US20020042839A1 - HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor - Google Patents

HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020042839A1
US20020042839A1 US09/882,375 US88237501A US2002042839A1 US 20020042839 A1 US20020042839 A1 US 20020042839A1 US 88237501 A US88237501 A US 88237501A US 2002042839 A1 US2002042839 A1 US 2002042839A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
server
http
client
requests
responses
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/882,375
Inventor
Christopher Peiffer
Israel L'Heureux
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Juniper Networks Inc
Original Assignee
Christopher Peiffer
L'heureux Israel
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Christopher Peiffer, L'heureux Israel filed Critical Christopher Peiffer
Priority to US09/882,375 priority Critical patent/US20020042839A1/en
Priority to AT01983121T priority patent/ATE370455T1/en
Priority to PCT/US2001/031854 priority patent/WO2002031676A1/en
Priority to AU2002214574A priority patent/AU2002214574A1/en
Priority to EP01983121A priority patent/EP1332437B1/en
Priority to US09/975,522 priority patent/US7231446B2/en
Priority to DE60130011T priority patent/DE60130011T2/en
Publication of US20020042839A1 publication Critical patent/US20020042839A1/en
Priority to US10/136,030 priority patent/US7055028B2/en
Assigned to REDLINE NETWORKS, INC. reassignment REDLINE NETWORKS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PEIFFER, CHRISTOPHER, L'HEUREUX, ISREAL
Assigned to JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. reassignment JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: REDLINE NETWORKS, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/02Protocols based on web technology, e.g. hypertext transfer protocol [HTTP]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/40Network security protocols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/16Implementation or adaptation of Internet protocol [IP], of transmission control protocol [TCP] or of user datagram protocol [UDP]
    • H04L69/161Implementation details of TCP/IP or UDP/IP stack architecture; Specification of modified or new header fields
    • H04L69/162Implementation details of TCP/IP or UDP/IP stack architecture; Specification of modified or new header fields involving adaptations of sockets based mechanisms
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/16Implementation or adaptation of Internet protocol [IP], of transmission control protocol [TCP] or of user datagram protocol [UDP]
    • H04L69/165Combined use of TCP and UDP protocols; selection criteria therefor
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/14Session management
    • H04L67/142Managing session states for stateless protocols; Signalling session states; State transitions; Keeping-state mechanisms
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S370/00Multiplex communications
    • Y10S370/916Multiplexer/demultiplexer

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to data transmission on computer networks, and more particularly to a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Multiplexor/Demultiplexor.
  • HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
  • the Internet has experienced explosive growth in recent years.
  • the emergence of the World Wide Web has enabled millions of users around the world to download easily web resources containing text, graphics, video, and sound data while at home, work, or from remote locations via wireless devices.
  • These web resources often are large in size and therefore require a long time to download, causing the user delay and frustration. Delay often causes users to abandon the requested web page and move on to another web page, resulting in lost revenue and exposure for many commercial web sites.
  • HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
  • TCP Transfer Control Protocol
  • a system, method and device for multiplexing and demultiplexing HTTP requests are provided.
  • the method may include receiving HTTP requests from a client and routing those requests to a plurality of sockets on a server.
  • the requests may be routed based on socket response time, the type or size of data being requested, or on other parameters related to the HTTP requests.
  • the method may also include receiving HTTP responses over a plurality of connections from the server and routing those responses to the client.
  • the method typically includes at an intermediate networking device, listening for a series of HTTP requests from an originating client, receiving the series of HTTP requests from the originating client, demultiplexing the series of HTTP requests into discrete HTTP requests, and sending each discrete HTTP request to an optimal server socket.
  • the method further includes listening for HTTP responses from a plurality of server sockets, receiving the HTTP responses from the plurality of server sockets, multiplexing the HTTP responses from the plurality of server sockets into a series of HTTP responses, and sending the series of HTTP responses to the originating client.
  • the system typically includes a server, a client configured to connect to the server via a computer network, and a computer networking device positioned intermediate the server and the client on the computer network.
  • the computer networking device typically has an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor configured to receive HTTP requests from the client and to distribute those requests over a plurality of TCP connections to a plurality of corresponding sockets on the server.
  • the device typically includes an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor configured to receive HTTP requests from a client and to distribute those requests to a plurality of sockets on a server.
  • the device typically is further configured to receive HTTP responses from the plurality of sockets on the server and to route those responses to the client.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a prior art network configuration.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic view of an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor system according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor system of FIG. 2, showing HTTP requests and responses.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a client computing device of the system of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic view of one embodiment of a networking device of the system of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic view of another embodiment of a networking device of the system of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method of demultiplexing and multiplexing HTTP requests and responses according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Prior art system 5 includes a plurality of remote clients 5 a and a server 5 b .
  • TCP Transport Control Protocol
  • Each TCP connection is established between a single socket on each remote client and a corresponding socket on the server, such that a one-to-one socket ratio is established.
  • Remote clients 5 a send Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) requests via established TCP connections to a TCP buffer associated with a server socket. Requests received at the TCP buffer are processed only as quickly as the server can respond to them. Often, requests build up in the buffer because the server cannot respond to them quickly enough, and server-side delay (also referred to as latency) often results. This is inefficient and frustrating, and may cause a user to abandon downloading the page.
  • HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
  • System 10 typically includes a plurality of remote clients 12 configured to communicate with servers 14 via computer network 16 .
  • remote client 12 sends HTTP requests via a networking device 20 to server 14 and waits for HTTP responses to return.
  • Networking device 20 includes an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 configured to route HTTP requests from a single socket on remote client 12 , to a plurality of sockets on server 14 .
  • HTTP requests are routed to an optimal server socket with optimal response time, in order to ensure efficient processing of the requests.
  • remote client 12 typically is a personal computer including a processor 13 a coupled to a communications bus 13 b .
  • a mass storage device 13 c such as a hard drive, CD ROM drive, tape drive, etc., and a memory 13 d are also linked to the communications bus 13 b .
  • Memory 13 d typically includes random access memory (RAM) 13 e , and read-only memory (ROM) 13 f .
  • ROM 13 f typically includes a basic input/output system (BIOS) 13 g , which is configured to start up and operate basic functions of the remote client.
  • Remote client 12 typically is configured to access computer network 16 via a network interface 13 h .
  • remote client 12 may be a portable data assistant, web-enabled wireless device, mainframe computer, or other suitable computing device.
  • Remote client 12 typically is configured to run an operating system (OS) 13 i to manage programs or applications.
  • Operating system 13 i is stored in mass storage device 13 c .
  • suitable operating systems include UNIX, Windows, MacOS, VMS, and OS/ 2 , although virtually any suitable operating system may be used.
  • Remote client 12 includes a browser program 13 i stored in mass storage device 13 c configured to display requested web resources to a user of remote client 12 .
  • Exemplary browser programs 34 include the Netscape browser commercially available from Netscape Communications Corporation of Santa Clara, California and the Internet Explorer browser commercially available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington.
  • Server 14 also typically is a computer similar to that shown in FIG. 4.
  • Server 14 typically includes a server program configured to communicate with remote clients using the HTTP protocol.
  • the server program typically is configured to receive HTTP requests, and, in response send HTTP responses to browser 13 i on remote client 12 via computer network 16 .
  • Computer network 16 typically is a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet and computer network 24 is a local area network (LAN).
  • WAN wide area network
  • LAN local area network
  • network 16 operates using TCP/IP protocols, although other protocols suitable for carrying HTTP requests and responses may be used.
  • Web site 18 typically includes a collection of web resources or URIs typically located at a web address called a URL (Uniform Resource Locator).
  • the term “web resource” refers generally to a data resource that may be downloaded by a web browser. Web resources may include web pages, code, graphics, video, sounds, text, and/or other data. Web resources may be static (e.g. stored file) or dynamic (e.g. dynamically generated output). Web resources may be stored on and served by a single server 14 or a number of servers 14 , as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. For example, images may be stored on one server while code may be stored in another server, alternatively, copies of images and code may be stored on multiple redundant servers.
  • networking device 20 typically includes a controller 20 a having a memory 20 b and processor 20 c linked by a bus 20 d . Also coupled to bus 20 d is a mass storage device 20 e including a multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 , which may also be referred to as a “mux/demux.”
  • Networking device 20 also typically includes a network interface 20 f coupled to bus 20 d and to an external network connection to computer network 16 .
  • Network interface 20 f is configured to enable networking device 20 to communicate with remote client 12 via WAN computer network 16 and with server 14 via LAN computer network 24 .
  • An example of a suitable network interface is the Intel Ethernet Pro 100 network card, commercially available from Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif.
  • Networking device 20 ′ typically includes an integrated circuit board 20 g .
  • the integrated circuit board contains a bus 20 h connecting a network interface 20 i , memory 20 i , processor 20 k , Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) 20 m , and mass storage device 20 n .
  • Network interface 20 i is configured to enable networking device 20 ′ to communicate with remote client 12 via computer network 16 and with server 14 via LAN 24 .
  • ASIC 20 m typically contains a multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 .
  • ASIC 20 m , processor 20 k , and memory 20 i form a controller 20 p configured to process requests for web resources according to the methods described below. It will be appreciated that the embodiments of networking device 20 , 20 ′ may be a stand-alone network appliance or may be integrated with a web server.
  • Networking device 20 typically is connected to server 14 via LAN 24 . Because device 20 is connected to server 14 via LAN 24 and remote client 12 via WAN 16 , networking device 20 may be considered a “server-side” proxy server.
  • a proxy server is a program or device that acts as an intermediary between a browser and a server.
  • Networking device 20 acts as an intermediary by receiving HTTP requests from remote clients 12 and sending those requests to a socket on server 14 , and by receiving server-generated HTTP responses and sending those responses to the remote client that originated the requests.
  • Networking device 20 includes a software or firmware multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 configured to route requests from a single remote client to a plurality of sockets on server 14 , and to route server responses from various sockets back to the originating remote client.
  • each remote client 12 has an associated network connection 26 , 28 , 30 established with multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 via WAN 16 .
  • Remote clients 12 are typically configured to send HTTP requests and receive HTTP responses via connections 26 , 28 , and 30 .
  • Each server 14 has an associated network connection 32 , 34 , 36 established with multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 via LAN 24 .
  • Servers 14 are typically configured to receive HTTP requests and send HTTP responses via connections 32 , 34 , and 36 . It will be appreciated that multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to establish additional connections with additional remote clients and servers.
  • connections 26 , 28 , 30 , 32 , 34 , and 36 are persistent TCP connections.
  • Persistent TCP connections are connections that remain open until explicitly commanded to close or until the server times-out the connection.
  • a connection other than a persistent TCP connection may be used.
  • HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to receive a series of HTTP requests A over a single connection 26 from a remote client 12 at a corresponding remote client-side socket 26 a .
  • socket refers to a port, buffer, logical node, or object configured to receive data in the HTTP format from a remote device via a network connection, and is not limited to a “socket” as defined in the Unix operating system environment.
  • HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is also configured to demultiplex the series of requests A into discrete requests A 1 -A 3 and to transport each discrete request A 1 -A 3 to one of a plurality of server-side sockets 32 a , 34 a , and 36 a .
  • This process is referred to as demultiplexing because a series of requests from a single TCP connection is broken up and routed over a plurality of TCP connections to a plurality of server sockets.
  • server-side sockets 32 a , 34 a , 36 a of mux/demux 22 are connected to corresponding server sockets 32 b , 34 b 36 b of server 14 via respective connections 32 , 34 , 36 , via LAN 24 .
  • HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 of one embodiment of the present invention is configured to route or distribute the incoming requests A from a single remote client-side socket such as 26 a to a plurality of server-side sockets 32 a , 34 a , and 36 a .
  • multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to route each of HTTP requests A to an optimal server socket, which typically is a least busy server socket.
  • multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 may be configured to detect the response time at each server socket 32 b , 34 b , 36 b by monitoring server-side sockets 32 a , 34 a , and 36 a .
  • the server socket with the fastest response time may be determined to be the least busy server socket.
  • another method may be used to determine the optimal server socket.
  • the HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor may be configured to determine the type of HTTP request being made and/or the type of data being requested and accordingly route the request to an optimal server-side socket, based on the requested data type or HTTP request type. For example, all image requests may be handled by a predetermined set of sockets on server 14 a , while all HTML requests may be handled by a predetermined set of sockets on server 14 b . In addition, all HTTP 1 . 0 requests may be detected by multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 and routed to an optimal socket on server 14 a , while all HTTP 1 . 1 requests may be detected and routed to an optimal socket on server 14 b .
  • Server 14 is configured to respond to the many incoming HTTP requests by sending out appropriate HTTP responses B, which may contain data requested by the HTTP requests.
  • HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to receive these responses at server-side sockets 32 a , 34 a , and 36 a and route these responses back to the appropriate remote client-side socket, such as 26 a , from which the corresponding HTTP request originated.
  • HTTP requests A 1 , A 2 , and A 3 all originate from remote client 12 a , and are routed to server sockets 32 b , 34 b , and 36 a , respectively, by HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 .
  • HTTP responses B 1 , B 2 , and B 3 are sent from server sockets 32 b , 34 b , and 36 b over persistent TCP connections 32 , 34 , and 36 to server-side sockets 32 a , 34 a , and 36 a , at which point the responses are all routed back to remote client-side socket 26 a for delivery to remote client 12 a via TCP connection 26 .
  • This process is referred to as multiplexing because discrete responses from a plurality of sockets are combined into a series of responses and sent over a single TCP connection to remote client 12 a .
  • HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to take a single series of HTTP requests received via a single socket and route the requests to a plurality of different sockets on server 14 , and route responses from the various server sockets back to the remote client, such that the performance of server 14 may be optimized.
  • HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to simultaneously demultiplex and multiplex HTTP requests and responses going to and from a plurality of remote clients 12 via a plurality of remote client-side sockets 26 a , 28 a , 30 a .
  • a method 100 may be practiced according to the present invention.
  • the steps of method 100 are typically accomplished by networking device 20 , utilizing remote client 12 , server 14 , WAN 16 , and LAN 24 .
  • the method may be accomplished by dedicated software on server 14 , or by some other suitable software or hardware device.
  • the method typically includes establishing persistent TCP connections between multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 and a plurality of sockets on server 14 typically via LAN 24 .
  • the method typically includes establishing persistent TCP connections between multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 and one or more remote clients 12 via WAN 16 .
  • the method further includes listening for a series of HTTP requests from an originating remote client 12 and/or for HTTP responses from various server sockets.
  • method 100 continues, at 108, to receive the series of HTTP requests from originating remote client 12 at a single remote client-side socket.
  • Method 100 further includes, at 110, demultiplexing the series of HTTP requests into a plurality of discrete HTTP requests.
  • the method further includes routing the series of requests to a plurality of sockets on an associated server, typically by sending each discrete HTTP request to an optimal server socket.
  • method 100 may also include monitoring server sockets 32 b , 34 b , and 36 b and determining an optimal server socket.
  • the multiplexor/demultiplexor typically determines an optimal server socket by determining a server socket with a least-lengthy response time.
  • the optimal server socket may be determined by determining a last-accessed server socket, determining a server socket with the fewest number of unfulfilled requests, determining the type or size of data being requested or other parameters related to the HTTP requests, or by weighing all or some of these conditions.
  • the multiplexor/demultiplexor is able to send a discrete HTTP request to the optimal server socket.
  • method 100 proceeds to 114 , and includes receiving HTTP responses from various server sockets.
  • the multiplexor/demultiplexor typically is able to determine the destination of the HTTP responses.
  • the method includes multiplexing the HTTP responses generated in response to requests from an originating remote client into a series of HTTP responses bound for the originating remote client.
  • method 100 includes sending the series of responses to the originating remote client.
  • the method includes returning to step 104 to establish a persistent TCP connection with the new remote client, or returning to step 102 to establish a persistent TCP connection with the new server, respectively.
  • HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 may be configured to establish a plurality of TCP connections with a plurality of servers and a plurality of remote clients, and therefore may be configured to handle HTTP requests and HTTP responses from multiple servers and remote clients at once.
  • the method may include receiving a series of HTTP requests originating from a single remote client and routing those requests to a plurality of sockets on a server.
  • the method may also include receiving HTTP responses over a plurality of TCP connections from the server and routing those responses to a single remote client.
  • single remote 20 client refers to the fact that a plurality of requests originate from a single client.
  • the method may be practiced with more than one remote client.

Abstract

A computer networking system, method and device for demultiplexing a series of HTTP requests and multiplexing HTTP responses. The method may include receiving a series of HTTP requests from a single client and routing those requests to a plurality of sockets on a server. The method may also include receiving HTTP responses from the plurality of sockets on the server and routing those responses to a single client.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application, Serial No. 60/239,552, entitled “HTTP Multiplexor/Demultiplexor,” filed on Oct. 10, 2000, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference. [0001]
  • 1. Technical Field [0002]
  • The present invention relates generally to data transmission on computer networks, and more particularly to a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Multiplexor/Demultiplexor. [0003]
  • 2. Background of the Invention [0004]
  • The Internet has experienced explosive growth in recent years. The emergence of the World Wide Web has enabled millions of users around the world to download easily web resources containing text, graphics, video, and sound data while at home, work, or from remote locations via wireless devices. These web resources often are large in size and therefore require a long time to download, causing the user delay and frustration. Delay often causes users to abandon the requested web page and move on to another web page, resulting in lost revenue and exposure for many commercial web sites. [0005]
  • One cause of delay is accumulation of Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) requests within a Transfer Control Protocol (TCP) buffer of a server socket at a server. When a user requests a web page, a web browser sends HTTP requests to a server socket via an established TCP connection. When the server does not process requests to a socket quickly enough, HTTP requests build up in the TCP buffer for that socket, resulting in processing delay in that socket. [0006]
  • It would be desirable to provide a system, method, and device for reducing buffer congestion and delay in server response time.[0007]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • A system, method and device for multiplexing and demultiplexing HTTP requests are provided. The method may include receiving HTTP requests from a client and routing those requests to a plurality of sockets on a server. The requests may be routed based on socket response time, the type or size of data being requested, or on other parameters related to the HTTP requests. The method may also include receiving HTTP responses over a plurality of connections from the server and routing those responses to the client. [0008]
  • According to another aspect of the invention, the method typically includes at an intermediate networking device, listening for a series of HTTP requests from an originating client, receiving the series of HTTP requests from the originating client, demultiplexing the series of HTTP requests into discrete HTTP requests, and sending each discrete HTTP request to an optimal server socket. The method further includes listening for HTTP responses from a plurality of server sockets, receiving the HTTP responses from the plurality of server sockets, multiplexing the HTTP responses from the plurality of server sockets into a series of HTTP responses, and sending the series of HTTP responses to the originating client. [0009]
  • The system typically includes a server, a client configured to connect to the server via a computer network, and a computer networking device positioned intermediate the server and the client on the computer network. The computer networking device typically has an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor configured to receive HTTP requests from the client and to distribute those requests over a plurality of TCP connections to a plurality of corresponding sockets on the server. [0010]
  • The device typically includes an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor configured to receive HTTP requests from a client and to distribute those requests to a plurality of sockets on a server. The device typically is further configured to receive HTTP responses from the plurality of sockets on the server and to route those responses to the client.[0011]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a prior art network configuration. [0012]
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic view of an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor system according to one embodiment of the present invention. [0013]
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor system of FIG. 2, showing HTTP requests and responses. [0014]
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a client computing device of the system of FIG. 2. [0015]
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic view of one embodiment of a networking device of the system of FIG. 2. [0016]
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic view of another embodiment of a networking device of the system of FIG. 2. [0017]
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method of demultiplexing and multiplexing HTTP requests and responses according to one embodiment of the present invention.[0018]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Referring initially to FIG. 1, a prior art networking system is shown generally at 5. [0019] Prior art system 5 includes a plurality of remote clients 5 a and a server 5 b. In prior art system 5, a single Transport Control Protocol (TCP) connection is established between each remote client 5 a and server 5 b. Each TCP connection is established between a single socket on each remote client and a corresponding socket on the server, such that a one-to-one socket ratio is established. Remote clients 5 a send Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) requests via established TCP connections to a TCP buffer associated with a server socket. Requests received at the TCP buffer are processed only as quickly as the server can respond to them. Often, requests build up in the buffer because the server cannot respond to them quickly enough, and server-side delay (also referred to as latency) often results. This is inefficient and frustrating, and may cause a user to abandon downloading the page.
  • In FIG. 2, a system for processing HTTP requests according to one embodiment of the present invention is shown generally at 10. [0020] System 10 typically includes a plurality of remote clients 12 configured to communicate with servers 14 via computer network 16. To access web resources located at Uniform Resource Indicators (URIs) on web site 18, remote client 12 sends HTTP requests via a networking device 20 to server 14 and waits for HTTP responses to return. Networking device 20 includes an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 configured to route HTTP requests from a single socket on remote client 12, to a plurality of sockets on server 14. Typically, HTTP requests are routed to an optimal server socket with optimal response time, in order to ensure efficient processing of the requests.
  • Referring now to FIG. 4, [0021] remote client 12 typically is a personal computer including a processor 13 a coupled to a communications bus 13 b. A mass storage device 13 c, such as a hard drive, CD ROM drive, tape drive, etc., and a memory 13 d are also linked to the communications bus 13 b. Memory 13 d typically includes random access memory (RAM) 13 e, and read-only memory (ROM) 13 f. ROM 13 f typically includes a basic input/output system (BIOS) 13 g, which is configured to start up and operate basic functions of the remote client. Remote client 12 typically is configured to access computer network 16 via a network interface 13 h. Alternatively, remote client 12 may be a portable data assistant, web-enabled wireless device, mainframe computer, or other suitable computing device.
  • [0022] Remote client 12 typically is configured to run an operating system (OS) 13 i to manage programs or applications. Operating system 13 i is stored in mass storage device 13 c. Examples of suitable operating systems include UNIX, Windows, MacOS, VMS, and OS/2, although virtually any suitable operating system may be used. Remote client 12 includes a browser program 13 i stored in mass storage device 13 c configured to display requested web resources to a user of remote client 12. Exemplary browser programs 34 include the Netscape browser commercially available from Netscape Communications Corporation of Santa Clara, California and the Internet Explorer browser commercially available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington.
  • [0023] Server 14 also typically is a computer similar to that shown in FIG. 4. Server 14 typically includes a server program configured to communicate with remote clients using the HTTP protocol. The server program typically is configured to receive HTTP requests, and, in response send HTTP responses to browser 13 i on remote client 12 via computer network 16.
  • [0024] Computer network 16 typically is a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet and computer network 24 is a local area network (LAN). Typically, network 16 operates using TCP/IP protocols, although other protocols suitable for carrying HTTP requests and responses may be used.
  • [0025] Web site 18 typically includes a collection of web resources or URIs typically located at a web address called a URL (Uniform Resource Locator). The term “web resource” refers generally to a data resource that may be downloaded by a web browser. Web resources may include web pages, code, graphics, video, sounds, text, and/or other data. Web resources may be static (e.g. stored file) or dynamic (e.g. dynamically generated output). Web resources may be stored on and served by a single server 14 or a number of servers 14, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. For example, images may be stored on one server while code may be stored in another server, alternatively, copies of images and code may be stored on multiple redundant servers.
  • As shown in FIG. 5, [0026] networking device 20 typically includes a controller 20 a having a memory 20 b and processor 20 c linked by a bus 20 d. Also coupled to bus 20 d is a mass storage device 20 e including a multiplexor/demultiplexor 22, which may also be referred to as a “mux/demux.” Networking device 20 also typically includes a network interface 20 f coupled to bus 20 d and to an external network connection to computer network 16. Network interface 20 f is configured to enable networking device 20 to communicate with remote client 12 via WAN computer network 16 and with server 14 via LAN computer network 24. An example of a suitable network interface is the Intel Ethernet Pro 100 network card, commercially available from Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif.
  • In FIG. 6, another embodiment of a networking device according to the present invention is shown generally at [0027] 20′. Networking device 20′ typically includes an integrated circuit board 20 g. The integrated circuit board contains a bus 20 h connecting a network interface 20 i, memory 20 i, processor 20 k, Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) 20 m, and mass storage device 20 n. Network interface 20 i is configured to enable networking device 20′ to communicate with remote client 12 via computer network 16 and with server 14 via LAN 24. ASIC 20 m typically contains a multiplexor/demultiplexor 22. ASIC 20 m, processor 20 k, and memory 20 i form a controller 20 p configured to process requests for web resources according to the methods described below. It will be appreciated that the embodiments of networking device 20, 20′ may be a stand-alone network appliance or may be integrated with a web server.
  • [0028] Networking device 20 typically is connected to server 14 via LAN 24. Because device 20 is connected to server 14 via LAN 24 and remote client 12 via WAN 16, networking device 20 may be considered a “server-side” proxy server. A proxy server is a program or device that acts as an intermediary between a browser and a server. Networking device 20 acts as an intermediary by receiving HTTP requests from remote clients 12 and sending those requests to a socket on server 14, and by receiving server-generated HTTP responses and sending those responses to the remote client that originated the requests.
  • [0029] Networking device 20 includes a software or firmware multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 configured to route requests from a single remote client to a plurality of sockets on server 14, and to route server responses from various sockets back to the originating remote client. As shown in FIG. 3, each remote client 12 has an associated network connection 26, 28, 30 established with multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 via WAN 16. Remote clients 12 are typically configured to send HTTP requests and receive HTTP responses via connections 26, 28, and 30. Each server 14 has an associated network connection 32, 34, 36 established with multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 via LAN 24. Servers 14 are typically configured to receive HTTP requests and send HTTP responses via connections 32, 34, and 36. It will be appreciated that multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to establish additional connections with additional remote clients and servers.
  • Typically [0030] connections 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 36 are persistent TCP connections. Persistent TCP connections are connections that remain open until explicitly commanded to close or until the server times-out the connection. Alternatively, a connection other than a persistent TCP connection may be used.
  • HTTP multiplexor/[0031] demultiplexor 22 is configured to receive a series of HTTP requests A over a single connection 26 from a remote client 12 at a corresponding remote client-side socket 26 a. As used herein, the term socket refers to a port, buffer, logical node, or object configured to receive data in the HTTP format from a remote device via a network connection, and is not limited to a “socket” as defined in the Unix operating system environment.
  • HTTP multiplexor/[0032] demultiplexor 22 is also configured to demultiplex the series of requests A into discrete requests A1-A3 and to transport each discrete request A1-A3 to one of a plurality of server- side sockets 32 a, 34 a, and 36 a. This process is referred to as demultiplexing because a series of requests from a single TCP connection is broken up and routed over a plurality of TCP connections to a plurality of server sockets. Typically server- side sockets 32 a, 34 a, 36 a of mux/demux 22 are connected to corresponding server sockets 32 b, 34 b 36 b of server 14 via respective connections 32, 34, 36, via LAN 24.
  • HTTP multiplexor/[0033] demultiplexor 22 of one embodiment of the present invention is configured to route or distribute the incoming requests A from a single remote client-side socket such as 26 a to a plurality of server- side sockets 32 a, 34 a, and 36 a. In doing so, multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to route each of HTTP requests A to an optimal server socket, which typically is a least busy server socket. To determine the optimal server socket, multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 may be configured to detect the response time at each server socket 32 b, 34 b, 36 b by monitoring server- side sockets 32 a, 34 a, and 36 a. The server socket with the fastest response time may be determined to be the least busy server socket. Alternatively, another method may be used to determine the optimal server socket. By adjusting the flow of requests away from slow, congested server sockets and toward fast congestion-free server sockets, the multiplexor/demultiplexor is able to increase the overall efficiency and response time of server 14.
  • In addition, the HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor may be configured to determine the type of HTTP request being made and/or the type of data being requested and accordingly route the request to an optimal server-side socket, based on the requested data type or HTTP request type. For example, all image requests may be handled by a predetermined set of sockets on [0034] server 14 a, while all HTML requests may be handled by a predetermined set of sockets on server 14 b. In addition, all HTTP 1.0 requests may be detected by multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 and routed to an optimal socket on server 14 a, while all HTTP 1.1 requests may be detected and routed to an optimal socket on server 14 b.
  • [0035] Server 14 is configured to respond to the many incoming HTTP requests by sending out appropriate HTTP responses B, which may contain data requested by the HTTP requests. HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to receive these responses at server- side sockets 32 a, 34 a, and 36 a and route these responses back to the appropriate remote client-side socket, such as 26 a, from which the corresponding HTTP request originated. For example, in the example shown in FIG. 3, HTTP requests A1, A2, and A3 all originate from remote client 12 a, and are routed to server sockets 32 b, 34 b, and 36 a, respectively, by HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22. In response, HTTP responses B1, B2, and B3 are sent from server sockets 32 b, 34 b, and 36 b over persistent TCP connections 32, 34, and 36 to server- side sockets 32 a, 34 a, and 36 a, at which point the responses are all routed back to remote client-side socket 26 a for delivery to remote client 12 a via TCP connection 26. This process is referred to as multiplexing because discrete responses from a plurality of sockets are combined into a series of responses and sent over a single TCP connection to remote client 12 a.
  • Thus, HTTP multiplexor/[0036] demultiplexor 22 is configured to take a single series of HTTP requests received via a single socket and route the requests to a plurality of different sockets on server 14, and route responses from the various server sockets back to the remote client, such that the performance of server 14 may be optimized.
  • Although multiplexing and demultiplexing has been described in detail with reference only to [0037] remote client 12 a, it will also be appreciated that HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 is configured to simultaneously demultiplex and multiplex HTTP requests and responses going to and from a plurality of remote clients 12 via a plurality of remote client- side sockets 26 a, 28 a, 30 a.
  • Turning to FIG. 7, a [0038] method 100 may be practiced according to the present invention. The steps of method 100 are typically accomplished by networking device 20, utilizing remote client 12, server 14, WAN 16, and LAN 24. Alternatively, the method may be accomplished by dedicated software on server 14, or by some other suitable software or hardware device. At 102, the method typically includes establishing persistent TCP connections between multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 and a plurality of sockets on server 14 typically via LAN 24. At 104, the method typically includes establishing persistent TCP connections between multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 and one or more remote clients 12 via WAN 16. At 106, the method further includes listening for a series of HTTP requests from an originating remote client 12 and/or for HTTP responses from various server sockets.
  • When a series of HTTP requests is detected at multiplexor/[0039] demultiplexor 22, method 100 continues, at 108, to receive the series of HTTP requests from originating remote client 12 at a single remote client-side socket. Method 100 further includes, at 110, demultiplexing the series of HTTP requests into a plurality of discrete HTTP requests. At 112, the method further includes routing the series of requests to a plurality of sockets on an associated server, typically by sending each discrete HTTP request to an optimal server socket.
  • Prior to step [0040] 112, method 100 may also include monitoring server sockets 32 b, 34 b, and 36 b and determining an optimal server socket. The multiplexor/demultiplexor typically determines an optimal server socket by determining a server socket with a least-lengthy response time. Alternatively, the optimal server socket may be determined by determining a last-accessed server socket, determining a server socket with the fewest number of unfulfilled requests, determining the type or size of data being requested or other parameters related to the HTTP requests, or by weighing all or some of these conditions. By determining an optimal server socket, the multiplexor/demultiplexor is able to send a discrete HTTP request to the optimal server socket.
  • When HTTP responses are detected at the multiplexor/demultiplexor at [0041] step 106, method 100 proceeds to 114, and includes receiving HTTP responses from various server sockets. The multiplexor/demultiplexor typically is able to determine the destination of the HTTP responses. At 116, the method includes multiplexing the HTTP responses generated in response to requests from an originating remote client into a series of HTTP responses bound for the originating remote client. At 118, method 100 includes sending the series of responses to the originating remote client.
  • When there is a new remote client or server detected at 120, the method includes returning to step [0042] 104 to establish a persistent TCP connection with the new remote client, or returning to step 102 to establish a persistent TCP connection with the new server, respectively. It will also be appreciated that HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 may be configured to establish a plurality of TCP connections with a plurality of servers and a plurality of remote clients, and therefore may be configured to handle HTTP requests and HTTP responses from multiple servers and remote clients at once.
  • According to another embodiment of the method, the method may include receiving a series of HTTP requests originating from a single remote client and routing those requests to a plurality of sockets on a server. The method may also include receiving HTTP responses over a plurality of TCP connections from the server and routing those responses to a single remote client. As used above, the term “single remote [0043] 20 client” refers to the fact that a plurality of requests originate from a single client. Of course, it will be appreciated that the method may be practiced with more than one remote client.
  • Use of the above described [0044] HTTP processing system 10, multiplexor/demultiplexor 22, and methods, in effect, reduce latency of server 14 in responding to HTTP requests because persistent connections between the server sockets and server-side sockets of multiplexor/demultiplexor 22 enable improved distribution of requests to optimal server sockets to maximize the efficiency of server 14.
  • While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the foregoing preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will understand that many variations may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims. The description of the invention should be understood to include all novel and non-obvious combinations of elements described herein, and claims may be presented in this or a later application to any novel and non-obvious combination of these elements. Where the claims recite “a” or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof, such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. [0045]

Claims (26)

We claim:
1. A computer networking device for use on a computer network connecting a client and a server, the client and server client being configured to communicate using Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), the computer networking device comprising, an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor configured to receive HTTP requests from the client and to distribute those requests over a plurality of TCP connections to a plurality of corresponding sockets on the server.
2. The computer networking device of claim 1, wherein the multiplexor/demultiplexor is further configured to receive HTTP responses from the server over a plurality of TCP connections and to route those responses to the client via a single TCP connection.
3. A computer networking method for processing HTTP requests, comprising:
receiving a series of HTTP requests from an originating client; and
routing the series of requests to a plurality of sockets on a server via a plurality of TCP connections.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the requests are routed based on a parameter selected from the group consisting of least-lengthy response time, last accessed socket, fewest number of unfulfilled requests, type of requested data, and size of requested data.
5. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
receiving HTTP responses over a plurality of connections from the server; and
routing the responses to the originating client.
6. A computer networking method for data transfer between an originating client, a server, and a networking device positioned intermediate the client and the server on a computer network, the method comprising:
at the networking device, listening for a series of HTTP requests from the originating client;
receiving the series of HTTP requests from the originating client;
demultiplexing the series of HTTP requests into discrete HTTP requests; and
sending each discrete HTTP request to an optimal server socket.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein receiving and sending occur via TCP connections.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the TCP connections are persistent.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein sending each discrete HTTP request to an optimal server socket includes determining an optimal server socket.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein determining an optimal server socket includes determining a server socket with a least-lengthy response time.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein determining an optimal server socket includes determining a last-accessed server socket.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein determining an optimal server socket includes determining a server socket with the fewest number of unfulfilled requests.
13. The method of claim 6, further comprising, listening for HTTP responses from a plurality of server sockets.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising, receiving the HTTP responses from the plurality of server sockets.
15. The method of claim 14, further comprising, multiplexing the HTTP responses from the plurality of server sockets into a series of HTTP responses.
16. The method of claim 15, further comprising, sending the series of HTTP responses to the originating client.
17. A computer networking method for data transfer between an originating client, a server, and an intermediate networking device, wherein the originating client and the server are configured to communicate over a computer network via the intermediate networking device, the method comprising:
at the intermediate networking device, listening for a series of HTTP requests from the originating client;
receiving the series of HTTP requests from the originating client;
demultiplexing the series of HTTP requests into discrete HTTP requests;
determining an optimal server socket for each discrete HTTP request;
sending each discrete HTTP request to the optimal server socket for the request;
listening for HTTP responses from a plurality of server sockets;
receiving the HTTP responses from the plurality of server sockets;
multiplexing the HTTP responses from the plurality of server sockets into a series of HTTP responses; and
sending the series of HTTP responses to the originating client.
18. A computer networking device for use on a computer network to improve data transfer, positioned intermediate a client and a server, the client and server being configured to communicate via the computer network using HTTP communication protocol, the computer networking device comprising, an HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor configured to receive HTTP requests from the client and to send the HTTP requests to a plurality of sockets on the server, and further configured to receive HTTP responses from the plurality of sockets on the server and to send the HTTP responses to the client.
19. The device of claim 18, wherein the computer networking device establishes TCP connections with the client and the plurality of server sockets.
20. The device of claim 19, wherein the TCP connections are persistent.
21. The device of claim 18, wherein the HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor is further configured to determine an optimal server socket for each HTTP request.
22. The device of claim 21, wherein the HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor is configured to send each HTTP request to the determined optimal server socket for the request.
23. A computer networking system for use with a computer network, the system comprising:
a server;
a client configured to connect to the server via the computer network; and
a computer networking device positioned intermediate the server and the client on the computer network;
wherein the computer networking device is configured to receive HTTP requests from the client and to distribute those requests over a plurality of TCP connections to a plurality of corresponding sockets on the server.
24. The computer networking system of claim 23, wherein the computer networking device is further configured to receive HTTP responses from the server over a plurality of TCP connections and to route those responses to the client via a single TCP connection.
25. A computer networking device for improving data transfer via a computer network, the device being configured to receive HTTP requests from a client, to determine an optimal server socket for each HTTP requests, and to send each HTTP request to the determined optimal server socket for the request.
26. The device of claim 25, wherein the device is further configured to receive an HTTP response from the optimal server socket and to send the HTTP response to the client.
US09/882,375 2000-10-10 2001-06-15 HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor Abandoned US20020042839A1 (en)

Priority Applications (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/882,375 US20020042839A1 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-06-15 HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor
US09/975,522 US7231446B2 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-10-10 HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor
PCT/US2001/031854 WO2002031676A1 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-10-10 Http multiplexor/demultiplexor
AU2002214574A AU2002214574A1 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-10-10 Http multiplexor/demultiplexor
EP01983121A EP1332437B1 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-10-10 Http multiplexor/demultiplexor
AT01983121T ATE370455T1 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-10-10 HTTP MULTIPLEXER/DEMULTIPLEXER
DE60130011T DE60130011T2 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-10-10 HTTP multiplexer / demultiplexer
US10/136,030 US7055028B2 (en) 2000-10-10 2002-04-29 HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor system for use in secure transactions

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US23955200P 2000-10-10 2000-10-10
US09/882,375 US20020042839A1 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-06-15 HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/975,522 Continuation-In-Part US7231446B2 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-10-10 HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020042839A1 true US20020042839A1 (en) 2002-04-11

Family

ID=26932665

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/882,375 Abandoned US20020042839A1 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-06-15 HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor
US09/975,522 Expired - Lifetime US7231446B2 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-10-10 HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/975,522 Expired - Lifetime US7231446B2 (en) 2000-10-10 2001-10-10 HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US20020042839A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1332437B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE370455T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2002214574A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60130011T2 (en)
WO (1) WO2002031676A1 (en)

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003015330A2 (en) 2001-08-08 2003-02-20 Flash Networks Ltd. A system and a method for accelerating communication of tcp/ip based content
US20030084093A1 (en) * 2001-10-30 2003-05-01 Grason Thomas S. Information gateway manager for multiple devices
US20040034687A1 (en) * 2002-08-01 2004-02-19 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation Extensible instant messaging service
US20050025150A1 (en) * 2003-08-01 2005-02-03 Itworx Egypt Accelerating network performance by striping and parallelization of TCP connections
US20050074007A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-04-07 Samuels Allen R. Transaction boundary detection for reduction in timeout penalties
US20050135418A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-06-23 Solace Systems, Inc. Multiplexing of control and data over an HTTP connection
GB2409793A (en) * 2004-01-02 2005-07-06 Zend Technologies Ltd Handling download requests
US20060089996A1 (en) * 2000-10-05 2006-04-27 Juniper Networks, Inc. Connection management system and method
US20060159029A1 (en) * 2005-01-20 2006-07-20 Samuels Allen R Automatic LAN/WAN port detection
US20070018403A1 (en) * 2005-02-14 2007-01-25 Wong Jacob Y Yangtze hold 'em and other poker games played with a chinese poker deck
US7263550B1 (en) * 2000-10-10 2007-08-28 Juniper Networks, Inc. Agent-based event-driven web server architecture
US20070206621A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2007-09-06 Robert Plamondon Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention
US20070257786A1 (en) * 2006-05-08 2007-11-08 International Business Machines Corporation Sequencing multi-source messages for delivery as partial sets to multiple destinations
US20090138956A1 (en) * 2007-11-27 2009-05-28 Red Hat, Inc. Multi-use application proxy
US20100077035A1 (en) * 2008-09-23 2010-03-25 Nokia Corporation Optimized Polling in Low Resource Devices
US7801978B1 (en) 2000-10-18 2010-09-21 Citrix Systems, Inc. Apparatus, method and computer program product for efficiently pooling connections between clients and servers
US8238241B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2012-08-07 Citrix Systems, Inc. Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control
US8259729B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2012-09-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements
US8411560B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2013-04-02 Citrix Systems, Inc. TCP selection acknowledgements for communicating delivered and missing data packets
US8432800B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2013-04-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for stochastic-based quality of service
US8437284B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2013-05-07 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets
US20140101235A1 (en) * 2012-10-05 2014-04-10 Redfin Corporation Multiplexing web requests for improved performance
US20150277997A1 (en) * 2014-03-31 2015-10-01 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Ordered Event Notification
US20160037509A1 (en) * 2014-07-30 2016-02-04 Onavo Mobile Ltd. Techniques to reduce bandwidth usage through multiplexing and compression
US9558097B2 (en) 2007-11-13 2017-01-31 Red Hat, Inc. Automated recording and playback of application interactions
US10375203B2 (en) * 2011-02-28 2019-08-06 Red Hat, Inc. Generating a selection of cloud data distribution service from alternative providers for staging data to host clouds
WO2022251250A3 (en) * 2021-05-27 2023-01-19 Aviatrix Systems, Inc. System and method for automating appliance configuration and operability

Families Citing this family (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7363248B2 (en) * 2000-12-22 2008-04-22 Invenda Corporation Pre-filling order forms for transactions over a communications network
US7415429B2 (en) * 2000-12-22 2008-08-19 Invenda Corporation Providing navigation objects for communications over a network
US7349867B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2008-03-25 Invenda Corporation Tracking transactions by using addresses in a communications network
KR100451721B1 (en) * 2000-12-30 2004-10-08 엘지전자 주식회사 Method for Matching Inter-processor Communication in Mobile Communication System
US20030041101A1 (en) * 2001-08-24 2003-02-27 Hansche Brian A. Presence watcher proxy
US7490162B1 (en) * 2002-05-15 2009-02-10 F5 Networks, Inc. Method and system for forwarding messages received at a traffic manager
US8244875B2 (en) * 2002-12-13 2012-08-14 ANXeBusiness Corporation Secure network computing
US8332464B2 (en) * 2002-12-13 2012-12-11 Anxebusiness Corp. System and method for remote network access
US7774484B1 (en) 2002-12-19 2010-08-10 F5 Networks, Inc. Method and system for managing network traffic
US20050193056A1 (en) * 2002-12-26 2005-09-01 Schaefer Diane E. Message transfer using multiplexed connections in an open system interconnection transaction processing environment
US7949712B2 (en) 2003-02-10 2011-05-24 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. High availability presence engine for instant messaging
US7493398B2 (en) * 2003-04-16 2009-02-17 Microsoft Corporation Shared socket connections for efficient data transmission
US9357033B2 (en) * 2003-06-17 2016-05-31 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for dynamic interleaving
US20050198302A1 (en) * 2003-12-29 2005-09-08 Microsoft Corporation Multi-client support
US20100211626A1 (en) * 2004-01-12 2010-08-19 Foundry Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for maintaining longer persistent connections
US20060288109A1 (en) * 2005-06-17 2006-12-21 Utstarcom, Inc. Method and apparatus to facilitate Layer 3 internet protocol socket connections
US8832705B1 (en) * 2005-12-28 2014-09-09 Emc Corporation Ordered mutual exclusion
US20070214251A1 (en) * 2006-03-07 2007-09-13 Zhong Li Naming and accessing remote servers through security split reverse proxy
JP2007317028A (en) * 2006-05-26 2007-12-06 Ns Solutions Corp Information processing apparatus, database management system, method for controlling information processing apparatus, and program
US20080114882A1 (en) * 2006-11-13 2008-05-15 David Alan Christenson Multiplexing Multiple Client Connections in a Single Socket
US7865576B2 (en) * 2007-01-31 2011-01-04 Alcatel Lucent Change of subscriber information in a multi-chassis network access environment
TW200847711A (en) * 2007-05-31 2008-12-01 Wistron Corp Method and related system for building up a network connection between clients and servers through a stream fork by utilizing http protocol
US9083758B2 (en) * 2007-06-11 2015-07-14 Nokia Technologies Oy System and method for using presence information
US8260934B2 (en) * 2007-08-31 2012-09-04 Red Hat, Inc. Multiplex transport
US8406133B2 (en) * 2009-02-24 2013-03-26 Silver Spring Networks, Inc. System and method of regulating a packet rate to optimize traffic in a network
US8193934B2 (en) * 2009-09-30 2012-06-05 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Method for using recording rules and previous value selection rules for presence information in a communications system
US20120054316A1 (en) * 2010-09-01 2012-03-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Tcp multiplexing over a proxy
US8996657B2 (en) * 2010-09-01 2015-03-31 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Systems and methods for multiplexing network channels
US20120151087A1 (en) * 2010-12-14 2012-06-14 Nuvel, Inc. System and method for providing a network proxy data tunnel
US9923677B2 (en) * 2014-12-26 2018-03-20 Intel Corporation Multiplexing many client streams over a single connection
US10834065B1 (en) 2015-03-31 2020-11-10 F5 Networks, Inc. Methods for SSL protected NTLM re-authentication and devices thereof
CN106487603B (en) * 2015-08-26 2019-12-10 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Response testing method and device
US10404698B1 (en) 2016-01-15 2019-09-03 F5 Networks, Inc. Methods for adaptive organization of web application access points in webtops and devices thereof
CN107231647B (en) * 2017-08-03 2019-01-11 Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 Network detecting method, network detection device and intelligent terminal
US10182009B1 (en) * 2018-07-24 2019-01-15 Capital One Services, Llc Creating endpoints

Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5812668A (en) * 1996-06-17 1998-09-22 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for verifying the operation of a remote transaction clearance system utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US5826261A (en) * 1996-05-10 1998-10-20 Spencer; Graham System and method for querying multiple, distributed databases by selective sharing of local relative significance information for terms related to the query
US5996076A (en) * 1997-02-19 1999-11-30 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for secure digital certification of electronic commerce
US6128663A (en) * 1997-02-11 2000-10-03 Invention Depot, Inc. Method and apparatus for customization of information content provided to a requestor over a network using demographic information yet the user remains anonymous to the server
US6173322B1 (en) * 1997-06-05 2001-01-09 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Network request distribution based on static rules and dynamic performance data
US6286029B1 (en) * 1997-04-28 2001-09-04 Sabre Inc. Kiosk controller that retrieves content from servers and then pushes the retrieved content to a kiosk in the order specified in a run list
US20010036271A1 (en) * 1999-09-13 2001-11-01 Javed Shoeb M. System and method for securely distributing digital content for short term use
US6324582B1 (en) * 1997-07-01 2001-11-27 Sitara Networks, Inc. Enhanced network communication
US6327578B1 (en) * 1998-12-29 2001-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation Four-party credit/debit payment protocol
US20010056416A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2001-12-27 J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves System and method for discovering information objects and information object repositories in computer networks
US20020038360A1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2002-03-28 Matthew Andrews System and method for locating a closest server in response to a client domain name request
US6374237B1 (en) * 1996-12-24 2002-04-16 Intel Corporation Data set selection based upon user profile
US6473851B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2002-10-29 Mark E Plutowski System for combining plurality of input control policies to provide a compositional output control policy
US6516338B1 (en) * 1998-05-15 2003-02-04 The Macmanus Group, Inc. Apparatus and accompanying methods for implementing network servers for use in providing interstitial web advertisements to a client computer
US20030028433A1 (en) * 1996-10-29 2003-02-06 Merriman Dwight Allen Method of delivery, targeting, and measuring advertising over networks
US6529903B2 (en) * 2000-07-06 2003-03-04 Google, Inc. Methods and apparatus for using a modified index to provide search results in response to an ambiguous search query
US6735586B2 (en) * 2000-02-08 2004-05-11 Sybase, Inc. System and method for dynamic content retrieval
US6754701B1 (en) * 2000-05-05 2004-06-22 Mercury Interactive Corporation Use of a single thread to support multiple network connections for server load testing

Family Cites Families (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0632522B2 (en) * 1983-12-29 1994-04-27 富士通株式会社 Digital signal transmission method
SU1458295A1 (en) * 1986-10-01 1989-02-15 Издательство "Известия" Советов Народных Депутатов Ссср Unit for connecting holders of space conveyer
US5329619A (en) * 1992-10-30 1994-07-12 Software Ag Cooperative processing interface and communication broker for heterogeneous computing environments
US6535880B1 (en) * 2000-05-09 2003-03-18 Cnet Networks, Inc. Automated on-line commerce method and apparatus utilizing a shopping server verifying product information on product selection
US6185619B1 (en) * 1996-12-09 2001-02-06 Genuity Inc. Method and apparatus for balancing the process load on network servers according to network and serve based policies
US5644718A (en) * 1994-11-10 1997-07-01 At&T Corporation Apparatus using circuit manager to associate a single circuit with each host application where the circuit is shared by a plurality of client applications
US5678007A (en) * 1994-11-22 1997-10-14 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for supporting multiple outstanding network requests on a single connection
US6128657A (en) * 1996-02-14 2000-10-03 Fujitsu Limited Load sharing system
US5754830A (en) * 1996-04-01 1998-05-19 Openconnect Systems, Incorporated Server and web browser terminal emulator for persistent connection to a legacy host system and method of operation
US5774660A (en) * 1996-08-05 1998-06-30 Resonate, Inc. World-wide-web server with delayed resource-binding for resource-based load balancing on a distributed resource multi-node network
US5918017A (en) * 1996-08-23 1999-06-29 Internatioinal Business Machines Corp. System and method for providing dynamically alterable computer clusters for message routing
US6012083A (en) * 1996-09-24 2000-01-04 Ricoh Company Ltd. Method and apparatus for document processing using agents to process transactions created based on document content
SE507138C2 (en) * 1996-10-14 1998-04-06 Mirror Image Internet Ab Procedure and apparatus for information transmission on the Internet
US6108782A (en) * 1996-12-13 2000-08-22 3Com Corporation Distributed remote monitoring (dRMON) for networks
US5941988A (en) * 1997-01-27 1999-08-24 International Business Machines Corporation Session and transport layer proxies via TCP glue
US6845505B1 (en) 1997-02-03 2005-01-18 Oracle International Corporation Web request broker controlling multiple processes
US6138162A (en) * 1997-02-11 2000-10-24 Pointcast, Inc. Method and apparatus for configuring a client to redirect requests to a caching proxy server based on a category ID with the request
US6104716A (en) * 1997-03-28 2000-08-15 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for lightweight secure communication tunneling over the internet
US6243379B1 (en) * 1997-04-04 2001-06-05 Ramp Networks, Inc. Connection and packet level multiplexing between network links
US6263368B1 (en) * 1997-06-19 2001-07-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Network load balancing for multi-computer server by counting message packets to/from multi-computer server
US6070191A (en) * 1997-10-17 2000-05-30 Lucent Technologies Inc. Data distribution techniques for load-balanced fault-tolerant web access
US6115745A (en) * 1997-11-25 2000-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Scheduling of distributed agents in a dialup network
US6078953A (en) * 1997-12-29 2000-06-20 Ukiah Software, Inc. System and method for monitoring quality of service over network
US6363077B1 (en) * 1998-02-13 2002-03-26 Broadcom Corporation Load balancing in link aggregation and trunking
US6003083A (en) * 1998-02-19 1999-12-14 International Business Machines Corporation Workload management amongst server objects in a client/server network with distributed objects
US6175869B1 (en) * 1998-04-08 2001-01-16 Lucent Technologies Inc. Client-side techniques for web server allocation
US6314463B1 (en) * 1998-05-29 2001-11-06 Webspective Software, Inc. Method and system for measuring queue length and delay
US6195680B1 (en) * 1998-07-23 2001-02-27 International Business Machines Corporation Client-based dynamic switching of streaming servers for fault-tolerance and load balancing
US6266707B1 (en) * 1998-08-17 2001-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for IP network address translation and IP filtering with dynamic address resolution
US6411986B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2002-06-25 Netscaler, Inc. Internet client-server multiplexer
KR100317251B1 (en) * 1998-12-14 2002-02-19 서평원 Apparatus for multiplexing line
US6490632B1 (en) * 1999-03-18 2002-12-03 3Com Corporation High performance load balancing and fail over support of internet protocol exchange traffic over multiple network interface cards
US6252848B1 (en) * 1999-03-22 2001-06-26 Pluris, Inc. System performance in a data network through queue management based on ingress rate monitoring
EP1049307A1 (en) * 1999-04-29 2000-11-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for dispatching client sessions within a cluster of servers connected to the World Wide Web
US7051066B1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2006-05-23 Cisco Technology, Inc. Integrating service managers into a routing infrastructure using forwarding agents
US6675216B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2004-01-06 Cisco Technolgy, Inc. Copy server for collaboration and electronic commerce
US6882623B1 (en) * 2000-02-08 2005-04-19 Native Networks Technologies Ltd. Multi-level scheduling method for multiplexing packets in a communications network
US6377975B1 (en) * 2000-03-01 2002-04-23 Interactive Intelligence, Inc. Methods and systems to distribute client software tasks among a number of servers
US6779039B1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2004-08-17 Avaya Technology Corp. System and method for routing message traffic using a cluster of routers sharing a single logical IP address distinct from unique IP addresses of the routers
US6591298B1 (en) * 2000-04-24 2003-07-08 Keynote Systems, Inc. Method and system for scheduling measurement of site performance over the internet
US6996631B1 (en) * 2000-08-17 2006-02-07 International Business Machines Corporation System having a single IP address associated with communication protocol stacks in a cluster of processing systems
US6738813B1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2004-05-18 Mercury Interactive Corporation System and method for monitoring performance of a server system using otherwise unused processing capacity of user computing devices
US6754621B1 (en) * 2000-10-06 2004-06-22 Andrew Cunningham Asynchronous hypertext messaging system and method

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5826261A (en) * 1996-05-10 1998-10-20 Spencer; Graham System and method for querying multiple, distributed databases by selective sharing of local relative significance information for terms related to the query
US5812668A (en) * 1996-06-17 1998-09-22 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for verifying the operation of a remote transaction clearance system utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US20030028433A1 (en) * 1996-10-29 2003-02-06 Merriman Dwight Allen Method of delivery, targeting, and measuring advertising over networks
US6374237B1 (en) * 1996-12-24 2002-04-16 Intel Corporation Data set selection based upon user profile
US6128663A (en) * 1997-02-11 2000-10-03 Invention Depot, Inc. Method and apparatus for customization of information content provided to a requestor over a network using demographic information yet the user remains anonymous to the server
US5996076A (en) * 1997-02-19 1999-11-30 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for secure digital certification of electronic commerce
US6286029B1 (en) * 1997-04-28 2001-09-04 Sabre Inc. Kiosk controller that retrieves content from servers and then pushes the retrieved content to a kiosk in the order specified in a run list
US6173322B1 (en) * 1997-06-05 2001-01-09 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Network request distribution based on static rules and dynamic performance data
US6324582B1 (en) * 1997-07-01 2001-11-27 Sitara Networks, Inc. Enhanced network communication
US6516338B1 (en) * 1998-05-15 2003-02-04 The Macmanus Group, Inc. Apparatus and accompanying methods for implementing network servers for use in providing interstitial web advertisements to a client computer
US6327578B1 (en) * 1998-12-29 2001-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation Four-party credit/debit payment protocol
US6473851B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2002-10-29 Mark E Plutowski System for combining plurality of input control policies to provide a compositional output control policy
US20010036271A1 (en) * 1999-09-13 2001-11-01 Javed Shoeb M. System and method for securely distributing digital content for short term use
US6735586B2 (en) * 2000-02-08 2004-05-11 Sybase, Inc. System and method for dynamic content retrieval
US20010056416A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2001-12-27 J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves System and method for discovering information objects and information object repositories in computer networks
US6754701B1 (en) * 2000-05-05 2004-06-22 Mercury Interactive Corporation Use of a single thread to support multiple network connections for server load testing
US20020038360A1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2002-03-28 Matthew Andrews System and method for locating a closest server in response to a client domain name request
US6529903B2 (en) * 2000-07-06 2003-03-04 Google, Inc. Methods and apparatus for using a modified index to provide search results in response to an ambiguous search query

Cited By (55)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7346691B2 (en) 2000-10-05 2008-03-18 Juniper Networks, Inc. Connection management system and method
US20060089996A1 (en) * 2000-10-05 2006-04-27 Juniper Networks, Inc. Connection management system and method
US7263550B1 (en) * 2000-10-10 2007-08-28 Juniper Networks, Inc. Agent-based event-driven web server architecture
US7747707B1 (en) 2000-10-10 2010-06-29 Juniper Networks, Inc. Agent-based event-driven web server architecture
US7917601B1 (en) 2000-10-10 2011-03-29 Juniper Networks, Inc. Agent-based event-driven web server architecture
US7801978B1 (en) 2000-10-18 2010-09-21 Citrix Systems, Inc. Apparatus, method and computer program product for efficiently pooling connections between clients and servers
US9148493B2 (en) 2000-10-18 2015-09-29 Citrix Systems, Inc. Apparatus, method and computer program product for efficiently pooling connections between clients and servers
US8631120B2 (en) 2000-10-18 2014-01-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Apparatus, method and computer program product for efficiently pooling connections between clients and servers
US8176183B2 (en) * 2001-08-08 2012-05-08 Flash Networks Ltd System and a method for accelerating communication of TCP/IP based content
US20080250103A1 (en) * 2001-08-08 2008-10-09 Assaf Bar-Yaacov System and a method for accelerating communication of tcp/ip based content
WO2003015330A2 (en) 2001-08-08 2003-02-20 Flash Networks Ltd. A system and a method for accelerating communication of tcp/ip based content
US7752331B2 (en) * 2001-10-30 2010-07-06 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Information gateway manager for multiple devices
US20030084093A1 (en) * 2001-10-30 2003-05-01 Grason Thomas S. Information gateway manager for multiple devices
US20040034687A1 (en) * 2002-08-01 2004-02-19 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation Extensible instant messaging service
US9008100B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2015-04-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgments
US8411560B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2013-04-02 Citrix Systems, Inc. TCP selection acknowledgements for communicating delivered and missing data packets
US9496991B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2016-11-15 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention
US8259729B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2012-09-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements
US8553699B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2013-10-08 Citrix Systems, Inc. Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements
US8824490B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2014-09-02 Citrix Systems, Inc. Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control
US8432800B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2013-04-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for stochastic-based quality of service
US8437284B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2013-05-07 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets
US8233392B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2012-07-31 Citrix Systems, Inc. Transaction boundary detection for reduction in timeout penalties
US8270423B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2012-09-18 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention
US9071543B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2015-06-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets
US20050074007A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-04-07 Samuels Allen R. Transaction boundary detection for reduction in timeout penalties
US8462630B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2013-06-11 Citrix Systems, Inc. Early generation of acknowledgements for flow control
US8238241B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2012-08-07 Citrix Systems, Inc. Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control
US20070206621A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2007-09-06 Robert Plamondon Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention
US7286476B2 (en) * 2003-08-01 2007-10-23 F5 Networks, Inc. Accelerating network performance by striping and parallelization of TCP connections
US20050025150A1 (en) * 2003-08-01 2005-02-03 Itworx Egypt Accelerating network performance by striping and parallelization of TCP connections
US7486698B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2009-02-03 Solace Systems, Inc. Multiplexing of control and data over an HTTP connection
US20050135418A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-06-23 Solace Systems, Inc. Multiplexing of control and data over an HTTP connection
GB2409793A (en) * 2004-01-02 2005-07-06 Zend Technologies Ltd Handling download requests
US20050149529A1 (en) * 2004-01-02 2005-07-07 Andi Gutmans Efficient handling of download requests
US20060159029A1 (en) * 2005-01-20 2006-07-20 Samuels Allen R Automatic LAN/WAN port detection
US8077632B2 (en) 2005-01-20 2011-12-13 Citrix Systems, Inc. Automatic LAN/WAN port detection
US20070018403A1 (en) * 2005-02-14 2007-01-25 Wong Jacob Y Yangtze hold 'em and other poker games played with a chinese poker deck
US7792153B2 (en) 2006-05-08 2010-09-07 International Business Machines Corporation Sequencing multi-source messages for delivery as partial sets to multiple destinations
US20070257786A1 (en) * 2006-05-08 2007-11-08 International Business Machines Corporation Sequencing multi-source messages for delivery as partial sets to multiple destinations
US9558097B2 (en) 2007-11-13 2017-01-31 Red Hat, Inc. Automated recording and playback of application interactions
US8849944B2 (en) * 2007-11-27 2014-09-30 Red Hat, Inc. Multi-use application proxy
US20090138956A1 (en) * 2007-11-27 2009-05-28 Red Hat, Inc. Multi-use application proxy
US20100077035A1 (en) * 2008-09-23 2010-03-25 Nokia Corporation Optimized Polling in Low Resource Devices
WO2010035108A1 (en) * 2008-09-23 2010-04-01 Nokia Corporation Optimized polling in low resource devices
US20110208810A1 (en) * 2008-09-23 2011-08-25 Nokia Corporation Optimized Polling in Low Resource Devices
US10375203B2 (en) * 2011-02-28 2019-08-06 Red Hat, Inc. Generating a selection of cloud data distribution service from alternative providers for staging data to host clouds
US9406082B2 (en) * 2012-10-05 2016-08-02 Redfin Corporation Multiplexing web requests for improved performance
US20140101235A1 (en) * 2012-10-05 2014-04-10 Redfin Corporation Multiplexing web requests for improved performance
US20150277997A1 (en) * 2014-03-31 2015-10-01 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Ordered Event Notification
US9778963B2 (en) * 2014-03-31 2017-10-03 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Ordered event notification
US10409655B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2019-09-10 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Ordered event notification
US11321150B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2022-05-03 Xilinx, Inc. Ordered event notification
US20160037509A1 (en) * 2014-07-30 2016-02-04 Onavo Mobile Ltd. Techniques to reduce bandwidth usage through multiplexing and compression
WO2022251250A3 (en) * 2021-05-27 2023-01-19 Aviatrix Systems, Inc. System and method for automating appliance configuration and operability

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1332437A1 (en) 2003-08-06
US7231446B2 (en) 2007-06-12
ATE370455T1 (en) 2007-09-15
EP1332437A4 (en) 2006-06-14
US20020052931A1 (en) 2002-05-02
AU2002214574A1 (en) 2002-04-22
DE60130011T2 (en) 2008-05-15
DE60130011D1 (en) 2007-09-27
WO2002031676A1 (en) 2002-04-18
EP1332437B1 (en) 2007-08-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20020042839A1 (en) HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor
US7055028B2 (en) HTTP multiplexor/demultiplexor system for use in secure transactions
US9288261B2 (en) Network resource modification for higher network connection concurrence
US8799502B2 (en) Systems and methods for controlling the number of connections established with a server
US7814225B2 (en) Techniques for delivering personalized content with a real-time routing network
US20040249948A1 (en) Performing application layer transactions during the connection establishment phase of connection-oriented protocols
US7315896B2 (en) Server network controller including packet forwarding and method therefor
US20060031282A1 (en) Techniques for updating live objects at clients using a dynamic routing network
US20110280247A1 (en) System and method for reducing latency via multiple network connections
US8051213B2 (en) Method for server-directed packet forwarding by a network controller based on a packet buffer threshold
US7051118B2 (en) Method and apparatus for anonymous subject-based addressing
US7564848B2 (en) Method for the establishing of connections in a communication system
US7127503B2 (en) Computer networking system, device, and method for improved speed in web page rendering
WO2002025463A1 (en) Method and apparatus for dynamic determination of optimum connection of a client to content servers
US5832232A (en) Method and apparatus for providing user-based flow control in a network system
JP2004312153A (en) Relay network switching method and optical edge apparatus
JP2001142813A (en) System for supporting service based on connection type protocol on web service based on non-connection type protocol

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: REDLINE NETWORKS, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PEIFFER, CHRISTOPHER;L'HEUREUX, ISREAL;REEL/FRAME:014592/0820;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030911 TO 20030923

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:REDLINE NETWORKS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016207/0098

Effective date: 20050620