US20070203928A1 - EDI instance based transaction set definition - Google Patents

EDI instance based transaction set definition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070203928A1
US20070203928A1 US11/362,425 US36242506A US2007203928A1 US 20070203928 A1 US20070203928 A1 US 20070203928A1 US 36242506 A US36242506 A US 36242506A US 2007203928 A1 US2007203928 A1 US 2007203928A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
edi
schema
data
data units
edi schema
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/362,425
Other versions
US7984373B2 (en
Inventor
Surendra Machiraju
Suraj Gaurav
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Microsoft Corp filed Critical Microsoft Corp
Priority to US11/362,425 priority Critical patent/US7984373B2/en
Assigned to MICROSOFT CORPORATION reassignment MICROSOFT CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GAURAV, SURAJ, MACHIRAJU, SURENDRA
Assigned to MICROSOFT CORPORATION reassignment MICROSOFT CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GAURAV, SURAJ, MACHIRAJU, SURENDRA
Priority to EP07716851A priority patent/EP1999699A4/en
Priority to CNA2007800065339A priority patent/CN101401117A/en
Priority to KR1020087019848A priority patent/KR20080101907A/en
Priority to PCT/US2007/001543 priority patent/WO2007100422A1/en
Priority to JP2008556323A priority patent/JP2009527851A/en
Publication of US20070203928A1 publication Critical patent/US20070203928A1/en
Publication of US7984373B2 publication Critical patent/US7984373B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Assigned to MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC reassignment MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10Text processing
    • G06F40/103Formatting, i.e. changing of presentation of documents
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services

Definitions

  • Electronic data interchange is one of the ways businesses use for exchanging computer-to-computer business information based on approved formatting standards and schemas. For example, millions of companies around the world transmit data associated with business transactions (e.g., purchase orders, shipping/air bills, invoices, or the like) using EDI to conduct commerce.
  • a large business entity or an EDI integration broker trades with numerous partners and has the technical capability to handle numerous EDI transaction data in various EDI formats and schemas.
  • These entities also known as “hubs,” transact with one or more suppliers, also known as “spokes”.
  • spokes Each of the spokes typically is a relatively small business entity that is only capable of dealing with one hub.
  • the hub Before the spokes attempt to initiate transactions via EDI with the hub, the hub typically transmits various EDI schemas to the spokes so that the spokes may properly format the EDI transactions according to the EDI schemas.
  • EDI schemas are large in size and the file size for each EDI schema typically ranges from 1 MB to 3 MB.
  • the hub or large trading partners customarily transmit a large amount of schemas to the spokes, without taking into considerations of the spokes' lack of hardware capability. As such, thousands of such schemas, which may occupy several Gigabytes in bandwidth during transmission, are transmitted from the hub to the spokes.
  • the hub transmits one or more descriptions of the schemas in a non-EDI structure to the spokes.
  • the description may be in a sample data/instance file or even be a text file written in plain English explaining and describing what type of information needs to be included in the EDI schemas.
  • the hub may send an existing EDI schema in a format such as an image file, a portable document format (PDF) file, or the like.
  • PDF portable document format
  • the spokes In order to begin transactions between the parties, the spokes typically need a translation program or a “document definition” program to define a schema in the proper format.
  • Current systems typically use a number of techniques such as using metadata to define an EDI transaction set from the description.
  • current systems are limited in defining descriptions of EDI schemas to certain formats, such as eXtensible Markup Language (XML) format.
  • existing techniques commence the translation process by integrating a sample instance, such as the description, delivered by the Hub and a set of word documents that elaborate on the EDI connectivity. This need of multiple documents to define a document definition reduces the efficiency of conducting business transactions.
  • Embodiments of the invention overcome the shortcomings of the existing systems by creating a document definition using a description or a sample instance of an EDI transaction.
  • embodiments of the invention heuristically analyze a plurality of data units described in the description to generate such document definition.
  • Embodiments of the invention also avoid reliance on other documents elaborating the EDI connectivity in creating the document definition for such EDI schema.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a system for conducting electronic data interchange (EDI) transactions according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • EDI electronic data interchange
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a system for creating an EDI transaction from a description of the EDI schema according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a description of an EDI schema according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a screen shot illustrating an EDI schema created from the description in FIG. 3 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary computer-readable medium on which aspects of the invention may be stored.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating operations of creating an electronic data interchange (EDI) transaction according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • EDI electronic data interchange
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a suitable computing system environment in which the invention may be implemented.
  • FIG. 1 a block diagram illustrates a system 100 for conducting electronic data interchange (EDI) transactions according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the system 100 includes a hub 102 linked to and communicating with one or more spokes 104 .
  • the hub 102 includes a server computer or a computing device serving one or more processors (e.g., processor 106 ) or processing units for executing computer-executable instructions for serving the spokes 104 .
  • the spokes 104 include a computing device having one or more components included in or coupled with a computer 130 , as shown in FIG. 7 .
  • the hub 102 also includes a memory area 108 for storing one or more EDI schemas, such as an EDI schema 110 .
  • the hub 102 and the spokes 104 establish agreements as to the EDI formats or standards to be used for transmitting transaction data therebetween.
  • the hub 102 selects the appropriate EDI schemas to be transmitted to the spokes 104 .
  • the hub 102 may choose to select all EDI schemas for all types of transactions, such as purchase orders, bills of lading, invoices, payrolls, or the like, to the spokes 104 .
  • the communications between the hub 102 and the spokes 104 can be a private or public communications network, a wired or wireless network
  • the spokes 104 typically lack the hardware resources to handle large amount of EDI schemas sent from the hub 102 .
  • the type and bandwidth of computing network communications for the spokes 104 are not equipped to handle such demand imposed by the thousands of EDI schemas, which can reach several Gigabytes in data size.
  • FIG. 2 a block diagram depicts a system 200 for creating an EDI transaction from a description of the EDI schema according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the system 200 includes a computing device 202 (e.g., a hub 102 or a spoke 104 - 1 ) having a processing unit or a processor 204 for executing computer-executable instructions.
  • the computing device 202 is used by a spoke for the following discussion.
  • the hub instead of sending an EDI schema to the spoke, transmits a description 206 of the schema and the format of the transaction data.
  • the description 206 is an example of a purchase order EDI instance and illustrates a purchase order transaction data format in conformity with the hub's requirements.
  • the computing device 202 receives the description of the EDI schema 206 (e.g., a description 302 in FIG. 3 ) via an interface 208 .
  • the interface 208 includes network interface protocols for handling data transmission over a common communications network, and a user interface (UI) for receiving user input from a user 210 .
  • the description 206 may be stored in a data store (not shown) coupled to the computing device 204 .
  • the processor 204 Upon receiving the description 206 , the processor 204 identifies a plurality of data units included in the received description 206 .
  • FIG. 3 a block diagram illustrates a description 302 of an EDI schema according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the plurality of data units includes data values associated with one or more of the following: transaction set definition, segment identification, and data elements.
  • the processor 204 next analyzes the identified plurality of data units to determine the content of the EDI schema. In one embodiment, the processor 204 queries a library 212 or the data store to determine whether a particular “Transaction Set ID,” such as transaction set ID 306 , exists in the library 212 . If the particular transaction set ID is found in the library 212 , the processor 204 determines that it has sufficient information to create an EDI schema based on the transaction set ID.
  • Transaction Set ID such as transaction set ID 306
  • the description 302 includes one or more data units or segments in box 304 , each data unit or segment describe the content of the EDI schema.
  • the processor 204 determines whether one or more transaction set identification is known from the identified plurality of data units.
  • the processor 204 also analyzes one or more identified segments and segment identifications (ID), which are also included in the plurality of data units. For example, a box 304 includes one or more segment headings or notifications in the description 302 . In one embodiment, the processor 204 determines whether one or more segments and/or segment IDs exist in the library 212 in order to create the EDI schema. The processor 204 continues analyze the description 206 to create the EDI schema, such as one or more of the data elements.
  • ID identified segments and segment identifications
  • the processor 204 executes a set of programmed heuristic logic to determine or analyze properties of data elements. For example, an eight-character long of format of ” 199yMmDd” or “200yMmDd” may be determined to belong to the date data type. Similarly, decimal strings may be mapped to Nn data type (e.g., integer data type with implied decimal).
  • the description 302 includes one or more data elements in one or more data types, such as an integer data element 308 , “3859199838”; a date data type 310 or 312 , “19950727 or 19970523”; a enumeration list data type 314 , “KOW-20392-10”; a Nn data type 316 or 318 , “35.68 or 2002.91”; and a string data type 320 , “electronics cabinet package (56′′ high)”.
  • an integer data element 308 “3859199838”
  • a date data type 310 or 312 “19950727 or 19970523”
  • a enumeration list data type 314 “KOW-20392-10”
  • Nn data type 316 or 318 “35.68 or 2002.91”
  • a string data type 320 “electronics cabinet package (56′′ high)”.
  • the processor 204 may provide partial results of the analysis via the interface 208 to the user 210 so that the user 210 may submit user input.
  • the processor 204 accesses a knowledge base 214 to further analyze the plurality of the data units and/or the properties (e.g., data type) of the data elements.
  • the processor 204 generates or creates a document definition 216 for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units.
  • the user 210 may manually review, verify, or modify the generated or created document definition 216 .
  • the user 210 or the processor 204 may use or apply the document definition to create an EDI transaction according to the document definition 216 .
  • the processor 204 stores the document definition 216 for processing and/or composing EDI transaction data that match or comply with the particular EDI schema associated with the document definition 216 .
  • FIG. 4 is a screen shot illustrating an EDI schema 400 created from the description in FIG. 3 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the EDI schema 400 shows the data as a result of the analysis of the description shown in FIG. 3 .
  • a box 402 illustrates the structure in EDI schema derived from the description in a non-EDI structure in the description 302 .
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary computer-readable medium 502 on which aspects of the invention may be stored.
  • the computer-readable medium 502 includes one or more computer-executable components for performing operations illustrated in FIG. 6 , which is a flow chart describing operations of creating an electronic data interchange (EDI) transaction according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • EDI electronic data interchange
  • an interface component 504 receives a description (e.g., description 302 ) of the EDI schema at 602 .
  • a data component 506 identifies a plurality of data units included in the received description of the EDI schema. The plurality of data units describes the content of the EDI schema.
  • An analysis component 508 analyzes the identified plurality of data units to determine the content of the EDI schema at 606 .
  • a document component 510 generates or creates the document definition (e.g., document definition 216 ) for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units.
  • an application component 512 uses or applies the document definition to create an EDI transaction according to the EDI schema.
  • a spoke or hub that wishes to transact business using EDI may receive a description of one or more EDI schemas in a non-EDI structure, such as a text file.
  • the description does not provide an immediate application to be used in composing an EDI transaction.
  • a processor of a computing device at the location the spoke or the hub receives the description from the source, which may be another hub.
  • the processor identifies or causes to identify a plurality of data units included in the received description of the EDI schema.
  • the plurality of data units describes the content of the EDI schema.
  • the plurality of data units may be delimited by one or more symbols or characters, such as a space, an asterisk, a dash, or other symbols.
  • the identified plurality of data units is analyzed to determine the content of the EDI schema.
  • the data units may include values, and the values may be categorized into one or more data types.
  • the processor may generate or create a document definition for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units.
  • a user at the computing device at the spoke or the hub may use the document definition to create an EDI transaction according to the EDI schema to begin transact business with the trading partners.
  • embodiments of the invention efficiently assist the users to quickly begin composing transaction data with the trading partners without a complicated translation process of the description and other supplemental data (e.g., metadata or documents).
  • FIG. 7 shows one example of a general purpose computing device in the form of a computer 130 .
  • a computer such as the computer 130 is suitable for use in the other figures illustrated and described herein.
  • Computer 130 has one or more processors or processing units 132 and a system memory 134 .
  • a system bus 136 couples various system components including the system memory 134 to the processors 132 .
  • the bus 136 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures.
  • such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus also known as Mezzanine bus.
  • ISA Industry Standard Architecture
  • MCA Micro Channel Architecture
  • EISA Enhanced ISA
  • VESA Video Electronics Standards Association
  • PCI Peripheral Component Interconnect
  • the computer 130 typically has at least some form of computer readable media.
  • Computer readable media which include both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media, may be any available medium that may be accessed by computer 130 .
  • Computer readable media comprise computer storage media and communication media.
  • Computer storage media include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.
  • computer storage media include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that may be used to store the desired information and that may be accessed by computer 130 .
  • Communication media typically embody computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and include any information delivery media. Those skilled in the art are familiar with the modulated data signal, which has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal.
  • Wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection
  • wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared, and other wireless media
  • communication media such as acoustic, RF, infrared, and other wireless media
  • the system memory 134 includes computer storage media in the form of removable and/or non-removable, volatile and/or nonvolatile memory.
  • system memory 134 includes read only memory (ROM) 138 and random access memory (RAM) 140 .
  • ROM read only memory
  • RAM random access memory
  • BIOS basic input/output system
  • RAM 140 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 132 .
  • FIG. 7 illustrates operating system 144 , application programs 146 , other program modules 148 , and program data 150 .
  • the computer 130 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a hard disk drive 154 that reads from or writes to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media.
  • FIG. 7 also shows a magnetic disk drive 156 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile magnetic disk 158 , and an optical disk drive 160 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile optical disk 162 such as a CD-ROM or other optical media.
  • removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media that may be used in the exemplary operating environment include, but are not limited to, magnetic tape cassettes, flash memory cards, digital versatile disks, digital video tape, solid state RAM, solid state ROM, and the like.
  • the hard disk drive 154 , and magnetic disk drive 156 and optical disk drive 160 are typically connected to the system bus 136 by a non-volatile memory interface, such as interface 166 .
  • the drives or other mass storage devices and their associated computer storage media discussed above and illustrated in FIG. 7 provide storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computer 130 .
  • hard disk drive 154 is illustrated as storing operating system 170 , application programs 172 , other program modules 174 , and program data 176 .
  • operating system 170 application programs 172 , other program modules 174 , and program data 176 are given different numbers here to illustrate that, at a minimum, they are different copies.
  • a user may enter commands and information into computer 130 through input devices or user interface selection devices such as a keyboard 180 and a pointing device 182 (e.g., a mouse, trackball, pen, or touch pad).
  • Other input devices may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like.
  • processing unit 132 through a user input interface 184 that is coupled to system bus 136 , but may be connected by other interface and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port, or a Universal Serial Bus (USB).
  • a monitor 188 or other type of display device is also connected to system bus 136 via an interface, such as a video interface 190 .
  • computers often include other peripheral output devices (not shown) such as a printer and speakers, which may be connected through an output peripheral interface (not shown).
  • the computer 130 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 194 .
  • the remote computer 194 may be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to computer 130 .
  • the logical connections depicted in FIG. 7 include a local area network (LAN) 196 and a wide area network (WAN) 198 , but may also include other networks.
  • LAN 136 and/or WAN 138 may be a wired network, a wireless network, a combination thereof, and so on.
  • Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and global computer networks (e.g., the Internet).
  • computer 130 When used in a local area networking environment, computer 130 is connected to the LAN 196 through a network interface or adapter 186 . When used in a wide area networking environment, computer 130 typically includes a modem 178 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 198 , such as the Internet.
  • the modem 178 which may be internal or external, is connected to system bus 136 via the user input interface 184 , or other appropriate mechanism.
  • program modules depicted relative to computer 130 may be stored in a remote memory storage device (not shown).
  • FIG. 7 illustrates remote application programs 192 as residing on the memory device.
  • the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
  • the data processors of computer 130 are programmed by means of instructions stored at different times in the various computer-readable storage media of the computer.
  • Programs and operating systems are typically distributed, for example, on floppy disks or CD-ROMs. From there, they are installed or loaded into the secondary memory of a computer. At execution, they are loaded at least partially into the computer's primary electronic memory.
  • aspects of the invention described herein includes these and other various types of computer-readable storage media when such media contain instructions or programs for implementing the steps described below in conjunction with a microprocessor or other data processor. Further, aspects of the invention include the computer itself when programmed according to the methods and techniques described herein.
  • Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with aspects of the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, mobile telephones, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
  • Embodiments of the invention may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices.
  • program modules include, but are not limited to, routines, programs, objects, components, and data structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
  • aspects of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network.
  • program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
  • An interface in the context of a software architecture includes a software module, component, code portion, or other sequence of computer-executable instructions.
  • the interface includes, for example, a first module accessing a second module to perform computing tasks on behalf of the first module.
  • the first and second modules include, in one example, application programming interfaces (APIs) such as provided by operating systems, component object model (COM) interfaces (e.g., for peer-to-peer application communication), and extensible markup language metadata interchange format (XMI) interfaces (e.g., for communication between web services).
  • APIs application programming interfaces
  • COM component object model
  • XMI extensible markup language metadata interchange format
  • the interface may be a tightly coupled, synchronous implementation such as in Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE), COM, or distributed COM (DCOM) examples.
  • the interface may be a loosely coupled, asynchronous implementation such as in a web service (e.g., using the simple object access protocol).
  • the interface includes any combination of the following characteristics: tightly coupled, loosely coupled, synchronous, and asynchronous.
  • the interface may conform to a standard protocol, a proprietary protocol, or any combination of standard and proprietary protocols.
  • the interfaces described herein may all be part of a single interface or may be implemented as separate interfaces or any combination therein.
  • the interfaces may execute locally or remotely to provide functionality. Further, the interfaces may include additional or less functionality than illustrated or described herein.
  • computer 130 executes computer-executable instructions such as those illustrated in the figures to implement aspects of the invention.
  • Embodiments of the invention may be implemented with computer-executable instructions.
  • the computer-executable instructions may be organized into one or more computer-executable components or modules.
  • Aspects of the invention may be implemented with any number and organization of such components or modules. For example, aspects of the invention are not limited to the specific computer-executable instructions or the specific components or modules illustrated in the figures and described herein.
  • Other embodiments of the invention may include different computer-executable instructions or components having more or less functionality than illustrated and described herein.

Abstract

Creating an electronic data interchange (EDI) transaction from a description of the EDI schema. The description defines the EDI schema in a non-EDI structure. The description of the EDI schema is received. A plurality of data units included in the received description of the EDI schema is identified. The plurality of data units describes the content of the EDI schema. The identified plurality of data units is analyzed to determine the content of the EDI schema. The document definition is generated for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units. The document definition is used to create an EDI transaction according to the EDI schema.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • Electronic data interchange (EDI) is one of the ways businesses use for exchanging computer-to-computer business information based on approved formatting standards and schemas. For example, millions of companies around the world transmit data associated with business transactions (e.g., purchase orders, shipping/air bills, invoices, or the like) using EDI to conduct commerce.
  • In a typical EDI transaction model, a large business entity or an EDI integration broker trades with numerous partners and has the technical capability to handle numerous EDI transaction data in various EDI formats and schemas. These entities, also known as “hubs,” transact with one or more suppliers, also known as “spokes”. Each of the spokes typically is a relatively small business entity that is only capable of dealing with one hub.
  • Before the spokes attempt to initiate transactions via EDI with the hub, the hub typically transmits various EDI schemas to the spokes so that the spokes may properly format the EDI transactions according to the EDI schemas. Currently, EDI schemas are large in size and the file size for each EDI schema typically ranges from 1 MB to 3 MB. In addition, the hub or large trading partners customarily transmit a large amount of schemas to the spokes, without taking into considerations of the spokes' lack of hardware capability. As such, thousands of such schemas, which may occupy several Gigabytes in bandwidth during transmission, are transmitted from the hub to the spokes.
  • Occasionally, the hub transmits one or more descriptions of the schemas in a non-EDI structure to the spokes. For example, the description may be in a sample data/instance file or even be a text file written in plain English explaining and describing what type of information needs to be included in the EDI schemas. Other times the hub may send an existing EDI schema in a format such as an image file, a portable document format (PDF) file, or the like.
  • In order to begin transactions between the parties, the spokes typically need a translation program or a “document definition” program to define a schema in the proper format. Current systems typically use a number of techniques such as using metadata to define an EDI transaction set from the description. However, current systems are limited in defining descriptions of EDI schemas to certain formats, such as eXtensible Markup Language (XML) format. In addition, existing techniques commence the translation process by integrating a sample instance, such as the description, delivered by the Hub and a set of word documents that elaborate on the EDI connectivity. This need of multiple documents to define a document definition reduces the efficiency of conducting business transactions.
  • SUMMARY
  • Embodiments of the invention overcome the shortcomings of the existing systems by creating a document definition using a description or a sample instance of an EDI transaction. In addition, embodiments of the invention heuristically analyze a plurality of data units described in the description to generate such document definition. Embodiments of the invention also avoid reliance on other documents elaborating the EDI connectivity in creating the document definition for such EDI schema.
  • This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
  • Other features will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a system for conducting electronic data interchange (EDI) transactions according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a system for creating an EDI transaction from a description of the EDI schema according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a description of an EDI schema according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a screen shot illustrating an EDI schema created from the description in FIG. 3 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary computer-readable medium on which aspects of the invention may be stored.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating operations of creating an electronic data interchange (EDI) transaction according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a suitable computing system environment in which the invention may be implemented.
  • Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Referring first to FIG. 1, a block diagram illustrates a system 100 for conducting electronic data interchange (EDI) transactions according to an embodiment of the invention. The system 100 includes a hub 102 linked to and communicating with one or more spokes 104. In one embodiment, the hub 102 includes a server computer or a computing device serving one or more processors (e.g., processor 106) or processing units for executing computer-executable instructions for serving the spokes 104. In one example, the spokes 104 include a computing device having one or more components included in or coupled with a computer 130, as shown in FIG. 7.
  • In one example, the hub 102 also includes a memory area 108 for storing one or more EDI schemas, such as an EDI schema 110. Initially, the hub 102 and the spokes 104 establish agreements as to the EDI formats or standards to be used for transmitting transaction data therebetween. Once the parties determine the particular EDI formats or standards to use, the hub 102 selects the appropriate EDI schemas to be transmitted to the spokes 104. In another example, the hub 102 may choose to select all EDI schemas for all types of transactions, such as purchase orders, bills of lading, invoices, payrolls, or the like, to the spokes 104. Although the communications between the hub 102 and the spokes 104 can be a private or public communications network, a wired or wireless network, the spokes 104 typically lack the hardware resources to handle large amount of EDI schemas sent from the hub 102. In addition, the type and bandwidth of computing network communications for the spokes 104 are not equipped to handle such demand imposed by the thousands of EDI schemas, which can reach several Gigabytes in data size.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, a block diagram depicts a system 200 for creating an EDI transaction from a description of the EDI schema according to an embodiment of the invention. The system 200 includes a computing device 202 (e.g., a hub 102 or a spoke 104-1) having a processing unit or a processor 204 for executing computer-executable instructions. For simplicity purpose only and not by limitation, the computing device 202 is used by a spoke for the following discussion.
  • Initially, two trading partners, a hub and a spoke, establish a trading agreement for transmitting transaction data using EDI. The hub, instead of sending an EDI schema to the spoke, transmits a description 206 of the schema and the format of the transaction data. In this example, the description 206 is an example of a purchase order EDI instance and illustrates a purchase order transaction data format in conformity with the hub's requirements.
  • The computing device 202 receives the description of the EDI schema 206 (e.g., a description 302 in FIG. 3) via an interface 208. In one embodiment, the interface 208 includes network interface protocols for handling data transmission over a common communications network, and a user interface (UI) for receiving user input from a user 210. In one embodiment, the description 206 may be stored in a data store (not shown) coupled to the computing device 204.
  • Upon receiving the description 206, the processor 204 identifies a plurality of data units included in the received description 206. Referring now to FIG. 3, a block diagram illustrates a description 302 of an EDI schema according to an embodiment of the invention. In one example, the plurality of data units includes data values associated with one or more of the following: transaction set definition, segment identification, and data elements.
  • The processor 204 next analyzes the identified plurality of data units to determine the content of the EDI schema. In one embodiment, the processor 204 queries a library 212 or the data store to determine whether a particular “Transaction Set ID,” such as transaction set ID 306, exists in the library 212. If the particular transaction set ID is found in the library 212, the processor 204 determines that it has sufficient information to create an EDI schema based on the transaction set ID.
  • In this particular example, the description 302 includes one or more data units or segments in box 304, each data unit or segment describe the content of the EDI schema. In one embodiment, the processor 204 determines whether one or more transaction set identification is known from the identified plurality of data units.
  • The processor 204 also analyzes one or more identified segments and segment identifications (ID), which are also included in the plurality of data units. For example, a box 304 includes one or more segment headings or notifications in the description 302. In one embodiment, the processor 204 determines whether one or more segments and/or segment IDs exist in the library 212 in order to create the EDI schema. The processor 204 continues analyze the description 206 to create the EDI schema, such as one or more of the data elements.
  • In one embodiment, the processor 204 executes a set of programmed heuristic logic to determine or analyze properties of data elements. For example, an eight-character long of format of ” 199yMmDd” or “200yMmDd” may be determined to belong to the date data type. Similarly, decimal strings may be mapped to Nn data type (e.g., integer data type with implied decimal).
  • For example, the description 302 includes one or more data elements in one or more data types, such as an integer data element 308, “3859199838”; a date data type 310 or 312, “19950727 or 19970523”; a enumeration list data type 314, “KOW-20392-10”; a Nn data type 316 or 318, “35.68 or 2002.91”; and a string data type 320, “electronics cabinet package (56″ high)”.
  • In one embodiment, the processor 204 may provide partial results of the analysis via the interface 208 to the user 210 so that the user 210 may submit user input. In an alternative embodiment, the processor 204 accesses a knowledge base 214 to further analyze the plurality of the data units and/or the properties (e.g., data type) of the data elements.
  • Once the analysis is completed, the processor 204 generates or creates a document definition 216 for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units. In one embodiment, the user 210 may manually review, verify, or modify the generated or created document definition 216. The user 210 or the processor 204 may use or apply the document definition to create an EDI transaction according to the document definition 216. In yet another embodiment, the processor 204 stores the document definition 216 for processing and/or composing EDI transaction data that match or comply with the particular EDI schema associated with the document definition 216.
  • While the description 302 is written in a certain format or style with a certain delimiter symbol, “*”, it is to be understood that embodiments of the invention may process descriptions written in other formats or styles without departing from the scope of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a screen shot illustrating an EDI schema 400 created from the description in FIG. 3 according to an embodiment of the invention. In particular, the EDI schema 400 shows the data as a result of the analysis of the description shown in FIG. 3. For example, a box 402 illustrates the structure in EDI schema derived from the description in a non-EDI structure in the description 302.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary computer-readable medium 502 on which aspects of the invention may be stored. For example, the computer-readable medium 502 includes one or more computer-executable components for performing operations illustrated in FIG. 6, which is a flow chart describing operations of creating an electronic data interchange (EDI) transaction according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • For example, an interface component 504 receives a description (e.g., description 302) of the EDI schema at 602. At 604, a data component 506 identifies a plurality of data units included in the received description of the EDI schema. The plurality of data units describes the content of the EDI schema. An analysis component 508 analyzes the identified plurality of data units to determine the content of the EDI schema at 606. At 608, a document component 510 generates or creates the document definition (e.g., document definition 216) for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units. At 610, an application component 512 uses or applies the document definition to create an EDI transaction according to the EDI schema.
  • In operation, embodiments of the invention may be implemented according to the following example. A spoke or hub that wishes to transact business using EDI may receive a description of one or more EDI schemas in a non-EDI structure, such as a text file. In other words, the description does not provide an immediate application to be used in composing an EDI transaction. As such, a processor of a computing device at the location the spoke or the hub receives the description from the source, which may be another hub. The processor identifies or causes to identify a plurality of data units included in the received description of the EDI schema. The plurality of data units describes the content of the EDI schema. In one example, the plurality of data units may be delimited by one or more symbols or characters, such as a space, an asterisk, a dash, or other symbols.
  • The identified plurality of data units is analyzed to determine the content of the EDI schema. For example, the data units may include values, and the values may be categorized into one or more data types. Once the data units are analyzed, the processor may generate or create a document definition for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units. By using the document definition, a user at the computing device at the spoke or the hub may use the document definition to create an EDI transaction according to the EDI schema to begin transact business with the trading partners.
  • By being able to generate or create a document definition from a description of the EDI schema only, not with additional documents or scripts, embodiments of the invention efficiently assist the users to quickly begin composing transaction data with the trading partners without a complicated translation process of the description and other supplemental data (e.g., metadata or documents).
  • FIG. 7 shows one example of a general purpose computing device in the form of a computer 130. In one embodiment of the invention, a computer such as the computer 130 is suitable for use in the other figures illustrated and described herein. Computer 130 has one or more processors or processing units 132 and a system memory 134. In the illustrated embodiment, a system bus 136 couples various system components including the system memory 134 to the processors 132. The bus 136 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus also known as Mezzanine bus.
  • The computer 130 typically has at least some form of computer readable media. Computer readable media, which include both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media, may be any available medium that may be accessed by computer 130. By way of example and not limitation, computer readable media comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. For example, computer storage media include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that may be used to store the desired information and that may be accessed by computer 130. Communication media typically embody computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and include any information delivery media. Those skilled in the art are familiar with the modulated data signal, which has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. Wired media, such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media, such as acoustic, RF, infrared, and other wireless media, are examples of communication media. Combinations of any of the above are also included within the scope of computer readable media.
  • The system memory 134 includes computer storage media in the form of removable and/or non-removable, volatile and/or nonvolatile memory. In the illustrated embodiment, system memory 134 includes read only memory (ROM) 138 and random access memory (RAM) 140. A basic input/output system 142 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 130, such as during start-up, is typically stored in ROM 138. RAM 140 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 132. By way of example, and not limitation, FIG. 7 illustrates operating system 144, application programs 146, other program modules 148, and program data 150.
  • The computer 130 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. For example, FIG. 7 illustrates a hard disk drive 154 that reads from or writes to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media. FIG. 7 also shows a magnetic disk drive 156 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile magnetic disk 158, and an optical disk drive 160 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile optical disk 162 such as a CD-ROM or other optical media. Other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media that may be used in the exemplary operating environment include, but are not limited to, magnetic tape cassettes, flash memory cards, digital versatile disks, digital video tape, solid state RAM, solid state ROM, and the like. The hard disk drive 154, and magnetic disk drive 156 and optical disk drive 160 are typically connected to the system bus 136 by a non-volatile memory interface, such as interface 166.
  • The drives or other mass storage devices and their associated computer storage media discussed above and illustrated in FIG. 7, provide storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computer 130. In FIG. 7, for example, hard disk drive 154 is illustrated as storing operating system 170, application programs 172, other program modules 174, and program data 176. Note that these components may either be the same as or different from operating system 144, application programs 146, other program modules 148, and program data 150. Operating system 170, application programs 172, other program modules 174, and program data 176 are given different numbers here to illustrate that, at a minimum, they are different copies.
  • A user may enter commands and information into computer 130 through input devices or user interface selection devices such as a keyboard 180 and a pointing device 182 (e.g., a mouse, trackball, pen, or touch pad). Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are connected to processing unit 132 through a user input interface 184 that is coupled to system bus 136, but may be connected by other interface and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port, or a Universal Serial Bus (USB). A monitor 188 or other type of display device is also connected to system bus 136 via an interface, such as a video interface 190. In addition to the monitor 188, computers often include other peripheral output devices (not shown) such as a printer and speakers, which may be connected through an output peripheral interface (not shown).
  • The computer 130 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 194. The remote computer 194 may be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to computer 130. The logical connections depicted in FIG. 7 include a local area network (LAN) 196 and a wide area network (WAN) 198, but may also include other networks. LAN 136 and/or WAN 138 may be a wired network, a wireless network, a combination thereof, and so on. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and global computer networks (e.g., the Internet).
  • When used in a local area networking environment, computer 130 is connected to the LAN 196 through a network interface or adapter 186. When used in a wide area networking environment, computer 130 typically includes a modem 178 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 198, such as the Internet. The modem 178, which may be internal or external, is connected to system bus 136 via the user input interface 184, or other appropriate mechanism. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to computer 130, or portions thereof, may be stored in a remote memory storage device (not shown). By way of example, and not limitation, FIG. 7 illustrates remote application programs 192 as residing on the memory device. The network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
  • Generally, the data processors of computer 130 are programmed by means of instructions stored at different times in the various computer-readable storage media of the computer. Programs and operating systems are typically distributed, for example, on floppy disks or CD-ROMs. From there, they are installed or loaded into the secondary memory of a computer. At execution, they are loaded at least partially into the computer's primary electronic memory. Aspects of the invention described herein includes these and other various types of computer-readable storage media when such media contain instructions or programs for implementing the steps described below in conjunction with a microprocessor or other data processor. Further, aspects of the invention include the computer itself when programmed according to the methods and techniques described herein.
  • For purposes of illustration, programs and other executable program components, such as the operating system, are illustrated herein as discrete blocks. It is recognized, however, that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computer, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.
  • Although described in connection with an exemplary computing system environment, including computer 130, embodiments of the invention are operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. The computing system environment is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of any aspect of the invention. Moreover, the computing system environment should not be interpreted as having any dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplary operating environment. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with aspects of the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, mobile telephones, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
  • Embodiments of the invention may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include, but are not limited to, routines, programs, objects, components, and data structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Aspects of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
  • An interface in the context of a software architecture includes a software module, component, code portion, or other sequence of computer-executable instructions. The interface includes, for example, a first module accessing a second module to perform computing tasks on behalf of the first module. The first and second modules include, in one example, application programming interfaces (APIs) such as provided by operating systems, component object model (COM) interfaces (e.g., for peer-to-peer application communication), and extensible markup language metadata interchange format (XMI) interfaces (e.g., for communication between web services).
  • The interface may be a tightly coupled, synchronous implementation such as in Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE), COM, or distributed COM (DCOM) examples. Alternatively or in addition, the interface may be a loosely coupled, asynchronous implementation such as in a web service (e.g., using the simple object access protocol). In general, the interface includes any combination of the following characteristics: tightly coupled, loosely coupled, synchronous, and asynchronous. Further, the interface may conform to a standard protocol, a proprietary protocol, or any combination of standard and proprietary protocols.
  • The interfaces described herein may all be part of a single interface or may be implemented as separate interfaces or any combination therein. The interfaces may execute locally or remotely to provide functionality. Further, the interfaces may include additional or less functionality than illustrated or described herein.
  • In operation, computer 130 executes computer-executable instructions such as those illustrated in the figures to implement aspects of the invention.
  • The order of execution or performance of the operations in embodiments of the invention illustrated and described herein is not essential, unless otherwise specified. That is, the operations may be performed in any order, unless otherwise specified, and embodiments of the invention may include additional or fewer operations than those disclosed herein. For example, it is contemplated that executing or performing a particular operation before, contemporaneously with, or after another operation is within the scope of aspects of the invention.
  • Embodiments of the invention may be implemented with computer-executable instructions. The computer-executable instructions may be organized into one or more computer-executable components or modules. Aspects of the invention may be implemented with any number and organization of such components or modules. For example, aspects of the invention are not limited to the specific computer-executable instructions or the specific components or modules illustrated in the figures and described herein. Other embodiments of the invention may include different computer-executable instructions or components having more or less functionality than illustrated and described herein.
  • When introducing elements of aspects of the invention or the embodiments thereof, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
  • As various changes could be made in the above constructions, products, and methods without departing from the scope of aspects of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

Claims (20)

1. A method for creating an electronic data interchange (EDI) transaction from a description of the EDI schema, said description defining the EDI schema in a non-EDI structure, said method comprising:
receiving the description of the EDI schema;
identifying a plurality of data units included in the received description of the EDI schema, said plurality of data units describing the content of the EDI schema;
analyzing the identified plurality of data units to determine the content of the EDI schema;
generating the document definition for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units; and
using the document definition to create an EDI transaction according to the EDI schema.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying comprises identifying a structure of EDI schema.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a user input in identifying the plurality of data units.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying comprises identifying the plurality of data units including data values associated with one or more of the following: transaction set definition, segment ID, and data elements.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising accessing a knowledge base to determine properties of data elements for generating the document definition for the EDI schema.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of data units includes one or more of the following: string, integer, enumeration list (string type with restrictions), date, and time.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein generating comprises generating an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) template for the EDI schema.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more computer-readable media have computer-executable instructions for performing the method of claim 1.
9. A system for creating an electronic data interchange (EDI) transaction from a description of the EDI schema, said description defining the EDI schema in a non-EDI structure, said system comprising:
an interface for receiving the description of the EDI schema;
a processor for executing computer-executable instructions for:
identifying a plurality of data units included in the received description of the EDI schema, said plurality of data units describing the content of the EDI schema;
generating the document definition for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units; and
using the document definition to create an EDI transaction according to the EDI schema.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor is configured to identify a structure of EDI schema.
11. The system of claim 9, wherein the interface further receives a user input in identifying the plurality of data units.
12. The system of claim 9, wherein the plurality of data units includes data values associated with one or more of the following: transaction set definition, segment ID, and data elements.
13. The system of claim 12, further comprising a knowledge base, and wherein the processor is configured to access said knowledge base to determine properties of data elements for generating the document definition for the EDI schema.
14. The system of claim 9, wherein the plurality of data units includes one or more of the following: string, integer, enumeration list (string type with restrictions), date, and time.
15. One or more computer-readable media having computer-executable components for creating an electronic data interchange (EDI) transaction from a description of the EDI schema, said description defining the EDI schema in a non-EDI structure, said computer-executable components comprising:
an interface component for receiving the description of the EDI schema;
a data component for identifying a plurality of data units included in the received description of the EDI schema, said plurality of data units describing the content of the EDI schema;
an analysis component for analyzing the identified plurality of data units to determine the content of the EDI schema;
a document component for generating the document definition for the EDI schema as a function of the analyzed plurality of data units; and
an application component for using the document definition to create an EDI transaction according to the EDI schema.
16. The computer-readable media of claim 15, wherein the data component is configured to identify a structure of EDI schema.
17. The computer-readable media of claim 15, wherein the interface component further receives a user input in identifying the plurality of data units.
18. The computer-readable media of claim 15, wherein the plurality of data units includes data values associated with one or more of the following: transaction set definition, segment ID, and data elements.
19. The computer-readable media of claim 18, further comprising a knowledge base, and wherein the document component accesses said knowledge base to determine properties of data elements for generating the document definition for the EDI schema.
20. The computer-readable media of claim 15, wherein the plurality of data units includes one or more of the following: string, integer, enumeration list (string type with restrictions), date, and time.
US11/362,425 2006-02-24 2006-02-24 EDI instance based transaction set definition Expired - Fee Related US7984373B2 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/362,425 US7984373B2 (en) 2006-02-24 2006-02-24 EDI instance based transaction set definition
JP2008556323A JP2009527851A (en) 2006-02-24 2007-01-19 EDI instance-based transaction set definition
KR1020087019848A KR20080101907A (en) 2006-02-24 2007-01-19 Edi instance based transaction set definition
CNA2007800065339A CN101401117A (en) 2006-02-24 2007-01-19 EDI instance based transaction set definition
EP07716851A EP1999699A4 (en) 2006-02-24 2007-01-19 Edi instance based transaction set definition
PCT/US2007/001543 WO2007100422A1 (en) 2006-02-24 2007-01-19 Edi instance based transaction set definition

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/362,425 US7984373B2 (en) 2006-02-24 2006-02-24 EDI instance based transaction set definition

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070203928A1 true US20070203928A1 (en) 2007-08-30
US7984373B2 US7984373B2 (en) 2011-07-19

Family

ID=38445276

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/362,425 Expired - Fee Related US7984373B2 (en) 2006-02-24 2006-02-24 EDI instance based transaction set definition

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7984373B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1999699A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2009527851A (en)
KR (1) KR20080101907A (en)
CN (1) CN101401117A (en)
WO (1) WO2007100422A1 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080072160A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Electronic data interchange transaction set definition based instance editing
US20080071887A1 (en) * 2006-09-19 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Intelligent translation of electronic data interchange documents to extensible markup language representations
US20080071817A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Electronic data interchange (edi) data dictionary management and versioning system
US20080071806A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Difference analysis for electronic data interchange (edi) data dictionary
US20080126385A1 (en) * 2006-09-19 2008-05-29 Microsoft Corporation Intelligent batching of electronic data interchange messages
US20080126386A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-05-29 Microsoft Corporation Translation of electronic data interchange messages to extensible markup language representation(s)
US20080168081A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-07-10 Microsoft Corporation Extensible schemas and party configurations for edi document generation or validation
US20080168109A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-07-10 Microsoft Corporation Automatic map updating based on schema changes
US20160306883A1 (en) * 2015-04-20 2016-10-20 Tobias Weller Business Intelligence Computing System with Offline Usage
CN108959202A (en) * 2017-05-23 2018-12-07 莫列斯有限公司 Handle the device of non-electronic data switched data
US20190114691A1 (en) * 2017-10-16 2019-04-18 Anthony Zakula Systems and methods for document to order conversion
US10402380B1 (en) 2018-05-09 2019-09-03 Carecloud Corporation Interactive user interface for schema transformation
US20190347341A1 (en) * 2018-05-09 2019-11-14 Carecloud Corporation Method and system for schema transformation
US11379906B2 (en) * 2015-12-22 2022-07-05 Epicor Software Corporation Document exchange conversation generator

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100070307A1 (en) * 2008-03-14 2010-03-18 Priyamvada Sinvhal-Sharma Insurance Verification, Eligibility, Referral and Precertification System and Method
US9542367B2 (en) 2015-04-24 2017-01-10 International Business Machines Corporation Programmatic self-learning of inter-system document processing configurations
EP3430584A4 (en) * 2016-03-13 2019-09-25 Vatbox, Ltd. System and method for automatically verifying transactions based on electronic documents

Citations (73)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4729096A (en) * 1984-10-24 1988-03-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for generating a translator program for a compiler/interpreter and for testing the resulting translator program
US4787035A (en) * 1985-10-17 1988-11-22 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Meta-interpreter
US4860203A (en) * 1986-09-17 1989-08-22 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for extracting documentation text from a source code program
US4951196A (en) * 1988-05-04 1990-08-21 Supply Tech, Inc. Method and apparatus for electronic data interchange
US5202977A (en) * 1990-07-13 1993-04-13 Premenos Corp. Edi translation system using plurality of communication processes and de-enveloping procedure corresponding to transmitted communication process
US5878419A (en) * 1996-01-19 1999-03-02 Novell, Inc. Method for creating a relational description of a formatted transaction
US5897645A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-04-27 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Method and system for composing electronic data interchange information
US5915259A (en) * 1996-03-20 1999-06-22 Xerox Corporation Document schema transformation by patterns and contextual conditions
US6101556A (en) * 1997-01-07 2000-08-08 New Era Of Networks, Inc. Method for content-based dynamic formatting for interoperation of computing and EDI systems
US6256667B1 (en) * 1997-09-29 2001-07-03 Viewlocity Ab Intelligent messaging
US20010018697A1 (en) * 2000-01-25 2001-08-30 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Structured document processing system and structured document processing method
US6302326B1 (en) * 1996-06-10 2001-10-16 Diebold, Incorporated Financial transaction processing system and method
US20010049743A1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2001-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation Message transformation selection tool and method
US20010056504A1 (en) * 1999-12-21 2001-12-27 Eugene Kuznetsov Method and apparatus of data exchange using runtime code generator and translator
US20020042757A1 (en) * 2000-10-06 2002-04-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for presentation of user interface for conducting contractual activity over a computer network
US6377953B1 (en) * 1998-12-30 2002-04-23 Oracle Corporation Database having an integrated transformation engine using pickling and unpickling of data
US20020049790A1 (en) * 2000-08-08 2002-04-25 Ricker Jeffrey M Data interchange format transformation method and data dictionary used therefor
US20020083099A1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2002-06-27 Ge Information Services, Inc. Document/message management
US6418400B1 (en) * 1997-12-31 2002-07-09 Xml-Global Technologies, Inc. Representation and processing of EDI mapping templates
US20020103715A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2002-08-01 International Business Machines Corporation Automotive information communication exchange system and method
US20020111964A1 (en) * 2001-02-14 2002-08-15 International Business Machines Corporation User controllable data grouping in structural document translation
US6442569B1 (en) * 1999-04-26 2002-08-27 General Electric Company Apparatus and method for data transfer between databases
US20020152175A1 (en) * 2001-04-17 2002-10-17 Armstrong John E. Methods and apparatus for the interoperablility and manipulation of data in a computer network
US20020178103A1 (en) * 2001-03-29 2002-11-28 International Business Machines Corporation Automated dynamic negotiation of electronic service contracts
US20030018666A1 (en) * 2001-07-17 2003-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Interoperable retrieval and deposit using annotated schema to interface between industrial document specification languages
US20030101184A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2003-05-29 Inventec Corporation Management system for parsing and receiving XML based schedules
US20030121001A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 G.E. Information Services, Inc. Automated method, system, and software for transforming data between extensible markup language format and electronic data interchange format
US6591260B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-07-08 Commerce One Operations, Inc. Method of retrieving schemas for interpreting documents in an electronic commerce system
US20030130845A1 (en) * 2002-01-09 2003-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for converting files to a specified markup language
US20030140048A1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2003-07-24 Meier Matthew J. Tracking EDI documents with information from multiple sources
US20030149934A1 (en) * 2000-05-11 2003-08-07 Worden Robert Peel Computer program connecting the structure of a xml document to its underlying meaning
US20030154404A1 (en) * 2001-08-14 2003-08-14 Smartpipes, Incorporated Policy engine for modular generation of policy for a flat, per-device database
US6609200B2 (en) * 1996-12-20 2003-08-19 Financial Services Technology Consortium Method and system for processing electronic documents
US20030158854A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-08-21 Fujitsu Limited Structured document converting method and data converting method
US20030167446A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2003-09-04 Thomas Semer Geoffrey Method of and software for recordal and validation of changes to markup language files
US20030182452A1 (en) * 2001-10-18 2003-09-25 Mitch Upton System and method for implementing a schema object model in application integration
US20030233420A1 (en) * 2000-04-03 2003-12-18 Juergen Stark Method and system for content driven electronic messaging
US20040010753A1 (en) * 2002-07-11 2004-01-15 International Business Machines Corporation Converting markup language files
US6687873B1 (en) * 2000-03-09 2004-02-03 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Method and system for reporting XML data from a legacy computer system
US6735598B1 (en) * 1999-10-29 2004-05-11 Oracle International Corporation Method and apparatus for integrating data from external sources into a database system
US20040107213A1 (en) * 2002-12-02 2004-06-03 Pedro Zubeldia Systems and methods for generating data files for testing EDI receiving and processing capabilities
US6772180B1 (en) * 1999-01-22 2004-08-03 International Business Machines Corporation Data representation schema translation through shared examples
US20040153968A1 (en) * 2002-10-24 2004-08-05 Jennie Ching Method and system for user customizable asset metadata generation in a web-based asset management system
US6785689B1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2004-08-31 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Consolidation of multiple source content schemas into a single target content schema
US20040177094A1 (en) * 2003-03-06 2004-09-09 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Association of application specific code with nodes of a document object model using extensions to an XML schema
US20040193435A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2004-09-30 Xuemin Fang EDI declaration management system and method
US20040205592A1 (en) * 2001-08-23 2004-10-14 Xmlcities, Inc. Method and apparatus for extensible stylesheet designs
US20050004885A1 (en) * 2003-02-11 2005-01-06 Pandian Suresh S. Document/form processing method and apparatus using active documents and mobilized software
US20050038816A1 (en) * 2003-08-15 2005-02-17 Easton Wyn Gordon Methods, systems and computer program prodcuts for validation of XML instance documents using JAVA classloaders
US20050055631A1 (en) * 2003-09-04 2005-03-10 Oracle International Corporation Techniques for streaming validation-based XML processing directions
US20050060317A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2005-03-17 Lott Christopher Martin Method and system for the specification of interface definitions and business rules and automatic generation of message validation and transformation software
US20050063387A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2005-03-24 Lien-Hong Chen System and method of order reexamination in electronic data interchange
US20050071344A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic generation of XML schema for backend driven data validation
US20050114405A1 (en) * 2003-11-25 2005-05-26 Microsoft Corporation Flat file processing method and system
US20050132276A1 (en) * 2003-12-15 2005-06-16 Microsoft Corporation Schema editor extensions
US20050131933A1 (en) * 2003-12-10 2005-06-16 Jha Uma S. Systems and methods for aggregating information exchange requirements
US20050138648A1 (en) * 2003-11-24 2005-06-23 Zahid Ahmed API and business language schema design framework for message exchanges
US20050150944A1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2005-07-14 Melick Bruce D. Method for data interchange
US20050187973A1 (en) * 2004-02-19 2005-08-25 Microsoft Corporation Managing XML documents containing hierarchical database information
US20050246415A1 (en) * 2000-06-22 2005-11-03 Microsoft Corporation Distributed computing services platform
US20050256965A1 (en) * 1993-11-19 2005-11-17 Rose Blush Software Llc Intellectual asset protocol for defining data exchange rules and formats for universal intellectual asset documents, and systems, methods, and computer program products related to same
US20050256892A1 (en) * 2004-03-16 2005-11-17 Ascential Software Corporation Regenerating data integration functions for transfer from a data integration platform
US20050262130A1 (en) * 2004-05-21 2005-11-24 Krishna Mohan Input data specification method and system in business-to-business integration
US20050278345A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2005-12-15 International Business Machines Corporation A system and method for speeding xml construction for a business transaction using prebuilt xml with static and dynamic sections
US20060005254A1 (en) * 2004-06-09 2006-01-05 Ross Alan D Integration of policy compliance enforcement and device authentication
US20060036522A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-02-16 Michael Perham System and method for a SEF parser and EDI parser generator
US7051072B2 (en) * 2000-02-16 2006-05-23 Bea Systems, Inc. Method for providing real-time conversations among business partners
US20070005786A1 (en) * 2005-06-21 2007-01-04 Sandeep Kumar XML message validation in a network infrastructure element
US20070022375A1 (en) * 2000-10-19 2007-01-25 David Walker Apparatus, system, and method for an electronic payment system
US20070112579A1 (en) * 2005-09-01 2007-05-17 Ads Alliance Data Systems, Inc. Market management system
US20070145138A1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2007-06-28 Tripletail Ventures, Inc. Method for data interchange
US20070220051A1 (en) * 2003-08-05 2007-09-20 James Brentano Method and System for Managing Digital Goods
US7599944B2 (en) * 2005-12-16 2009-10-06 Microsoft Corporation Electronic data interchange (EDI) schema simplification interface

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09146931A (en) * 1995-11-24 1997-06-06 Dainippon Screen Mfg Co Ltd Document type definition generating device
JPH1196161A (en) * 1997-09-19 1999-04-09 Toyota Central Res & Dev Lab Inc Document conversion device
JPH11196161A (en) 1997-12-26 1999-07-21 Ryuichi Usui Portable telephone set protection case
AU1450501A (en) 1999-11-02 2001-05-14 Commerce One Operations Inc Commerce community schema for the global trading web
WO2001055895A2 (en) 2000-01-28 2001-08-02 Commerce One Operations, Inc. System and method for schema evolution in an e-commerce network
US20020035482A1 (en) 2000-08-28 2002-03-21 Coble Keith A. Business to business information environment with subscriber-publisher model
KR100411884B1 (en) 2000-12-27 2003-12-24 한국전자통신연구원 Device and Method to Integrate XML e-Business into Non-XML e-Business System
US7200805B2 (en) 2002-03-19 2007-04-03 Logiclibrary, Inc. Dynamic generation of schema information for data description languages
JP2003281123A (en) * 2002-03-26 2003-10-03 Mitsubishi Electric Information Systems Corp Electronic application form preparing tool, method and program for preparing electronic application form

Patent Citations (75)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4729096A (en) * 1984-10-24 1988-03-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for generating a translator program for a compiler/interpreter and for testing the resulting translator program
US4787035A (en) * 1985-10-17 1988-11-22 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Meta-interpreter
US4860203A (en) * 1986-09-17 1989-08-22 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for extracting documentation text from a source code program
US4951196A (en) * 1988-05-04 1990-08-21 Supply Tech, Inc. Method and apparatus for electronic data interchange
US5202977A (en) * 1990-07-13 1993-04-13 Premenos Corp. Edi translation system using plurality of communication processes and de-enveloping procedure corresponding to transmitted communication process
US20050256965A1 (en) * 1993-11-19 2005-11-17 Rose Blush Software Llc Intellectual asset protocol for defining data exchange rules and formats for universal intellectual asset documents, and systems, methods, and computer program products related to same
US5878419A (en) * 1996-01-19 1999-03-02 Novell, Inc. Method for creating a relational description of a formatted transaction
US5915259A (en) * 1996-03-20 1999-06-22 Xerox Corporation Document schema transformation by patterns and contextual conditions
US6302326B1 (en) * 1996-06-10 2001-10-16 Diebold, Incorporated Financial transaction processing system and method
US5897645A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-04-27 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Method and system for composing electronic data interchange information
US6609200B2 (en) * 1996-12-20 2003-08-19 Financial Services Technology Consortium Method and system for processing electronic documents
US6101556A (en) * 1997-01-07 2000-08-08 New Era Of Networks, Inc. Method for content-based dynamic formatting for interoperation of computing and EDI systems
US6256667B1 (en) * 1997-09-29 2001-07-03 Viewlocity Ab Intelligent messaging
US6418400B1 (en) * 1997-12-31 2002-07-09 Xml-Global Technologies, Inc. Representation and processing of EDI mapping templates
US6377953B1 (en) * 1998-12-30 2002-04-23 Oracle Corporation Database having an integrated transformation engine using pickling and unpickling of data
US6772180B1 (en) * 1999-01-22 2004-08-03 International Business Machines Corporation Data representation schema translation through shared examples
US6442569B1 (en) * 1999-04-26 2002-08-27 General Electric Company Apparatus and method for data transfer between databases
US20030140048A1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2003-07-24 Meier Matthew J. Tracking EDI documents with information from multiple sources
US6735598B1 (en) * 1999-10-29 2004-05-11 Oracle International Corporation Method and apparatus for integrating data from external sources into a database system
US20010056504A1 (en) * 1999-12-21 2001-12-27 Eugene Kuznetsov Method and apparatus of data exchange using runtime code generator and translator
US20070145138A1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2007-06-28 Tripletail Ventures, Inc. Method for data interchange
US20050150944A1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2005-07-14 Melick Bruce D. Method for data interchange
US20010018697A1 (en) * 2000-01-25 2001-08-30 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Structured document processing system and structured document processing method
US6591260B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-07-08 Commerce One Operations, Inc. Method of retrieving schemas for interpreting documents in an electronic commerce system
US7051072B2 (en) * 2000-02-16 2006-05-23 Bea Systems, Inc. Method for providing real-time conversations among business partners
US7249157B2 (en) * 2000-02-16 2007-07-24 Bea Systems, Inc. Collaboration system for exchanging of data between electronic participants via collaboration space by using a URL to identify a combination of both collaboration space and business protocol
US6687873B1 (en) * 2000-03-09 2004-02-03 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Method and system for reporting XML data from a legacy computer system
US20030233420A1 (en) * 2000-04-03 2003-12-18 Juergen Stark Method and system for content driven electronic messaging
US20030149934A1 (en) * 2000-05-11 2003-08-07 Worden Robert Peel Computer program connecting the structure of a xml document to its underlying meaning
US20010049743A1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2001-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation Message transformation selection tool and method
US20050246415A1 (en) * 2000-06-22 2005-11-03 Microsoft Corporation Distributed computing services platform
US20030167446A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2003-09-04 Thomas Semer Geoffrey Method of and software for recordal and validation of changes to markup language files
US20020049790A1 (en) * 2000-08-08 2002-04-25 Ricker Jeffrey M Data interchange format transformation method and data dictionary used therefor
US20020042757A1 (en) * 2000-10-06 2002-04-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for presentation of user interface for conducting contractual activity over a computer network
US20070022375A1 (en) * 2000-10-19 2007-01-25 David Walker Apparatus, system, and method for an electronic payment system
US20020083099A1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2002-06-27 Ge Information Services, Inc. Document/message management
US20020103715A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2002-08-01 International Business Machines Corporation Automotive information communication exchange system and method
US20020111964A1 (en) * 2001-02-14 2002-08-15 International Business Machines Corporation User controllable data grouping in structural document translation
US20020178103A1 (en) * 2001-03-29 2002-11-28 International Business Machines Corporation Automated dynamic negotiation of electronic service contracts
US20020152175A1 (en) * 2001-04-17 2002-10-17 Armstrong John E. Methods and apparatus for the interoperablility and manipulation of data in a computer network
US6785689B1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2004-08-31 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Consolidation of multiple source content schemas into a single target content schema
US20030018666A1 (en) * 2001-07-17 2003-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Interoperable retrieval and deposit using annotated schema to interface between industrial document specification languages
US20030154404A1 (en) * 2001-08-14 2003-08-14 Smartpipes, Incorporated Policy engine for modular generation of policy for a flat, per-device database
US20040205592A1 (en) * 2001-08-23 2004-10-14 Xmlcities, Inc. Method and apparatus for extensible stylesheet designs
US20030182452A1 (en) * 2001-10-18 2003-09-25 Mitch Upton System and method for implementing a schema object model in application integration
US20030101184A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2003-05-29 Inventec Corporation Management system for parsing and receiving XML based schedules
US7281211B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2007-10-09 Gxs, Inc. Automated method, system, and software for transforming data between extensible markup language format and electronic data interchange format
US20030121001A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 G.E. Information Services, Inc. Automated method, system, and software for transforming data between extensible markup language format and electronic data interchange format
US20030158854A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-08-21 Fujitsu Limited Structured document converting method and data converting method
US20030130845A1 (en) * 2002-01-09 2003-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for converting files to a specified markup language
US20040010753A1 (en) * 2002-07-11 2004-01-15 International Business Machines Corporation Converting markup language files
US20040153968A1 (en) * 2002-10-24 2004-08-05 Jennie Ching Method and system for user customizable asset metadata generation in a web-based asset management system
US20040107213A1 (en) * 2002-12-02 2004-06-03 Pedro Zubeldia Systems and methods for generating data files for testing EDI receiving and processing capabilities
US20050004885A1 (en) * 2003-02-11 2005-01-06 Pandian Suresh S. Document/form processing method and apparatus using active documents and mobilized software
US20040177094A1 (en) * 2003-03-06 2004-09-09 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Association of application specific code with nodes of a document object model using extensions to an XML schema
US20040193435A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2004-09-30 Xuemin Fang EDI declaration management system and method
US20070220051A1 (en) * 2003-08-05 2007-09-20 James Brentano Method and System for Managing Digital Goods
US20050038816A1 (en) * 2003-08-15 2005-02-17 Easton Wyn Gordon Methods, systems and computer program prodcuts for validation of XML instance documents using JAVA classloaders
US20050055631A1 (en) * 2003-09-04 2005-03-10 Oracle International Corporation Techniques for streaming validation-based XML processing directions
US20050060317A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2005-03-17 Lott Christopher Martin Method and system for the specification of interface definitions and business rules and automatic generation of message validation and transformation software
US20050063387A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2005-03-24 Lien-Hong Chen System and method of order reexamination in electronic data interchange
US20050071344A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic generation of XML schema for backend driven data validation
US20050138648A1 (en) * 2003-11-24 2005-06-23 Zahid Ahmed API and business language schema design framework for message exchanges
US20050114405A1 (en) * 2003-11-25 2005-05-26 Microsoft Corporation Flat file processing method and system
US20050131933A1 (en) * 2003-12-10 2005-06-16 Jha Uma S. Systems and methods for aggregating information exchange requirements
US20050132276A1 (en) * 2003-12-15 2005-06-16 Microsoft Corporation Schema editor extensions
US20050187973A1 (en) * 2004-02-19 2005-08-25 Microsoft Corporation Managing XML documents containing hierarchical database information
US20050256892A1 (en) * 2004-03-16 2005-11-17 Ascential Software Corporation Regenerating data integration functions for transfer from a data integration platform
US20050262130A1 (en) * 2004-05-21 2005-11-24 Krishna Mohan Input data specification method and system in business-to-business integration
US20050278345A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2005-12-15 International Business Machines Corporation A system and method for speeding xml construction for a business transaction using prebuilt xml with static and dynamic sections
US20060005254A1 (en) * 2004-06-09 2006-01-05 Ross Alan D Integration of policy compliance enforcement and device authentication
US20060036522A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-02-16 Michael Perham System and method for a SEF parser and EDI parser generator
US20070005786A1 (en) * 2005-06-21 2007-01-04 Sandeep Kumar XML message validation in a network infrastructure element
US20070112579A1 (en) * 2005-09-01 2007-05-17 Ads Alliance Data Systems, Inc. Market management system
US7599944B2 (en) * 2005-12-16 2009-10-06 Microsoft Corporation Electronic data interchange (EDI) schema simplification interface

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080071887A1 (en) * 2006-09-19 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Intelligent translation of electronic data interchange documents to extensible markup language representations
US20080126385A1 (en) * 2006-09-19 2008-05-29 Microsoft Corporation Intelligent batching of electronic data interchange messages
US8108767B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2012-01-31 Microsoft Corporation Electronic data interchange transaction set definition based instance editing
US20080071817A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Electronic data interchange (edi) data dictionary management and versioning system
US20080071806A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Difference analysis for electronic data interchange (edi) data dictionary
WO2008036635A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-27 Microsoft Corporation Difference analysis for electronic data interchange (edi) data dictionary
US20080126386A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-05-29 Microsoft Corporation Translation of electronic data interchange messages to extensible markup language representation(s)
US8161078B2 (en) * 2006-09-20 2012-04-17 Microsoft Corporation Electronic data interchange (EDI) data dictionary management and versioning system
US20080072160A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Electronic data interchange transaction set definition based instance editing
US20080168109A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-07-10 Microsoft Corporation Automatic map updating based on schema changes
US20080168081A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-07-10 Microsoft Corporation Extensible schemas and party configurations for edi document generation or validation
US20160306883A1 (en) * 2015-04-20 2016-10-20 Tobias Weller Business Intelligence Computing System with Offline Usage
US11379906B2 (en) * 2015-12-22 2022-07-05 Epicor Software Corporation Document exchange conversation generator
CN108959202A (en) * 2017-05-23 2018-12-07 莫列斯有限公司 Handle the device of non-electronic data switched data
TWI651949B (en) * 2017-05-23 2019-02-21 莫仕有限公司 Device and server for processing non-electronic data exchange data
US20190114691A1 (en) * 2017-10-16 2019-04-18 Anthony Zakula Systems and methods for document to order conversion
US10699329B2 (en) * 2017-10-16 2020-06-30 Anthony Zakula Systems and methods for document to order conversion
US10402380B1 (en) 2018-05-09 2019-09-03 Carecloud Corporation Interactive user interface for schema transformation
US20190347341A1 (en) * 2018-05-09 2019-11-14 Carecloud Corporation Method and system for schema transformation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7984373B2 (en) 2011-07-19
WO2007100422A1 (en) 2007-09-07
CN101401117A (en) 2009-04-01
KR20080101907A (en) 2008-11-21
WO2007100422A8 (en) 2008-10-02
EP1999699A1 (en) 2008-12-10
EP1999699A4 (en) 2011-06-01
JP2009527851A (en) 2009-07-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7984373B2 (en) EDI instance based transaction set definition
US7703099B2 (en) Scalable transformation and configuration of EDI interchanges
US9075833B2 (en) Generating XML schema from JSON data
US7320003B2 (en) Method and system for storing and retrieving document data using a markup language string and a serialized string
US8370281B2 (en) Self-modification of a mainframe-based business rules engine construction tool
US20070088598A1 (en) Mechanism for using processlets to model service processes
US20090100402A1 (en) Configuring and constructing applications in a mainframe-based computing environment
US7685208B2 (en) XML payload specification for modeling EDI schemas
US7584414B2 (en) Export to excel
US9116705B2 (en) Mainframe-based browser
US20090099981A1 (en) Mainframe-based business rules engine construction tool
US20070074178A1 (en) Method and system for broadly sharing UML-based models
JP2012529711A (en) Software extension analysis method and system
US8904339B2 (en) Method and system for modeling runtime behavior
US7620645B2 (en) Scalable algorithm for sharing EDI schemas
US8156148B2 (en) Scalable algorithm for sharing EDI schemas
US8776098B2 (en) Exchanging data using data transformation
US9002870B2 (en) System, method and computer program product for EDI-to-EDI translations
US20230105023A1 (en) Deployment migration tool with decoding capabilities
Bergland et al. Integrating Systems Through Universal Transformation Using IBM WebSphere Transformation Extender
JP2006065382A (en) Outsourcing system, method and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MACHIRAJU, SURENDRA;GAURAV, SURAJ;REEL/FRAME:017495/0277

Effective date: 20060221

AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MACHIRAJU, SURENDRA;GAURAV, SURAJ;REEL/FRAME:017632/0888

Effective date: 20060221

AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034543/0001

Effective date: 20141014

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20150719