US20020007301A1 - Candidate chaser - Google Patents

Candidate chaser Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020007301A1
US20020007301A1 US09/897,826 US89782601A US2002007301A1 US 20020007301 A1 US20020007301 A1 US 20020007301A1 US 89782601 A US89782601 A US 89782601A US 2002007301 A1 US2002007301 A1 US 2002007301A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
mail
chaser
candidate
web page
mail address
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/897,826
Inventor
Stephen Reuning
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US09/897,826 priority Critical patent/US20020007301A1/en
Priority to US09/911,024 priority patent/US20020087573A1/en
Publication of US20020007301A1 publication Critical patent/US20020007301A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/105Human resources
    • G06Q10/1053Employment or hiring
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99944Object-oriented database structure
    • Y10S707/99945Object-oriented database structure processing

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the process of recruiting new employees, specifically harvesting email addresses belonging to potential viable candidates from sites and postings searched for and found on the Internet and sending specifically related help wanted advertisements via electronic mail to those addresses then receiving, filtering, sorting and distributing the response.
  • Classified help wanted advertising in print, television and radio media as well as postings of help wanted advertisements on Internet web sites are a common practice.
  • Such mediums for prospecting employment candidates are passive in the context of the candidate seeker's objectives. They require the reaction of a potential job seeker who must be reading a specific periodical, watching or listening to a specific broadcast or visiting a specific internet web site or requested a specific push technology internet broadcast. There are too many job opportunity broadcasts and sites available for any job seeker to peruse even a minor percentage on a timely basis. A candidate seeker could attempt to advertise through every applicable site and medium in order to reach every potential candidate however such a strategy is impractical if not impossible.
  • the Candidate Chaser machine automatically locates Internet site pages and web postings which contain operator specified keywords or Boolean combinations and then extracts all email addresses from those pages as well as linked pages to as many linking levels as selected by the operator and then sends a job opportunity description enclosed in an electronic mail message to each of the extracted addresses then recieves responses from recipients of the job opportunity message then filters those messages by reading their text and forwards only desirable responses to the candidate seeking client's electronic mail address thusly sparing the client interaction with large amounts of irrelevant response while presenting viable candidates for a given job opening.
  • the Candidate Chaser machine operator inputs keywords then commands the Candidate Chaser machine to interact with the infinite number of interface possibilities available on the Internet. The operator is not required conduct or observe the cumbersome, tedious, frustrating A and agonizingly slow task of reviewing data contained on Internet web sites, newsgroup postings and other data sources that may exist from time to time on the net. Once started the Candidate Chaser machine conducts the Internet search without operator intervention.
  • the Candidate Chaser process does not use a static database as its source of addresses but instead takes advantage of the dynamic properties of the Internet where new information is added every minute somewhere on the planet. Candidate Chaser does this by reading internet sites online and extracting email addresses as they appear on targeted sites, postings and broadcasts just prior to broadcasting a job opportunity advertisement.
  • Job opportunity announcements are communicated to potential candidates within hours.
  • Candidate Chaser job opportunity advertisements are delivered directly to the worker's email box therefore she/he is not required to search for applicable job offerings.
  • Job opportunity advertisements broadcast by Candidate Chaser stimulate workers to consider new career opportunities even when they are not actively seeking new employment thusly expanding the universe of candidates beyond those available to the employer through passive advertising methodologies.
  • the Candidate Chaser process costs less per hire to operate than other recruitment methods.
  • the Candidate Chaser process uses a combination of publicly available and proprietary software computer programs and generally available computer hardware and computer peripherals to operate as a single unit as a means to harvest email addresses of specifically targeted individuals based on their work experiences and interests, then broadcasts a job opportunity advertisement to the recipients at the harvested addresses and then appropriately sorts and redirects consequential response to remove databases, or to quality contol functions or to clients' electronic mail addresses and deletes responses from the virtual mail server.
  • Candidate Chaser machine hardware description herein is for illustration purposes only. It should be noted that the number of general purpose computer processors and the method for interfacing them, for example KVM's (Keyboard, Video, Mouse switch) used, may vary depending on the required capacity and improvements in hardware available. Factors that would affect required capacity include but are not limited to the number of outgoing mailings projected on a daily basis, the size of the address collection lists to which the messages will be directed, the frequency of mailings and the number of responses expected.
  • KVM's Keyboard, Video, Mouse switch
  • Candidate Chaser machine unit always requires the same types of software working in combination as described herein as the candidate chaser process.
  • the Candidate Chaser machine presently in operation consists of ten general purpose computers manufactured by the Compaq computer company each equipped with a 150 mhz pentium processors by Intel, 24 megabytes of ram, a 1.4 gigabyte hard-drives and 28.8 k internal modem.
  • the units are stacked together one on top of the other, held together by a computer rack that is attached to a platform with four sets of swiveling wheels. Attached to the rack above the ten general purpose computer processors are two video monitors one placed above the other.
  • the computer monitors are also manufactured by Compaq computer company.
  • the monitors are three switches commonly known as KVM's manufactured by a company called Belkin which are used to switch the keyboard and monitor and mouse interfaces from one general purpose computer to another.
  • KVM switches commonly known as KVM's manufactured by a company called Belkin which are used to switch the keyboard and monitor and mouse interfaces from one general purpose computer to another.
  • the purpose of the KVM configuration is to reduce the need for monitors, mousers, and keyboards.
  • the operator of the Candidate Chaser machine unit and process requires the use of a monitor and keyboard to interface with the individual general purpose computers only at certain times during the process. Therefore, it is not necessary to have a number of keyboards mice, and monitors equal to the number of general purpose computers.
  • a substitute for the modem connections could be a network connection, such as ethernet, to a router and subsequent ISDN, T1 or fraction thereof, T3 or fraction thereof, or any other telecommunication link to the Internet that may be available.
  • Attached to the front of the Candidate Chaser machine is a platform that is approximately 36 inches by 12 inches providing a flat surface on which the two keyboards and two mice can rest.
  • the platform is attached to a swivel mechanism so the keyboard height may be adjusted for the comfort of the Candidate Chaser machine and process operator.
  • chaser 101 chaser 101 , chaser 102 , chaser 103 , chaser 104 , chaser 105 , chaser 106 , chaser 107 , chaser 108 , chaser 109 , chaser 110 .
  • Chaser 101 is used to receive mail forwarded from chaser 110 .
  • Chaser 110 forwards certain pieces of received mail to chaser 101 so that a program installed on chaser 101 can extract the address from the any received message then store the address in a text file so that it may be imported at another time into a file labeled the “remove file” that is referred to later in the process.
  • Chaser 101 is programmed to use an Internet connection to a mail server so it may download electronic mail messages sent to said server by chaser 110 .
  • a software computer program called “Replyman” manufactured by ExtractorPro is installed on chaser 101 and serves the purpose to extract the addresses from the downloaded messages and store them into a text file. It is not required that the software “Replyman” be used to execute this process.
  • a programmer experienced in this technology could write a simple program to perform this task using any of an assortment of language compilers such as C, Basic, Assembler, or Cobol.
  • Chaser 102 is configured to establish a connection with a server providing smtp access for the purpose of delivering electronic mail.
  • a software program called “ExtractorPro Mailer” is installed for the purpose of importing data from text files created by the other chaser harvesting units which are installed on chaser 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 .
  • Chaser 102 is equipped with the mailing program so that it may import the addresses from the text files, provide for the compilation of a job opportunity advertising message, a subject and a from field.
  • the software also completes the broadcast of the message to all the extracted addresses through a smtp channel or multiple smtp channels over the Internet.
  • ExtractorPro mailing program there are similar computer software programs available to accomplish the same purpose as ExtractorPro's. Those computer programs included but are not limited to computer software packages called Mach10, Stealth, and NetContact. The capabilities and details regarding these computer software programs are included in the Prior Art Documents attached to this application.
  • Chaser units 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , and 109 are installed with computer program software called “WebWeasel” which is described in the attached Prior Art Document #7.
  • the Webweasel software executes a search of the Internet seeking web sites that contain the keywords entered by the Candidate Chaser Machine and Process operator and then download the text of the discovered web sites into the memory of the general purpose computer and then compare the text of the web site to an algorythm that recognizes a combination of characters which represent an electronic mail address and then store the electronic mail addresses into a database or text list for export to the mailing broadcast computer software at a later stage in the process.
  • the Candidate Chaser Machine must be installed with computer software program that will enable it to search for web sites containing operator entered keywords and extract electronic mail addresses from the discovered web sites. It is not necessary for a Candidate Chaser Machine to be equipped with “Webweasel” computer software. There are other computer software programs available including but not limited to: Sonic, Web Collector, and Net Contact which are described in the Prior Art Documents attached to this application.
  • the typical Candidate Chaser machine consists of one or more general purpose computers equipped with microprocessor, ram, hard disk drive, a communication interface that links the computers to the Internet, one or more keyboards and mouse interface, one or more monitors, and software to be described later. If one monitor is used with multiple computers then a KVM keyboard mouse monitor switch box is employed so operator may switch monitor and keyboard interfaces between computers.
  • the general purpose computers are physically connected to a network router that can consist of simple analog modems connected to simple telephone lines or more complex digital routing methods but in all cases access to the Internet is necessary.
  • the operator may instruct the machine to locate Hyper Text Markup Language Links, which are embedded addresses to other files on the Internet, on any of the website pages or postings turned up by the search.
  • the operator may instruct the machine to follow the Links to their respective sites and locate more links at those sites.
  • the operator may instruct the machine to follow the links as many level as desired. The number of link levels to search are determined by the focus required of the collection of addresses sought.
  • the machine searches the text of the downloaded file for character strings representative of electronic mail addresses and saves those addresses in memory or disk storage.
  • a filtering algorithm be used as follows: extract any string of characters that fits “space” _*@*_“space” where “*” is a wildcard variable representing any combination of characters.
  • the machine continues to download and store site and posting addresses and download and store text into memory and extract addresses without continued operator action until all applicable extractions are completed or the operator instructs the machine to stop.
  • Collections of addresses may be stored in separate electronic storage files for repeated retrieval at later times.
  • the collected addresses are extracted from sites and postings containing the specified keywords or Boolean combinations, it is reasonable to predict that a consequential number of those addresses will belong to individuals with experiences, interests, capabilities, professional titles or talents related to those keywords or Boolean combinations.
  • Installed commercially available electronic mailing computer software enables the operator to instruct the machine to deliver a specific job opportunity advertising message to each address collected into a specific file. The operator types the copy into the machine keyboard interface and then instructs the machine to send the message to a specific collection of addresses at a specified time.
  • Each message has a “From” field and a “Reply to:” field in addition to others.
  • recipients look to the “From” and “Reply to:” fields for instructions relating to sending response messages.
  • the operator of the Candidate Chaser machine and process may insert any electronic mail address into the “From” and “Reply to:” fields as she/he may desire.
  • the Candidate Chaser machine is designed to handle many mailings at one time and could be used to serve multiple candidate seeking hiring clients.
  • the “From” and “Reply to:” fields could contain the electronic mail address of the client for each given job opportunity message. Thus, each client would receive response to their message directly.
  • a domain name is registered with InterNIC and the IP address location of a virtual mail server is designated.
  • the virtual mail server is programmed to deliver all mail to one user logon at a specified POP 3 channel.
  • a single “Virtual Mail Server” (VMS) can be maintained on an Internet Service Provider (ISP) host for each Candidate Chaser machine or on a private server.
  • the VMS is designated by a domain name registered with Internic, for example “abcd123.com”.
  • Candidate Chaser clients are assigned Mail Accounts to the domain by the Candidate Chaser machine operator, for example 1001@abcd123.com.
  • a Master User Name (MUN) for the domain on the VMS for example smr@abcd123.com, programmed to download all mail received into the account no matter what the prefix, is programmed into the server.
  • Electronic mail messages to potential candidates contain the client's assigned VMS mail account in the “Reply” field so that responses are directed to the domain and received into the virtual mail server's storage. Consequently, the “To,” field in the response message contains the client's mailing account address at the Candidate Chaser virtual mail server domain.
  • Mail directed to different clients based on the address in the “To:” field, is downloaded from the VMS in a single COMBINED batch using the mail computer software program to accessing the MUN account.
  • the mail program filters and redirects the electronic mail message based on the filters and filter actions listed in the paragraphs that follow.
  • Messages containing resumes and curriculum vitae are forwarded to a designated resume collection electronic mail address. Any messages that were not forwarded to the remove site or deleted for non-delivery are forwarded to the client's personal mail address at their mail server, for example: sally@aol.com. Mail that doesn't match any filter is forwarded to the quality control staffs' mail address so they can inspect it and determine whether filters need adjustment.
  • Filters are set up using the “Filters” command language of any commercially available filter capable mailing computer software program.
  • the following filter program is designed for a Candidate Chaser machine using ten general purpose computers where the computers are referenced by a sequencial labeling system with the labels as follows: Chase101, Chase102, Chase103, Chase104, Chase105, Chase106, Chase107, Chase108, Chase109, Chase110, where the unit referenced as Chase101 receives messages containing electronic mail addresses designated for addition the remove list
  • Body contains “remove” or “spam” action equals make subject “Remove” then action equals redirect to chase101@domain.com then server option equals “delete” then action equals “Skip Rest”.
  • Each Candidate Chaser machine is designated its own Master User Name at a Virtual Mail Server where a domain name specific to each machine is registered, for example “abcd123.com”.
  • ALL mail sent to any variation of XXX@abcd123.com where XXX represents any designated client address assigned to that domain, is downloaded in one batch to the mail processing computer software program by accessing the assigned user name via the assigned POP3 channel.
  • the user “SMR” may download all mail sent to the domain “ahcd123.com” through the POP “mailhost.yourisp.net”.
  • the ISP maintains the server on its domain called “mailhost.yourisp.net”.
  • the ISP will use the MUN domain as the POP3 channel so that it is possible to download the mail using a user name such as “SMR” through the POP3 channel “abcd123.com” or whatever other domain name is assigned by the ISP.
  • the ISP that provides the Virtual Mail Server is not necessarily the provider of dial-up access to the server. Therefore, one might dialup the internet using one ISP such as Netcom to get onto the Internet Backbone and then access the Virtual Mailserver at a different ISP.
  • the DNS settings in the dial-up program (usually entered in the TCP/IP settings of the dial-up) can be from one ISP while the POP3 settings can be from another.
  • Candidate Chaser Machine and Process automatically locates Internet site pages and web postings which contain operator specified keywords or Boolean combinations and then extracts all email addresses from those pages as well as linked pages to as many linking levels as selected by the operator and then sends a job opportunity description enclosed in an electronic mail message to each of the extracted addresses then receives responses from recipients of the job opportunity message then filters those messages by reading their text and forwards only desirable responses to the candidate seeking client's electronic mail address thusly sparing the client interaction with large amounts of irrelevant response while presenting viable candidates for a given job opening.
  • the Candidate Chaser process does not use a static database as its source of addresses but instead takes advantage of the dynamic properties of the Internet where new information is added every minute.
  • Candidate Chaser job opportunity advertisements are delivered directly to the worker's email box therefore she/he is not required to search for applicable job offerings.
  • Job opportunity advertisements broadcast by Candidate Chaser stimulate workers to consider new career opportunities even when they are not actively seeking new employment thusly expanding the universe of candidates beyond those available to the employer through passive advertising methodologies.
  • the Candidate Chaser process costs less per hire to operate than many other recruitment methods.

Abstract

The Candidate Chaser machine and method automatically locates Internet site pages and web postings which contain operator specified keywords or Boolean combinations and then extracts all electronic mail addresses from those pages as well as hyper-linked pages to as many linking levels as selected by the operator and then sends a job opportunity description in the form of an electronic mail message to each of the extracted addresses then receives responses from recipients of the job opportunity message then filters those messages by reading their text and forwards only desired responses to the candidate seeking client's electronic mail address thusly sparing the client interaction with large amounts of irrelevant response while presenting viable candidates for a given job opening. It applies a distinctive and non-obvious method for delivering identical electronic mail messages to a group of targeted potential job candidates sharing a specifically desired single or set of common experiences, interests, capabilities, professional titles or talents relating to the needs of the candidate seeking hiring entity and handling their response.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCES
  • This application is a Continuation of Ser. No. [0001] 08/984,650, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. ______.
  • GOVERMENT RIGHTS
  • None. [0002]
  • BACKGROUND
  • 1. Field of Invention [0003]
  • This invention relates to the process of recruiting new employees, specifically harvesting email addresses belonging to potential viable candidates from sites and postings searched for and found on the Internet and sending specifically related help wanted advertisements via electronic mail to those addresses then receiving, filtering, sorting and distributing the response. [0004]
  • 2. Description of Prior Art [0005]
  • Classified help wanted advertising in print, television and radio media as well as postings of help wanted advertisements on Internet web sites are a common practice. Such mediums for prospecting employment candidates are passive in the context of the candidate seeker's objectives. They require the reaction of a potential job seeker who must be reading a specific periodical, watching or listening to a specific broadcast or visiting a specific internet web site or requested a specific push technology internet broadcast. There are too many job opportunity broadcasts and sites available for any job seeker to peruse even a minor percentage on a timely basis. A candidate seeker could attempt to advertise through every applicable site and medium in order to reach every potential candidate however such a strategy is impractical if not impossible. Even if it were practical or possible the candidate seeker would not reach viable candidates who are not actively searching job opportunity advertising sites. The United States Federal Government predicts demand for technical labor in such areas as information technology, sciences, biotechnology and engineering to exceed supply by as much as fifteen percent by the year 2002. In such a situation competitive employers require more aggressive means to prospect employment candidate than the prior mentioned passive methodologies. [0006]
  • Bulk electronic mailing is a common process used to broadcast messages to groups of email addresses collected in databases however the processes used prior to Candidate Chaser are static and the targeting is dependent on pre-assembled databases of email addresses. In such cases where email address lists are procured from a database sources mailers are subject to limited accuracy on two categories: first, are the addresses still active, second, are the individuals interested in receiving email related to the mailers' offerings. Furthermore, the present state of electronic mail address databases does not permit the targeting of addresses based on the individual owner's experiences, interests, capabilities, professional titles or talents. [0007]
  • While bulk electronic mailing is unquestionably legal, there is a powerful lobby opposing general broadcasts of large untargeted and unsolicited bulk electronic mailings which consume huge amounts of internet communication bandwidth causing system delays, increased cost without benefit and mail server failures. Such mailings are broadcast to high quantities, 50,000-200,000 addresses at a time, in the hopes that a fraction, perhaps one tenth of a percent will reach a viable and interested audience. Most of the bandwidth consumption would not be necessary if a more targeted approach was used. [0008]
  • Employers spend over a billion dollars every year in the United States on employment agency fees, classified advertising costs, recruiting staff, the design of recruitment programs and software and referral bonus programs. Many of those employers are large companies that have invested tremendous development resources into solving their recruiting problems and cost reduction yet not a single one of them has created an automated recruiting system like the Candidate Chaser machine and process patented herein. The articles attached and labeled as Prior Art Documents #27, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42 indicate a recruiting industry searching for internet solutions to recruiting difficulties yet none suggest a solution similar to that presented by the Candidate Chaser machine and process supporting the position of unobviousness relating to the Candidate Chaser machine and process. [0009]
  • Most workers would like to be informed of employment opportunities with quality of life improving advantages including but not limited to compensation increases, advanced training, enhanced benefits, more challenge, diversity and improved career path provided notices of such opportunities were made at the workers' convenience and that workers are not overwhelmed with non-applicable job offerings. Employment agencies and headhunters serve such a purpose but they are prohibitively expensive. No automated and more cost effective alternative was available until the herein described Candidate Chaser was invented. [0010]
  • Present job opportunity advertising systems take days and weeks to reach potential candidates. [0011]
  • While my research indicates no present use of bulk electronic mail for targeted help wanted advertising, use of available bulk email systems would result in “bad address” responses from servers, remove responses, and revenge “flames” from anti-spammers burdening and crashing the advertisers' incoming electronic mail system. [0012]
  • A search of the IBM Patent Server at htt://patent.womplex.ib.com looking for the following words individually in the “abstract” field; recruit, recruiting, hire, hiring, job, candidate, classified, position, bulk, addresses, and recruitment turned up no relevant matching or related patents. A search on the same database for the phrase “electronic mail” turned up no apparently related patents except those patenting the process of sending and receiving electronic mail itself. The patent information and abstract which appear most closely related are attached and labeled as: Prior Art Document #28 U.S. Pat. No. 5,245,532, Prior Art Document #29 U.S. Pat. No. 5,040,141, Prior Art Document #30 U.S. Pat. No. 5,632,018, Prior Art Document #31 U.S. Pat. No. 5,408,334, Prior Art Document #32 U.S. Pat. No. 5,487,100, and Prior Art Document #33 U.S. Pat. No. 5,613,108. [0013]
  • A search for articles and publications discussing “recruiting on the Internet” turned up two hundred forty nine separate documents. While discussing the use of electronic mail for the circulation of resumes and discussion of job possibilities, no reference is ever made to any recruiting solution that even remotely resembles the Candidate Chaser machine and process. I believe this supports the unobviousness of the Candidate Chaser machine as a solution to recruiting difficulties. Those article which best represent present art on the subject of “recruiting on the Internet” are attached and labeled as Prior Art Documents #27, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42. [0014]
  • There are a good number of commercially available computer software programs which can perform certain functions of the Candidate Chaser machine. However, none of them alone or in obvious combination accomplish the task of the Candidate Chaser. The said commercially available computer software programs are described in the attached Prior Art Documents #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22. [0015]
  • Objects and Advantages [0016]
  • The Candidate Chaser machine automatically locates Internet site pages and web postings which contain operator specified keywords or Boolean combinations and then extracts all email addresses from those pages as well as linked pages to as many linking levels as selected by the operator and then sends a job opportunity description enclosed in an electronic mail message to each of the extracted addresses then recieves responses from recipients of the job opportunity message then filters those messages by reading their text and forwards only desirable responses to the candidate seeking client's electronic mail address thusly sparing the client interaction with large amounts of irrelevant response while presenting viable candidates for a given job opening. [0017]
  • The Candidate Chaser machine operator inputs keywords then commands the Candidate Chaser machine to interact with the infinite number of interface possibilities available on the Internet. The operator is not required conduct or observe the cumbersome, tedious, frustrating A and agonizingly slow task of reviewing data contained on Internet web sites, newsgroup postings and other data sources that may exist from time to time on the net. Once started the Candidate Chaser machine conducts the Internet search without operator intervention. [0018]
  • The Candidate Chaser process does not use a static database as its source of addresses but instead takes advantage of the dynamic properties of the Internet where new information is added every minute somewhere on the planet. Candidate Chaser does this by reading internet sites online and extracting email addresses as they appear on targeted sites, postings and broadcasts just prior to broadcasting a job opportunity advertisement. [0019]
  • Job opportunity announcements are communicated to potential candidates within hours. [0020]
  • Candidate Chaser job opportunity advertisements are delivered directly to the worker's email box therefore she/he is not required to search for applicable job offerings. [0021]
  • Workers view the Candidate Chaser job opportunity advertisement by choice at their convenience any time night or day since the advertisement arrives and resides in the email message box until they take an action or their software automatically discards it based on their previously set filters. [0022]
  • Job opportunity advertisements broadcast by Candidate Chaser stimulate workers to consider new career opportunities even when they are not actively seeking new employment thusly expanding the universe of candidates beyond those available to the employer through passive advertising methodologies. [0023]
  • Specific job opportunity ads are only broadcast to specifically applicable individuals who made their email addresses available on their resumes, on web pages indicating subject matter related to the job opening or on new group postings where subjects related to the job opening were specifically discussed. [0024]
  • Individuals adverse to receiving additional job opportunity advertisements easily eliminate their addresses from any potential future mailings by typing “remove” into the message subject heading and executing their mail programs “reply” command. [0025]
  • The customized harvesting of email addresses focused on the specific needs of each job opportunity advertisement individually results in relatively low quantities of advertisements broadcast. And much less broadcast bandwidth waste due to non-applicable recipients. [0026]
  • The Candidate Chaser process costs less per hire to operate than other recruitment methods. [0027]
  • Responses to electronically mailed advertisements are automatically processed through software filters: protecting job opportunity advertisers from “flames”, storing removal committed addresses into a universal database, and sorting qualified responses to the appropriate hiring authorities email box. [0028]
  • SUMMARY
  • The Candidate Chaser process uses a combination of publicly available and proprietary software computer programs and generally available computer hardware and computer peripherals to operate as a single unit as a means to harvest email addresses of specifically targeted individuals based on their work experiences and interests, then broadcasts a job opportunity advertisement to the recipients at the harvested addresses and then appropriately sorts and redirects consequential response to remove databases, or to quality contol functions or to clients' electronic mail addresses and deletes responses from the virtual mail server. [0029]
  • DESCRIPTION FIG. 1 AND FIG. 2
  • The Candidate Chaser machine hardware description herein is for illustration purposes only. It should be noted that the number of general purpose computer processors and the method for interfacing them, for example KVM's (Keyboard, Video, Mouse switch) used, may vary depending on the required capacity and improvements in hardware available. Factors that would affect required capacity include but are not limited to the number of outgoing mailings projected on a daily basis, the size of the address collection lists to which the messages will be directed, the frequency of mailings and the number of responses expected. [0030]
  • While the number of general purpose computer processors included in a single Candidate Chaser unit may be increased, perhaps infinitely, the unit always requires at least one general purpose computer processor unit. The Candidate Chaser machine unit always requires the same types of software working in combination as described herein as the candidate chaser process. [0031]
  • The first Candidate Chaser unit constructed and described herein was assembled from single general purpose computers installed with the Windows95 Operating System. [0032]
  • Systems other than Windows 95 could be used to conduct the candidate chaser process. Other widely accepted operating system platform such as Unix, OS2, and Macintosh as well as any operating system platforms that may come available from time to time could be used provided they meet the ability to allow for the operation of computer software programs necessary to the outcome of the Candidate Chaser process. [0033]
  • The Candidate Chaser machine presently in operation consists of ten general purpose computers manufactured by the Compaq computer company each equipped with a 150 mhz pentium processors by Intel, 24 megabytes of ram, a 1.4 gigabyte hard-drives and 28.8 k internal modem. The units are stacked together one on top of the other, held together by a computer rack that is attached to a platform with four sets of swiveling wheels. Attached to the rack above the ten general purpose computer processors are two video monitors one placed above the other. The computer monitors are also manufactured by Compaq computer company. Above the monitors are three switches commonly known as KVM's manufactured by a company called Belkin which are used to switch the keyboard and monitor and mouse interfaces from one general purpose computer to another. The purpose of the KVM configuration is to reduce the need for monitors, mousers, and keyboards. The operator of the Candidate Chaser machine unit and process requires the use of a monitor and keyboard to interface with the individual general purpose computers only at certain times during the process. Therefore, it is not necessary to have a number of keyboards mice, and monitors equal to the number of general purpose computers. [0034]
  • Specialized cabling connects the computers to the KvM switches and the KVM switches to the monitors, mice, and keyboards. The RJ11 modem ports are connected by cable to ten separate telephone trunk lines installed by the telephone company on the walls of the facility where the Candidate Chaser machine is operated. [0035]
  • A substitute for the modem connections could be a network connection, such as ethernet, to a router and subsequent ISDN, T1 or fraction thereof, T3 or fraction thereof, or any other telecommunication link to the Internet that may be available. [0036]
  • Attached to the front of the Candidate Chaser machine is a platform that is approximately 36 inches by 12 inches providing a flat surface on which the two keyboards and two mice can rest. The platform is attached to a swivel mechanism so the keyboard height may be adjusted for the comfort of the Candidate Chaser machine and process operator. [0037]
  • To provide for a means of organized reference and procedure manuals, during communication regarding the process and descriptions the individual general purpose computers are labeled as follows: chaser [0038] 101, chaser 102, chaser 103, chaser 104, chaser 105, chaser 106, chaser 107, chaser 108, chaser 109, chaser 110.
  • Chaser [0039] 101 is used to receive mail forwarded from chaser 110. Chaser 110 forwards certain pieces of received mail to chaser 101 so that a program installed on chaser 101 can extract the address from the any received message then store the address in a text file so that it may be imported at another time into a file labeled the “remove file” that is referred to later in the process. Chaser 101 is programmed to use an Internet connection to a mail server so it may download electronic mail messages sent to said server by chaser 110. A software computer program called “Replyman” manufactured by ExtractorPro (see Prior Art Document #7) is installed on chaser 101 and serves the purpose to extract the addresses from the downloaded messages and store them into a text file. It is not required that the software “Replyman” be used to execute this process. A programmer experienced in this technology could write a simple program to perform this task using any of an assortment of language compilers such as C, Basic, Assembler, or Cobol.
  • Chaser [0040] 102 is configured to establish a connection with a server providing smtp access for the purpose of delivering electronic mail. A software program called “ExtractorPro Mailer” is installed for the purpose of importing data from text files created by the other chaser harvesting units which are installed on chaser 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109. Chaser 102 is equipped with the mailing program so that it may import the addresses from the text files, provide for the compilation of a job opportunity advertising message, a subject and a from field. The software also completes the broadcast of the message to all the extracted addresses through a smtp channel or multiple smtp channels over the Internet. In addition to ExtractorPro mailing program there are similar computer software programs available to accomplish the same purpose as ExtractorPro's. Those computer programs included but are not limited to computer software packages called Mach10, Stealth, and NetContact. The capabilities and details regarding these computer software programs are included in the Prior Art Documents attached to this application.
  • Chaser units [0041] 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, and 109 are installed with computer program software called “WebWeasel” which is described in the attached Prior Art Document #7. Based on operator commands, the Webweasel software executes a search of the Internet seeking web sites that contain the keywords entered by the Candidate Chaser Machine and Process operator and then download the text of the discovered web sites into the memory of the general purpose computer and then compare the text of the web site to an algorythm that recognizes a combination of characters which represent an electronic mail address and then store the electronic mail addresses into a database or text list for export to the mailing broadcast computer software at a later stage in the process. The Candidate Chaser Machine must be installed with computer software program that will enable it to search for web sites containing operator entered keywords and extract electronic mail addresses from the discovered web sites. It is not necessary for a Candidate Chaser Machine to be equipped with “Webweasel” computer software. There are other computer software programs available including but not limited to: Sonic, Web Collector, and Net Contact which are described in the Prior Art Documents attached to this application.
  • Operation and Process Description FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 [0042]
  • The typical Candidate Chaser machine consists of one or more general purpose computers equipped with microprocessor, ram, hard disk drive, a communication interface that links the computers to the Internet, one or more keyboards and mouse interface, one or more monitors, and software to be described later. If one monitor is used with multiple computers then a KVM keyboard mouse monitor switch box is employed so operator may switch monitor and keyboard interfaces between computers. [0043]
  • The general purpose computers are physically connected to a network router that can consist of simple analog modems connected to simple telephone lines or more complex digital routing methods but in all cases access to the Internet is necessary. [0044]
  • Installed commercially available “offline browsing” computer software enables the operator to instruct the machine to locate websites and postings, accessed via the internet, which contain operator specified keywords or Boolean combinations and then to download and store the address of the located matching websites and postings into memory. The address is in the format of the URL (Universal Resource Locator) or other address indicator protocols used on the Internet. The machine immediately or at another time downloads the text from the files at the addresses which were located and stored in memory. [0045]
  • The keywords and Boolean combinations entered into the machine should be closely related to the experiences, interests, capabilities, professional titles or talents desired in applicable job candidates. [0046]
  • The operator may instruct the machine to locate Hyper Text Markup Language Links, which are embedded addresses to other files on the Internet, on any of the website pages or postings turned up by the search. The operator may instruct the machine to follow the Links to their respective sites and locate more links at those sites. The operator may instruct the machine to follow the links as many level as desired. The number of link levels to search are determined by the focus required of the collection of addresses sought. [0047]
  • Once the text of a site or posting is downloaded the machine searches the text of the downloaded file for character strings representative of electronic mail addresses and saves those addresses in memory or disk storage. Presently, the electronic mailing protocol dictates that a filtering algorithm be used as follows: extract any string of characters that fits “space” _*@*_“space” where “*” is a wildcard variable representing any combination of characters. [0048]
  • The machine continues to download and store site and posting addresses and download and store text into memory and extract addresses without continued operator action until all applicable extractions are completed or the operator instructs the machine to stop. [0049]
  • Collections of addresses may be stored in separate electronic storage files for repeated retrieval at later times. [0050]
  • Since the collected addresses are extracted from sites and postings containing the specified keywords or Boolean combinations, it is reasonable to predict that a consequential number of those addresses will belong to individuals with experiences, interests, capabilities, professional titles or talents related to those keywords or Boolean combinations. [0051]
  • Installed commercially available electronic mailing computer software enables the operator to instruct the machine to deliver a specific job opportunity advertising message to each address collected into a specific file. The operator types the copy into the machine keyboard interface and then instructs the machine to send the message to a specific collection of addresses at a specified time. [0052]
  • Each message has a “From” field and a “Reply to:” field in addition to others. When electronic mail messages are received, recipients look to the “From” and “Reply to:” fields for instructions relating to sending response messages. The operator of the Candidate Chaser machine and process may insert any electronic mail address into the “From” and “Reply to:” fields as she/he may desire. The Candidate Chaser machine is designed to handle many mailings at one time and could be used to serve multiple candidate seeking hiring clients. In the case of multiple clients, the “From” and “Reply to:” fields could contain the electronic mail address of the client for each given job opportunity message. Thus, each client would receive response to their message directly. [0053]
  • There are reasons why the operator of the Candidate Chaser machine might want to filter responses before received by the client. First, a significant percentage of the response is error messages due to the fact electronic mail addresses are terminated often without forwarding instructions. Second, a percentage of responses are requests to be removed from future mailings. Third, a significant percentage of messages are “thanks but no thanks but keep me notified of other stuff” responses. Fourth, a percentage of responses are notifications that the recipient is forwarding the message to someone that might be more interested. Fifth, only a small percentage of responses are from candidates that are interested in applying for the job. [0054]
  • In order to filter responses before they are directed to the client's electronic mail address the following procedure is used: A domain name is registered with InterNIC and the IP address location of a virtual mail server is designated. The virtual mail server is programmed to deliver all mail to one user logon at a specified POP[0055] 3 channel. A single “Virtual Mail Server” (VMS) can be maintained on an Internet Service Provider (ISP) host for each Candidate Chaser machine or on a private server. The VMS is designated by a domain name registered with Internic, for example “abcd123.com”. Candidate Chaser clients are assigned Mail Accounts to the domain by the Candidate Chaser machine operator, for example 1001@abcd123.com. A Master User Name (MUN) for the domain on the VMS, for example smr@abcd123.com, programmed to download all mail received into the account no matter what the prefix, is programmed into the server. Electronic mail messages to potential candidates contain the client's assigned VMS mail account in the “Reply” field so that responses are directed to the domain and received into the virtual mail server's storage. Consequently, the “To,” field in the response message contains the client's mailing account address at the Candidate Chaser virtual mail server domain. Mail, directed to different clients based on the address in the “To:” field, is downloaded from the VMS in a single COMBINED batch using the mail computer software program to accessing the MUN account. The mail program filters and redirects the electronic mail message based on the filters and filter actions listed in the paragraphs that follow.
  • Mail containing spam complaints or requesting removal from lists are directed to the Candidate Chaser machine's remove list creating computer software program, which presently is ExtractorPro Reply Man but can be any similar performing software package, so the addresses are automatically added to the Candidate Chaser machine's remove list and NOT forwarded to the client. Error messages indicating nondeliverable messages are deleted and NOT forwarded to clients. [0056]
  • Messages containing resumes and curriculum vitae are forwarded to a designated resume collection electronic mail address. Any messages that were not forwarded to the remove site or deleted for non-delivery are forwarded to the client's personal mail address at their mail server, for example: sally@aol.com. Mail that doesn't match any filter is forwarded to the quality control staffs' mail address so they can inspect it and determine whether filters need adjustment. [0057]
  • Filters are set up using the “Filters” command language of any commercially available filter capable mailing computer software program. The following filter program is designed for a Candidate Chaser machine using ten general purpose computers where the computers are referenced by a sequencial labeling system with the labels as follows: Chase101, Chase102, Chase103, Chase104, Chase105, Chase106, Chase107, Chase108, Chase109, Chase110, where the unit referenced as Chase101 receives messages containing electronic mail addresses designated for addition the remove list [0058]
  • 1. Checking Mail option=leave mail on server (Mail will be removed from server by filter actions only.) [0059]
  • 2. Every filter is programmed to execute on “incoming” mail only. [0060]
  • 2.1. Filters [0061]
  • 2.1.1. Removes to Chase101 [0062]
  • 2.1.1.1. Subject contains “remove” or “spam” action equals make subject “Remove” then action equals redirect to chase101@.domain.com then server option equals “delete” then action equals “Skip Rest”. [0063]
  • 2.1.1.2. Subject contains “unsubscribe” or “junk” action equals make subject “Remove” then action equals redirect to chase101@domain.com then server option equals “delete” then action equals “Skip Rest”. [0064]
  • 2.1.1.3. Subject contains “garbage” or “trash” action equals make subject “Remove” then action equals redirect to chaselOl@domain.com then server option equals “delete” then action equals “Skip Rest”. [0065]
  • 2.1.1.4. Body contains “remove” or “spam” action equals make subject “Remove” then action equals redirect to chase101@domain.com then server option equals “delete” then action equals “Skip Rest”. [0066]
  • 2.1.1.5. Body contains “garbage” or “trash” action equals make subject “Remove” then action equals redirect to chase101@domain.com then server option equals “delete” then action equals “Skip Rest”. [0067]
  • 2.1.2. Undeliverables Deleted [0068]
  • 2.1.2.1. Subject contains “deliver” or “error” then action equals server option “delete” then “Skip Rest” [0069]
  • 2.1.2.2. Subject contains “unknown” or “bad” then action equals server option “delete” then “Skip Rest” [0070]
  • 2.1.2.3. Subject contains “illegal” or “fail” then action equals server option “delete” then “Skip Rest” [0071]
  • 2.1.3. Resume attached [0072]
  • 2.1.3.1. Subject contains “resume” or “vitae” then action equals redirect to resuine@domain.com [0073]
  • 2.1.3.2. Body contains “resume” or “vitae” then action equals redirect to resume@domain.com [0074]
  • 2.1.4. Forward to customer everything not deleted and matching their address [0075]
  • 2.1.4.1. To contains XXX@abcd123.com then action equals redirect to user@theirdomain.com and server option equals delete and action equals “Skip Rest” Notice: every client requires one of these filters [0076]
  • 2.1.5. Forward non filtered items to Quality Control Person—Theoretically nothing should be available to filter and forward to the Quality Control Function at this point unless there is a filter programming oversight. [0077]
  • 2.1.5.1. To “appears” then redirect to qc@qcdomaine.com then server option equals delete and “Skip Rest”[0078]
  • Each Candidate Chaser machine is designated its own Master User Name at a Virtual Mail Server where a domain name specific to each machine is registered, for example “abcd123.com”. ALL mail sent to any variation of XXX@abcd123.com , where XXX represents any designated client address assigned to that domain, is downloaded in one batch to the mail processing computer software program by accessing the assigned user name via the assigned POP3 channel. For example the user “SMR” may download all mail sent to the domain “ahcd123.com” through the POP “mailhost.yourisp.net”. In this case the ISP maintains the server on its domain called “mailhost.yourisp.net”. Often the ISP will use the MUN domain as the POP3 channel so that it is possible to download the mail using a user name such as “SMR” through the POP3 channel “abcd123.com” or whatever other domain name is assigned by the ISP. [0079]
  • The ISP that provides the Virtual Mail Server is not necessarily the provider of dial-up access to the server. Therefore, one might dialup the internet using one ISP such as Netcom to get onto the Internet Backbone and then access the Virtual Mailserver at a different ISP. The DNS settings in the dial-up program (usually entered in the TCP/IP settings of the dial-up) can be from one ISP while the POP3 settings can be from another. [0080]
  • Conclusion, Ramifications, and Scope [0081]
  • Accordingly, the reader will see that the Candidate Chaser Machine and Process automatically locates Internet site pages and web postings which contain operator specified keywords or Boolean combinations and then extracts all email addresses from those pages as well as linked pages to as many linking levels as selected by the operator and then sends a job opportunity description enclosed in an electronic mail message to each of the extracted addresses then receives responses from recipients of the job opportunity message then filters those messages by reading their text and forwards only desirable responses to the candidate seeking client's electronic mail address thusly sparing the client interaction with large amounts of irrelevant response while presenting viable candidates for a given job opening. [0082]
  • The Candidate Chaser process does not use a static database as its source of addresses but instead takes advantage of the dynamic properties of the Internet where new information is added every minute. [0083]
  • Job opportunity announcements are communicated to potential candidates within hours of submission [0084]
  • Candidate Chaser job opportunity advertisements are delivered directly to the worker's email box therefore she/he is not required to search for applicable job offerings. [0085]
  • Workers view the Candidate Chaser job opportunity advertisement by choice at their convenience any time night or day since the advertisement arrives and resides in the email message box until they take an action or their software automatically discards it based on their previously set filters. [0086]
  • Job opportunity advertisements broadcast by Candidate Chaser stimulate workers to consider new career opportunities even when they are not actively seeking new employment thusly expanding the universe of candidates beyond those available to the employer through passive advertising methodologies. [0087]
  • Specific job opportunity ads are only broadcast to specifically applicable individuals who made their email addresses available on their resumes, on web pages indicating subject matter related to the job opening or on new group postings where subjects related to the job opening were specifically discussed. [0088]
  • Individuals adverse to receiving additional job opportunity advertisements easily eliminate their addresses from any potential future mailings by typing “remove” into the message subject heading and executing their mail programs “reply” command [0089]
  • The customized harvesting of email addresses focused on the specific needs of each job opportunity advertisement individually results in relatively low quantities of advertisements broadcast and therefore, much less broadcast bandwidth is wasted due to non-applicable recipients. [0090]
  • The Candidate Chaser process costs less per hire to operate than many other recruitment methods. [0091]
  • Responses to electronically mailed advertisements are automatically processed through software filters presenting job opportunity advertisers with responses from interested candidates only. [0092]
  • The scope of this invention is limited to operating the combination of types of computer hardware, types of telecomunication hardware, and types of computer software programs and their operation in a specified manner as described herein consistent with achieving the objectives of the process set forth herein. Although the description above contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of invention but as merely providing illustrations of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. For example, the search for web sites containing operator specified keywords may be executed using computer software programs not yet designed, created or available instead of the computer software program listed in the description. [0093]
  • Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given. [0094]
  • To clarify, note that in the appended claims I use the terms “a” and “an” to mean at least one, and “web page” to include web pages and Internet pages, as well as internet postings such as postings to internet chat rooms. [0095]

Claims (19)

I claim:
1. A system for locating an individual with specifically defined professional qualifications, the system comprising:
a. a filter that can search a web page to identify in said web page the presence or absence of specifically defined professional qualifications, and
b. an e-mail address extractor that can extract an e-mail address from said web page.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein said filter can sort a plurality of web pages and calculate a score for each said web page.
3. The system of claim 2, further comprising:
c. means for sending an e-mail to said extracted e-mail address.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein said filter generates a score for said web page, and wherein said means for sending e-mail automatically sends an e-mail to said extracted e-mail address if said score for said web page satisfies a predetermined threshold value.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein said e-mail comprises data on a job opportunity.
6. A method for locating an individual with a specifically defined professional qualification, the method comprising:
a. locating a web page which contains text identifying said professional qualification;
b. for web pages containing said text identifying said professional qualification, extracting from said web page an e-mail address.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising:
c. sending an e-mail to said extracted e-mail address.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said e-mail comprises data on a job opportunity.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein said e-mail address extracting further comprises extracting e-mail addresses from linked web pages, to as many linking levels as desired.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said text identifying said professional qualification comprises a keyword or Boolean combination of keywords.
11. The method of claim 10, further comprising screening said web pages using advanced natural language screening technology.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein said advanced natural language screening technology comprises rules to identify resumes.
13. A system for locating an individual with a specifically defined professional qualification, the system comprising:
a. a web page locator which can locate a web page containing text identifying said professional qualification;
b. an e-mail address extractor.
14. The system of claim 13, further comprising:
c. means for sending an e-mail to an extracted e-mail address.
15. The system of claim 14, wherein said e-mail comprises data on a job opportunity.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein said e-mail address extractor can extract e-mail addresses from linked web pages, to as many linking levels as desired.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein said text identifying said professional qualification comprises a keyword or Boolean combination of keywords.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising screening said web pages using advanced natural language screening technology.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein said advanced natural language screening technology comprises rules to identify resumes.
US09/897,826 1997-12-03 2001-07-03 Candidate chaser Abandoned US20020007301A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/897,826 US20020007301A1 (en) 1997-12-03 2001-07-03 Candidate chaser
US09/911,024 US20020087573A1 (en) 1997-12-03 2001-07-24 Automated prospector and targeted advertisement assembly and delivery system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/984,650 US6381592B1 (en) 1997-12-03 1997-12-03 Candidate chaser
US09/897,826 US20020007301A1 (en) 1997-12-03 2001-07-03 Candidate chaser

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/984,650 Continuation US6381592B1 (en) 1997-12-03 1997-12-03 Candidate chaser

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/911,024 Continuation-In-Part US20020087573A1 (en) 1997-12-03 2001-07-24 Automated prospector and targeted advertisement assembly and delivery system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020007301A1 true US20020007301A1 (en) 2002-01-17

Family

ID=25530737

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/984,650 Expired - Fee Related US6381592B1 (en) 1997-12-03 1997-12-03 Candidate chaser
US09/897,826 Abandoned US20020007301A1 (en) 1997-12-03 2001-07-03 Candidate chaser

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/984,650 Expired - Fee Related US6381592B1 (en) 1997-12-03 1997-12-03 Candidate chaser

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US6381592B1 (en)

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020137539A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-09-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication terminal unit capable of receiving a message and method for identifying a message sender in the same
US6654787B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2003-11-25 Brightmail, Incorporated Method and apparatus for filtering e-mail
US20040123157A1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-06-24 Wholesecurity, Inc. Method, system, and computer program product for security within a global computer network
US20040225550A1 (en) * 2003-05-06 2004-11-11 Interactive Clinical Systems, Inc. Software program for, system for, and method of facilitating staffing of an opening in a work schedule at a facility
US20050108339A1 (en) * 2003-05-15 2005-05-19 Matt Gleeson Method and apparatus for filtering email spam using email noise reduction
US20050261950A1 (en) * 2004-05-21 2005-11-24 Mccandliss Glenn A Method of scheduling appointment coverage for service professionals
US20060031328A1 (en) * 2004-07-13 2006-02-09 Malik Dale W Electronic message distribution system
US20060041532A1 (en) * 2004-08-17 2006-02-23 Nikolov Momchil B System for automating the process of retrieving and replying to job postings
US20060106675A1 (en) * 2004-11-16 2006-05-18 Cohen Peter D Providing an electronic marketplace to facilitate human performance of programmatically submitted tasks
US20060106774A1 (en) * 2004-11-16 2006-05-18 Cohen Peter D Using qualifications of users to facilitate user performance of tasks
US20060245003A1 (en) * 2005-04-28 2006-11-02 Xerox Corporation Method and system for sending material
US20070116241A1 (en) * 2005-11-10 2007-05-24 Flocken Phil A Support case management system
US20080172284A1 (en) * 2007-01-17 2008-07-17 Larry Hartmann Management of job candidate interview process using online facility
US20080189123A1 (en) * 2007-02-07 2008-08-07 Bryant Wong Career database system and method
US20090019116A1 (en) * 2007-07-09 2009-01-15 Rene Niebuhr Large distribution message handling
US20090070872A1 (en) * 2003-06-18 2009-03-12 David Cowings System and method for filtering spam messages utilizing URL filtering module
US20090282110A1 (en) * 2008-05-12 2009-11-12 International Business Machines Corporation Customizable dynamic e-mail distribution lists
US20100083122A1 (en) * 2008-10-01 2010-04-01 International Business Machines Corporation Systems, methods and computer products for controlling multiple machines using a seamless user-interface to a multi-display
US7739337B1 (en) 2005-06-20 2010-06-15 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for grouping spam email messages
US7941490B1 (en) 2004-05-11 2011-05-10 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting spam in email messages and email attachments
US8005697B1 (en) 2004-11-16 2011-08-23 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Performing automated price determination for tasks to be performed
US8010609B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2011-08-30 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for maintaining reputation lists of IP addresses to detect email spam
US8135778B1 (en) 2005-04-27 2012-03-13 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for certifying mass emailings
US8271588B1 (en) 2003-09-24 2012-09-18 Symantec Corporation System and method for filtering fraudulent email messages
US8843388B1 (en) * 2009-06-04 2014-09-23 West Corporation Method and system for processing an employment application
US20150304259A1 (en) * 2003-03-25 2015-10-22 Verisign, Inc. Control and management of electronic messaging
US9985943B1 (en) 2013-12-18 2018-05-29 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Automated agent detection using multiple factors
US10438225B1 (en) 2013-12-18 2019-10-08 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Game-based automated agent detection

Families Citing this family (102)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5999939A (en) * 1997-12-21 1999-12-07 Interactive Search, Inc. System and method for displaying and entering interactively modified stream data into a structured form
US6996561B2 (en) * 1997-12-21 2006-02-07 Brassring, Llc System and method for interactively entering data into a database
US7173651B1 (en) * 1998-06-02 2007-02-06 Knowles Andrew T Apparatus and system for prompt digital photo delivery and archival
US7672879B1 (en) 1998-12-08 2010-03-02 Yodlee.Com, Inc. Interactive activity interface for managing personal data and performing transactions over a data packet network
US8069407B1 (en) 1998-12-08 2011-11-29 Yodlee.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting changes in websites and reporting results to web developers for navigation template repair purposes
US7085997B1 (en) 1998-12-08 2006-08-01 Yodlee.Com Network-based bookmark management and web-summary system
CA2356182A1 (en) * 1998-12-21 2000-06-29 Roland R. Thompson System and method for performing substitute fulfillment information compilation and notification
US6477565B1 (en) * 1999-06-01 2002-11-05 Yodlee.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for restructuring of personalized data for transmission from a data network to connected and portable network appliances
US7752535B2 (en) 1999-06-01 2010-07-06 Yodlec.com, Inc. Categorization of summarized information
US6662194B1 (en) * 1999-07-31 2003-12-09 Raymond Anthony Joao Apparatus and method for providing recruitment information
US7945468B1 (en) 1999-08-20 2011-05-17 Frontline Technologies, Inc. Notification of employees via pass code accessed web pages
US6360221B1 (en) * 1999-09-21 2002-03-19 Neostar, Inc. Method and apparatus for the production, delivery, and receipt of enhanced e-mail
US9092535B1 (en) 1999-09-21 2015-07-28 Google Inc. E-mail embedded textual hyperlink object
US6714944B1 (en) * 1999-11-30 2004-03-30 Verivita Llc System and method for authenticating and registering personal background data
CA2394446A1 (en) * 1999-12-13 2001-06-14 Mary L. Richardson Method and system for employment placement
US20030014294A1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2003-01-16 Hiroyuki Yoneyama Job offer/job seeker information processing system
AU2001249472A1 (en) * 2000-03-27 2001-10-08 Bryce Arrowood Computer-implemented web database system for staffing of personnel
US6785679B1 (en) * 2000-03-29 2004-08-31 Brassring, Llc Method and apparatus for sending and tracking resume data sent via URL
US6631400B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2003-10-07 Distefano, Iii Thomas L. Statement regarding federally sponsored research or development
JP2001306598A (en) * 2000-04-20 2001-11-02 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Data input form retrieval system and method, and computer-readable recording medium
US20030208393A1 (en) * 2001-04-19 2003-11-06 John Younger Method and system generating referrals for job positions based upon virtual communities comprised of members relevant to the job positions
US7873533B2 (en) * 2000-04-21 2011-01-18 Accolo, Inc. Comprehensive employment recruiting communications system with translation facility
US7725525B2 (en) * 2000-05-09 2010-05-25 James Duncan Work Method and apparatus for internet-based human network brokering
US6728695B1 (en) * 2000-05-26 2004-04-27 Burning Glass Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for making predictions about entities represented in documents
US20020055870A1 (en) * 2000-06-08 2002-05-09 Thomas Roland R. System for human capital management
US20060080134A1 (en) * 2000-07-07 2006-04-13 Paul Toomey Virtual system for accessing services for job seekers, employers, training providers, benefit applicants and others
US7536340B2 (en) * 2000-07-24 2009-05-19 Cashedge, Inc. Compliance monitoring method and apparatus
US7797207B1 (en) 2000-07-24 2010-09-14 Cashedge, Inc. Method and apparatus for analyzing financial data
US7013310B2 (en) * 2002-01-03 2006-03-14 Cashedge, Inc. Method and apparatus for retrieving and processing data
US8086508B2 (en) * 2000-07-24 2011-12-27 Cashedge, Inc. Method and apparatus for delegating authority
US7146338B2 (en) 2001-06-28 2006-12-05 Checkfree Services Corporation Inter-network financial service
JP2002063121A (en) * 2000-08-23 2002-02-28 Minolta Co Ltd Data-distributing device
US7383223B1 (en) 2000-09-20 2008-06-03 Cashedge, Inc. Method and apparatus for managing multiple accounts
US20030236728A1 (en) * 2000-09-20 2003-12-25 Amir Sunderji Method and apparatus for managing a financial transaction system
US7016853B1 (en) * 2000-09-20 2006-03-21 Openhike, Inc. Method and system for resume storage and retrieval
US20080015982A1 (en) * 2000-09-20 2008-01-17 Jeremy Sokolic Funds transfer method and system including payment enabled invoices
US7233940B2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2007-06-19 Answers Corporation System for processing at least partially structured data
US7243125B2 (en) * 2000-12-08 2007-07-10 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for presenting e-mail threads as semi-connected text by removing redundant material
US8156051B1 (en) * 2001-01-09 2012-04-10 Northwest Software, Inc. Employment recruiting system
US7493366B1 (en) * 2001-03-01 2009-02-17 Verizon Laboratories, Inc. System and method for processing customer requests relating to unsolicited commercial email and other service disruptions
US20020152245A1 (en) * 2001-04-05 2002-10-17 Mccaskey Jeffrey Web publication of newspaper content
US20030101061A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2003-05-29 Wheeland Shawn M. Securing prospective representatives for a home based business
US20050187867A1 (en) * 2002-01-03 2005-08-25 Sokolic Jeremy N. System and method for associating identifiers with transactions
US20040236653A1 (en) * 2002-01-03 2004-11-25 Sokolic Jeremy N. System and method for associating identifiers with data
US7203845B2 (en) * 2002-01-11 2007-04-10 Cashedge, Inc. Multiple trust modes for handling data
US20030177052A1 (en) * 2002-03-12 2003-09-18 Smith William W. Human resources management system and method
US7424438B2 (en) * 2002-03-19 2008-09-09 Marc Vianello Apparatus and methods for providing career and employment services
US20040024761A1 (en) * 2002-07-13 2004-02-05 Kolbe Steven J. Web-besed, industry specific, staffing interactive database
US20040148220A1 (en) * 2003-01-27 2004-07-29 Freeman Robert B. System and method for candidate management
US20090182602A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2009-07-16 Hotlinkhr, Inc. Human resources method for employee demographics reporting compliance
US20090112670A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2009-04-30 Black Steven C Human resources method for employee termination procedures
US20040243428A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2004-12-02 Black Steven C. Automated compliance for human resource management
EP1661018A4 (en) * 2003-08-15 2009-08-26 Oversee Net Internet domain keyword optimization
US20060106636A1 (en) * 2004-04-08 2006-05-18 Hillel Segal Internet-based job placement system for creating proposals for screened and pre-qualified participants
US20050228709A1 (en) * 2004-04-08 2005-10-13 Hillel Segal Internet-based job placement system for managing proposals for screened and pre-qualified participants
US20060085736A1 (en) * 2004-10-16 2006-04-20 Au Anthony S A Scientific Formula and System which derives standardized data and faster search processes in a Personnel Recruiting System, that generates more accurate results
US20060195398A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2006-08-31 Sanjeev Dheer Method and apparatus for processing payment requests
US20060206344A1 (en) * 2005-03-12 2006-09-14 Au Anthony S Scientific Formula and System which derives and creates a standardized data table in a Personnel Recruiting System
US20060212305A1 (en) * 2005-03-18 2006-09-21 Jobster, Inc. Method and apparatus for ranking candidates using connection information provided by candidates
US20060212476A1 (en) * 2005-03-18 2006-09-21 Bogle Phillip L Method and apparatus for tracking candidate referrers
US20060212448A1 (en) * 2005-03-18 2006-09-21 Bogle Phillip L Method and apparatus for ranking candidates
US20070067239A1 (en) * 2005-09-19 2007-03-22 Cashedge, Inc. Method and Apparatus for Transferring Financial Information
US7653567B2 (en) * 2005-09-23 2010-01-26 Jason Stuart Gorham Integrated online job recruitment system
US20070100748A1 (en) * 2005-10-19 2007-05-03 Sanjeev Dheer Multi-channel transaction system for transferring assets between accounts at different financial institutions
US20070118392A1 (en) * 2005-10-28 2007-05-24 Richard Zinn Classification and Management of Keywords across Multiple Campaigns
US8103679B1 (en) 2006-01-13 2012-01-24 CareerBuilder, LLC Method and system for matching data sets of non-standard formats
US8090725B1 (en) 2006-01-13 2012-01-03 CareerBuilder, LLC Method and system for matching data sets of non-standard formats
US8375026B1 (en) 2006-01-13 2013-02-12 CareerBuilder, LLC Method and system for matching data sets of non-standard formats
US9336333B2 (en) * 2006-02-13 2016-05-10 Linkedin Corporation Searching and reference checking within social networks
US11062267B1 (en) 2006-03-30 2021-07-13 Geographic Solutions, Inc. Automated reactive talent matching
US9390422B2 (en) * 2006-03-30 2016-07-12 Geographic Solutions, Inc. System, method and computer program products for creating and maintaining a consolidated jobs database
US10223671B1 (en) 2006-06-30 2019-03-05 Geographic Solutions, Inc. System, method and computer program products for direct applying to job applications
US7606752B2 (en) 2006-09-07 2009-10-20 Yodlee Inc. Host exchange in bill paying services
US20080126950A1 (en) * 2006-11-28 2008-05-29 Patrick Leo Glenski Smart Reply Function on Web Pages
US7930290B2 (en) * 2007-01-12 2011-04-19 Microsoft Corporation Providing virtual really simple syndication (RSS) feeds
US20080221910A1 (en) * 2007-03-08 2008-09-11 Anthony Au Scientific Formula and System using a slider bar which derives standardized data and faster search processes in a Personnel Recruiting System that generates more accurate results
US20080222133A1 (en) * 2007-03-08 2008-09-11 Anthony Au System that automatically identifies key words & key texts from a source document, such as a job description, and apply both (key words & text) as context in the automatic matching with another document, such as a resume, to produce a numerically scored result.
US7895133B2 (en) * 2007-04-09 2011-02-22 International Business Machines Corporation Pricing method and system
US8412564B1 (en) 2007-04-25 2013-04-02 Thomson Reuters System and method for identifying excellence within a profession
US20080288400A1 (en) 2007-04-27 2008-11-20 Cashedge, Inc. Centralized Payment Method and System for Online and Offline Transactions
US8117303B2 (en) * 2007-06-29 2012-02-14 Nokia Corporation Systems, methods, devices, and computer program products for downloading content for offline browsing
US20090024577A1 (en) * 2007-07-20 2009-01-22 Gregory Prestel System and method for organizing, posting and searching information on a network
US20090037235A1 (en) * 2007-07-30 2009-02-05 Anthony Au System that automatically identifies a Candidate for hiring by using a composite score comprised of a Spec Score generated by a Candidates answers to questions and an Industry Score based on a database of key words & key texts compiled from source documents, such as job descriptions
US20090177535A1 (en) * 2007-09-18 2009-07-09 Pmp Corporation System and method for monitoring and executing substitute fulfillment
US8140366B2 (en) * 2008-01-04 2012-03-20 Frontline Technologies, Inc. Method, system and program product for filling job orders
US20100030687A1 (en) * 2008-01-18 2010-02-04 Cashedge, Inc. Real-Time Settlement of Financial Transactions Using Electronic Fund Transfer Networks
US9152208B2 (en) * 2008-04-10 2015-10-06 Here Global B.V. Methods, apparatuses and computer program products for updating a content item
US20090276359A1 (en) * 2008-04-24 2009-11-05 Cashedge, Inc. Multi-Product-Multi-Channel Payment Platform System and Method
US8261334B2 (en) 2008-04-25 2012-09-04 Yodlee Inc. System for performing web authentication of a user by proxy
US8555359B2 (en) * 2009-02-26 2013-10-08 Yodlee, Inc. System and methods for automatically accessing a web site on behalf of a client
WO2011149558A2 (en) 2010-05-28 2011-12-01 Abelow Daniel H Reality alternate
US8601002B1 (en) 2010-10-30 2013-12-03 Jobvite, Inc. Method and system for identifying job candidates
US9727827B2 (en) 2011-06-24 2017-08-08 Jobvite, Inc. Method and system for referral tracking
US20130036065A1 (en) * 2011-08-04 2013-02-07 Jobvite, Inc. Method and system for identifying job candidates, social networks, and recruiters to facilitate the recruiting process
US10102502B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2018-10-16 Jobvite, Inc. Method and system for source tracking
WO2013049687A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Mail Bypass, Inc. Message delivery systems and methods
US8626659B1 (en) 2012-09-28 2014-01-07 Fiserv, Inc. Facilitating presentation of content relating to a financial transaction
US20140188728A1 (en) 2012-12-31 2014-07-03 Fiserv, Inc. Systems and methods for performing financial transactions
US20150310395A1 (en) * 2014-04-29 2015-10-29 Christopher Shepherd System and method of placing job candidates
US20160034853A1 (en) * 2014-07-31 2016-02-04 Linkedln Corporation Determining a user's latent preference
US10185946B2 (en) 2014-12-31 2019-01-22 Fiserv, Inc. Facilitating presentation of content relating to a financial transaction
CN109582704B (en) * 2018-10-17 2019-10-25 龙马智芯(珠海横琴)科技有限公司 Recruitment information and the matched method of job seeker resume

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5197004A (en) * 1989-05-08 1993-03-23 Resumix, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic categorization of applicants from resumes
US5164897A (en) * 1989-06-21 1992-11-17 Techpower, Inc. Automated method for selecting personnel matched to job criteria
US5873077A (en) * 1995-01-13 1999-02-16 Ricoh Corporation Method and apparatus for searching for and retrieving documents using a facsimile machine
US5966714A (en) * 1995-04-28 1999-10-12 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for scaling large electronic mail databases for devices with limited storage
US5832497A (en) * 1995-08-10 1998-11-03 Tmp Worldwide Inc. Electronic automated information exchange and management system
US5758324A (en) * 1995-12-15 1998-05-26 Hartman; Richard L. Resume storage and retrieval system
US6119135A (en) * 1996-02-09 2000-09-12 At&T Corporation Method for passively browsing the internet using images extracted from web pages
US5918207A (en) * 1996-05-01 1999-06-29 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Process and system for predictive resource planning
US5978799A (en) * 1997-01-30 1999-11-02 Hirsch; G. Scott Search engine including query database, user profile database, information templates and email facility
US6006222A (en) * 1997-04-25 1999-12-21 Culliss; Gary Method for organizing information
US5978768A (en) * 1997-05-08 1999-11-02 Mcgovern; Robert J. Computerized job search system and method for posting and searching job openings via a computer network

Cited By (50)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
USRE41940E1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2010-11-16 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering E-mail
US6654787B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2003-11-25 Brightmail, Incorporated Method and apparatus for filtering e-mail
US7882193B1 (en) 1998-12-31 2011-02-01 Symantec Corporation Apparatus and method for weighted and aging spam filtering rules
US7822435B2 (en) 2001-03-21 2010-10-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication terminal unit capable of receiving a message and method for identifying a message sender in the same
US20070010243A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2007-01-11 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication terminal unit capable of receiving a message and method for identifying a message sender in the same
US20020137539A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-09-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication terminal unit capable of receiving a message and method for identifying a message sender in the same
US7266387B2 (en) 2001-03-21 2007-09-04 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication terminal unit capable of receiving a message and method for identifying a message sender in the same
US20070197171A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2007-08-23 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication terminal unit capable of receiving a message and method for identifying a message sender in the same
US7016700B2 (en) * 2001-03-21 2006-03-21 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication terminal unit capable of receiving a message and method for identifying a message sender in the same
US7167720B2 (en) 2001-03-21 2007-01-23 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication terminal unit capable of receiving a message and method for identifying a message sender in the same
US7624110B2 (en) 2002-12-13 2009-11-24 Symantec Corporation Method, system, and computer program product for security within a global computer network
US20040123157A1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-06-24 Wholesecurity, Inc. Method, system, and computer program product for security within a global computer network
US20150304259A1 (en) * 2003-03-25 2015-10-22 Verisign, Inc. Control and management of electronic messaging
US10462084B2 (en) * 2003-03-25 2019-10-29 Verisign, Inc. Control and management of electronic messaging via authentication and evaluation of credentials
US20040225550A1 (en) * 2003-05-06 2004-11-11 Interactive Clinical Systems, Inc. Software program for, system for, and method of facilitating staffing of an opening in a work schedule at a facility
US8402102B2 (en) 2003-05-15 2013-03-19 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering email spam using email noise reduction
US20050108339A1 (en) * 2003-05-15 2005-05-19 Matt Gleeson Method and apparatus for filtering email spam using email noise reduction
US7831667B2 (en) 2003-05-15 2010-11-09 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering email spam using email noise reduction
US20110055343A1 (en) * 2003-05-15 2011-03-03 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering email spam using email noise reduction
US20090070872A1 (en) * 2003-06-18 2009-03-12 David Cowings System and method for filtering spam messages utilizing URL filtering module
US8145710B2 (en) 2003-06-18 2012-03-27 Symantec Corporation System and method for filtering spam messages utilizing URL filtering module
US8271588B1 (en) 2003-09-24 2012-09-18 Symantec Corporation System and method for filtering fraudulent email messages
US7941490B1 (en) 2004-05-11 2011-05-10 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting spam in email messages and email attachments
US20050261950A1 (en) * 2004-05-21 2005-11-24 Mccandliss Glenn A Method of scheduling appointment coverage for service professionals
US20060031328A1 (en) * 2004-07-13 2006-02-09 Malik Dale W Electronic message distribution system
US7996471B2 (en) * 2004-07-13 2011-08-09 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Electronic message distribution system
US20060041532A1 (en) * 2004-08-17 2006-02-23 Nikolov Momchil B System for automating the process of retrieving and replying to job postings
US20090287532A1 (en) * 2004-11-16 2009-11-19 Cohen Peter D Providing an electronic marketplace to facilitate human performance of programmatically submitted tasks
US8392235B1 (en) 2004-11-16 2013-03-05 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Performing automated price determination for tasks to be performed
US20060106675A1 (en) * 2004-11-16 2006-05-18 Cohen Peter D Providing an electronic marketplace to facilitate human performance of programmatically submitted tasks
US20060106774A1 (en) * 2004-11-16 2006-05-18 Cohen Peter D Using qualifications of users to facilitate user performance of tasks
US8306840B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2012-11-06 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Providing an electronic marketplace to facilitate human performance of programmatically submitted tasks
US8005697B1 (en) 2004-11-16 2011-08-23 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Performing automated price determination for tasks to be performed
US7945469B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2011-05-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Providing an electronic marketplace to facilitate human performance of programmatically submitted tasks
US8135778B1 (en) 2005-04-27 2012-03-13 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for certifying mass emailings
US7483179B2 (en) * 2005-04-28 2009-01-27 Xerox Corporation Method and system for sending material
US20060245003A1 (en) * 2005-04-28 2006-11-02 Xerox Corporation Method and system for sending material
US7739337B1 (en) 2005-06-20 2010-06-15 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for grouping spam email messages
US8010609B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2011-08-30 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for maintaining reputation lists of IP addresses to detect email spam
US20070116241A1 (en) * 2005-11-10 2007-05-24 Flocken Phil A Support case management system
US20080172284A1 (en) * 2007-01-17 2008-07-17 Larry Hartmann Management of job candidate interview process using online facility
US7991635B2 (en) * 2007-01-17 2011-08-02 Larry Hartmann Management of job candidate interview process using online facility
US20080189123A1 (en) * 2007-02-07 2008-08-07 Bryant Wong Career database system and method
US20090019116A1 (en) * 2007-07-09 2009-01-15 Rene Niebuhr Large distribution message handling
US8204943B2 (en) * 2007-07-09 2012-06-19 Sap Ag Large distribution message handling
US20090282110A1 (en) * 2008-05-12 2009-11-12 International Business Machines Corporation Customizable dynamic e-mail distribution lists
US20100083122A1 (en) * 2008-10-01 2010-04-01 International Business Machines Corporation Systems, methods and computer products for controlling multiple machines using a seamless user-interface to a multi-display
US8843388B1 (en) * 2009-06-04 2014-09-23 West Corporation Method and system for processing an employment application
US9985943B1 (en) 2013-12-18 2018-05-29 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Automated agent detection using multiple factors
US10438225B1 (en) 2013-12-18 2019-10-08 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Game-based automated agent detection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6381592B1 (en) 2002-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6381592B1 (en) Candidate chaser
US6370139B2 (en) System and method for providing information dispersal in a networked computing environment
US20200074505A1 (en) Method and system for delivering electronic communications
Yong Ahn et al. On the design concepts for CRM system
US20020032602A1 (en) Recipient selection and message delivery system and method
US7310617B1 (en) Real-time financial card offer and application system
KR100855195B1 (en) Rendering content-targeted ads with e-mail
US20140006168A1 (en) Determining the relevance of offers
US20030028441A1 (en) Answer fulfillment-based marketing
US20030132972A1 (en) Method and device for removing junk e-mail messages
Brennan et al. Survey-based experimental research via the web: Some observations
US20100017294A1 (en) Email advertisement system and method
US20010051897A1 (en) Method and system for qualifying consumers for trade publication subscriptions
Alrashed et al. The lifetime of email messages: A large-scale analysis of email revisitation
US20040019646A1 (en) Methods and systems for providing an on-line interaction manager
US20040236835A1 (en) Direct mail manager for tracking customer attributes
Sackmary Internet survey research: Practices, problems, and prospects
US20040243698A1 (en) Tracking purchaser attributes
US20030160609A9 (en) Method and facility for storing and indexing web browsing data
US20050015481A1 (en) Register manager for tracking customer attributes
Gupta et al. E-mail management: A techno-managerial research perspective
US20030225842A1 (en) Distribution of messages using an address book of a user
Schlosser et al. Culture clash in Internet marketing: Implications for marketing practices
Esteban et al. Evaluating a user-model based personalisation architecture for digital news services
JP5105265B2 (en) Will collection method, will confirmation system, and will collection system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION