates that a suggested response corresponding to the predefined category is more likely to be a correct response than a suggested response corresponding to a predefined category with a low match score. Based upon the computed match scores, the modeling application 410 (FIG. 4) determines if the query meets any of the predetermined threshold levels for an automated response.
  • For example, if each match score associated with each predefined category is less than a corresponding predetermined threshold level, then in step 625, the modeling application 410 routes the query to an agent for further analysis. Preferably, the agent is a human agent. However, in alternate embodiments, the agent may be an automated service, such as an automated phone service or an automated computer system. Next, in step 630, the server 205 sends the client 105 a confirmation page. In one embodiment, the confirmation page comprises a communication confirming that the client's query is being routed to the agent for further analysis. Next, in step 635, the agent replies to the query. In one embodiment of the invention, the agent replies to the client 105 via an electronic mail system. However, the scope of the present invention covers alternate agent-reply methods, such as web-based, telephonic, or facsimile methods.
  • Next, in optional step 640, the language analysis server 210 processes the agent's reply to the client to generate agent-based feedback. The language analysis server 210 may then update the knowledge base 215 based upon the agent-based feedback. The agent-based feedback may comprise positive or negative feedback. The language analysis server 210 uses the feedback to modify the knowledge base. For example, the language analysis server 210 may modify concepts, add new concepts, eliminate concepts, or modify weights assigned to different concepts associated with concept-oriented nodes. The language analysis server 210 may also modify relationships between nodes, such as structural relationships defined by branching structures, for example. In alternate embodiments, the language analysis server 210 may modify classification rules associated with rule-oriented nodes stored in the knowledge base 215.
  • Referring back to step 620, if at least one match score associated with at least one predefined category is greater than or equal to a corresponding predetermined threshold level, then in step 645, the server 205 submits a resource page to the client 105. The resource page may comprise a suggested response page, where each suggested response corresponds to a predefined category with an associated match score greater than or equal to the corresponding threshold level. A suggested response may include a message that recites, for example, “no response was found.” Alternatively, if an associated match score is greater than or equal to a corresponding high-threshold level, then the resource page comprises a solution page that provides either a link or a web page to the client 105 that may directly resolve the query. Each predefined category may have different threshold levels and high-threshold levels. Next, in step 650, the client 105 responds to the resource page and the server 205 determines whether the client query is resolved based upon the client response. In one embodiment of the invention, the query is not resolved if the client 105 escalates (e.g., the client 105 responds with a request for help), and the process then continues at step 625.
  • However, if in step 650 the query is resolved, then in optional step 655, the language analysis server 210 receives client-based feedback (i.e., feedback based upon the client's response). In one embodiment of the invention, the query is considered resolved if the client 105 selects a suggested response, or if the client 105 does not select any response (i.e., the client 105 is non-responsive).
  • In optional step 655, the language analysis server 210 updates. the knowledge base 215 based upon the client-based feedback. For example, a selection of a suggested response corresponding to a high match score generates a positive client-based feedback that may strengthen the concept-oriented nodes of the knowledge base 215 that generated the suggested responses. In one embodiment of the invention, a concept-oriented node may be strengthened by redistributing weights assigned to concepts associated with the node. However, if the client 105 selects a suggested response corresponding to a low match score, then the client 105 generates negative client-based feedback that may modify the concept-oriented nodes and branching structures that generated the selected suggested response.
  • The present invention has been described above with reference to exemplary embodiments. Other embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of this disclosure. The present invention may readily be implemented using configurations other than those described in the exemplary embodiments above. Therefore, these and other variations upon the exemplary embodiments are covered by the present invention.

Claims (13)

1-10. (canceled)
11. A method for processing a web-based query, comprising:
transmitting a web page to a client for display, the web page including at least one user-interactable element for entering a natural language query and the web form including meta-data that is not associated with the natural language query's content;
receiving the natural language query and the meta-data from the client;
analyzing the natural language query and the meta-data to classify the natural language query into at least one predefined category using information contained within a knowledge base; and
selectively transmitting a resource page to the client for display, the resource page including at least one suggested response and optionally other data corresponding to the at least one predefined category.
12. The method of claim 11, further comprising:
receiving a communicative action from the client; and
adapting the knowledge base in accordance with the communicative action.
13. The method of claim 11, further comprising:
calculating a set of match scores, each match score of the set of match scores corresponding to one of a plurality of predefined categories and being representative of a confidence level that the natural language query is relevant to the one of the plurality of predefined categories; and
classifying the natural language query into the at least one predefined category based on a match score associated therewith.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising routing the natural language query to an agent if none of the match scores of the set of match scores meet a predetermined threshold level.
15. The method of claim 13, further comprising routing the natural language query to an agent based upon an analysis of the set of match scores according to a predetermined logic.
16. The method of claim 15, further comprising transmitting to the client a confirmation page confirming that the natural language query has been routed to the agent.
17. The method of claim 15, further comprising updating the knowledge base according to the agent's response to the natural language query.
18. The method of claim 13, further comprising transmitting a solution page to the client if at least one match score of the set of match scores meet a predetermined high-threshold level.
19. The method of claim 13, further comprising transmitting a solution page to the client based upon an analysis of the set of match scores according to a predetermined logic.
20. The method of claim 11, wherein the other data comprises one or more links to web resources.
21. A computer-readable storage medium having embodied thereon a program, the program being executable by a computer to perform a method for processing a web-based query, the method comprising:
transmitting a web page to a client for display, the web page including at least one user-interactable element for entering a natural language query and the web form including meta-data that is not associated with the natural language query's content;
receiving the natural language query and the meta-data from the client;
analyzing the natural language query and the meta-data to classify the natural language query into at least one predefined category using information contained within a knowledge base; and
selectively transmitting a resource page to the client for display, the resource page including at least one suggested response and optionally other data corresponding to the at least one predefined category.
22. A method for processing a web-based query, comprising:
means for transmitting a web page to a client for display, the web page including at least one user-interactable element for entering a natural language query and the web form including meta-data that is not associated with the natural language query's content;
means for receiving the natural language query and the meta-data from the client;
means for analyzing the natural language query and the meta-data to classify the natural language query into at least one predefined category using information contained within a knowledge base; and
means for selectively transmitting a resource page to the client for display, the resource page including at least one suggested response and optionally other data corresponding to the at least one predefined category.
US11/843,972 2003-05-06 2007-08-23 Web-based customer service interface Abandoned US20070288444A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/843,972 US20070288444A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2007-08-23 Web-based customer service interface
US14/935,174 US10055501B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2015-11-06 Web-based customer service interface

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US46857603P 2003-05-06 2003-05-06
US10/839,930 US20050187913A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2004-05-05 Web-based customer service interface
US11/843,972 US20070288444A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2007-08-23 Web-based customer service interface

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/839,930 Continuation US20050187913A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2004-05-05 Web-based customer service interface

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/935,174 Continuation US10055501B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2015-11-06 Web-based customer service interface

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070288444A1 true US20070288444A1 (en) 2007-12-13

Family

ID=34864338

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/839,930 Abandoned US20050187913A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2004-05-05 Web-based customer service interface
US11/843,972 Abandoned US20070288444A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2007-08-23 Web-based customer service interface
US14/935,174 Expired - Fee Related US10055501B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2015-11-06 Web-based customer service interface

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/839,930 Abandoned US20050187913A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2004-05-05 Web-based customer service interface

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/935,174 Expired - Fee Related US10055501B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2015-11-06 Web-based customer service interface

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US20050187913A1 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060259465A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2006-11-16 Microsoft Corporation Binding for multi-part identifiers
US20070150458A1 (en) * 2005-12-08 2007-06-28 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute System for extending data query using ontology, and method therefor
US7702642B1 (en) * 2005-12-07 2010-04-20 Precise Software Solutions, Inc. Method, system and computer-readable code for instrumenting code for logging database-related strings
US20100145961A1 (en) * 2008-12-05 2010-06-10 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for adaptive categorization for use with dynamic taxonomies
US20120233207A1 (en) * 2010-07-29 2012-09-13 Keyvan Mohajer Systems and Methods for Enabling Natural Language Processing
US8438276B1 (en) 2004-08-31 2013-05-07 Precise Software Solutions, Inc. Method of monitoring network and application performance by analyzing web clients and web servers
WO2013177213A2 (en) 2012-05-24 2013-11-28 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for enabling natural language processing
US8688253B2 (en) 2010-05-04 2014-04-01 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for sound recognition
US8694534B2 (en) 2010-07-29 2014-04-08 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for searching databases by sound input
US8788527B1 (en) 2003-12-31 2014-07-22 Precise Software Solutions, Inc. Object-level database performance management
US8856148B1 (en) 2009-11-18 2014-10-07 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for determining underplayed and overplayed items
US9292488B2 (en) 2014-02-01 2016-03-22 Soundhound, Inc. Method for embedding voice mail in a spoken utterance using a natural language processing computer system
US9390167B2 (en) 2010-07-29 2016-07-12 Soundhound, Inc. System and methods for continuous audio matching
WO2016149528A1 (en) * 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 24/7 Customer, Inc. Systems and methods for acquiring structured inputs in customer interactions
US9507849B2 (en) 2013-11-28 2016-11-29 Soundhound, Inc. Method for combining a query and a communication command in a natural language computer system
US9564123B1 (en) 2014-05-12 2017-02-07 Soundhound, Inc. Method and system for building an integrated user profile
US20170060366A1 (en) * 2015-08-27 2017-03-02 Oracle International Corporation Knowledge base search and retrieval based on document similarity
US10121165B1 (en) 2011-05-10 2018-11-06 Soundhound, Inc. System and method for targeting content based on identified audio and multimedia
CN109493186A (en) * 2018-11-20 2019-03-19 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 The method and apparatus for determining pushed information
CN110213344A (en) * 2019-05-14 2019-09-06 长沙手之声信息科技有限公司 A kind of long-range sign language translation on line system and method for multicenter
US10832005B1 (en) 2013-11-21 2020-11-10 Soundhound, Inc. Parsing to determine interruptible state in an utterance by detecting pause duration and complete sentences
US10957310B1 (en) 2012-07-23 2021-03-23 Soundhound, Inc. Integrated programming framework for speech and text understanding with meaning parsing
US11295730B1 (en) 2014-02-27 2022-04-05 Soundhound, Inc. Using phonetic variants in a local context to improve natural language understanding

Families Citing this family (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8290768B1 (en) 2000-06-21 2012-10-16 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for determining a set of attributes based on content of communications
US6408277B1 (en) * 2000-06-21 2002-06-18 Banter Limited System and method for automatic task prioritization
US9699129B1 (en) 2000-06-21 2017-07-04 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for increasing email productivity
US7644057B2 (en) * 2001-01-03 2010-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for electronic communication management
US8495002B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2013-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Software tool for training and testing a knowledge base
US20050187913A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2005-08-25 Yoram Nelken Web-based customer service interface
US20040249796A1 (en) * 2003-06-06 2004-12-09 Microsoft Corporation Query classification
US8364467B1 (en) 2006-03-31 2013-01-29 Google Inc. Content-based classification
US7849030B2 (en) 2006-05-31 2010-12-07 Hartford Fire Insurance Company Method and system for classifying documents
US20070282594A1 (en) * 2006-06-02 2007-12-06 Microsoft Corporation Machine translation in natural language application development
WO2008055034A2 (en) * 2006-10-30 2008-05-08 Noblis, Inc. Method and system for personal information extraction and modeling with fully generalized extraction contexts
JP4810469B2 (en) * 2007-03-02 2011-11-09 株式会社東芝 Search support device, program, and search support system
US8082151B2 (en) * 2007-09-18 2011-12-20 At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp System and method of generating responses to text-based messages
US20130232204A1 (en) * 2012-03-01 2013-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Identifying and processing previously sent and received messages
US20160004696A1 (en) * 2013-07-07 2016-01-07 Hristo Trenkov Call and response processing engine and clearinghouse architecture, system and method
US9864952B2 (en) * 2014-05-27 2018-01-09 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Controlled question and answer knowledge system management confirming customer does not want to terminate/cancel service/relationship
US11651242B2 (en) 2014-08-27 2023-05-16 International Business Machines Corporation Generating answers to text input in an electronic communication tool with a question answering system
US10019672B2 (en) * 2014-08-27 2018-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Generating responses to electronic communications with a question answering system
US10805244B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2020-10-13 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Service platform to support automated chat communications and methods for use therewith
US10268734B2 (en) * 2016-09-30 2019-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation Providing search results based on natural language classification confidence information
CN108269112A (en) * 2016-12-30 2018-07-10 北京国双科技有限公司 The update method and device of advertising creative
US10997227B2 (en) * 2017-01-18 2021-05-04 Google Llc Systems and methods for processing a natural language query in data tables
US10691685B2 (en) * 2017-06-03 2020-06-23 Apple Inc. Converting natural language input to structured queries
US10614143B2 (en) * 2017-08-28 2020-04-07 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for automated page category recommendation
US20190108276A1 (en) * 2017-10-10 2019-04-11 NEGENTROPICS Mesterséges Intelligencia Kutató és Fejlesztõ Kft Methods and system for semantic search in large databases
US11288566B2 (en) 2018-05-31 2022-03-29 International Business Machines Corporation Building a gossip group of domain-specific chatbots
WO2020073022A1 (en) * 2018-10-04 2020-04-09 Virtual Hold Technology Solutions, Llc System and method for assisting customers in accessing service opions.
US10776137B2 (en) * 2018-11-21 2020-09-15 International Business Machines Corporation Decluttering a computer device desktop
US11140099B2 (en) * 2019-05-21 2021-10-05 Apple Inc. Providing message response suggestions
US11436489B2 (en) * 2019-11-25 2022-09-06 Intuit Inc. Combining statistical methods with a knowledge graph
CN114006987A (en) * 2021-10-29 2022-02-01 联想(北京)有限公司 Visual interaction method and device

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010047270A1 (en) * 2000-02-16 2001-11-29 Gusick David L. Customer service system and method
US20020059069A1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2002-05-16 Cheng Hsu Natural language interface
US20030004706A1 (en) * 2001-06-27 2003-01-02 Yale Thomas W. Natural language processing system and method for knowledge management
US20040010491A1 (en) * 2002-06-28 2004-01-15 Markus Riedinger User interface framework
US20040064554A1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-01 Kuno Harumi Anne Network service system and mechanism for searching service registries
US6889222B1 (en) * 2000-12-26 2005-05-03 Aspect Communications Corporation Method and an apparatus for providing personalized service

Family Cites Families (334)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US254904A (en) * 1882-03-14 Process of producing barbed fencing material
US52907A (en) * 1866-02-27 Improvement in paper shirt-bosoms
US73129A (en) * 1868-01-07 Franklin r
US78119A (en) * 1868-05-19 Barak t
US87623A (en) * 1869-03-09 Improved pinion
US87618A (en) * 1869-03-09 Improved compound for renewing hair
US42090A (en) * 1864-03-29 Improvement in window-sash weights
US27463A (en) * 1860-03-13 George e
US3648253A (en) * 1969-12-10 1972-03-07 Ibm Program scheduler for processing systems
US4110823A (en) 1977-02-17 1978-08-29 Xerox Corporation Soft display word processing system with multiple autonomous processors
US4286322A (en) 1979-07-03 1981-08-25 International Business Machines Corporation Task handling apparatus
JPS58175074A (en) * 1982-04-07 1983-10-14 Toshiba Corp Analyzing system of sentence structure
US4814974A (en) * 1982-07-02 1989-03-21 American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories Programmable memory-based arbitration system for implementing fixed and flexible priority arrangements
US4724523A (en) * 1985-07-01 1988-02-09 Houghton Mifflin Company Method and apparatus for the electronic storage and retrieval of expressions and linguistic information
US4658370A (en) * 1984-06-07 1987-04-14 Teknowledge, Inc. Knowledge engineering tool
US4908865A (en) * 1984-12-27 1990-03-13 Texas Instruments Incorporated Speaker independent speech recognition method and system
US4642756A (en) * 1985-03-15 1987-02-10 S & H Computer Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for scheduling the execution of multiple processing tasks in a computer system
US4852181A (en) * 1985-09-26 1989-07-25 Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Speech recognition for recognizing the catagory of an input speech pattern
JPH063934B2 (en) 1986-11-25 1994-01-12 株式会社日立製作所 Automatic reminder system
US4914657A (en) * 1987-04-15 1990-04-03 Allied-Signal Inc. Operations controller for a fault tolerant multiple node processing system
US4823306A (en) 1987-08-14 1989-04-18 International Business Machines Corporation Text search system
US4942527A (en) 1987-12-11 1990-07-17 Schumacher Billy G Computerized management system
US5051924A (en) 1988-03-31 1991-09-24 Bergeron Larry E Method and apparatus for the generation of reports
US5228116A (en) 1988-07-15 1993-07-13 Aicorp., Inc. Knowledge base management system
DE68928230T2 (en) 1988-09-15 1998-02-05 Oce Tech Bv System for the grammatical processing of a sentence composed of natural language
US5067099A (en) 1988-11-03 1991-11-19 Allied-Signal Inc. Methods and apparatus for monitoring system performance
US5111398A (en) 1988-11-21 1992-05-05 Xerox Corporation Processing natural language text using autonomous punctuational structure
JPH02159674A (en) * 1988-12-13 1990-06-19 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Method for analyzing meaning and method for analyzing syntax
US5023832A (en) 1989-01-12 1991-06-11 Honeywell Inc. Method of maintaining asynchronous real-time data
JP2635750B2 (en) 1989-01-25 1997-07-30 株式会社東芝 Priority determination device
NL8900247A (en) 1989-02-01 1990-09-03 Bso Buro Voor Systeemontwikkel METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING MULTIPLE ANALYZES IN A DEPENDENCE GRAMMATICS, AND A DEPLUSING DEVICE FOR GENERATING SUCH VIEW.
US4984178A (en) * 1989-02-21 1991-01-08 Texas Instruments Incorporated Chart parser for stochastic unification grammar
JPH02240769A (en) * 1989-03-14 1990-09-25 Canon Inc Device for preparing natural language sentence
GB8918553D0 (en) 1989-08-15 1989-09-27 Digital Equipment Int Message control system
US5794194A (en) 1989-11-28 1998-08-11 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Word spotting in a variable noise level environment
US5018215A (en) 1990-03-23 1991-05-21 Honeywell Inc. Knowledge and model based adaptive signal processor
US5125024A (en) 1990-03-28 1992-06-23 At&T Bell Laboratories Voice response unit
US5251129A (en) 1990-08-21 1993-10-05 General Electric Company Method for automated morphological analysis of word structure
US5418717A (en) 1990-08-27 1995-05-23 Su; Keh-Yih Multiple score language processing system
US5325298A (en) 1990-11-07 1994-06-28 Hnc, Inc. Methods for generating or revising context vectors for a plurality of word stems
US5615360A (en) * 1990-11-13 1997-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method for interfacing applications with a content addressable memory
JPH04182000A (en) 1990-11-16 1992-06-29 A T R Jido Honyaku Denwa Kenkyusho:Kk Continuous speech recognizing device
JP3009215B2 (en) 1990-11-30 2000-02-14 株式会社日立製作所 Natural language processing method and natural language processing system
US5708829A (en) * 1991-02-01 1998-01-13 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Text indexing system
US5369577A (en) 1991-02-01 1994-11-29 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Text searching system
GB9106082D0 (en) 1991-03-22 1991-05-08 Secr Defence Dynamical system analyser
JPH04315254A (en) * 1991-04-15 1992-11-06 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Signal identification device
US5365430A (en) 1991-06-25 1994-11-15 At&T Bell Laboratories Method for parsing images
US5210872A (en) 1991-06-28 1993-05-11 Texas Instruments Inc. Critical task scheduling for real-time systems
US5345501A (en) 1991-07-15 1994-09-06 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Telephone central office based method of and system for processing customer orders
US5251131A (en) 1991-07-31 1993-10-05 Thinking Machines Corporation Classification of data records by comparison of records to a training database using probability weights
US5349526A (en) 1991-08-07 1994-09-20 Occam Research Corporation System and method for converting sentence elements unrecognizable by a computer system into base language elements recognizable by the computer system
US5630128A (en) 1991-08-09 1997-05-13 International Business Machines Corporation Controlled scheduling of program threads in a multitasking operating system
DE4131387A1 (en) 1991-09-20 1993-03-25 Siemens Ag METHOD FOR RECOGNIZING PATTERNS IN TIME VARIANTS OF MEASURING SIGNALS
US5265033A (en) 1991-09-23 1993-11-23 Atm Communications International, Inc. ATM/POS based electronic mail system
US5265065A (en) 1991-10-08 1993-11-23 West Publishing Company Method and apparatus for information retrieval from a database by replacing domain specific stemmed phases in a natural language to create a search query
US5369570A (en) 1991-11-14 1994-11-29 Parad; Harvey A. Method and system for continuous integrated resource management
US6507872B1 (en) * 1992-09-25 2003-01-14 David Michael Geshwind Class of methods for improving perceived efficiency of end-user interactive access of a large database such as the world-wide web via a communication network such as “The Internet”
US5278942A (en) * 1991-12-05 1994-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation Speech coding apparatus having speaker dependent prototypes generated from nonuser reference data
US5371807A (en) 1992-03-20 1994-12-06 Digital Equipment Corporation Method and apparatus for text classification
US5544262A (en) 1992-04-07 1996-08-06 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for processing graphically input equations
US5325526A (en) 1992-05-12 1994-06-28 Intel Corporation Task scheduling in a multicomputer system
US5247677A (en) 1992-05-22 1993-09-21 Apple Computer, Inc. Stochastic priority-based task scheduler
US5625554A (en) * 1992-07-20 1997-04-29 Xerox Corporation Finite-state transduction of related word forms for text indexing and retrieval
US5311583A (en) 1992-08-05 1994-05-10 At&T Bell Laboratories International priority calling system with callback features
EP0657043B1 (en) * 1992-08-31 1997-03-05 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Configurable man-machine communication structure for machine tool or robot control systems
ATE239337T1 (en) * 1992-09-30 2003-05-15 Motorola Inc ELECTRONIC MESSAGE DELIVERY SYSTEM
GB9222884D0 (en) 1992-10-30 1992-12-16 Massachusetts Inst Technology System for administration of privatization in newly democratic nations
IL107482A (en) 1992-11-04 1998-10-30 Conquest Software Inc Method for resolution of natural-language queries against full-text databases
JP3553987B2 (en) * 1992-11-13 2004-08-11 株式会社日立製作所 Client server system
US5559710A (en) 1993-02-05 1996-09-24 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Apparatus for control and evaluation of pending jobs in a factory
JP2561801B2 (en) 1993-02-24 1996-12-11 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション Method and system for managing process scheduling
JP3599775B2 (en) * 1993-04-21 2004-12-08 ゼロックス コーポレイション Finite state coding system for hyphenation rules
CA2115210C (en) 1993-04-21 1997-09-23 Joseph C. Andreshak Interactive computer system recognizing spoken commands
US5832220A (en) 1993-04-30 1998-11-03 International Business Machines Corp. Automatic settting of an acknowledgement option based upon distribution content in a data processing system
US5475588A (en) 1993-06-18 1995-12-12 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. System for decreasing the time required to parse a sentence
DE4331710A1 (en) 1993-09-17 1995-03-23 Sel Alcatel Ag Method and device for creating and editing text documents
US5745652A (en) * 1993-10-08 1998-04-28 International Business Machines Corporation Adaptive resource allocation using neural networks
US5437032A (en) 1993-11-04 1995-07-25 International Business Machines Corporation Task scheduler for a miltiprocessor system
US5991751A (en) 1997-06-02 1999-11-23 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for patent-centric and group-oriented data processing
ATE193607T1 (en) 1993-11-26 2000-06-15 Siemens Ag COMPUTING UNIT WITH SEVERAL EXECUTIONABLE TASKS
US5493692A (en) * 1993-12-03 1996-02-20 Xerox Corporation Selective delivery of electronic messages in a multiple computer system based on context and environment of a user
US5444820A (en) 1993-12-09 1995-08-22 Long Island Lighting Company Adaptive system and method for predicting response times in a service environment
JP3476237B2 (en) 1993-12-28 2003-12-10 富士通株式会社 Parser
US5806040A (en) 1994-01-04 1998-09-08 Itt Corporation Speed controlled telephone credit card verification system
JP3339741B2 (en) 1994-01-13 2002-10-28 株式会社リコー Language analyzer
EP0667587A3 (en) 1994-02-15 1996-01-31 Motorola Inc Method for generically describing measured results.
US5600831A (en) 1994-02-28 1997-02-04 Lucent Technologies Inc. Apparatus and methods for retrieving information by modifying query plan based on description of information sources
IL113432A (en) 1994-04-23 2000-11-21 Glaxo Group Ltd Process for the diastereoselective synthesis of nucleoside analogues
US5644686A (en) 1994-04-29 1997-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation Expert system and method employing hierarchical knowledge base, and interactive multimedia/hypermedia applications
US5542088A (en) 1994-04-29 1996-07-30 Intergraph Corporation Method and apparatus for enabling control of task execution
US5826076A (en) 1994-05-13 1998-10-20 Liant Software Corporation Computer-based information access method and apparatus to permit SQL-based manipulation of programming language-specific data files
US5493677A (en) * 1994-06-08 1996-02-20 Systems Research & Applications Corporation Generation, archiving, and retrieval of digital images with evoked suggestion-set captions and natural language interface
US5752052A (en) 1994-06-24 1998-05-12 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for bootstrapping statistical processing into a rule-based natural language parser
US5610812A (en) * 1994-06-24 1997-03-11 Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. Contextual tagger utilizing deterministic finite state transducer
US5748973A (en) 1994-07-15 1998-05-05 George Mason University Advanced integrated requirements engineering system for CE-based requirements assessment
US5577239A (en) 1994-08-10 1996-11-19 Moore; Jeffrey Chemical structure storage, searching and retrieval system
FR2724243B1 (en) 1994-09-06 1997-08-14 Sgs Thomson Microelectronics MULTI-TASK PROCESSING SYSTEM
DE4434255A1 (en) 1994-09-24 1996-03-28 Sel Alcatel Ag Device for voice recording with subsequent text creation
US5799268A (en) 1994-09-28 1998-08-25 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for extracting knowledge from online documentation and creating a glossary, index, help database or the like
US5596502A (en) * 1994-11-14 1997-01-21 Sunoptech, Ltd. Computer system including means for decision support scheduling
JP2855409B2 (en) 1994-11-17 1999-02-10 日本アイ・ビー・エム株式会社 Natural language processing method and system
US5577241A (en) 1994-12-07 1996-11-19 Excite, Inc. Information retrieval system and method with implementation extensible query architecture
GB2296349A (en) 1994-12-19 1996-06-26 Secr Defence Maintaining order of input data events
US5694616A (en) 1994-12-30 1997-12-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for prioritization of email items by selectively associating priority attribute with at least one and fewer than all of the recipients
DE19604803A1 (en) * 1995-02-10 1996-10-10 Meidensha Electric Mfg Co Ltd System condition monitor using chaos theory
JP2923552B2 (en) 1995-02-13 1999-07-26 富士通株式会社 Method of constructing organization activity database, input method of analysis sheet used for it, and organization activity management system
US5845246A (en) 1995-02-28 1998-12-01 Voice Control Systems, Inc. Method for reducing database requirements for speech recognition systems
US5701400A (en) 1995-03-08 1997-12-23 Amado; Carlos Armando Method and apparatus for applying if-then-else rules to data sets in a relational data base and generating from the results of application of said rules a database of diagnostics linked to said data sets to aid executive analysis of financial data
US5636124A (en) 1995-03-08 1997-06-03 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Multitasking industrial controller
EP0732651B1 (en) * 1995-03-15 2001-09-26 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Data processing system for executing tasks having diverse priorities and modem incorporating same
US5724481A (en) * 1995-03-30 1998-03-03 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for automatic speech recognition of arbitrary spoken words
US5754671A (en) 1995-04-12 1998-05-19 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method for improving cursive address recognition in mail pieces using adaptive data base management
US5749066A (en) 1995-04-24 1998-05-05 Ericsson Messaging Systems Inc. Method and apparatus for developing a neural network for phoneme recognition
US5634121A (en) 1995-05-30 1997-05-27 Lockheed Martin Corporation System for identifying and linking domain information using a parsing process to identify keywords and phrases
JP3385146B2 (en) 1995-06-13 2003-03-10 シャープ株式会社 Conversational sentence translator
US5724571A (en) * 1995-07-07 1998-03-03 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating query responses in a computer-based document retrieval system
US5680628A (en) 1995-07-19 1997-10-21 Inso Corporation Method and apparatus for automated search and retrieval process
CA2180392C (en) 1995-07-31 2001-02-13 Paul Wesley Cohrs User selectable multiple threshold criteria for voice recognition
US6006221A (en) 1995-08-16 1999-12-21 Syracuse University Multilingual document retrieval system and method using semantic vector matching
US6026388A (en) * 1995-08-16 2000-02-15 Textwise, Llc User interface and other enhancements for natural language information retrieval system and method
US5634053A (en) 1995-08-29 1997-05-27 Hughes Aircraft Company Federated information management (FIM) system and method for providing data site filtering and translation for heterogeneous databases
US5822731A (en) 1995-09-15 1998-10-13 Infonautics Corporation Adjusting a hidden Markov model tagger for sentence fragments
US5737734A (en) * 1995-09-15 1998-04-07 Infonautics Corporation Query word relevance adjustment in a search of an information retrieval system
JP3298379B2 (en) 1995-09-20 2002-07-02 株式会社日立製作所 Electronic approval method and system
US5884032A (en) * 1995-09-25 1999-03-16 The New Brunswick Telephone Company, Limited System for coordinating communications via customer contact channel changing system using call centre for setting up the call between customer and an available help agent
US5940612A (en) 1995-09-27 1999-08-17 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for queuing of tasks in a multiprocessing system
US5765033A (en) 1997-02-06 1998-06-09 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. System for routing electronic mails
US5948058A (en) 1995-10-30 1999-09-07 Nec Corporation Method and apparatus for cataloging and displaying e-mail using a classification rule preparing means and providing cataloging a piece of e-mail into multiple categories or classification types based on e-mail object information
US5764906A (en) 1995-11-07 1998-06-09 Netword Llc Universal electronic resource denotation, request and delivery system
GB9524136D0 (en) 1995-11-23 1996-01-24 Xerox Corp Indexing a database by finite-state transducer
US6278973B1 (en) 1995-12-12 2001-08-21 Lucent Technologies, Inc. On-demand language processing system and method
IL116708A (en) 1996-01-08 2000-12-06 Smart Link Ltd Real-time task manager for a personal computer
US6073101A (en) 1996-02-02 2000-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Text independent speaker recognition for transparent command ambiguity resolution and continuous access control
US5895447A (en) * 1996-02-02 1999-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Speech recognition using thresholded speaker class model selection or model adaptation
US6076088A (en) 1996-02-09 2000-06-13 Paik; Woojin Information extraction system and method using concept relation concept (CRC) triples
JPH11506239A (en) * 1996-03-05 1999-06-02 フィリップス エレクトロニクス ネムローゼ フェンノートシャップ Transaction system
US6301602B1 (en) 1996-03-08 2001-10-09 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Priority information display system
DE19610848A1 (en) 1996-03-19 1997-09-25 Siemens Ag Computer unit for speech recognition and method for computer-aided mapping of a digitized speech signal onto phonemes
EP0798638B1 (en) 1996-03-28 2008-07-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Periodic process scheduling method
US5721897A (en) 1996-04-09 1998-02-24 Rubinstein; Seymour I. Browse by prompted keyword phrases with an improved user interface
US5913215A (en) 1996-04-09 1999-06-15 Seymour I. Rubinstein Browse by prompted keyword phrases with an improved method for obtaining an initial document set
US5995922A (en) 1996-05-02 1999-11-30 Microsoft Corporation Identifying information related to an input word in an electronic dictionary
US5715371A (en) * 1996-05-31 1998-02-03 Lucent Technologies Inc. Personal computer-based intelligent networks
US5819210A (en) 1996-06-21 1998-10-06 Xerox Corporation Method of lazy contexted copying during unification
US6035104A (en) * 1996-06-28 2000-03-07 Data Link Systems Corp. Method and apparatus for managing electronic documents by alerting a subscriber at a destination other than the primary destination
US5878386A (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Natural language parser with dictionary-based part-of-speech probabilities
US5721770A (en) * 1996-07-02 1998-02-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Agent vectoring programmably conditionally assigning agents to various tasks including tasks other than handling of waiting calls
JPH10105368A (en) 1996-07-12 1998-04-24 Senshu Ginkou:Kk Device and method for vocal process request acceptance
US6021403A (en) * 1996-07-19 2000-02-01 Microsoft Corporation Intelligent user assistance facility
US5864863A (en) * 1996-08-09 1999-01-26 Digital Equipment Corporation Method for parsing, indexing and searching world-wide-web pages
US5920854A (en) 1996-08-14 1999-07-06 Infoseek Corporation Real-time document collection search engine with phrase indexing
US6223201B1 (en) * 1996-08-27 2001-04-24 International Business Machines Corporation Data processing system and method of task management within a self-managing application
CA2184518A1 (en) 1996-08-30 1998-03-01 Jim Reed Real time structured summary search engine
US6025843A (en) * 1996-09-06 2000-02-15 Peter Sklar Clustering user interface
EP0829811A1 (en) 1996-09-11 1998-03-18 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Method and system for information retrieval
US5878385A (en) * 1996-09-16 1999-03-02 Ergo Linguistic Technologies Method and apparatus for universal parsing of language
US6708202B1 (en) 1996-10-16 2004-03-16 Microsoft Corporation Method for highlighting information contained in an electronic message
US6182029B1 (en) * 1996-10-28 2001-01-30 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York System and method for language extraction and encoding utilizing the parsing of text data in accordance with domain parameters
GB2331166B (en) * 1997-11-06 2002-09-11 Ibm Database search engine
US5956667A (en) 1996-11-08 1999-09-21 Research Foundation Of State University Of New York System and methods for frame-based augmentative communication
US5867495A (en) * 1996-11-18 1999-02-02 Mci Communications Corporations System, method and article of manufacture for communications utilizing calling, plans in a hybrid network
US5836771A (en) * 1996-12-02 1998-11-17 Ho; Chi Fai Learning method and system based on questioning
US5956711A (en) 1997-01-16 1999-09-21 Walter J. Sullivan, III Database system with restricted keyword list and bi-directional keyword translation
CA2226233C (en) 1997-01-21 2006-05-09 At&T Corp. Systems and methods for determinizing and minimizing a finite state transducer for speech recognition
US5864848A (en) * 1997-01-31 1999-01-26 Microsoft Corporation Goal-driven information interpretation and extraction system
US5946388A (en) 1997-02-06 1999-08-31 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for priority queuing of telephone calls
US6161094A (en) 1997-02-14 2000-12-12 Ann Adcock Corporation Method of comparing utterances for security control
AUPO525497A0 (en) 1997-02-21 1997-03-20 Mills, Dudley John Network-based classified information systems
US6112126A (en) 1997-02-21 2000-08-29 Baker Hughes Incorporated Adaptive object-oriented optimization software system
US6434435B1 (en) 1997-02-21 2002-08-13 Baker Hughes Incorporated Application of adaptive object-oriented optimization software to an automatic optimization oilfield hydrocarbon production management system
US5890147A (en) * 1997-03-07 1999-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Scope testing of documents in a search engine using document to folder mapping
US6185603B1 (en) * 1997-03-13 2001-02-06 At&T Corp. Method and system for delivery of e-mail and alerting messages
JPH10254719A (en) 1997-03-14 1998-09-25 Canon Inc Information processor and information processing method
JP3033514B2 (en) 1997-03-31 2000-04-17 日本電気株式会社 Large vocabulary speech recognition method and apparatus
US6314446B1 (en) 1997-03-31 2001-11-06 Stiles Inventions Method and system for monitoring tasks in a computer system
US6138128A (en) 1997-04-02 2000-10-24 Microsoft Corp. Sharing and organizing world wide web references using distinctive characters
US6182059B1 (en) * 1997-04-03 2001-01-30 Brightware, Inc. Automatic electronic message interpretation and routing system
US5970449A (en) 1997-04-03 1999-10-19 Microsoft Corporation Text normalization using a context-free grammar
FR2762917B1 (en) 1997-05-02 1999-06-11 Alsthom Cge Alcatel METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY ASSIGNING TASKS TO EVENTS ARRIVING ON A SET OF HOLDING LINES
US5940821A (en) 1997-05-21 1999-08-17 Oracle Corporation Information presentation in a knowledge base search and retrieval system
US6038560A (en) * 1997-05-21 2000-03-14 Oracle Corporation Concept knowledge base search and retrieval system
GB9710522D0 (en) 1997-05-23 1997-07-16 Rolls Royce Plc Control system
US6415250B1 (en) 1997-06-18 2002-07-02 Novell, Inc. System and method for identifying language using morphologically-based techniques
US6032111A (en) * 1997-06-23 2000-02-29 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for compiling context-dependent rewrite rules and input strings
US6012053A (en) * 1997-06-23 2000-01-04 Lycos, Inc. Computer system with user-controlled relevance ranking of search results
US6233575B1 (en) 1997-06-24 2001-05-15 International Business Machines Corporation Multilevel taxonomy based on features derived from training documents classification using fisher values as discrimination values
JPH1115756A (en) * 1997-06-24 1999-01-22 Omron Corp Electronic mail discrimination method, device, therefor and storage medium
EP0889587B1 (en) 1997-07-02 2005-11-16 Micronas Semiconductor Holding AG Device for reducing data rate
US6658447B2 (en) 1997-07-08 2003-12-02 Intel Corporation Priority based simultaneous multi-threading
US5933822A (en) 1997-07-22 1999-08-03 Microsoft Corporation Apparatus and methods for an information retrieval system that employs natural language processing of search results to improve overall precision
US6055528A (en) * 1997-07-25 2000-04-25 Claritech Corporation Method for cross-linguistic document retrieval
US6018735A (en) * 1997-08-22 2000-01-25 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Non-literal textual search using fuzzy finite-state linear non-deterministic automata
US6081774A (en) 1997-08-22 2000-06-27 Novell, Inc. Natural language information retrieval system and method
US5963447A (en) 1997-08-22 1999-10-05 Hynomics Corporation Multiple-agent hybrid control architecture for intelligent real-time control of distributed nonlinear processes
US6243735B1 (en) 1997-09-01 2001-06-05 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Microcontroller, data processing system and task switching control method
AU742831B2 (en) * 1997-09-04 2002-01-10 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Methods and/or systems for selecting data sets
US5983216A (en) 1997-09-12 1999-11-09 Infoseek Corporation Performing automated document collection and selection by providing a meta-index with meta-index values indentifying corresponding document collections
US6182120B1 (en) * 1997-09-30 2001-01-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for scheduling queued messages based on queue delay and queue priority
US6269368B1 (en) 1997-10-17 2001-07-31 Textwise Llc Information retrieval using dynamic evidence combination
US6212544B1 (en) * 1997-10-23 2001-04-03 International Business Machines Corporation Altering thread priorities in a multithreaded processor
US6058389A (en) 1997-10-31 2000-05-02 Oracle Corporation Apparatus and method for message queuing in a database system
US5991756A (en) 1997-11-03 1999-11-23 Yahoo, Inc. Information retrieval from hierarchical compound documents
US6260068B1 (en) 1998-06-10 2001-07-10 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for migrating resources in a multi-processor computer system
US6073098A (en) 1997-11-21 2000-06-06 At&T Corporation Method and apparatus for generating deterministic approximate weighted finite-state automata
US6493447B1 (en) 1997-11-21 2002-12-10 Mci Communications Corporation Contact server for call center for syncronizing simultaneous telephone calls and TCP/IP communications
US6009422A (en) 1997-11-26 1999-12-28 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for query translation/semantic translation using generalized query language
US5991713A (en) 1997-11-26 1999-11-23 International Business Machines Corp. Efficient method for compressing, storing, searching and transmitting natural language text
GB9726654D0 (en) 1997-12-17 1998-02-18 British Telecomm Data input and retrieval apparatus
US6298324B1 (en) 1998-01-05 2001-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Speech recognition system with changing grammars and grammar help command
US5999932A (en) 1998-01-13 1999-12-07 Bright Light Technologies, Inc. System and method for filtering unsolicited electronic mail messages using data matching and heuristic processing
US6067565A (en) 1998-01-15 2000-05-23 Microsoft Corporation Technique for prefetching a web page of potential future interest in lieu of continuing a current information download
US5974465A (en) 1998-01-21 1999-10-26 3Com Corporation Method and apparatus for prioritizing the enqueueing of outbound data packets in a network device
US6314439B1 (en) 1998-02-06 2001-11-06 International Business Machines Corporation Computer system, program product and method of creating aliases and accessing storage locations in a computer system with same
US6249606B1 (en) 1998-02-19 2001-06-19 Mindmaker, Inc. Method and system for gesture category recognition and training using a feature vector
US6138139A (en) 1998-10-29 2000-10-24 Genesys Telecommunications Laboraties, Inc. Method and apparatus for supporting diverse interaction paths within a multimedia communication center
US6360243B1 (en) * 1998-03-10 2002-03-19 Motorola, Inc. Method, device and article of manufacture for implementing a real-time task scheduling accelerator
US6430615B1 (en) 1998-03-13 2002-08-06 International Business Machines Corporation Predictive model-based measurement acquisition employing a predictive model operating on a manager system and a managed system
US6421675B1 (en) 1998-03-16 2002-07-16 S. L. I. Systems, Inc. Search engine
US6038535A (en) * 1998-03-23 2000-03-14 Motorola, Inc. Speech classifier and method using delay elements
US6182039B1 (en) * 1998-03-24 2001-01-30 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus using probabilistic language model based on confusable sets for speech recognition
US6085159A (en) 1998-03-26 2000-07-04 International Business Machines Corporation Displaying voice commands with multiple variables
US6236987B1 (en) 1998-04-03 2001-05-22 Damon Horowitz Dynamic content organization in information retrieval systems
US6327581B1 (en) 1998-04-06 2001-12-04 Microsoft Corporation Methods and apparatus for building a support vector machine classifier
US6308197B1 (en) 1998-04-29 2001-10-23 Xerox Corporation Machine control using register construct
US6490572B2 (en) 1998-05-15 2002-12-03 International Business Machines Corporation Optimization prediction for industrial processes
US5999990A (en) 1998-05-18 1999-12-07 Motorola, Inc. Communicator having reconfigurable resources
US6411982B2 (en) 1998-05-28 2002-06-25 Hewlett-Packard Company Thread based governor for time scheduled process execution
US6094652A (en) 1998-06-10 2000-07-25 Oracle Corporation Hierarchical query feedback in an information retrieval system
US6006225A (en) * 1998-06-15 1999-12-21 Amazon.Com Refining search queries by the suggestion of correlated terms from prior searches
US6064977A (en) 1998-06-19 2000-05-16 International Business Machine Corporation Web server with integrated scheduling and calendaring
US6161130A (en) 1998-06-23 2000-12-12 Microsoft Corporation Technique which utilizes a probabilistic classifier to detect "junk" e-mail by automatically updating a training and re-training the classifier based on the updated training set
US6321226B1 (en) 1998-06-30 2001-11-20 Microsoft Corporation Flexible keyboard searching
US6070149A (en) 1998-07-02 2000-05-30 Activepoint Ltd. Virtual sales personnel
NO983175L (en) 1998-07-10 2000-01-11 Fast Search & Transfer Asa Search system for data retrieval
US6144958A (en) 1998-07-15 2000-11-07 Amazon.Com, Inc. System and method for correcting spelling errors in search queries
US6226630B1 (en) 1998-07-22 2001-05-01 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering incoming information using a search engine and stored queries defining user folders
US6363377B1 (en) * 1998-07-30 2002-03-26 Sarnoff Corporation Search data processor
US6446061B1 (en) 1998-07-31 2002-09-03 International Business Machines Corporation Taxonomy generation for document collections
US6304872B1 (en) 1998-08-13 2001-10-16 Tornado Technology Co. Ltd. Search system for providing fulltext search over web pages of world wide web servers
US6263332B1 (en) 1998-08-14 2001-07-17 Vignette Corporation System and method for query processing of structured documents
US6353667B1 (en) * 1998-08-27 2002-03-05 Avaya Technology Corp. Minimum interruption cycle time threshold for reserve call center agents
US6167370A (en) 1998-09-09 2000-12-26 Invention Machine Corporation Document semantic analysis/selection with knowledge creativity capability utilizing subject-action-object (SAO) structures
JP2000090098A (en) 1998-09-09 2000-03-31 Hitachi Ltd Data base querying method, its implementing device, and medium recording processing program thereof
US6377949B1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2002-04-23 Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for assigning a confidence level to a term within a user knowledge profile
US6271840B1 (en) 1998-09-24 2001-08-07 James Lee Finseth Graphical search engine visual index
US6363373B1 (en) * 1998-10-01 2002-03-26 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for concept searching using a Boolean or keyword search engine
US6418458B1 (en) 1998-10-02 2002-07-09 Ncr Corporation Object-oriented prioritized work thread pool
US6449646B1 (en) 1998-10-13 2002-09-10 Aspect Communications Corporation Method and apparatus for allocating mixed transaction type messages to resources via an integrated queuing mechanism
US6292794B1 (en) 1998-10-22 2001-09-18 Libera, Inc. Method of integrating text retrieval to enhance software stem searching
US6480843B2 (en) 1998-11-03 2002-11-12 Nec Usa, Inc. Supporting web-query expansion efficiently using multi-granularity indexing and query processing
US6282565B1 (en) 1998-11-17 2001-08-28 Kana Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for performing enterprise email management
US6292938B1 (en) 1998-12-02 2001-09-18 International Business Machines Corporation Retargeting optimized code by matching tree patterns in directed acyclic graphs
US6366910B1 (en) * 1998-12-07 2002-04-02 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for generation of hierarchical search results
US6477562B2 (en) 1998-12-16 2002-11-05 Clearwater Networks, Inc. Prioritized instruction scheduling for multi-streaming processors
US6349295B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2002-02-19 Walker Digital, Llc Method and apparatus for performing supplemental searches over a network
US6442589B1 (en) 1999-01-14 2002-08-27 Fujitsu Limited Method and system for sorting and forwarding electronic messages and other data
US6424997B1 (en) 1999-01-27 2002-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Machine learning based electronic messaging system
US6434230B1 (en) 1999-02-02 2002-08-13 Avaya Technology Corp. Rules-based queuing of calls to call-handling resources
US6182036B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2001-01-30 Motorola, Inc. Method of extracting features in a voice recognition system
US6744878B1 (en) 1999-03-02 2004-06-01 Aspect Communications Corporation Real-time transaction routing augmented with forecast data and agent schedules
US6397212B1 (en) 1999-03-04 2002-05-28 Peter Biffar Self-learning and self-personalizing knowledge search engine that delivers holistic results
US6275819B1 (en) 1999-03-16 2001-08-14 Novell, Inc. Method and apparatus for characterizing and retrieving query results
US6584464B1 (en) 1999-03-19 2003-06-24 Ask Jeeves, Inc. Grammar template query system
US6862710B1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2005-03-01 Insightful Corporation Internet navigation using soft hyperlinks
US6421066B1 (en) 1999-03-23 2002-07-16 Klab.Com - The Knowledge Infrastructure Laboratory Ltd. Method for creating a knowledge map
US6463493B1 (en) * 1999-03-24 2002-10-08 Dell Products L.P. Adaptive card-sensitive bus slot method and system
US7047242B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2006-05-16 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Weighted term ranking for on-line query tool
US6393415B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2002-05-21 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Adaptive partitioning techniques in performing query requests and request routing
US6493694B1 (en) 1999-04-01 2002-12-10 Qwest Communications Interational Inc. Method and system for correcting customer service orders
US6463533B1 (en) 1999-04-15 2002-10-08 Webtv Networks, Inc. System for generating site-specific user aliases in a computer network
US6434556B1 (en) 1999-04-16 2002-08-13 Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Visualization of Internet search information
US6304864B1 (en) 1999-04-20 2001-10-16 Textwise Llc System for retrieving multimedia information from the internet using multiple evolving intelligent agents
US6370526B1 (en) * 1999-05-18 2002-04-09 International Business Machines Corporation Self-adaptive method and system for providing a user-preferred ranking order of object sets
US6594697B1 (en) 1999-05-20 2003-07-15 Microsoft Corporation Client system having error page analysis and replacement capabilities
US6611825B1 (en) 1999-06-09 2003-08-26 The Boeing Company Method and system for text mining using multidimensional subspaces
US6374221B1 (en) * 1999-06-22 2002-04-16 Lucent Technologies Inc. Automatic retraining of a speech recognizer while using reliable transcripts
SE516871C2 (en) 1999-06-23 2002-03-12 Teracom Ab Method for flow control in a data communication network
US6446256B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2002-09-03 Microsoft Corporation Extension of parsable structures
AU763131B2 (en) 1999-07-09 2003-07-17 Acularo Pty Ltd Methods of organising information
US6496853B1 (en) 1999-07-12 2002-12-17 Micron Technology, Inc. Method and system for managing related electronic messages
US6535795B1 (en) * 1999-08-09 2003-03-18 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method for chemical addition utilizing adaptive optimization
US6742015B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2004-05-25 Accenture Llp Base services patterns in a netcentric environment
US6477580B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2002-11-05 Accenture Llp Self-described stream in a communication services patterns environment
US6571282B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2003-05-27 Accenture Llp Block-based communication in a communication services patterns environment
US6256773B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2001-07-03 Accenture Llp System, method and article of manufacture for configuration management in a development architecture framework
US6324534B1 (en) 1999-09-10 2001-11-27 Requisite Technology, Inc. Sequential subset catalog search engine
US6601026B2 (en) 1999-09-17 2003-07-29 Discern Communications, Inc. Information retrieval by natural language querying
US6618727B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2003-09-09 Infoglide Corporation System and method for performing similarity searching
US6442542B1 (en) 1999-10-08 2002-08-27 General Electric Company Diagnostic system with learning capabilities
US6654726B1 (en) 1999-11-05 2003-11-25 Ford Motor Company Communication schema of online system and method of status inquiry and tracking related to orders for consumer product having specific configurations
US6615172B1 (en) 1999-11-12 2003-09-02 Phoenix Solutions, Inc. Intelligent query engine for processing voice based queries
US6449589B1 (en) 1999-11-16 2002-09-10 Microsoft Corporation Elimination of left recursion from context-free grammars
US6785671B1 (en) 1999-12-08 2004-08-31 Amazon.Com, Inc. System and method for locating web-based product offerings
US6496836B1 (en) 1999-12-20 2002-12-17 Belron Systems, Inc. Symbol-based memory language system and method
US6850513B1 (en) * 1999-12-30 2005-02-01 Intel Corporation Table-based packet classification
US6542889B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-04-01 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and apparatus for similarity text search based on conceptual indexing
US6460074B1 (en) 2000-02-10 2002-10-01 Martin E. Fishkin Electronic mail system
US6560590B1 (en) 2000-02-14 2003-05-06 Kana Software, Inc. Method and apparatus for multiple tiered matching of natural language queries to positions in a text corpus
US6714643B1 (en) * 2000-02-24 2004-03-30 Siemens Information & Communication Networks, Inc. System and method for implementing wait time estimation in automatic call distribution queues
US6311194B1 (en) 2000-03-15 2001-10-30 Taalee, Inc. System and method for creating a semantic web and its applications in browsing, searching, profiling, personalization and advertising
US6513026B1 (en) * 2000-06-17 2003-01-28 Microsoft Corporation Decision theoretic principles and policies for notification
US6957432B2 (en) 2000-03-21 2005-10-18 Microsoft Corporation Real-time scheduler
US20010027463A1 (en) 2000-03-22 2001-10-04 Fujitsu Limited Task priority decision apparatus and method, workflow system, work processing method, and recording medium
US6745181B1 (en) 2000-05-02 2004-06-01 Iphrase.Com, Inc. Information access method
US6704728B1 (en) * 2000-05-02 2004-03-09 Iphase.Com, Inc. Accessing information from a collection of data
US6711561B1 (en) * 2000-05-02 2004-03-23 Iphrase.Com, Inc. Prose feedback in information access system
US6714905B1 (en) * 2000-05-02 2004-03-30 Iphrase.Com, Inc. Parsing ambiguous grammar
US6904595B2 (en) 2000-05-08 2005-06-07 Microtune (San Diego), Inc. Priority in a portable thread environment
US6438575B1 (en) 2000-06-07 2002-08-20 Clickmarks, Inc. System, method, and article of manufacture for wireless enablement of the world wide web using a wireless gateway
US6408277B1 (en) 2000-06-21 2002-06-18 Banter Limited System and method for automatic task prioritization
US6505158B1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2003-01-07 At&T Corp. Synthesis-based pre-selection of suitable units for concatenative speech
US6738759B1 (en) 2000-07-07 2004-05-18 Infoglide Corporation, Inc. System and method for performing similarity searching using pointer optimization
US6675159B1 (en) * 2000-07-27 2004-01-06 Science Applic Int Corp Concept-based search and retrieval system
EP1182550A3 (en) 2000-08-21 2006-08-30 Texas Instruments France Task based priority arbitration
US6766320B1 (en) 2000-08-24 2004-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Search engine with natural language-based robust parsing for user query and relevance feedback learning
JP2002082815A (en) 2000-09-07 2002-03-22 Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd Task program control system
US20020103871A1 (en) 2000-09-11 2002-08-01 Lingomotors, Inc. Method and apparatus for natural language processing of electronic mail
US6665662B1 (en) 2000-11-20 2003-12-16 Cisco Technology, Inc. Query translation system for retrieving business vocabulary terms
KR20010016276A (en) 2000-11-29 2001-03-05 안병엽 Method and system for processing e-mail with an anonymous receiver
US6910212B2 (en) 2000-12-04 2005-06-21 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for improved complex storage locks
US20020073129A1 (en) 2000-12-04 2002-06-13 Yu-Chung Wang Integrated multi-component scheduler for operating systems
US20030028564A1 (en) * 2000-12-19 2003-02-06 Lingomotors, Inc. Natural language method and system for matching and ranking documents in terms of semantic relatedness
JP3578082B2 (en) 2000-12-20 2004-10-20 株式会社デンソー Processing execution device and recording medium
US20020087623A1 (en) 2000-12-30 2002-07-04 Eatough David A. Method and apparatus for determining network topology and/or managing network related tasks
US7644057B2 (en) 2001-01-03 2010-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for electronic communication management
US6834385B2 (en) 2001-01-04 2004-12-21 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for utilizing dispatch queues in a multiprocessor data processing system
US6957433B2 (en) 2001-01-08 2005-10-18 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for adaptive performance optimization of data processing systems
US20020150966A1 (en) 2001-02-09 2002-10-17 Muraca Patrick J. Specimen-linked database
US8219620B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2012-07-10 Mcafee, Inc. Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback
US6925154B2 (en) 2001-05-04 2005-08-02 International Business Machines Corproation Methods and apparatus for conversational name dialing systems
US20030046297A1 (en) * 2001-08-30 2003-03-06 Kana Software, Inc. System and method for a partially self-training learning system
US8495002B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2013-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Software tool for training and testing a knowledge base
US20050187913A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2005-08-25 Yoram Nelken Web-based customer service interface

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010047270A1 (en) * 2000-02-16 2001-11-29 Gusick David L. Customer service system and method
US20020059069A1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2002-05-16 Cheng Hsu Natural language interface
US6889222B1 (en) * 2000-12-26 2005-05-03 Aspect Communications Corporation Method and an apparatus for providing personalized service
US20030004706A1 (en) * 2001-06-27 2003-01-02 Yale Thomas W. Natural language processing system and method for knowledge management
US20040010491A1 (en) * 2002-06-28 2004-01-15 Markus Riedinger User interface framework
US20040064554A1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-01 Kuno Harumi Anne Network service system and mechanism for searching service registries

Cited By (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8788527B1 (en) 2003-12-31 2014-07-22 Precise Software Solutions, Inc. Object-level database performance management
US8438276B1 (en) 2004-08-31 2013-05-07 Precise Software Solutions, Inc. Method of monitoring network and application performance by analyzing web clients and web servers
US7580923B2 (en) * 2005-05-10 2009-08-25 Microsoft Corporation Binding for multi-part identifiers
US20060259465A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2006-11-16 Microsoft Corporation Binding for multi-part identifiers
US7702642B1 (en) * 2005-12-07 2010-04-20 Precise Software Solutions, Inc. Method, system and computer-readable code for instrumenting code for logging database-related strings
US20070150458A1 (en) * 2005-12-08 2007-06-28 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute System for extending data query using ontology, and method therefor
US20100145961A1 (en) * 2008-12-05 2010-06-10 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for adaptive categorization for use with dynamic taxonomies
US8161028B2 (en) * 2008-12-05 2012-04-17 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for adaptive categorization for use with dynamic taxonomies
US8856148B1 (en) 2009-11-18 2014-10-07 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for determining underplayed and overplayed items
US8688253B2 (en) 2010-05-04 2014-04-01 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for sound recognition
US9280598B2 (en) 2010-05-04 2016-03-08 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for sound recognition
US9355407B2 (en) 2010-07-29 2016-05-31 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for searching cloud-based databases
US8694537B2 (en) * 2010-07-29 2014-04-08 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for enabling natural language processing
US8694534B2 (en) 2010-07-29 2014-04-08 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for searching databases by sound input
US10657174B2 (en) 2010-07-29 2020-05-19 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for providing identification information in response to an audio segment
US20140019483A1 (en) * 2010-07-29 2014-01-16 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and Methods for Generating and Using Shared Natural Language Libraries
US10055490B2 (en) 2010-07-29 2018-08-21 Soundhound, Inc. System and methods for continuous audio matching
US20170109368A1 (en) * 2010-07-29 2017-04-20 SoundHound, Inc Systems and methods for generating and using shared natural language libraries
US20230325358A1 (en) * 2010-07-29 2023-10-12 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for generating and using shared natural language libraries
US9390167B2 (en) 2010-07-29 2016-07-12 Soundhound, Inc. System and methods for continuous audio matching
US20120233207A1 (en) * 2010-07-29 2012-09-13 Keyvan Mohajer Systems and Methods for Enabling Natural Language Processing
US10832287B2 (en) 2011-05-10 2020-11-10 Soundhound, Inc. Promotional content targeting based on recognized audio
US10121165B1 (en) 2011-05-10 2018-11-06 Soundhound, Inc. System and method for targeting content based on identified audio and multimedia
WO2013177213A2 (en) 2012-05-24 2013-11-28 Soundhound, Inc. Systems and methods for enabling natural language processing
WO2013177213A3 (en) * 2012-05-24 2014-01-23 Soundhound, Inc. Enabling natural language processing
US10957310B1 (en) 2012-07-23 2021-03-23 Soundhound, Inc. Integrated programming framework for speech and text understanding with meaning parsing
US10996931B1 (en) 2012-07-23 2021-05-04 Soundhound, Inc. Integrated programming framework for speech and text understanding with block and statement structure
US11776533B2 (en) 2012-07-23 2023-10-03 Soundhound, Inc. Building a natural language understanding application using a received electronic record containing programming code including an interpret-block, an interpret-statement, a pattern expression and an action statement
US10832005B1 (en) 2013-11-21 2020-11-10 Soundhound, Inc. Parsing to determine interruptible state in an utterance by detecting pause duration and complete sentences
US9507849B2 (en) 2013-11-28 2016-11-29 Soundhound, Inc. Method for combining a query and a communication command in a natural language computer system
US9601114B2 (en) 2014-02-01 2017-03-21 Soundhound, Inc. Method for embedding voice mail in a spoken utterance using a natural language processing computer system
US9292488B2 (en) 2014-02-01 2016-03-22 Soundhound, Inc. Method for embedding voice mail in a spoken utterance using a natural language processing computer system
US11295730B1 (en) 2014-02-27 2022-04-05 Soundhound, Inc. Using phonetic variants in a local context to improve natural language understanding
US11030993B2 (en) 2014-05-12 2021-06-08 Soundhound, Inc. Advertisement selection by linguistic classification
US10311858B1 (en) 2014-05-12 2019-06-04 Soundhound, Inc. Method and system for building an integrated user profile
US9564123B1 (en) 2014-05-12 2017-02-07 Soundhound, Inc. Method and system for building an integrated user profile
WO2016149528A1 (en) * 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 24/7 Customer, Inc. Systems and methods for acquiring structured inputs in customer interactions
US10552885B2 (en) 2015-03-17 2020-02-04 [24]7.ai, Inc. Systems and methods for acquiring structured inputs in customer interactions
US10332123B2 (en) * 2015-08-27 2019-06-25 Oracle International Corporation Knowledge base search and retrieval based on document similarity
US20170060366A1 (en) * 2015-08-27 2017-03-02 Oracle International Corporation Knowledge base search and retrieval based on document similarity
CN109493186A (en) * 2018-11-20 2019-03-19 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 The method and apparatus for determining pushed information
CN110213344A (en) * 2019-05-14 2019-09-06 长沙手之声信息科技有限公司 A kind of long-range sign language translation on line system and method for multicenter

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20050187913A1 (en) 2005-08-25
US10055501B2 (en) 2018-08-21
US20160063126A1 (en) 2016-03-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10055501B2 (en) Web-based customer service interface
US7644057B2 (en) System and method for electronic communication management
US10917483B2 (en) Automated communication-based intelligence engine
US8478780B2 (en) Method and apparatus for identifying and classifying query intent
US7657519B2 (en) Forming intent-based clusters and employing same by search
CN107957992B (en) Automatic processing method and system for user feedback information
US20130297661A1 (en) System and method for mapping source columns to target columns
KR101812222B1 (en) Counseling system and method through robo advisor
CN107784051A (en) Online customer service answering system and method
KR20180022762A (en) Method, system and computer-readable recording medium for providing customer counseling service using real-time response message generation
US6782391B1 (en) Intelligent knowledge base content categorizer (IKBCC)
KR20200137601A (en) Apparatus and method for processing of question and answer using chatbot
KR20030003396A (en) Method for Content Recommendation Service using Content Category-based Personal Profile structures
AU2018219291A1 (en) Decision support system and methods associated with same
CN110502692A (en) Information retrieval method, device, equipment and storage medium based on search engine
CN114564595A (en) Knowledge graph updating method and device and electronic equipment
US11188585B2 (en) Systems and methods for aligning data tables to domain ontologies
CN114265957A (en) Multiple data source combined query method and system based on graph database
CN107832342B (en) Robot chatting method and system
CN109145092B (en) Database updating and intelligent question and answer management method, device and equipment
KR101926855B1 (en) Apparatus for providing question-answering service of call center
JP2002157422A (en) Credit method and recording medium
CN113407734B (en) Method for constructing knowledge graph system based on real-time big data
US11562126B2 (en) Coaching system and coaching method
KR102374530B1 (en) Optimized question and answer system and method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION