US20030090692A1 - Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server - Google Patents

Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030090692A1
US20030090692A1 US10/284,274 US28427402A US2003090692A1 US 20030090692 A1 US20030090692 A1 US 20030090692A1 US 28427402 A US28427402 A US 28427402A US 2003090692 A1 US2003090692 A1 US 2003090692A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
image
bitmap
client
server
version
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/284,274
Inventor
Michael Cooper
Mark Hamzy
Scott Jones
Mark Vanderwiele
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/284,274 priority Critical patent/US20030090692A1/en
Publication of US20030090692A1 publication Critical patent/US20030090692A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N1/00Scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, e.g. facsimile transmission; Details thereof
    • H04N1/32Circuits or arrangements for control or supervision between transmitter and receiver or between image input and image output device, e.g. between a still-image camera and its memory or between a still-image camera and a printer device
    • H04N1/333Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor
    • H04N1/33307Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor prior to start of transmission, input or output of the picture signal only
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N2201/00Indexing scheme relating to scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, and to details thereof
    • H04N2201/32Circuits or arrangements for control or supervision between transmitter and receiver or between image input and image output device, e.g. between a still-image camera and its memory or between a still-image camera and a printer device
    • H04N2201/333Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor
    • H04N2201/33307Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor of a particular mode
    • H04N2201/33314Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor of a particular mode of reading or reproducing mode
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N2201/00Indexing scheme relating to scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, and to details thereof
    • H04N2201/32Circuits or arrangements for control or supervision between transmitter and receiver or between image input and image output device, e.g. between a still-image camera and its memory or between a still-image camera and a printer device
    • H04N2201/333Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor
    • H04N2201/33307Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor of a particular mode
    • H04N2201/33314Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor of a particular mode of reading or reproducing mode
    • H04N2201/33328Resolution
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N2201/00Indexing scheme relating to scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, and to details thereof
    • H04N2201/32Circuits or arrangements for control or supervision between transmitter and receiver or between image input and image output device, e.g. between a still-image camera and its memory or between a still-image camera and a printer device
    • H04N2201/333Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor
    • H04N2201/33307Mode signalling or mode changing; Handshaking therefor of a particular mode
    • H04N2201/33378Type or format of data, e.g. colour or B/W, halftone or binary, computer image file or facsimile data

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to transmission of image content in a computer network and, in particular, to a method for enabling a user of a client machine to negotiate the format of an image to be transferred to the client machine from a server in the network.
  • the World Wide Web is the Internet's multimedia information retrieval system.
  • client machines effect transactions to web servers using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), which is a known application protocol providing users access to files (e.g., text, graphics, images, sound, video, etc.) using a standard page description language known as Hypertext Markup Language (HTML).
  • HTML provides basic document formatting and allows the developer to specify “links” to other servers and files.
  • a network path to a server is identified by a so-called Uniform Resource Locator (URL) having a special syntax for defining a network connection.
  • URL Uniform Resource Locator
  • Use of an HTML-compatible browser e.g., Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer
  • the client makes a request to the server identified in the link and, in return, receives in return a document or,other object formatted according to HTML.
  • a collection of documents or objects supported on a web server is sometimes referred to as a web site.
  • Many web pages include high resolution images or graphics.
  • image typically either the entire image is transferred or, alternatively, a smaller, low-resolution version is served.
  • An example of a low-resolution image is a thumbnail image, which the user may review and then select to control the browser to fetch the full resolution image. Transmission of a thumbnail image instead of the full resolution image it represents conserves significant bandwidth and network resources.
  • each of the client and server include a dedicated handshake process that allows the machines to first determine whether they both support the image customization functionality. If so, then the server may then use an image customization process on images to be transmitted to the client to selectively modify the amount of data and the format of the graphical image files to be sent to the client in response to a request for the image.
  • the server makes use of server image control data and/or client image control data.
  • the client image control data is data or information obtained from the client that is useful in determining both the suitable amount of data and/or format for the graphical image files to be sent.
  • client data includes user data and client system data.
  • the user data may include user preference, intended use, or a specific quality level.
  • the client system data includes type of compression supported, transmission performance criteria, and equipment data (e.g., display format, printer format, or the like).
  • the technique illustrated in Hunt et al. reduce image transmission time and save network bandwidth, the approach has certain disadvantages.
  • the technique proposed by Hunt et al. envisions that a given graphical image file be processed prior to receipt of the client request.
  • the image file is processed to create a modified image file that is partitioned into various additive segments. As more and more of the segments are added together, a better quality image is created.
  • a first segment can be used for displaying the image as a high quality, thumbnail size image or a low quality, feature size image.
  • the resulting image can be used as a high quality, feature size image or a low quality, full screen size image.
  • Preprocessing the image in accordance with the teachings of the Hunt et al. patent effectively offsets the advantages that are otherwise achieved by sending the customized images.
  • the generation of the custom segments consumes both processing and storage resources at the server, thus minimizing the value of the technique.
  • the types of client image control data identified in the patent do not afford the user of the client machine sufficient flexibility to control the characteristics of the actual image transferred.
  • a more specific object of this invention is to enable a user of a client browser to specify given bitmap format characteristics when making a request for a high resolution image supported on the server.
  • the image is processed “on-the-fly” as it is served in response to the client request to produce a version customized according to the specific request.
  • bitmap format characteristics that may be specified are quite varied.
  • One particular type of format characteristic is the number of bits per pixel in the image, which is a measure of color depth.
  • Other types of image format characteristics that may be specified when making a request for an image supported on the server include a type of compression method (lossy vs. non-lossy), image loss, or the type of target device.
  • the user of the client machine may simply make a coarse selection of the quality of the image he or she desires as a function of the time required to download the particular image file.
  • this selection is made using a slider control.
  • the particular selection is then translated into appropriate control parameters to select the bits per pixel and bitmap compression format best suited to adapt the images for transfer to the client.
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified illustration of a client-server environment in which the present invention may be implemented
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the various functional components of the image transfer mechanism of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a simplified illustration of an image that is decomposed into a plurality of pixel elements
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a client-side operation of the present invention
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a representative client-side user interface for use in the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a server-side operation of the present invention.
  • the present invention may be implemented in any client server-based computer network operating environment.
  • the invention is illustrated in the context of an open Internet networking environment wherein users of client machines interconnect to servers that support content to be downloaded, typically via a web-based protocol such as HTTP. While this is a preferred operating environment, one of ordinary skill will appreciate that the principles of the present invention are not limited to use for Web content retrieval between a web site and a client browser. The techniques are useful in any environment in which it is required to transfer an image file between a server and a client, irrespective of the given transfer protocol, system configuration or networking environment.
  • FIG. 1 A representative system in which the present invention is implemented is illustrated in FIG. 1.
  • a plurality of Internet client machines 10 are connectable to a computer network Internet Service Provider (ISP) 12 via a network such as a dialup telephone network 14 .
  • ISP 12 interfaces the client machines 10 to the remainder of the network 18 , which includes a plurality of web content server machines 20 .
  • Network 18 typically includes other servers for control of domain name resolution, routing and other control functions.
  • a client machine typically includes a suite of known Internet tools, including a Web browser, to access the servers of the network and thus obtain certain services.
  • These services include one-to-one messaging (e-mail), one-to-many messaging (bulletin board), on-line chat, file transfer and browsing.
  • e-mail electronic mail
  • bulletin board electronic mail
  • HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
  • HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
  • HTML Hypertext Markup Language
  • the collection of servers that use HTTP comprise the World Wide Web, which is the Internet's multimedia information retrieval system.
  • a representative web server 20 comprises one or more processors 22 (e.g., ⁇ 86, Pentium-based, RISC-based, or the like), a system memory 25 for supporting an operating system 24 (e.g., AIX, Windows NT, Windows '98, Linux, or the like) and a web server program 26 (e.g., IBM Netfinity, WebSphere, or the like).
  • An application programming interface (API) 28 or other interface provides extensions to enable application developers to extend and/or customize the core functionality thereof through software programs including plug-ins, servlets, and the like.
  • One such program is an image transfer mechanism 30 of the present invention. The mechanism provides server-side processing of images as such objects are served to a particular client machine (and, in particular, to a given user at the client machine).
  • FIG. 2 shows the mechanism 30 as being resident in system memory (e.g., RAM) 25 associated with a given processor 22 operating within the server platform 20 .
  • the image transfer mechanism 30 includes several functional components: an applet 32 , a manager 34 , a set of client response routines 36 a - n, and a dynamic image processor 38 .
  • the applet 32 comprises a set of Java class files and is adapted to be served to given client machines in the network.
  • the applet 32 is executable in the user's client machine using local resources, e.g., a web browser or other graphics viewer.
  • the applet is designed for execution on the client machine by a particular user to generate a set of image format data that defines the transfer characteristics for a given image.
  • the functionality of the applet 32 may be a client-side plug-in, may be built in to a client browser or provided as a standalone program. Implementation as an applet is desirable as it enables the image transfer mechanism to reside on a given server.
  • the image transfer mechanism enables a user of client machine, e.g., a user of a HTTP-compliant web browser, to specify the particular transfer characteristics of an image to be served to the client machine from a server in the computer network.
  • a given image 40 to be served to the client machine for display e.g., on a raster-based image display device, conventionally a CRT
  • the amount of color information contained in each pixel is determined by the pixel's depth, or bits per pixel. The more bits per pixel, the more colors, shades, and hues a pixel may contain. Thus, for example, at one bit per pixel, the pixel contains only two colors; however, at eight bits per pixel, the pixel may contain 256 colors. Of course, the more colors in an image, the better the resolution and image quality.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart describing the basic client-side operation of the present invention.
  • the routine begins at step 44 to determine whether the user of the client machine desires to negotiate a given image transfer format. If not, the routine cycles. If, however, the user desires to customize the image transfer characteristics (of a given image, or of all images on a page, or the like), the outcome of the test at step 44 is positive. Control then continues at step 46 with the display of a user dialog 48 such as illustrated in FIG. 5.
  • the user dialog 48 preferably is generated by the applet of the image transfer mechanism.
  • the user dialog may be accessed from a browser pull-down menu (if the functionality is built into the browser), or by some other means (e.g., a server-side CGI-based scripting function). Nevertheless, this dialog is merely representative and should not be taken to limit the scope of the present invention.
  • the user dialog 48 includes a number of graphical controls.
  • a master slider 50 has a number of control positions as determined by the relative placement of the slider. Typically, the slider is positioned using a conventional drag operation, using an input device such as a mouse or trackpad device. As illustrated, the master slider 50 has a topmost position, for the fastest download, and a bottommost position, for the slowest download. As can be seen, the fastest download is associated with the worst quality image, while the slowest download is associated with the best quality image. The user may select a given speed versus quality characteristic by positioning the slider as desired.
  • the user dialog 48 includes a number of additional controls that may be selected by the user to control a particular image transfer characteristic.
  • the dialog includes a set of radio buttons 52 that enable the user to select a particular color depth.
  • a secondary slider 54 may be used to select a given number of dots per inch, which is a printer characteristic.
  • Another set of radio buttons 56 may be used to identify a given type of bitmap compression format.
  • the user dialog 48 presents four different types of bitmap compression: TIFF (Tagged Image File Format), RLE (Run-Length Encoding), GIF (Graphics Interchange Format), and JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group).
  • TIFF, RLE and GIF are representative lossless types of image compression
  • JPEG is a representative lossly data compression technique.
  • a color ratio value is displayed in the field 58 .
  • the dialog also includes various control buttons such as OK, Cancel and Help.
  • the client-side routine tests at step 60 to determine whether the user has positioned the master slider 50 . If the result of the test at step 60 is negative, the routine continues at step 62 to store the user-selected image transfer characteristics (i.e. the bit per pel setting, the bitmap compression format, and the like). These values may be conveniently stored in a file on the client. If the result of the test at step 60 is positive, the routine branches to step 64 to calculate the bits per pel and the bitmap compression format that best approximates the user's selection. Control then continues at step 65 to store the generated values. The routine then tests at step 66 to determine whether an image has been requested. An image may be requested in any number of ways.
  • the image is requested as part of a web page.
  • the routine retrieves the image transfer characteristic data previously stored. This is step 68 .
  • the image transfer characteristic data is delivered with the client request to the server. This completes the client-side processing.
  • the image transfer characteristic data may be generated at the client machine and then uploaded to the server (at which the image is hosted) in a communication separate from the actual request for the image.
  • the data may be uploaded and stored at the server in a file uniquely associated with identifying information of the user (e.g., userid and password).
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating the server-side processing of a client request for the image.
  • a high resolution version of the image is stored on or otherwise accessible from the server.
  • the routine begins at step 72 be testing to determine whether a client request (e.g., an HTTP GET request) has been received. If not, the routine cycles. If, however, a client request has been received, the routine continues at step 74 to determine whether the request includes any data specifying the image transfer characteristics. If the outcome of the test at step 74 is negative, the routine branches to step 76 and returns the requested file(s) without processing the image.
  • a client request e.g., an HTTP GET request
  • each client response routine processes a given client request and is implemented as a Java servlet.
  • the client response routine may be implemented as standalone native code.
  • the client response routine parses the image transfer data received from (or otherwise associated with) the client request (e.g., if such data were uploaded to and stored at the server earlier). After parsing the data stream, the client response routine returns control back to the manager 34 , passing back the image formatting data at step 83 .
  • the manager retrieves a requested image file.
  • the manager passes the requested image file and the image formatting data to the dynamic image processor 38 of the image transfer mechanism.
  • the dynamic image processor 38 using the formatting data an input, transforms the image into a version that best matches the user's specification.
  • the dynamic image processor 38 encodes the image with this compression format.
  • the dynamic image processor also transforms the image according to the requested color depth (i.e. bits per pel) value of the formatting data.
  • the output of the dynamic image processor is then passed at step 90 to other server control processes as required.
  • the other server control process may be a routine that generates a data stream to be returned to the client that includes other data besides the processed image. This completes the server-side processing.
  • the present invention provides many advantages over the prior art.
  • the user of the client machine By allowing the user of the client machine to select the color depth, namely the bits per pel, the user has significantly more control over how the image is actually delivered from the server.
  • the user of the client machine downloads an 8′′ ⁇ 11′′ bitmap of 24 bits per pel for a printer having a resolution of 360 ⁇ 360 dots per inch, the total amount of the download is approximately 33 Mbytes.
  • the user can modify the bits per pel desired for the download, which greatly reduces the file size and thus the download time.
  • the time required to transmit the file from the server to the client will be increased by a factor of 3 ⁇ .
  • the user can alter the compression technique to facilitate a more efficient download given the available network and/or local resources.
  • the above-illustrated interface identifies a number of bitmap compression techniques that may be customized by the user of the client machine.
  • bitmap compression techniques that may be customized by the user of the client machine.
  • One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, however, that there are numerous other types of graphics file formats that may processed in like manner.
  • the present invention is not limited to the formats identified in the representative interface.
  • Other conventional compression formats that may be implemented include, without limitation: PNG (Portable Network Graphics), BMP (Microsoft Windows device-independent bitmap format), DIB (Device Independent Bitmap), PCX, WMF (Windows Metafile Format), PAL (Palette File Format), and others.
  • the dynamic image processor includes or has access to the particular bitmap processing algorithm that is made available to the user for customizing the file format request.
  • a representative client on which the applet (or equivalent client-side code) is run is a personal computer, notebook computer, Internet appliance or pervasive computing device (e.g., a PDA or palm computer) that is ⁇ 86-, PowerPC®- or RISC-based.
  • the client includes an operating system such as IBM® OS/2®, Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Windows CE or PalmOS.
  • the client includes a suite of Internet tools including a Web browser, such as Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer, that has a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and support for application plug-ins or helper applications.
  • the applet is executable in the JVM in a well-known manner.
  • the above-described functionality thus preferably includes a server side piece and a client side piece.
  • the server side piece comprises the manager, the set of client response routines, and the dynamic image processing routine.
  • the server-side routines may be implemented as a Java servlet or as standalone native code. Some of the image processing routines may be commercially available programs that provide known image compression functions.
  • the client side piece is preferably a Java applet, although the client piece may be written in native code.
  • the above-described functionality is implemented in software executable in a processor, namely, as a set of instructions (program code) in a code module resident in the random access memory of the computer.
  • the set of instructions may be stored in another computer memory, for example, in a hard disk drive, or in a removable memory such as an optical disk (for eventual use in a CD ROM) or floppy disk (for eventual use in a floppy disk drive), or downloaded via the Internet or other computer network.
  • a Web “client” should be broadly construed to mean any computer or component thereof directly or indirectly connected or connectable in any known or later-developed manner to a computer network, such as the Internet.
  • the term Web “server” should also be broadly construed to mean a computer, computer platform, an adjunct to a computer or platform, or any component thereof.
  • a “client” should be broadly construed to mean one who requests or gets the file, and “server” is the entity which downloads the file.

Abstract

A method for serving an image from a server to a client, e.g., a computer having a browser or other graphics viewing engine. The user of the client first specifies a set of one or more bitmap characteristics for an image transfer, with at least one of the bitmap characteristics including a number of bits per pixel. Preferably, this specification is accomplished using an applet or other piece of code that is downloaded to the client from the server. Later, when the server receives a client request that includes data identifying a specified bitmap characteristic, a server processing routine (e.g., a servlet) generates a version of the image that conforms to the specified bitmap characteristic. This version is then delivered back to the client in response to the original request. In this way, the user of the client machine can control the particular characteristics of the image files that are delivered to his or her machine.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Technical Field [0001]
  • The present invention relates generally to transmission of image content in a computer network and, in particular, to a method for enabling a user of a client machine to negotiate the format of an image to be transferred to the client machine from a server in the network. [0002]
  • 2. Description of the Related Art [0003]
  • The World Wide Web is the Internet's multimedia information retrieval system. In the web environment, client machines effect transactions to web servers using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), which is a known application protocol providing users access to files (e.g., text, graphics, images, sound, video, etc.) using a standard page description language known as Hypertext Markup Language (HTML). HTML provides basic document formatting and allows the developer to specify “links” to other servers and files. In the Internet paradigm, a network path to a server is identified by a so-called Uniform Resource Locator (URL) having a special syntax for defining a network connection. Use of an HTML-compatible browser (e.g., Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer) at a client machine involves specification of a link via the URL. In response, the client makes a request to the server identified in the link and, in return, receives in return a document or,other object formatted according to HTML. A collection of documents or objects supported on a web server is sometimes referred to as a web site. [0004]
  • Many web pages include high resolution images or graphics. When it is desired to transmit an image over the Internet, typically either the entire image is transferred or, alternatively, a smaller, low-resolution version is served. An example of a low-resolution image is a thumbnail image, which the user may review and then select to control the browser to fetch the full resolution image. Transmission of a thumbnail image instead of the full resolution image it represents conserves significant bandwidth and network resources. [0005]
  • It is also known in the prior art to provide software routines at both a client and a server in a distributed computer network to enable the amount of data in a graphical image that is to be transmitted (i.e. from server to client) to be customized in according with client and/or server-supplied information. Such a technique is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,764,235 to Hunt et al. In this patent, each of the client and server include a dedicated handshake process that allows the machines to first determine whether they both support the image customization functionality. If so, then the server may then use an image customization process on images to be transmitted to the client to selectively modify the amount of data and the format of the graphical image files to be sent to the client in response to a request for the image. In performing the image customization process, the server makes use of server image control data and/or client image control data. The client image control data is data or information obtained from the client that is useful in determining both the suitable amount of data and/or format for the graphical image files to be sent. Typically, such data includes user data and client system data. The user data may include user preference, intended use, or a specific quality level. The client system data includes type of compression supported, transmission performance criteria, and equipment data (e.g., display format, printer format, or the like). [0006]
  • While the technique illustrated in Hunt et al. reduce image transmission time and save network bandwidth, the approach has certain disadvantages. Foremost, the technique proposed by Hunt et al. envisions that a given graphical image file be processed prior to receipt of the client request. According to the patent, the image file is processed to create a modified image file that is partitioned into various additive segments. As more and more of the segments are added together, a better quality image is created. Thus, for example, a first segment can be used for displaying the image as a high quality, thumbnail size image or a low quality, feature size image. By combining this segment with another segment, the resulting image can be used as a high quality, feature size image or a low quality, full screen size image. [0007]
  • Preprocessing the image in accordance with the teachings of the Hunt et al. patent effectively offsets the advantages that are otherwise achieved by sending the customized images. In particular, the generation of the custom segments consumes both processing and storage resources at the server, thus minimizing the value of the technique. In addition, the types of client image control data identified in the patent do not afford the user of the client machine sufficient flexibility to control the characteristics of the actual image transferred. [0008]
  • The present invention addresses these deficiencies of the prior art. [0009]
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is a general object of the present invention to enable a user of a client machine to negotiate the bitmap format of a given image to be transferred to the machine from a server in a computer network. [0010]
  • A more specific object of this invention is to enable a user of a client browser to specify given bitmap format characteristics when making a request for a high resolution image supported on the server. In operation, the image is processed “on-the-fly” as it is served in response to the client request to produce a version customized according to the specific request. [0011]
  • By identifying specific image bitmap format characteristics, a significant reduction in transmission time and file storage space can be achieved. [0012]
  • Preferably, the type of bitmap format characteristics that may be specified are quite varied. One particular type of format characteristic is the number of bits per pixel in the image, which is a measure of color depth. Other types of image format characteristics that may be specified when making a request for an image supported on the server include a type of compression method (lossy vs. non-lossy), image loss, or the type of target device. [0013]
  • According to another feature of the invention, the user of the client machine may simply make a coarse selection of the quality of the image he or she desires as a function of the time required to download the particular image file. Preferably, this selection is made using a slider control. Once the slider is set, the particular selection is then translated into appropriate control parameters to select the bits per pixel and bitmap compression format best suited to adapt the images for transfer to the client. [0014]
  • The foregoing has outlined some of the more pertinent objects and features of the present invention. These objects should be construed to be merely illustrative of some of the more prominent features and applications of the invention. Many other beneficial results can be attained by applying the disclosed invention in a different manner or modifying the invention as will be described. Accordingly, other objects and a fuller understanding of the invention may be had by referring to the following Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment. [0015]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof, reference should be made to the following Detailed Description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which: [0016]
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified illustration of a client-server environment in which the present invention may be implemented; [0017]
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the various functional components of the image transfer mechanism of the present invention; [0018]
  • FIG. 3 is a simplified illustration of an image that is decomposed into a plurality of pixel elements; [0019]
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a client-side operation of the present invention; [0020]
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a representative client-side user interface for use in the present invention; and [0021]
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a server-side operation of the present invention. [0022]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • The present invention may be implemented in any client server-based computer network operating environment. In the preferred embodiment described below, the invention is illustrated in the context of an open Internet networking environment wherein users of client machines interconnect to servers that support content to be downloaded, typically via a web-based protocol such as HTTP. While this is a preferred operating environment, one of ordinary skill will appreciate that the principles of the present invention are not limited to use for Web content retrieval between a web site and a client browser. The techniques are useful in any environment in which it is required to transfer an image file between a server and a client, irrespective of the given transfer protocol, system configuration or networking environment. [0023]
  • With the above caveat, a representative system in which the present invention is implemented is illustrated in FIG. 1. A plurality of [0024] Internet client machines 10 are connectable to a computer network Internet Service Provider (ISP) 12 via a network such as a dialup telephone network 14. As is well known, the dialup telephone network usually has a given, limited number of connections 16 a-16 n. ISP 12 interfaces the client machines 10 to the remainder of the network 18, which includes a plurality of web content server machines 20. Network 18 typically includes other servers for control of domain name resolution, routing and other control functions. A client machine typically includes a suite of known Internet tools, including a Web browser, to access the servers of the network and thus obtain certain services. These services include one-to-one messaging (e-mail), one-to-many messaging (bulletin board), on-line chat, file transfer and browsing. Various known Internet protocols are used for these services. Thus, for example, browsing is effected using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), which provides users access to multimedia files using Hypertext Markup Language (HTML). The collection of servers that use HTTP comprise the World Wide Web, which is the Internet's multimedia information retrieval system.
  • A [0025] representative web server 20 comprises one or more processors 22 (e.g., ×86, Pentium-based, RISC-based, or the like), a system memory 25 for supporting an operating system 24 (e.g., AIX, Windows NT, Windows '98, Linux, or the like) and a web server program 26 (e.g., IBM Netfinity, WebSphere, or the like). An application programming interface (API) 28 or other interface provides extensions to enable application developers to extend and/or customize the core functionality thereof through software programs including plug-ins, servlets, and the like. One such program is an image transfer mechanism 30 of the present invention. The mechanism provides server-side processing of images as such objects are served to a particular client machine (and, in particular, to a given user at the client machine).
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, the image transfer mechanism may be implemented most conveniently in software, namely, as a set of instructions that are executed in a processor. Thus, for purposes of illustration, FIG. 2 shows the [0026] mechanism 30 as being resident in system memory (e.g., RAM) 25 associated with a given processor 22 operating within the server platform 20. The image transfer mechanism 30 includes several functional components: an applet 32, a manager 34, a set of client response routines 36 a-n, and a dynamic image processor 38. The applet 32 comprises a set of Java class files and is adapted to be served to given client machines in the network. The applet 32 is executable in the user's client machine using local resources, e.g., a web browser or other graphics viewer. As will be seen, the applet is designed for execution on the client machine by a particular user to generate a set of image format data that defines the transfer characteristics for a given image. Alternatively, the functionality of the applet 32 may be a client-side plug-in, may be built in to a client browser or provided as a standalone program. Implementation as an applet is desirable as it enables the image transfer mechanism to reside on a given server.
  • Generally, the image transfer mechanism enables a user of client machine, e.g., a user of a HTTP-compliant web browser, to specify the particular transfer characteristics of an image to be served to the client machine from a server in the computer network. By way of brief background, and with reference to FIG. 3, a given [0027] image 40 to be served to the client machine for display (e.g., on a raster-based image display device, conventionally a CRT) or for printing comprises an equal amount of picture elements, called pixels 42. The amount of color information contained in each pixel is determined by the pixel's depth, or bits per pixel. The more bits per pixel, the more colors, shades, and hues a pixel may contain. Thus, for example, at one bit per pixel, the pixel contains only two colors; however, at eight bits per pixel, the pixel may contain 256 colors. Of course, the more colors in an image, the better the resolution and image quality.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart describing the basic client-side operation of the present invention. The routine begins at [0028] step 44 to determine whether the user of the client machine desires to negotiate a given image transfer format. If not, the routine cycles. If, however, the user desires to customize the image transfer characteristics (of a given image, or of all images on a page, or the like), the outcome of the test at step 44 is positive. Control then continues at step 46 with the display of a user dialog 48 such as illustrated in FIG. 5. The user dialog 48 preferably is generated by the applet of the image transfer mechanism. Alternatively, the user dialog may be accessed from a browser pull-down menu (if the functionality is built into the browser), or by some other means (e.g., a server-side CGI-based scripting function). Nevertheless, this dialog is merely representative and should not be taken to limit the scope of the present invention.
  • The [0029] user dialog 48 includes a number of graphical controls. A master slider 50 has a number of control positions as determined by the relative placement of the slider. Typically, the slider is positioned using a conventional drag operation, using an input device such as a mouse or trackpad device. As illustrated, the master slider 50 has a topmost position, for the fastest download, and a bottommost position, for the slowest download. As can be seen, the fastest download is associated with the worst quality image, while the slowest download is associated with the best quality image. The user may select a given speed versus quality characteristic by positioning the slider as desired.
  • As also seen in FIG. 5, the [0030] user dialog 48 includes a number of additional controls that may be selected by the user to control a particular image transfer characteristic. Thus, for example, the dialog includes a set of radio buttons 52 that enable the user to select a particular color depth. A secondary slider 54 may be used to select a given number of dots per inch, which is a printer characteristic. Another set of radio buttons 56 may be used to identify a given type of bitmap compression format. In this example, which is merely representative, the user dialog 48 presents four different types of bitmap compression: TIFF (Tagged Image File Format), RLE (Run-Length Encoding), GIF (Graphics Interchange Format), and JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group). As is well-known, TIFF, RLE and GIF are representative lossless types of image compression, while JPEG is a representative lossly data compression technique. When the user selects the particular type of compression format, a color ratio value is displayed in the field 58. The dialog also includes various control buttons such as OK, Cancel and Help.
  • Returning now back to the flowchart of FIG. 4, the client-side routine then tests at [0031] step 60 to determine whether the user has positioned the master slider 50. If the result of the test at step 60 is negative, the routine continues at step 62 to store the user-selected image transfer characteristics (i.e. the bit per pel setting, the bitmap compression format, and the like). These values may be conveniently stored in a file on the client. If the result of the test at step 60 is positive, the routine branches to step 64 to calculate the bits per pel and the bitmap compression format that best approximates the user's selection. Control then continues at step 65 to store the generated values. The routine then tests at step 66 to determine whether an image has been requested. An image may be requested in any number of ways. In an illustrative embodiment, the image is requested as part of a web page. When the outcome of the test at step 66 is positive, the routine retrieves the image transfer characteristic data previously stored. This is step 68. At step 70, the image transfer characteristic data is delivered with the client request to the server. This completes the client-side processing.
  • One of ordinary skill will appreciate that the image transfer characteristic data may be generated at the client machine and then uploaded to the server (at which the image is hosted) in a communication separate from the actual request for the image. Thus, for example, the data may be uploaded and stored at the server in a file uniquely associated with identifying information of the user (e.g., userid and password). [0032]
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating the server-side processing of a client request for the image. As noted previously, in the preferred embodiment, a high resolution version of the image is stored on or otherwise accessible from the server. The routine begins at [0033] step 72 be testing to determine whether a client request (e.g., an HTTP GET request) has been received. If not, the routine cycles. If, however, a client request has been received, the routine continues at step 74 to determine whether the request includes any data specifying the image transfer characteristics. If the outcome of the test at step 74 is negative, the routine branches to step 76 and returns the requested file(s) without processing the image. If, however, the outcome of the test at step 74, the routine continues at step 78 to pass the request to the manager routine 34 of the image transfer mechanism. At step 80, the manager 34 launches an instance of a client response routine 36. According to a preferred embodiment, each client response routine processes a given client request and is implemented as a Java servlet. Alternatively, the client response routine may be implemented as standalone native code.
  • Referring now back to FIG. 6, at [0034] step 82 the client response routine parses the image transfer data received from (or otherwise associated with) the client request (e.g., if such data were uploaded to and stored at the server earlier). After parsing the data stream, the client response routine returns control back to the manager 34, passing back the image formatting data at step 83. At step 84, the manager retrieves a requested image file. At step 86, the manager then passes the requested image file and the image formatting data to the dynamic image processor 38 of the image transfer mechanism.
  • Control then continues at [0035] step 88. At this step, the dynamic image processor 38, using the formatting data an input, transforms the image into a version that best matches the user's specification. Thus, for example, if formatting data specifies a RLE encoding as the bitmap compression format, the dynamic image processor 38 encodes the image with this compression format. The dynamic image processor also transforms the image according to the requested color depth (i.e. bits per pel) value of the formatting data. The output of the dynamic image processor is then passed at step 90 to other server control processes as required. Thus, for example, the other server control process may be a routine that generates a data stream to be returned to the client that includes other data besides the processed image. This completes the server-side processing.
  • The present invention provides many advantages over the prior art. By allowing the user of the client machine to select the color depth, namely the bits per pel, the user has significantly more control over how the image is actually delivered from the server. To provide a concrete example, if the user of the client machine downloads an 8″×11″ bitmap of 24 bits per pel for a printer having a resolution of 360×360 dots per inch, the total amount of the download is approximately 33 Mbytes. Using the present invention, the user can modify the bits per pel desired for the download, which greatly reduces the file size and thus the download time. Thus, for example, if the user designates 8 bits per pel, this has the effect of reducing the effective download size by one-third. Thus, the time required to transmit the file from the server to the client will be increased by a factor of 3×. In like manner, the user can alter the compression technique to facilitate a more efficient download given the available network and/or local resources. [0036]
  • The above-illustrated interface identifies a number of bitmap compression techniques that may be customized by the user of the client machine. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, however, that there are numerous other types of graphics file formats that may processed in like manner. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the formats identified in the representative interface. Other conventional compression formats that may be implemented include, without limitation: PNG (Portable Network Graphics), BMP (Microsoft Windows device-independent bitmap format), DIB (Device Independent Bitmap), PCX, WMF (Windows Metafile Format), PAL (Palette File Format), and others. As noted above, preferably the dynamic image processor includes or has access to the particular bitmap processing algorithm that is made available to the user for customizing the file format request. [0037]
  • A representative client on which the applet (or equivalent client-side code) is run is a personal computer, notebook computer, Internet appliance or pervasive computing device (e.g., a PDA or palm computer) that is ×86-, PowerPC®- or RISC-based. The client includes an operating system such as IBM® OS/2®, Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Windows CE or PalmOS. As noted above, the client includes a suite of Internet tools including a Web browser, such as Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer, that has a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and support for application plug-ins or helper applications. The applet is executable in the JVM in a well-known manner. [0038]
  • Generalizing, the above-described functionality thus preferably includes a server side piece and a client side piece. The server side piece comprises the manager, the set of client response routines, and the dynamic image processing routine. As has been noted, the server-side routines may be implemented as a Java servlet or as standalone native code. Some of the image processing routines may be commercially available programs that provide known image compression functions. As also described above, the client side piece is preferably a Java applet, although the client piece may be written in native code. In either case, preferably the above-described functionality is implemented in software executable in a processor, namely, as a set of instructions (program code) in a code module resident in the random access memory of the computer. Until required by the computer, the set of instructions may be stored in another computer memory, for example, in a hard disk drive, or in a removable memory such as an optical disk (for eventual use in a CD ROM) or floppy disk (for eventual use in a floppy disk drive), or downloaded via the Internet or other computer network. [0039]
  • In addition, although the various methods described are conveniently implemented in a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by software, one of ordinary skill in the art would also recognize that such methods may be carried out in hardware, in firmware, or in more specialized apparatus constructed to perform the required method steps. [0040]
  • Further, as used herein, a Web “client” should be broadly construed to mean any computer or component thereof directly or indirectly connected or connectable in any known or later-developed manner to a computer network, such as the Internet. The term Web “server” should also be broadly construed to mean a computer, computer platform, an adjunct to a computer or platform, or any component thereof. Of course, a “client” should be broadly construed to mean one who requests or gets the file, and “server” is the entity which downloads the file. [0041]
  • Having thus described our invention, what we claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent is set forth in the following claims. [0042]

Claims (26)

1. A method for serving an image from a server to a client, comprising the steps of:
specifying a set of one or more bitmap characteristics for an image transfer, at least one of the bitmap characteristics including a number of bits per pixel;
responsive to a client request, generating a version of the image that conforms to the specified bitmap characteristic; and
serving the version of the image back to the client.
2. The method as described in claim 1 wherein the set of bitmap characteristics includes a bitmap compression format.
3. The method as described in claim 3 wherein the step of generating the version of the image includes processing the image according to the specified bitmap compression format.
4. The method as described in claim 2 wherein the bitmap compression format is lossy.
5. The method as described in claim 2 wherein the bitmap compression format is non-lossy.
6. The method as described in claim 1 wherein the step of specifying the set of bitmap characteristics include setting a graphic control.
7. The method as described in claim 1 wherein the graphic control is a: slider having first and second positions and a plurality of intermediate positions.
8. The method as described in claim 7 wherein the first position selects a subset of bitmap characteristics for a fastest download and lowest quality version of the image.
9. The method as described in claim 7 wherein the second position selects a subset of bitmap characteristics for a slowest download and highest quality version of the image.
10. A method for serving an image from a server to a client, comprising the steps of:
storing an image at the server;
at the client, specifying a set of one or more bitmap characteristics for an image transfer, at least one of the bitmap characteristics including a number of bits per pixel;
at the server, responsive to a client request that includes data identifying a specified bitmap characteristic, generating a version of the image that conforms to the specified bitmap characteristic; and
serving the version of the image back to the client.
11. The method as described in claim 10 wherein the client is a computer having a browser for issuing the client request.
12. The method as described in claim 10 wherein the bitmap characteristics include a bitmap compression format.
13. The method as described in claim 10 wherein the bitmap characteristics include a number of dots per inch on a printer associated with the client.
14. The method as described in claim 10 wherein the image is stored at the server in a high resolution format.
15. A method for serving a web page having an image, comprising the steps of:
at a web server, receiving a request for the web page; and
parsing the request to identify given data identifying a requested bitmap characteristic; if the request includes the given data, generating a version of the image that conforms with the requested bitmap characteristic; and
serving the web page with the version of the image.
16. The method as described in claim 15 wherein the requested bitmap characteristic is a number of bits per pixel.
17. The method as described in claim 15 wherein the requested bitmap characteristic is a number of bits per pixel and a given bitmap compression technique.
18. A computer program product in a computer-readable medium for serving bitmap-adjusted images to a plurality of web clients, comprising:
code executable at a given web client for enabling a user to specify a bitmap characteristic;
means operative upon receipt of a given request from a web client for parsing the given request to determine whether the user has specified a bitmap characteristic;
means responsive to a positive determination for generating a bitmap-adjusted version of the image; and
means for serving the bitmap-adjusted version of the image in response to the given request.
19. The computer program product as described in claim 18 wherein the bitmap characteristic is a number of bits per pixel.
20. The computer program product as described in claim 18 wherein the code executable on the given web client is an applet.
21. The computer program product as described in claim 18 wherein the means for parsing includes a manager routine and a set of client response routines, wherein a given client response routine is launched by the manager upon receipt by the manager of a given client request.
22. The computer program product as described in claim 18 wherein the means for generating includes an image processor.
23. The computer program product as described in claim 22 wherein the image processor includes means for processing the image according to a given bitmap compression technique.
24. A server operative in a computer network, comprising:
at least one image stored in a high resolution format;
an applet deliverable to a given web client for execution on the web client by a user to generate given data, the given data identifying a number of bits per pixel;
code responsive to receipt of a given request for the image for parsing the given request to identify the given data; and
code responsive to the identification for generating a version of the image having a reduced number of bits per pixel.
25. The server as described in claim 24 further including code for serving the version of the image having the reduced number of bits per pixel.
26. A computer program product electronically deliverable to a web client for execution in a browser virtual machine, comprising:
code for generating a user dialog including a master graphic control, the master graphic control having at least first and second positions and a plurality of intermediate positions; and
code responsive to placement of the control at the first position for generating a set of bitmap characteristics for a fastest download and lowest quality version of an image; and
code responsive to placement of the control at the second position for generating a set of bitmap characteristics for a slowest download and highest quality version of the image.
US10/284,274 1999-11-04 2002-10-30 Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server Abandoned US20030090692A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/284,274 US20030090692A1 (en) 1999-11-04 2002-10-30 Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/434,765 US7099040B1 (en) 1999-11-04 1999-11-04 Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server
US10/284,274 US20030090692A1 (en) 1999-11-04 2002-10-30 Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/434,765 Division US7099040B1 (en) 1999-11-04 1999-11-04 Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030090692A1 true US20030090692A1 (en) 2003-05-15

Family

ID=23725595

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/434,765 Expired - Fee Related US7099040B1 (en) 1999-11-04 1999-11-04 Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server
US10/284,274 Abandoned US20030090692A1 (en) 1999-11-04 2002-10-30 Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/434,765 Expired - Fee Related US7099040B1 (en) 1999-11-04 1999-11-04 Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US7099040B1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060259590A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2006-11-16 Chung-Cheng Tsai Online printing service system on the Internet
US20090199252A1 (en) * 2008-01-31 2009-08-06 Philippe Wieczorek Method and system for accessing applications

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7240346B2 (en) * 2002-11-13 2007-07-03 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for accessing drawing resources
US9910838B2 (en) * 2005-09-20 2018-03-06 Adobe Systems Incorporated Alternates of assets
US8212805B1 (en) 2007-01-05 2012-07-03 Kenneth Banschick System and method for parametric display of modular aesthetic designs
US7529804B1 (en) 2008-05-15 2009-05-05 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for comprehensive automatic color customization in an email message based on cultural perspective
US8831090B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2014-09-09 Avigilon Corporation Method, system and apparatus for image capture, analysis and transmission

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5179651A (en) * 1988-11-08 1993-01-12 Massachusetts General Hospital Apparatus for retrieval and processing of selected archived images for display at workstation terminals
US5442749A (en) * 1991-08-22 1995-08-15 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Network video server system receiving requests from clients for specific formatted data through a default channel and establishing communication through separate control and data channels
US5745909A (en) * 1996-07-09 1998-04-28 Webtv Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing flicker when displaying HTML images on a television monitor
US5764235A (en) * 1996-03-25 1998-06-09 Insight Development Corporation Computer implemented method and system for transmitting graphical images from server to client at user selectable resolution
US5911044A (en) * 1996-11-08 1999-06-08 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Network image scanning system which transmits image information from a scanner over a network to a client computer
US6098092A (en) * 1996-11-08 2000-08-01 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Server to dynamically generate graphics for the world wide web
US6167442A (en) * 1997-02-18 2000-12-26 Truespectra Inc. Method and system for accessing and of rendering an image for transmission over a network
US6362836B1 (en) * 1998-04-06 2002-03-26 The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. Universal application server for providing applications on a variety of client devices in a client/server network

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6008836A (en) 1996-06-03 1999-12-28 Webtv Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for adjusting television display control using a browser
JPH10174103A (en) 1996-12-13 1998-06-26 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Image encoder, encoded image recording medium, image decoder, image encoding method and encoded image transmitting method

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5179651A (en) * 1988-11-08 1993-01-12 Massachusetts General Hospital Apparatus for retrieval and processing of selected archived images for display at workstation terminals
US5442749A (en) * 1991-08-22 1995-08-15 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Network video server system receiving requests from clients for specific formatted data through a default channel and establishing communication through separate control and data channels
US5764235A (en) * 1996-03-25 1998-06-09 Insight Development Corporation Computer implemented method and system for transmitting graphical images from server to client at user selectable resolution
US5745909A (en) * 1996-07-09 1998-04-28 Webtv Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing flicker when displaying HTML images on a television monitor
US5911044A (en) * 1996-11-08 1999-06-08 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Network image scanning system which transmits image information from a scanner over a network to a client computer
US6098092A (en) * 1996-11-08 2000-08-01 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Server to dynamically generate graphics for the world wide web
US6167442A (en) * 1997-02-18 2000-12-26 Truespectra Inc. Method and system for accessing and of rendering an image for transmission over a network
US6362836B1 (en) * 1998-04-06 2002-03-26 The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. Universal application server for providing applications on a variety of client devices in a client/server network

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060259590A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2006-11-16 Chung-Cheng Tsai Online printing service system on the Internet
US20090199252A1 (en) * 2008-01-31 2009-08-06 Philippe Wieczorek Method and system for accessing applications

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7099040B1 (en) 2006-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6230196B1 (en) Generation of smart HTML anchors in dynamic web page creation
US6654814B1 (en) Systems, methods and computer program products for dynamic placement of web content tailoring
KR100620836B1 (en) A method for generation and assembly of web page content
US7092946B2 (en) System and methodology for providing a mobile device with a network-based intelligent resource fork
US6684257B1 (en) Systems, methods and computer program products for validating web content tailored for display within pervasive computing devices
JP4446355B2 (en) Information presentation and management in online trading environment
US7313757B2 (en) Method and system for cross-platform form creation and deployment
US7405838B2 (en) Information processing apparatus, information processing method and print systems
US6049342A (en) System and method for controlling the downloading and display of an animated sequence from a network
US7073121B2 (en) Web page thumbnails and user configured complementary information provided from a server
US7847957B2 (en) Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and program
US6735694B1 (en) Method and system for certifying authenticity of a web page copy
US20020002569A1 (en) Systems, methods and computer program products for associating dynamically generated web page content with web site visitors
US20020143822A1 (en) Method and apparatus for applying an adaptive layout process to a layout template
US7617275B2 (en) Method and apparatus for terminal server addressability via URL specification
US20090327522A1 (en) Micro-client for Internet Appliances
EP0889420A2 (en) Media manager for access to multiple media types
US20140040771A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Downloading and Viewing Images
GB2328300A (en) Printing pages related to a viewed WWW page
GB2355357A (en) Scanner for scanning images directly to an online web page
US20060075334A1 (en) Information processing apparatus, history file generation method and program
US20030126261A1 (en) System and method for intelligent routing of tasks across a distributed network
US7099040B1 (en) Method for enabling a client to specify the characteristics of an image to be downloaded from a server
US6636235B1 (en) Lettering adjustments for display resolution
US7003584B1 (en) Apparatus and method for accessing request header information using a transcoding filter servlet

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: EXPRESSLY ABANDONED -- DURING EXAMINATION