US20030161336A1 - Network management system for designating a communications gateway between domains - Google Patents

Network management system for designating a communications gateway between domains Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030161336A1
US20030161336A1 US10/367,924 US36792403A US2003161336A1 US 20030161336 A1 US20030161336 A1 US 20030161336A1 US 36792403 A US36792403 A US 36792403A US 2003161336 A1 US2003161336 A1 US 2003161336A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
management system
network management
gateways
network
gateway
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/367,924
Inventor
Christophe Preguica
Damien Galand
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Alcatel Lucent SAS
Original Assignee
Alcatel SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Alcatel SA filed Critical Alcatel SA
Assigned to ALCATEL reassignment ALCATEL ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GALAND, DAMIEN, PREGUICA, CHRISTOPHE
Publication of US20030161336A1 publication Critical patent/US20030161336A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/02Topology update or discovery
    • H04L45/04Interdomain routing, e.g. hierarchical routing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L61/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
    • H04L61/50Address allocation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to sending data packets out from a data network. It applies particularly well to Internet type networks.
  • the gateway is a border router which has means for communicating both with routers that are internal to the network in question, and with routers of other networks, generally other border routers.
  • the node originating transmission of the data packet therefore needs to know the address of the border router gateway.
  • This address may be known either by configuration, or by interrogating a domain name server (DNS).
  • DNS domain name server
  • this gateway plays a critical role in sending data packets between two domains.
  • the gateway must be capable of handling all of the traffic sent between the two domains. This traffic can be large and can lead to the gateway becoming overloaded, with the consequence of a reduction in transmission performance between the two domains.
  • the gateway may suffer a hardware or software failure, and no longer be capable of sending data packets from one domain to another. In such a situation, traffic becomes impossible between the two domains.
  • the object of the invention is to solve that pair of problems by proposing that a plurality of gateways be arranged to send data packets between the two domains.
  • the invention provides a network management system having means for obtaining information about equipment in the network, some of the equipment being constituted by gateways suitable for enabling traffic to be sent out from the network.
  • the network management system includes means for sending, to the domain name server associated with the network, the address(s) of one or more of said gateways as determined on the basis of said information.
  • said means are arranged to order a list of gateways prior to sending the list to the domain name server.
  • said means implement a dynamic update command to send the address(es).
  • This command may be designed to contain a list of addresses. For example, it may be a command of the “DNS update” type in accordance with RFC 2136.
  • either the domain name server or the router originating the transmission can decide on the “best” gateway for allowing data packets to be sent to the second domain. This makes it possible to avoid sending data packets via a gateway that has failed or that is overloaded. It is also possible to spread loading over a set of available gateways.
  • a router R 1 of domain N 1 can communicate with domain N 2 via three gateways G 1 , G 2 , G 3 . These gateways have sufficient knowledge to enable data packets to be sent between the two domains N 1 and N 2 by means of a routing protocol of the border gateway protocol (GBP) type, as defined in RFC 1771 of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
  • GBP border gateway protocol
  • Data packets are transmitted within a domain, e.g. from router R 1 to one of the gateways G 1 , G 2 , G 3 , for example, by means of a routing protocol such as the open shortest path first (OSPF) protocol as defined by RFC 2328 of said IETF.
  • OSPF open shortest path first
  • the domain N 1 is associated with a network management system TE.
  • a network management system is a modular system combining various tools enabling the operator of a network or a network domain to manage various aspects thereof: handling breakdowns, traffic, call charging, etc.
  • this network management system need be no more than a traffic engineering (TE) tool.
  • TE traffic engineering
  • the gateways G 1 , G 2 , and G 3 send information (respectively I 1 , I 2 , and I 3 ) to the network management system TE.
  • This information may be sent periodically at the initiative of the gateways themselves, or it may be sent at the initiative of the network management system TE.
  • This information is representative of the load and/or the status of each of the gateways.
  • the network management system TE can thus be aware of the status of the various gateways, i.e. whether they are operational or not, and how heavily they are loaded.
  • the network management system TE can:
  • gateways suitable for use for inter-domain transmission can exclude any gateways that have failed, e.g. because of a hardware or software breakdown;
  • gateways put the gateways in an order, e.g. as a function of their respective loadings and/or capacities.
  • Ordering may be done in such a manner that the gateway having the greatest amount of availability is at the top of the list, and so on down to the last gateway which is the least available gateway.
  • the availability of each gateway can depend on its capacity, since, in practice, each gateway may be of a different model, or indeed from a different manufacturer.
  • Availability may also depend on the loading of each gateway which is a function of the real traffic being conveyed by the gateways. This loading is sent directly by the gateways G 1 , G 2 , and G 3 by means of the information I 1 , I 2 , and I 3 .
  • the network management system TE also has means for sending the address of one or more of these gateways to the domain name server DNS associated with the domain N 1 .
  • the network management system TE sends only the address of the “best” gateway to the domain name server DNS.
  • This address can be transmitted to the domain name server by means of a dynamically updated command.
  • This dynamically updated command may, for example, be the “DNS update” command as defined by IETF's RFC 2136 entitled “Dynamic update in the domain name system”.
  • This dynamic update command enables apparatus outside the domain name server DNS to modify the internal tables of the DNS.
  • it makes it possible to add a correspondence between a symbolic name corresponding to domain N 2 and the address of the gateway as determined by the network management system TE.
  • the network management system TE can send a new address regularly, whenever conditions relating to the gateways G 1 , G 2 , and G 3 change. For example, if it finds out that one of the gateways has ceased to operate, it can then transmit the address of a new gateway to the domain name server DNS. Similarly, if the share of loading between the gateways varies, it can likewise transmit the address of another gateway.
  • the router R 1 seeks to send a data packet to the domain N 2 it begins by sending a request to the domain name server DNS, which request includes a symbolic name corresponding to the domain N 2 .
  • the domain name server DNS then consults its internal tables. Because of the updating mechanism implemented by the network management system, the domain name server DNS possesses the address of the gateway which is the “best” at a given instant.
  • the domain name server DNS thus sends the address of the “best” gateway to the router R 1 using the usual mechanism for communication between routers and domain name servers.
  • the router R 1 can then send the data packet to the domain N 2 , using the gateway that is considered to be the “best” by the network management system at that given instant.
  • the gateway then sends the data packet to the router R 2 which can forward it into the domain N 2 .
  • the network management system TE sends the addresses of a plurality of gateways to the domain name server in the form of a list.
  • This list may be ordered prior to being sent to the domain name server DNS.
  • the criteria selected for ordering the gateways may be their respective loadings and/or their respective available resources, in the same manner as is used for determining the “best” gateway in the first embodiment.
  • the optionally ordered list of gateway addresses can be transmitted by means of a dynamic update command, e.g. of the “DNS update” type in compliance with IETF's RFC 2136.
  • the internal tables of the server can then have a type of entry which consists in establishing a relationship between a symbolic name and a list of addresses.
  • a router R 1 seeking to transmit a data packet to the domain N 2 begins by sending a request to the domain name server DNS containing a symbolic name corresponding to the domain N 2 .
  • the domain name server DNS then sends the list associated with the symbolic name contained in the request.
  • the router R 1 then has a list of available gateways enabling it to access the domain N 2 .
  • Its selection may consist merely in using the first address in the list.
  • This method of operating enables the router R 1 to have the complete list of available gateways immediately. Thus, if the first gateway should become unavailable in the time interval concerned, or if the route between said router R 1 and the gateway were to be wrongly configured, it is then easy for the router R 1 to turn to the following gateway in the list without needing to interrogate the domain name server again.

Abstract

A network management system having means for obtaining information about equipment in the network, some of said equipment being constituted by gateways suitable for enabling traffic to be sent out from said network, the system including means for sending, to the domain name server associated with said network, the address(es) of one or more of said gateways as determined on the basis of said information.

Description

  • The present invention relates to sending data packets out from a data network. It applies particularly well to Internet type networks. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • When a node of a network seeks to send a data packet out from its own network, the data packet is sent via a gateway. Conventionally, the gateway is a border router which has means for communicating both with routers that are internal to the network in question, and with routers of other networks, generally other border routers. [0002]
  • The node originating transmission of the data packet therefore needs to know the address of the border router gateway. [0003]
  • This address may be known either by configuration, or by interrogating a domain name server (DNS). [0004]
  • It can thus be understood that this gateway plays a critical role in sending data packets between two domains. [0005]
  • As a result, the gateway must be capable of handling all of the traffic sent between the two domains. This traffic can be large and can lead to the gateway becoming overloaded, with the consequence of a reduction in transmission performance between the two domains. [0006]
  • In addition, the gateway may suffer a hardware or software failure, and no longer be capable of sending data packets from one domain to another. In such a situation, traffic becomes impossible between the two domains. [0007]
  • OBJECT AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The object of the invention is to solve that pair of problems by proposing that a plurality of gateways be arranged to send data packets between the two domains. [0008]
  • More precisely, the invention provides a network management system having means for obtaining information about equipment in the network, some of the equipment being constituted by gateways suitable for enabling traffic to be sent out from the network. The network management system includes means for sending, to the domain name server associated with the network, the address(s) of one or more of said gateways as determined on the basis of said information. [0009]
  • In an embodiment of the invention, said means are arranged to order a list of gateways prior to sending the list to the domain name server. [0010]
  • In an embodiment of the invention, said means implement a dynamic update command to send the address(es). This command may be designed to contain a list of addresses. For example, it may be a command of the “DNS update” type in accordance with RFC 2136. [0011]
  • Thus, at any given moment, either the domain name server or the router originating the transmission can decide on the “best” gateway for allowing data packets to be sent to the second domain. This makes it possible to avoid sending data packets via a gateway that has failed or that is overloaded. It is also possible to spread loading over a set of available gateways.[0012]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
  • The invention and its advantages appear more clearly from the following description given with reference to the sole accompanying Figure which shows an embodiment of the invention.[0013]
  • MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In the sole Figure, a router R[0014] 1 of domain N1 can communicate with domain N2 via three gateways G1, G2, G3. These gateways have sufficient knowledge to enable data packets to be sent between the two domains N1 and N2 by means of a routing protocol of the border gateway protocol (GBP) type, as defined in RFC 1771 of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
  • Data packets are transmitted within a domain, e.g. from router R[0015] 1 to one of the gateways G1, G2, G3, for example, by means of a routing protocol such as the open shortest path first (OSPF) protocol as defined by RFC 2328 of said IETF.
  • In conventional manner, the domain N[0016] 1 is associated with a network management system TE.
  • A network management system is a modular system combining various tools enabling the operator of a network or a network domain to manage various aspects thereof: handling breakdowns, traffic, call charging, etc. [0017]
  • In the context of the present invention, this network management system need be no more than a traffic engineering (TE) tool. [0018]
  • The gateways G[0019] 1, G2, and G3 send information (respectively I1, I2, and I3) to the network management system TE. This information may be sent periodically at the initiative of the gateways themselves, or it may be sent at the initiative of the network management system TE.
  • This information is representative of the load and/or the status of each of the gateways. The network management system TE can thus be aware of the status of the various gateways, i.e. whether they are operational or not, and how heavily they are loaded. [0020]
  • As a function of this information, the network management system TE can: [0021]
  • select gateways suitable for use for inter-domain transmission. For this purpose, the network management system can exclude any gateways that have failed, e.g. because of a hardware or software breakdown; [0022]
  • put the gateways in an order, e.g. as a function of their respective loadings and/or capacities. [0023]
  • Ordering may be done in such a manner that the gateway having the greatest amount of availability is at the top of the list, and so on down to the last gateway which is the least available gateway. The availability of each gateway can depend on its capacity, since, in practice, each gateway may be of a different model, or indeed from a different manufacturer. Availability may also depend on the loading of each gateway which is a function of the real traffic being conveyed by the gateways. This loading is sent directly by the gateways G[0024] 1, G2, and G3 by means of the information I1, I2, and I3.
  • The network management system TE also has means for sending the address of one or more of these gateways to the domain name server DNS associated with the domain N[0025] 1.
  • In a first embodiment of the invention, the network management system TE sends only the address of the “best” gateway to the domain name server DNS. This address can be transmitted to the domain name server by means of a dynamically updated command. This dynamically updated command may, for example, be the “DNS update” command as defined by IETF's RFC 2136 entitled “Dynamic update in the domain name system”. [0026]
  • This dynamic update command enables apparatus outside the domain name server DNS to modify the internal tables of the DNS. In particular, it makes it possible to add a correspondence between a symbolic name corresponding to domain N[0027] 2 and the address of the gateway as determined by the network management system TE.
  • The network management system TE can send a new address regularly, whenever conditions relating to the gateways G[0028] 1, G2, and G3 change. For example, if it finds out that one of the gateways has ceased to operate, it can then transmit the address of a new gateway to the domain name server DNS. Similarly, if the share of loading between the gateways varies, it can likewise transmit the address of another gateway.
  • When the router R[0029] 1 seeks to send a data packet to the domain N2it begins by sending a request to the domain name server DNS, which request includes a symbolic name corresponding to the domain N2.
  • The domain name server DNS then consults its internal tables. Because of the updating mechanism implemented by the network management system, the domain name server DNS possesses the address of the gateway which is the “best” at a given instant. [0030]
  • This address is associated by the above-described dynamic updating mechanism with the symbolic name contained in the request. [0031]
  • The domain name server DNS thus sends the address of the “best” gateway to the router R[0032] 1 using the usual mechanism for communication between routers and domain name servers. The router R1 can then send the data packet to the domain N2, using the gateway that is considered to be the “best” by the network management system at that given instant.
  • The gateway then sends the data packet to the router R[0033] 2 which can forward it into the domain N2.
  • In a second embodiment of the invention, the network management system TE sends the addresses of a plurality of gateways to the domain name server in the form of a list. [0034]
  • This list may be ordered prior to being sent to the domain name server DNS. [0035]
  • The criteria selected for ordering the gateways may be their respective loadings and/or their respective available resources, in the same manner as is used for determining the “best” gateway in the first embodiment. [0036]
  • In the same manner as described for the first embodiment, the optionally ordered list of gateway addresses can be transmitted by means of a dynamic update command, e.g. of the “DNS update” type in compliance with IETF's RFC 2136. [0037]
  • In this embodiment, a new type of entry needs to be provided in the internal tables of the domain name server, and similarly the dynamic update command is to be designed to contain a list of addresses. [0038]
  • The internal tables of the server can then have a type of entry which consists in establishing a relationship between a symbolic name and a list of addresses. [0039]
  • Thereafter, the mechanism proceeds as in the prior art and as in the above description for the first embodiment: a router R[0040] 1 seeking to transmit a data packet to the domain N2 begins by sending a request to the domain name server DNS containing a symbolic name corresponding to the domain N2. The domain name server DNS then sends the list associated with the symbolic name contained in the request.
  • The router R[0041] 1 then has a list of available gateways enabling it to access the domain N2.
  • Its selection may consist merely in using the first address in the list. [0042]
  • This method of operating enables the router R[0043] 1 to have the complete list of available gateways immediately. Thus, if the first gateway should become unavailable in the time interval concerned, or if the route between said router R1 and the gateway were to be wrongly configured, it is then easy for the router R1 to turn to the following gateway in the list without needing to interrogate the domain name server again.

Claims (5)

What is claimed is:
1/ A network management system having means for obtaining information about equipment in the network, some of said equipment being constituted by gateways suitable for enabling traffic to be sent out from said network, the system including means for sending, to the domain name server associated with said network, the address(es) of one or more of said gateways as determined on the basis of said information.
2/ A network management system according to claim 1, in which said means are arranged to order a list of gateways prior to sending the list to said domain name server.
3/ A network management system according to claim 1, in which said means implement a dynamic update command to send said address(es).
4/ A network management system according. to the preceding claim, in which said command is designed to contain a list of addresses.
5/ A network management system according to claim 3, in which said command is of the “DNS update” type in accordance with RFC 2136.
US10/367,924 2002-02-28 2003-02-19 Network management system for designating a communications gateway between domains Abandoned US20030161336A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0202548A FR2836613B1 (en) 2002-02-28 2002-02-28 NETWORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A COMMUNICATION GATEWAY BETWEEN DOMAINS
FR0202548 2002-02-28

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030161336A1 true US20030161336A1 (en) 2003-08-28

Family

ID=27676172

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/367,924 Abandoned US20030161336A1 (en) 2002-02-28 2003-02-19 Network management system for designating a communications gateway between domains

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20030161336A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1341360B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE352166T1 (en)
DE (1) DE60311160T2 (en)
FR (1) FR2836613B1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006005991A1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-01-19 Nokia Inc. Method and system for dynamic device address management
WO2006063118A2 (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-06-15 Pure Networks, Inc. Network management
JP2008512906A (en) * 2005-04-29 2008-04-24 フアウェイジシュヨウシアンゴンシ Method, system and apparatus for configuring interconnections between IP domains
CN100407815C (en) * 2006-02-24 2008-07-30 华为技术有限公司 Method for insertion point obtaining insertion gateway address in mobile communication network

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010039585A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2001-11-08 Leonard Primak System and method for directing a client to a content source
US6347085B2 (en) * 1996-08-16 2002-02-12 Netspeak Corporation Method and apparatus for establishing communications between packet-switched and circuit-switched networks
US20020105954A1 (en) * 2001-02-02 2002-08-08 Craig Peter Alan Dynamic update proxy
US6735617B1 (en) * 2000-08-10 2004-05-11 Bbnt Solutions Llc Routing T-37 E-mail over an H 323 (VOIP) network
US6981029B1 (en) * 2001-07-17 2005-12-27 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for processing a request for information in a network
US7133922B1 (en) * 2000-08-07 2006-11-07 The Hong Kong University Of Science And Technology Method and apparatus for streaming of data
US7209968B1 (en) * 2001-05-29 2007-04-24 Agilent Technologies, Inc. System and method for recovering management of network element(s) responsive to failure of a distributed gateway

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6347085B2 (en) * 1996-08-16 2002-02-12 Netspeak Corporation Method and apparatus for establishing communications between packet-switched and circuit-switched networks
US20010039585A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2001-11-08 Leonard Primak System and method for directing a client to a content source
US7133922B1 (en) * 2000-08-07 2006-11-07 The Hong Kong University Of Science And Technology Method and apparatus for streaming of data
US6735617B1 (en) * 2000-08-10 2004-05-11 Bbnt Solutions Llc Routing T-37 E-mail over an H 323 (VOIP) network
US20020105954A1 (en) * 2001-02-02 2002-08-08 Craig Peter Alan Dynamic update proxy
US7209968B1 (en) * 2001-05-29 2007-04-24 Agilent Technologies, Inc. System and method for recovering management of network element(s) responsive to failure of a distributed gateway
US6981029B1 (en) * 2001-07-17 2005-12-27 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for processing a request for information in a network

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8065408B2 (en) 2004-06-30 2011-11-22 Nokia, Inc. Method and system for dynamic device address management
US20060047803A1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-03-02 Nokia Inc. Method and system for dynamic device address management
WO2006005991A1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-01-19 Nokia Inc. Method and system for dynamic device address management
WO2006063118A2 (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-06-15 Pure Networks, Inc. Network management
WO2006063118A3 (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-11-30 Pure Networks Inc Network management
JP4937913B2 (en) * 2005-04-29 2012-05-23 ホアウェイ・テクノロジーズ・カンパニー・リミテッド Method, system and apparatus for configuring interconnections between IP domains
AU2006243577B2 (en) * 2005-04-29 2009-05-21 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method, system and device for implementing interconnection between IP domains
US20080159518A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2008-07-03 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method, System And Device For Implementing Interconnection Between Ip Domains
JP2008512906A (en) * 2005-04-29 2008-04-24 フアウェイジシュヨウシアンゴンシ Method, system and apparatus for configuring interconnections between IP domains
US9525583B2 (en) 2005-04-29 2016-12-20 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method, system and device for implementing interconnection between IP domains
US20170070477A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2017-03-09 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method, System and Device for Implementing Interconnection Between IP Domains
US9906489B2 (en) * 2005-04-29 2018-02-27 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method, system and device for implementing interconnection between IP domains
CN100407815C (en) * 2006-02-24 2008-07-30 华为技术有限公司 Method for insertion point obtaining insertion gateway address in mobile communication network

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2836613A1 (en) 2003-08-29
EP1341360A1 (en) 2003-09-03
ATE352166T1 (en) 2007-02-15
FR2836613B1 (en) 2004-06-18
DE60311160D1 (en) 2007-03-08
DE60311160T2 (en) 2007-12-13
EP1341360B1 (en) 2007-01-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11070606B1 (en) Selecting routes through a network
JP6004405B2 (en) System and method for managing network packet forwarding in a controller
JP4001820B2 (en) Address converter
US10397316B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for load balancing in SDN networks
JP3372455B2 (en) Packet relay control method, packet relay device, and program storage medium
US6154776A (en) Quality of service allocation on a network
US20060056420A1 (en) Communication apparatus selecting a source address
US8499093B2 (en) Methods, systems, and computer readable media for stateless load balancing of network traffic flows
US20070074281A1 (en) Presence-base packet routing control apparatus and packet routing control method
CN100452746C (en) Method for determining out interface and multi-switch-in wideband router
EP2362606A1 (en) Information system, apparatus and method
JP2000312226A (en) Method for warranting communication quality
US20080130671A1 (en) Packet distributing apparatus and packet distributing method
US20020001313A1 (en) IP Data transmission network using a route selection based on level 4/5 protocol information
CN110048956A (en) Internetwork link load control system
JP4619943B2 (en) Packet communication method and packet communication system
US7327677B2 (en) Method for establishment of connections of pre-determined performance for a packet-oriented communication network with a resource manager
US20030161336A1 (en) Network management system for designating a communications gateway between domains
JP2003218916A (en) Front end processor and routing management method
Hoogendoorn et al. Towards carrier-grade next generation networks
JPH1013471A (en) Inter-network connection system and domain name managing method
WO2022013908A1 (en) Communication relay device, communication relay system, communication relay method, and program
CN115150312A (en) Routing method and device
US7580401B2 (en) Method and apparatus for performing routing operations in a communications network
CN111835858A (en) Equipment access method, equipment and system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ALCATEL, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PREGUICA, CHRISTOPHE;GALAND, DAMIEN;REEL/FRAME:013784/0919

Effective date: 20030123

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION