US20020002621A1 - Multiple network connections from a single ppp link with partial network address translation - Google Patents
Multiple network connections from a single ppp link with partial network address translation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020002621A1 US20020002621A1 US09/186,214 US18621498A US2002002621A1 US 20020002621 A1 US20020002621 A1 US 20020002621A1 US 18621498 A US18621498 A US 18621498A US 2002002621 A1 US2002002621 A1 US 2002002621A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- network
- packet
- network address
- user
- destination
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/40—Network security protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/14—Multichannel or multilink protocols
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of computer networks. More particularly, the present invention relates to managing multiple network connections from a single PPP link with partial network address translation.
- the Point-to-Point protocol is a data link protocol that provides dial up access over analog or digital transmission lines.
- PPP provides many advanced features, including error detection, support of multiple protocols, negotiation of IP addresses at connection time, and authentication.
- the second is a link control protocol for bringing lines up, testing them, negotiating options, and bringing them down again when they are no longer needed. This is known as the Link Control Protocol (LCP).
- LCP Link Control Protocol
- the third is a way to negotiate network layer options in a way independent of the network layer protocol to be used. Thus, the method chosen may have a different Network Control Protocol (NCP) for each network layer supported.
- NCP Network Control Protocol
- PPP is commonly used as the data link protocol between a user and an Internet Service Provider (ISP) or access point. This is usually accomplished through the following method.
- the personal computer of the user is instructed to call the ISP through a modem .
- the ISP's modem receives the call and establishes a physical connection, the personal computer sends a series of LCP packets in the payload field of one or more PPP frames. These packets, and their responses, comprise the negotiation of the session, and set the PPP parameters to be used during the session.
- NCP packets are sent to configure the network layer.
- the personal computer wants to run a TCP/IP protocol stack, so it needs an IP address.
- the NCP for IP may then be used to assign an IP address to the user (dynamic assignment of IP addresses is now common for dial-up users).
- the personal computer has become an Internet host and may send and receive IP packets, just as a hardwired host could.
- NCP is used to tear down the network layer connection and free the IP address.
- the LCP is then used to shut down the data link layer connection. Finally, the personal computer hangs up the modem, releasing the physical layer connection.
- intranets have been rising in popularity, especially with large companies.
- An intranet is an internal network that serves only a specific type of person (such as employees of a corporation, or students at a school).
- the intranet is usually not accessible to the general public.
- Intranets have become popular mainly because they allow for much more productive communication between users within the network, TABLE 1 Name Direction Description Configure-request I ⁇ R List of proposed options and values Configure-ack I ⁇ R All options are accepted Configure-nak I ⁇ R Some options are not accepted Configure-reject I ⁇ R Some options are not negotiable Terminate-request I ⁇ R Request to shut down the line Terminate-ack I ⁇ R OK to shut down the line Code-reject I ⁇ R Unknown request received Protocol-reject I ⁇ R Unknown protocol received Echo-request I ⁇ R Please send this frame back Echo-reply I ⁇ R Here is the frame back Discard-request I ⁇ R Discard this frame (for testing)
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting the typical connection to an intranet.
- Personal computer 10 connects through a link 12 to an Internet service provider (ISP) or access point (AP) 14 .
- ISP Internet service provider
- AP access point
- the ISP or AP 14 then connects through link 16 to the Intranet 18 .
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a connection to the Internet 62 through an intranet 58 .
- a user at PC 50 maintains a PPP connection 52 to ISP 54 , which is connected to the intranet 58 .
- Intranet 58 is then connected through link 60 to the Internet 62 .
- the drawback of this solution is that the traffic from the user at PC 50 to the Internet 62 passes through the intranet 58 . This increases the traffic traveling through the intranet 58 and poses a security risk to the information sent via the intranet 58 .
- PPP Planar Packet Control Protocol
- NAT Network address translation
- IP Internet Protocol
- Gateway which is a device that acts as an interface between the ISP and the intranet or Internet.
- Network address translation provides two main advantages. First, it adds security to the LAN or intranet, as it acts as a type of firewall, preventing users from outside the LAN or intranet from determining the internal network addressing scheme of the LAN or intranet. Second, it saves network addresses. With the ever growing popularity of the Internet and computer networks, a major issue is the availability of IP addresses. A standard IP address is 32 bytes in length, providing a total of 232 possible IP addresses. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that not all of these possible IP addresses are available due to administrative expediencies, such as reserving blocks of IP addresses for future use. Network address translation saves IP addresses by allowing the ISP to use IP addresses internally that may be used by other networks on the Internet because there is no possibility of conflict.
- IPSec IP security protocol
- a primary PPP connection is established between a user and a first network.
- a first real network address for the user is then received, the first real network address assigned by the first network.
- the gateway may establish a secondary network session between a gateway and a second network, receiving a second real network address assigned by the second network. Additional network connections may be added as secondary network sessions.
- Network address translation is then performed on packets traveling between the user and any of the secondary network sessions, but not on packets traveling between the user and the primary PPP connection. This allows for connection to multiple networks without disturbing the primary PPP session and also allows for the utilization of applications which may not be used with network address translation on the primary PPP session.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting a typical connection to an intranet.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a connection to the Internet through an intranet.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the use of a gateway to couple multiple networks according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for establishing multiple network connections for a user having a PPP connection to a gateway according to presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating a network gateway for use in a system having a user with a PPP connection to a gateway.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating multiple network connections from a single PPP connection as they would appear after the steps depicted in FIG. 4 were executed in accordance with a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for outgoing communications routing in a system in which a user is connected to a first network and a second network according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is a diagram of a packet in accordance with the IP protocol.
- FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for incoming communications routing of in a system in which a user is connected to a first network and a second network according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating a network in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
- the components, process steps, and/or data structures are implemented using a gateway device.
- Different implementations may be used and may include other types of operating systems, computing platforms, computer programs, and/or general purpose machines.
- devices of a less general purpose nature such as hardwired devices, devices relying on FPGA or ASIC technology, or the like, may also be used without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventive concepts disclosed herewith.
- a method for making multiple network connections with only partial network address translation is provided. This method may be executed by a gateway.
- a gateway is a device which performs protocol conversion between different types of networks or applications.
- the term gateway is not meant to be limited to a single type of device, as any device, hardware or software, that may act as a bridge between the user and the networks may be considered a gateway for purposes of this application.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the use of a gateway to couple multiple networks.
- Computer 80 connects to gateway 82 through a modem 84 , while computers 86 a and 86 b couple to a hub 88 , then through modem 90 to gateway 82 .
- Gateway 82 may then interface computers 80 , 86 a , and 86 b to multiple networks. These may include a first corporate intranet 92 , a second corporate intranet 94 , and the Internet 96 .
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for establishing multiple network connections for a user having a PPP connection to a gateway according to presently preferred embodiment of the invention.
- a PPP session is established between the user and a first network. This may have been performed in two separate steps. First, the user may have established a PPP session with the gateway. Second, the gateway may have then established a PPP session with the first network, thus extending the endpoint of the PPP session established by the user to the first network. This is known as a primary session because it is one contiguous session with the endpoints being the user and the first network.
- a first real network address is received for the user. This first real network address is assigned by the first network.
- this network will be the dominant one for the user, meaning that this network is the one used the most by the user.
- this connection will likely be the one that is used to connect to the intranet of the company of which the user is employed, since it is likely that more traffic will travel between the user and the first network than the user and the second network.
- this primary session be linked to the dominant network or that the dominant network be a specific network.
- the gateway may establish a secondary network session between the gateway and a second network. Unlike the primary session, there is no requirement that this session be a PPP session (although it may be). Therefore, this session may comply with any network protocol.
- a second real network address for the user is received, the second real network address assigned by the second network. Since this is a secondary session, network address translation will be utilized. This may or may not require an action to be taken by the gateway at this point. Some forms of network address translation require that a NAT table be maintained.
- the gateway may place the second real network address in a NAT table in an entry corresponding to the first real network address.
- the first real network address may be used as the local address.
- Some forms of network address translation involve simply applying the network address translation scheme to each packet as it is received. In such instances, no steps need to be taken by the gateway until a packet is received.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating a network gateway for use in a system having a user with a PPP connection to the gateway.
- User 130 has a PPP connection to gateway 132 .
- the gateway 132 then contains many parts that interface the user 130 to multiple networks.
- a request receiver 134 receives a first PPP connection request from the user.
- An LCP negotiator 136 negotiates LCP options between the user and a first network.
- a network session initiator 138 establishes a primary PPP session between the user and a first network while a network address receiver 140 receives a first real network address for the user, the first real network address assigned by the first network.
- the request receiver 134 further receives a second PPP connection request from the user.
- the LCP negotiator 136 further negotiates LCP options between the user and a second network.
- the network session initiator 138 further establishes a secondary network session between the gateway and a second network and the network address receiver 140 further receives a second real network address for the user, the second real network address assigned by the second network.
- the gateway may also contain a network address translation table 142 having multiple entries 144 .
- a NAT table storer 146 may then store the second real network address in the network address translation table 132 in an entry 144 corresponding to the first real network address.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating multiple network connections from a single PPP connection as they would appear after the steps depicted in FIG. 4 were executed.
- PC 150 maintains the PPP connection to the ISP 154 , which may contain the gateway.
- Primary PPP session 156 links the PC to the first network 158 , while secondary network connection 160 connects the gateway to the second network.
- the gateway may configure more than one secondary network sessions should the user so desire. These additional secondary network sessions are created in a similar fashion to the original secondary network session.
- Tunneling allows two hosts on the same type of network to communicate even though there may be different types of network in between. Tunneling is accomplished by encapsulating packets sent from a first type of network within packets of a type compatible with a second type of network for the duration of the packet's journey through the second type of network. Then, the outer packet is stripped off (and possibly some demultiplexing takes place) when the packet reaches the first type of network again.
- Layer Two Tunneling Protocol is a specific tunneling protocol that acts as an extension to the PPP protocol to allow ISPs to operate virtual private networks. L2TP or any other tunneling protocol may be used when establishing the primary and secondary sessions.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for outgoing communications routing in a system in which a user is connected to a first network and a second network according to a presently preferred embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a packet in accordance with the IP protocol. Normally, there will be a destination network address field 232 within the packet 230 . The destination network address may then be extracted from this field. Then the address may be compared with a routing table. This routing table may be maintained by the gateway or a router. The routing table contains a list of addresses and the corresponding networks to which packets sent to that address should be routed. This allows the gateway to forward the packets to the correct network. In many cases, routing the packets to either network will allow the packet to arrive at its destination.
- the routing table may indicate the network that will provide for the shortest travel time for the packet, in order to save the user some time.
- it will not be clear to which network to send the packet (indicated by the fact that there is no entry for the address in the routing table). In these eases, a default network will be established to which to send packets.
- the packet is directly forwarded to the first network. If, however, the destination network is the second network, then at step 206 network address translation is performed (perhaps by applying a network address translation mapping scheme to the packet or perhaps by looking up the destination address in a NAT table) to modify the source network address. At step 208 , the packet is then forwarded to the second network.
- a similar scheme may be utilized when there are more than two simultaneous network connections, with NAT being performed on each network connection but the primary one.
- FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for incoming communications routing of in a system in which a user is connected to a first network and a second network.
- a packet is received from the first network or the second network.
- the packet is examined to determine the source network. Referring back to FIG. 8, like the destination address, the source address of the packet is generally located within a field 234 in the packet 230 .
- the packet is simply forwarded to the user at step 254 . If, however, the source is the second network (or any other secondary sessions), network address translation is performed on the packet at step 256 . Then the packet is forwarded to the user at step 258 .
- FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating a network gateway according to another embodiment of the present invention. The components of this gateway may be combined with the gateway depicted in FIG. 5 for use as one complete gateway.
- a packet receiver 300 receives a packet sent by the user.
- Packet examiner 302 examines the packet to determine if its destination is the first network or the second network.
- Packet forwarder 304 forwards the packet to the first network if the packet indicates that its destination is the first network.
- Network address translator 306 performs network address translation on the packet if the packet indicates that its destination is the second network.
- the packet forwarder 304 further forwards the translated packet to the second network if the packet indicates that its destination is the second network.
- a NAT table storer 308 may be provided which stores the second real network address in a network address translation table in an entry corresponding to the first real network address.
- Packet examiner 302 further includes an address extractor 310 , which extracts a destination network address from the packet, a routing table searcher 312 , which looks up the destination network address in a routing table, and a network determiner 314 , which determines that said destination is the first network or the second network based upon the listing for the destination network address in the routing table.
- the packet receiver 300 receives a second packet, the second packet sent from the first network or the second network.
- the packet examiner 302 further examines the second packet to determine if its source is the first network or the second network.
- the network address translator 304 performs network address translation on the second packet if the second packet indicates that its source is the second network.
- the packet forwarder 306 further forwards the second packet to the user.
- the packet examiner 302 may further contain an address extractor 308 , which extracts a destination network address from the packet, a routing table searcher 310 , which looks up the destination network address in a routing table, and a network determiner 312 , which determines that the destination is the first network or the second network based upon the listing for the destination network in the routing table.
- the network determiner 312 may further determine that the destination is the first network or second network based upon a default setting if the destination network address is not listed in the routing table.
- the packet receiver 300 may further receive a second packet, the second packet sent from said first network or said second network,
- the packet examiner 302 may further examine said second packet to determine if its source is said first network or said second network.
- the network address translator 306 may further perform network address translation on said second packet if said second packet indicates that its source is said second network.
- the packet forwarder 304 may further forward said second packet to the user.
- the present invention allows for the simultaneous connection to two or more network s from only one single PPP connection. It also allows for networks to be added at the time the user requests connection, such that the networks do not need to be preconfigured.
- the primary PPP connection to the first network is maintained without using network address translation, thus allowing for the use of applications that affect the header of the packets, thus providing more security when programs like IPSec are used.
- An additional increase in security is provided in that traffic to networks travel directly to the gateway rather than through one of the other simultaneously connected networks.
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field Of the Invention
- The present invention relates to the field of computer networks. More particularly, the present invention relates to managing multiple network connections from a single PPP link with partial network address translation.
- 2. The Background
- The Point-to-Point protocol (PPP) is a data link protocol that provides dial up access over analog or digital transmission lines. PPP provides many advanced features, including error detection, support of multiple protocols, negotiation of IP addresses at connection time, and authentication. There are three main features of PPP. The first is that it provides a framing method to delineate the end of one frame and the beginning of the next one, in order to handle error detection. The second is a link control protocol for bringing lines up, testing them, negotiating options, and bringing them down again when they are no longer needed. This is known as the Link Control Protocol (LCP). The third is a way to negotiate network layer options in a way independent of the network layer protocol to be used. Thus, the method chosen may have a different Network Control Protocol (NCP) for each network layer supported.
- PPP is commonly used as the data link protocol between a user and an Internet Service Provider (ISP) or access point. This is usually accomplished through the following method. The personal computer of the user is instructed to call the ISP through a modem . After the ISP's modem receives the call and establishes a physical connection, the personal computer sends a series of LCP packets in the payload field of one or more PPP frames. These packets, and their responses, comprise the negotiation of the session, and set the PPP parameters to be used during the session.
- Once the negotiation is complete, a series of NCP packets are sent to configure the network layer. Typically, the personal computer wants to run a TCP/IP protocol stack, so it needs an IP address. The NCP for IP may then be used to assign an IP address to the user (dynamic assignment of IP addresses is now common for dial-up users). At this point, the personal computer has become an Internet host and may send and receive IP packets, just as a hardwired host could. When the user has finished, NCP is used to tear down the network layer connection and free the IP address. The LCP is then used to shut down the data link layer connection. Finally, the personal computer hangs up the modem, releasing the physical layer connection.
- There are currently eleven types of LCP packets. These types are illustrated in Table 1 below, along with the direction in which they travel (from Initiator (I) to responder (R) or vice-versa) and their description.
- In recent years, “intranets” have been rising in popularity, especially with large companies. An intranet is an internal network that serves only a specific type of person (such as employees of a corporation, or students at a school). The intranet is usually not accessible to the general public. Intranets have become popular mainly because they allow for much more productive communication between users within the network,
TABLE 1 Name Direction Description Configure-request I → R List of proposed options and values Configure-ack I ← R All options are accepted Configure-nak I ← R Some options are not accepted Configure-reject I ← R Some options are not negotiable Terminate-request I → R Request to shut down the line Terminate-ack I ← R OK to shut down the line Code-reject I ← R Unknown request received Protocol-reject I ← R Unknown protocol received Echo-request I → R Please send this frame back Echo-reply I ← R Here is the frame back Discard-request I → R Discard this frame (for testing) - even when the users are dispersed over a wide geographic area (such as in multi-national corporations).
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting the typical connection to an intranet.
Personal computer 10 connects through alink 12 to an Internet service provider (ISP) or access point (AP)14. The ISP or AP 14 then connects through link 16 to theIntranet 18. - Many entities that maintain intranets, however, have also wanted to offer users access to the Internet or to other intranets as well. There were, however, a limited number of ways that this could be accomplished. The first, and most simple, way would be for the user to first terminate the existing PPP connection between the PC10 and the ISP or access point 24. Then the user could log into a second intranet or to the Internet. The major drawbacks of this solution are obvious. It does not allow for simultaneous connection to two intranets, or to one intranet and the Internet, thus limiting the productivity of the user. Additionally, it requires termination of the PPP link between the PC and the ISP, thus using up valuable time on the user's end, as he has to re-initiate a connection process.
- The second way an entity could offer access to a second intranet or to the Internet is to have a preconfigured connection from the intranet to the second intranet or Internet, such that communications between the user and the second intranet or Internet pass through the intranet. FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a connection to the Internet62 through an
intranet 58. A user at PC 50 maintains aPPP connection 52 toISP 54, which is connected to theintranet 58.Intranet 58 is then connected throughlink 60 to the Internet 62. The drawback of this solution is that the traffic from the user at PC 50 to the Internet 62 passes through theintranet 58. This increases the traffic traveling through theintranet 58 and poses a security risk to the information sent via theintranet 58. - One major drawback of PPP, therefore, is that it is designed as a point to point protocol, meaning that it is designed for use between two endpoints. Therefore, it is currently not possible for a user to connect to two independent endpoints simultaneously (such as an intranet and the Internet, or to two independent intranets) using a single PPP link.
- What is needed is a method by which a user may connect to two independent endpoints simultaneously using a single PPP link.
- Additionally, when a system is designed in which data is to be sent to the Internet, Network address translation (NAT) is sometimes used. NAT is an Internet standard that enables a local-area network (LAN), intranet, or ISP to use one set of network addresses for internal traffic and a separate set of network addresses for external traffic. Network addresses are generally Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, but there are many other possible network addresses as well. At the ISP level, there is normally a gateway, which is a device that acts as an interface between the ISP and the intranet or Internet. When network address translation is used, the Gateway will act to convert the destination addresses of incoming and outgoing packets so that traffic is directed to the correct address.
- Network address translation provides two main advantages. First, it adds security to the LAN or intranet, as it acts as a type of firewall, preventing users from outside the LAN or intranet from determining the internal network addressing scheme of the LAN or intranet. Second, it saves network addresses. With the ever growing popularity of the Internet and computer networks, a major issue is the availability of IP addresses. A standard IP address is 32 bytes in length, providing a total of 232 possible IP addresses. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that not all of these possible IP addresses are available due to administrative expediencies, such as reserving blocks of IP addresses for future use. Network address translation saves IP addresses by allowing the ISP to use IP addresses internally that may be used by other networks on the Internet because there is no possibility of conflict.
- There are several drawbacks, however, to using NAT. The first is that it is slightly more inefficient than not using NAT, since each packet must then be examined by a gateway or router and the translation performed. Of greater importance, however, is the fact that there are several kinds of IP applications which are incompatible with a system in which NAT is being used. These include any type of application which encrypts the header of the IP packet. One example of this is the IP security protocol (IPSec). IPSec encrypts the entire IP packet (header included) and only allows decryption at an endpoint with access privileges to the header. Since the header is encrypted, NAT will alter the packet so that the receiver of the packet will not accept the packet.
- What is needed is a solution which overcomes these drawbacks.
- Multiple simultaneous network connections from a single PPP connection may be accomplished. A primary PPP connection is established between a user and a first network. A first real network address for the user is then received, the first real network address assigned by the first network. Then, the gateway may establish a secondary network session between a gateway and a second network, receiving a second real network address assigned by the second network. Additional network connections may be added as secondary network sessions. Network address translation is then performed on packets traveling between the user and any of the secondary network sessions, but not on packets traveling between the user and the primary PPP connection. This allows for connection to multiple networks without disturbing the primary PPP session and also allows for the utilization of applications which may not be used with network address translation on the primary PPP session.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting a typical connection to an intranet.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a connection to the Internet through an intranet.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the use of a gateway to couple multiple networks according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for establishing multiple network connections for a user having a PPP connection to a gateway according to presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating a network gateway for use in a system having a user with a PPP connection to a gateway.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating multiple network connections from a single PPP connection as they would appear after the steps depicted in FIG. 4 were executed in accordance with a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for outgoing communications routing in a system in which a user is connected to a first network and a second network according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is a diagram of a packet in accordance with the IP protocol.
- FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for incoming communications routing of in a system in which a user is connected to a first network and a second network according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating a network in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
- Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description of the present invention is illustrative only and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons.
- In accordance with a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention, the components, process steps, and/or data structures are implemented using a gateway device. Different implementations may be used and may include other types of operating systems, computing platforms, computer programs, and/or general purpose machines. In addition, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that devices of a less general purpose nature, such as hardwired devices, devices relying on FPGA or ASIC technology, or the like, may also be used without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventive concepts disclosed herewith.
- A method for making multiple network connections with only partial network address translation is provided. This method may be executed by a gateway. A gateway is a device which performs protocol conversion between different types of networks or applications. The term gateway is not meant to be limited to a single type of device, as any device, hardware or software, that may act as a bridge between the user and the networks may be considered a gateway for purposes of this application. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the use of a gateway to couple multiple networks. Computer80 connects to
gateway 82 through amodem 84, while computers 86 a and 86 b couple to ahub 88, then throughmodem 90 togateway 82.Gateway 82 may then interface computers 80, 86 a, and 86 b to multiple networks. These may include a firstcorporate intranet 92, a secondcorporate intranet 94, and theInternet 96. - FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for establishing multiple network connections for a user having a PPP connection to a gateway according to presently preferred embodiment of the invention. At
step 100, a PPP session is established between the user and a first network. This may have been performed in two separate steps. First, the user may have established a PPP session with the gateway. Second, the gateway may have then established a PPP session with the first network, thus extending the endpoint of the PPP session established by the user to the first network. This is known as a primary session because it is one contiguous session with the endpoints being the user and the first network. Atstep 102, a first real network address is received for the user. This first real network address is assigned by the first network. Since this is the primary session, it is likely that this network will be the dominant one for the user, meaning that this network is the one used the most by the user. For example, this connection will likely be the one that is used to connect to the intranet of the company of which the user is employed, since it is likely that more traffic will travel between the user and the first network than the user and the second network. However, there is no requirement that this primary session be linked to the dominant network or that the dominant network be a specific network. - Since the primary session will most likely have the most amount of traffic traveling on it, network address translation will not be performed on packets traveling through this session. This allows the user to utilize the various Internet applications that could not be used with NAT, such as IPSec. The utilization of IPSec or similar security protocols may also allay some of the security concerns regarding access to information on the first network.
- At some point during the session, the user may request connection to a second network. Therefore, at
step 104, the gateway may establish a secondary network session between the gateway and a second network. Unlike the primary session, there is no requirement that this session be a PPP session (although it may be). Therefore, this session may comply with any network protocol. Atstep 106, a second real network address for the user is received, the second real network address assigned by the second network. Since this is a secondary session, network address translation will be utilized. This may or may not require an action to be taken by the gateway at this point. Some forms of network address translation require that a NAT table be maintained. In such instances, the gateway may place the second real network address in a NAT table in an entry corresponding to the first real network address. There is no need to assign a virtual network address, since the first real network address may be used as the local address. Some forms of network address translation involve simply applying the network address translation scheme to each packet as it is received. In such instances, no steps need to be taken by the gateway until a packet is received. - FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating a network gateway for use in a system having a user with a PPP connection to the gateway.
User 130 has a PPP connection togateway 132. Thegateway 132 then contains many parts that interface theuser 130 to multiple networks. Arequest receiver 134 receives a first PPP connection request from the user. AnLCP negotiator 136 negotiates LCP options between the user and a first network. Anetwork session initiator 138 establishes a primary PPP session between the user and a first network while a network address receiver 140 receives a first real network address for the user, the first real network address assigned by the first network. Therequest receiver 134 further receives a second PPP connection request from the user. TheLCP negotiator 136 further negotiates LCP options between the user and a second network. Thenetwork session initiator 138 further establishes a secondary network session between the gateway and a second network and the network address receiver 140 further receives a second real network address for the user, the second real network address assigned by the second network. - The gateway may also contain a network address translation table142 having
multiple entries 144. ANAT table storer 146 may then store the second real network address in the network address translation table 132 in anentry 144 corresponding to the first real network address. - FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating multiple network connections from a single PPP connection as they would appear after the steps depicted in FIG. 4 were executed.
PC 150 maintains the PPP connection to theISP 154, which may contain the gateway.Primary PPP session 156 links the PC to thefirst network 158, whilesecondary network connection 160 connects the gateway to the second network. - The gateway may configure more than one secondary network sessions should the user so desire. These additional secondary network sessions are created in a similar fashion to the original secondary network session.
- Additionally, “tunneling” may be utilized in the case where not all the links follow the same protocol. Tunneling allows two hosts on the same type of network to communicate even though there may be different types of network in between. Tunneling is accomplished by encapsulating packets sent from a first type of network within packets of a type compatible with a second type of network for the duration of the packet's journey through the second type of network. Then, the outer packet is stripped off (and possibly some demultiplexing takes place) when the packet reaches the first type of network again. Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) is a specific tunneling protocol that acts as an extension to the PPP protocol to allow ISPs to operate virtual private networks. L2TP or any other tunneling protocol may be used when establishing the primary and secondary sessions.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for outgoing communications routing in a system in which a user is connected to a first network and a second network according to a presently preferred embodiment of the invention.
- At
step 200, a packet is received from the user. Atstep 202, the packet is examined to determine if its destination is the first network or the second network. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a packet in accordance with the IP protocol. Normally, there will be a destinationnetwork address field 232 within thepacket 230. The destination network address may then be extracted from this field. Then the address may be compared with a routing table. This routing table may be maintained by the gateway or a router. The routing table contains a list of addresses and the corresponding networks to which packets sent to that address should be routed. This allows the gateway to forward the packets to the correct network. In many cases, routing the packets to either network will allow the packet to arrive at its destination. In these cases, the routing table may indicate the network that will provide for the shortest travel time for the packet, in order to save the user some time. In yet other cases, it will not be clear to which network to send the packet (indicated by the fact that there is no entry for the address in the routing table). In these eases, a default network will be established to which to send packets. - Referring back to FIG. 7, if the destination network is the first network, then at
step 204 the packet is directly forwarded to the first network. If, however, the destination network is the second network, then atstep 206 network address translation is performed (perhaps by applying a network address translation mapping scheme to the packet or perhaps by looking up the destination address in a NAT table) to modify the source network address. Atstep 208, the packet is then forwarded to the second network. A similar scheme may be utilized when there are more than two simultaneous network connections, with NAT being performed on each network connection but the primary one. - Likewise, when a packet is received from the second network (or any other of the secondary sessions), then network address translation is performed. FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for incoming communications routing of in a system in which a user is connected to a first network and a second network. At
step 250, a packet is received from the first network or the second network. Atstep 252, the packet is examined to determine the source network. Referring back to FIG. 8, like the destination address, the source address of the packet is generally located within afield 234 in thepacket 230. Referring to FIG. 9, if the source is the first network, the packet is simply forwarded to the user atstep 254. If, however, the source is the second network (or any other secondary sessions), network address translation is performed on the packet atstep 256. Then the packet is forwarded to the user atstep 258. - FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating a network gateway according to another embodiment of the present invention. The components of this gateway may be combined with the gateway depicted in FIG. 5 for use as one complete gateway. A
packet receiver 300 receives a packet sent by the user.Packet examiner 302 examines the packet to determine if its destination is the first network or the second network.Packet forwarder 304 forwards the packet to the first network if the packet indicates that its destination is the first network. Network address translator 306 performs network address translation on the packet if the packet indicates that its destination is the second network. Thepacket forwarder 304 further forwards the translated packet to the second network if the packet indicates that its destination is the second network. - Additionally, a
NAT table storer 308 may be provided which stores the second real network address in a network address translation table in an entry corresponding to the first real network address.Packet examiner 302 further includes anaddress extractor 310, which extracts a destination network address from the packet, a routing table searcher 312, which looks up the destination network address in a routing table, and a network determiner 314, which determines that said destination is the first network or the second network based upon the listing for the destination network address in the routing table. - For incoming packets, the
packet receiver 300 receives a second packet, the second packet sent from the first network or the second network. Thepacket examiner 302 further examines the second packet to determine if its source is the first network or the second network. Thenetwork address translator 304 performs network address translation on the second packet if the second packet indicates that its source is the second network. The packet forwarder 306 further forwards the second packet to the user. - The
packet examiner 302 may further contain anaddress extractor 308, which extracts a destination network address from the packet, arouting table searcher 310, which looks up the destination network address in a routing table, and a network determiner 312, which determines that the destination is the first network or the second network based upon the listing for the destination network in the routing table. The network determiner 312 may further determine that the destination is the first network or second network based upon a default setting if the destination network address is not listed in the routing table. - The
packet receiver 300 may further receive a second packet, the second packet sent from said first network or said second network, Thepacket examiner 302 may further examine said second packet to determine if its source is said first network or said second network. The network address translator 306 may further perform network address translation on said second packet if said second packet indicates that its source is said second network. Thepacket forwarder 304 may further forward said second packet to the user. - The present invention allows for the simultaneous connection to two or more network s from only one single PPP connection. It also allows for networks to be added at the time the user requests connection, such that the networks do not need to be preconfigured. The primary PPP connection to the first network is maintained without using network address translation, thus allowing for the use of applications that affect the header of the packets, thus providing more security when programs like IPSec are used. An additional increase in security is provided in that traffic to networks travel directly to the gateway rather than through one of the other simultaneously connected networks.
- While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications than mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.
Claims (95)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/186,214 US6381646B2 (en) | 1998-11-03 | 1998-11-03 | Multiple network connections from a single PPP link with partial network address translation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/186,214 US6381646B2 (en) | 1998-11-03 | 1998-11-03 | Multiple network connections from a single PPP link with partial network address translation |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020002621A1 true US20020002621A1 (en) | 2002-01-03 |
US6381646B2 US6381646B2 (en) | 2002-04-30 |
Family
ID=22684094
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/186,214 Expired - Lifetime US6381646B2 (en) | 1998-11-03 | 1998-11-03 | Multiple network connections from a single PPP link with partial network address translation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6381646B2 (en) |
Cited By (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020099856A1 (en) * | 2001-01-15 | 2002-07-25 | Kazuhiro Shitama | Information processing device and method thereof, recording medium and program |
US20040001496A1 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2004-01-01 | Jon Yusko | Method and apparatus for PPP auto-connect |
WO2004030317A1 (en) * | 2002-09-25 | 2004-04-08 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for transparently exchanging data packets |
EP1571800A1 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2005-09-07 | France Telecom | Method and system of a client accessing services provided by a service provider |
US20060104280A1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2006-05-18 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for coordinating a change in service provider between a client and a server with identity based service access management |
US7107614B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2006-09-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for network address translation integration with IP security |
US20070061883A1 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2007-03-15 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for generating fictitious content for a computer |
US20070064649A1 (en) * | 2005-09-16 | 2007-03-22 | Tero Makela | Two-layer network identification |
US20070127456A1 (en) * | 2003-10-29 | 2007-06-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Communications apparatus and method |
US20070157315A1 (en) * | 1999-08-30 | 2007-07-05 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for using timestamps to detect attacks |
US7330896B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2008-02-12 | Nortel Networks Limited | Correlating data streams of different protocols |
US20080141349A1 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2008-06-12 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for computer security |
US20080267201A1 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2008-10-30 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for managing dynamic network sessions |
US20090011410A1 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2009-01-08 | Masato Mitsuhashi | Method for tailoring administration of drugs by quantitation of mrna |
US20090064331A1 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2009-03-05 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for preventing detection of a selected process running on a computer |
US20090207806A1 (en) * | 2008-02-20 | 2009-08-20 | Nokia Corporation | IP mobility multihoming |
US7869436B1 (en) * | 2005-10-13 | 2011-01-11 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for connecting to virtual networks using non supplicant authentication |
US20150271140A1 (en) * | 1999-06-15 | 2015-09-24 | Tectia Oyj | Tunnelling of Information |
CN114128234A (en) * | 2020-02-06 | 2022-03-01 | 华为云计算技术有限公司 | Virtual address allocation for preventing conflicts in a multi-network environment |
Families Citing this family (49)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ES2290986T3 (en) | 1997-03-12 | 2008-02-16 | Nomadix, Inc. | NAME TRANSMITTER OR ROUTER. |
US7194554B1 (en) | 1998-12-08 | 2007-03-20 | Nomadix, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing dynamic network authorization authentication and accounting |
US8266266B2 (en) | 1998-12-08 | 2012-09-11 | Nomadix, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing dynamic network authorization, authentication and accounting |
US8713641B1 (en) | 1998-12-08 | 2014-04-29 | Nomadix, Inc. | Systems and methods for authorizing, authenticating and accounting users having transparent computer access to a network using a gateway device |
FR2787956B1 (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2001-02-23 | France Telecom | METHOD OF ADDRESSING IN A DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND NAME AND ADDRESS SERVER IMPLEMENTING SUCH A METHOD |
US6563824B1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2003-05-13 | 3Com Corporation | Apparatus and methods for determining the correct workstation within a LAN for a LAN modem to route a packet |
US6496867B1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2002-12-17 | 3Com Corporation | System and method to negotiate private network addresses for initiating tunneling associations through private and/or public networks |
US6687833B1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2004-02-03 | Networks Associates, Inc. | System and method for providing a network host decoy using a pseudo network protocol stack implementation |
WO2001031885A2 (en) | 1999-10-22 | 2001-05-03 | Nomadix, Inc. | Gateway device having an xml interface and associated method |
US7171492B1 (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2007-01-30 | Utstarcom, Inc. | Method and application programming interface for assigning multiple network addresses |
US6631416B2 (en) * | 2000-04-12 | 2003-10-07 | Openreach Inc. | Methods and systems for enabling a tunnel between two computers on a network |
US7028334B2 (en) * | 2000-04-12 | 2006-04-11 | Corente, Inc. | Methods and systems for using names in virtual networks |
US7085854B2 (en) * | 2000-04-12 | 2006-08-01 | Corente, Inc. | Methods and systems for enabling communication between a processor and a network operations center |
US7028333B2 (en) * | 2000-04-12 | 2006-04-11 | Corente, Inc. | Methods and systems for partners in virtual networks |
US7047424B2 (en) * | 2000-04-12 | 2006-05-16 | Corente, Inc. | Methods and systems for hairpins in virtual networks |
US7181766B2 (en) * | 2000-04-12 | 2007-02-20 | Corente, Inc. | Methods and system for providing network services using at least one processor interfacing a base network |
US7181542B2 (en) * | 2000-04-12 | 2007-02-20 | Corente, Inc. | Method and system for managing and configuring virtual private networks |
US6996628B2 (en) * | 2000-04-12 | 2006-02-07 | Corente, Inc. | Methods and systems for managing virtual addresses for virtual networks |
US6618757B1 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2003-09-09 | Nortel Networks Limited | System and method for dynamic IP address management |
US7146410B1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2006-12-05 | Nortel Networks Limited | System and method for executing control protocols among nodes in separate IP networks |
US6772210B1 (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2004-08-03 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for exchanging communications between telephone number based devices in an internet protocol environment |
US6876640B1 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2005-04-05 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Method and system for mobile station point-to-point protocol context transfer |
US20020124095A1 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2002-09-05 | Sultan Israel Daniel | Apparatus and method for sending point-to-point protocol over ethernet |
US7293108B2 (en) * | 2001-03-15 | 2007-11-06 | Intel Corporation | Generic external proxy |
US20020138552A1 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2002-09-26 | Debruine Timothy S. | Method and system for optimizing private network file transfers in a public peer-to-peer network |
US6978308B2 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2005-12-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for nesting virtual private networking connections with coincident endpoints |
US7533409B2 (en) * | 2001-03-22 | 2009-05-12 | Corente, Inc. | Methods and systems for firewalling virtual private networks |
US20030009561A1 (en) * | 2001-06-14 | 2003-01-09 | Sollee Patrick N. | Providing telephony services to terminals behind a firewall and /or network address translator |
JP3697711B2 (en) * | 2001-07-04 | 2005-09-21 | 日本電気株式会社 | PPP termination device, network device, and LCP echo request response method |
JP3625445B2 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2005-03-02 | 株式会社東芝 | Network relay device and network relay method |
KR100440964B1 (en) * | 2001-12-29 | 2004-07-21 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method of receiving E-mails in internet fax via only once point-to-point protocol connection |
US20030145082A1 (en) * | 2002-01-25 | 2003-07-31 | Son Yong Ho | NAT device with LAN monitor for remote management |
US7395354B2 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2008-07-01 | Corente, Inc. | Methods and systems for resolving addressing conflicts based on tunnel information |
US7443865B1 (en) * | 2002-04-04 | 2008-10-28 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Multiple network connections from a single PPP link with network address translation |
KR100532098B1 (en) * | 2002-11-16 | 2005-11-29 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Incoming and outgoing call system based on duplicate private network |
US7660985B2 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2010-02-09 | At&T Corp. | Program security through stack segregation |
US7220390B2 (en) * | 2003-05-16 | 2007-05-22 | Velocys, Inc. | Microchannel with internal fin support for catalyst or sorption medium |
US7237267B2 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2007-06-26 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Policy-based network security management |
US7716350B2 (en) * | 2003-10-23 | 2010-05-11 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and devices for sharing content on a network |
US7607021B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2009-10-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Isolation approach for network users associated with elevated risk |
US20050271047A1 (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2005-12-08 | Huonder Russell J | Method and system for managing multiple overlapping address domains |
US8312530B2 (en) * | 2004-07-12 | 2012-11-13 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for providing security in a network environment using accounting information |
US8572721B2 (en) | 2006-08-03 | 2013-10-29 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for routing packets in a VPN-client-to-VPN-client connection via an SSL/VPN network appliance |
US7769869B2 (en) * | 2006-08-21 | 2010-08-03 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of providing server initiated connections on a virtual private network |
WO2009151863A2 (en) * | 2008-06-10 | 2009-12-17 | Myers Wolin, Llc | A network gateway for time-critical and mission-critical networks |
US20110085552A1 (en) * | 2009-10-14 | 2011-04-14 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | System and method for forming virtual private network |
US9455908B2 (en) * | 2014-07-07 | 2016-09-27 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Bi-directional flow stickiness in a network environment |
US9503363B2 (en) | 2015-03-16 | 2016-11-22 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Segment routing label switch paths in network functions virtualization communications networks |
US9979629B2 (en) | 2015-08-21 | 2018-05-22 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Distribution of segment identifiers in network functions virtualization and software defined network environments |
Family Cites Families (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5241594A (en) | 1992-06-02 | 1993-08-31 | Hughes Aircraft Company | One-time logon means and methods for distributed computing systems |
FI91700C (en) | 1992-08-14 | 1994-07-25 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | A method for transmitting packet data and a mobile station for a cellular radio system |
DE4321458A1 (en) | 1993-06-29 | 1995-01-12 | Alcatel Network Services | Network management support method and network management facility therefor |
JP3425192B2 (en) | 1993-08-25 | 2003-07-07 | 富士通株式会社 | Address information automatic setting processing method and address information setting device |
US5555244A (en) | 1994-05-19 | 1996-09-10 | Integrated Network Corporation | Scalable multimedia network |
JPH09510596A (en) * | 1994-06-08 | 1997-10-21 | エイチイー・ホールディングス・インコーポレーテッド・ディー ビーエー・ヒューズ・エレクトロニクス | Apparatus and method for hybrid network access |
US5617417A (en) | 1994-09-07 | 1997-04-01 | Stratacom, Inc. | Asynchronous transfer mode communication in inverse multiplexing over multiple communication links |
US5655077A (en) | 1994-12-13 | 1997-08-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for authenticating access to heterogeneous computing services |
US5592470A (en) | 1994-12-21 | 1997-01-07 | At&T | Broadband wireless system and network architecture providing broadband/narrowband service with optimal static and dynamic bandwidth/channel allocation |
JPH08235114A (en) | 1995-02-28 | 1996-09-13 | Hitachi Ltd | Server access method and charge information managing method |
US5583862A (en) | 1995-03-28 | 1996-12-10 | Bay Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for routing for virtual networks |
JP2770782B2 (en) | 1995-05-31 | 1998-07-02 | 日本電気株式会社 | LAN connection device |
US5793763A (en) | 1995-11-03 | 1998-08-11 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Security system for network address translation systems |
US5740171A (en) | 1996-03-28 | 1998-04-14 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Address translation mechanism for a high-performance network switch |
US5854901A (en) | 1996-07-23 | 1998-12-29 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for serverless internet protocol address discovery using source address of broadcast or unicast packet |
US5684950A (en) | 1996-09-23 | 1997-11-04 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Method and system for authenticating users to multiple computer servers via a single sign-on |
US5812529A (en) | 1996-11-12 | 1998-09-22 | Lanquest Group | Method and apparatus for network assessment |
US6011910A (en) | 1997-04-08 | 2000-01-04 | 3Com Corporation | Supporting authentication across multiple network access servers |
US5944824A (en) | 1997-04-30 | 1999-08-31 | Mci Communications Corporation | System and method for single sign-on to a plurality of network elements |
US6091951A (en) | 1997-05-14 | 2000-07-18 | Telxon Corporation | Seamless roaming among multiple networks |
US6021496A (en) | 1997-07-07 | 2000-02-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | User authentication from non-native server domains in a computer network |
US5991810A (en) | 1997-08-01 | 1999-11-23 | Novell, Inc. | User name authentication for gateway clients accessing a proxy cache server |
US6023724A (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 2000-02-08 | 3Com Corporation | Apparatus and methods for use therein for an ISDN LAN modem that displays fault information to local hosts through interception of host DNS request messages |
US6018770A (en) | 1997-10-13 | 2000-01-25 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for managing packet-switched connections |
US6092196A (en) | 1997-11-25 | 2000-07-18 | Nortel Networks Limited | HTTP distributed remote user authentication system |
US6026441A (en) | 1997-12-16 | 2000-02-15 | At&T Corporation | Method for establishing communication on the internet with a client having a dynamically assigned IP address |
US6009103A (en) | 1997-12-23 | 1999-12-28 | Mediaone Group, Inc. | Method and system for automatic allocation of resources in a network |
US6055236A (en) * | 1998-03-05 | 2000-04-25 | 3Com Corporation | Method and system for locating network services with distributed network address translation |
US6112245A (en) * | 1998-04-07 | 2000-08-29 | 3Com Corporation | Session establishment for static links in Point-to-Point Protocol sessions |
US6205479B1 (en) | 1998-04-14 | 2001-03-20 | Juno Online Services, Inc. | Two-tier authentication system where clients first authenticate with independent service providers and then automatically exchange messages with a client controller to gain network access |
US6141687A (en) | 1998-05-08 | 2000-10-31 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Using an authentication server to obtain dial-out information on a network |
US6119160A (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2000-09-12 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Multiple-level internet protocol accounting |
-
1998
- 1998-11-03 US US09/186,214 patent/US6381646B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7107614B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2006-09-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for network address translation integration with IP security |
US7330896B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2008-02-12 | Nortel Networks Limited | Correlating data streams of different protocols |
US20150271140A1 (en) * | 1999-06-15 | 2015-09-24 | Tectia Oyj | Tunnelling of Information |
US20090064331A1 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2009-03-05 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for preventing detection of a selected process running on a computer |
US20080141349A1 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2008-06-12 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for computer security |
US8549640B2 (en) | 1999-07-14 | 2013-10-01 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for computer security |
US7854005B2 (en) | 1999-07-14 | 2010-12-14 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for generating fictitious content for a computer |
US7827605B2 (en) | 1999-07-14 | 2010-11-02 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for preventing detection of a selected process running on a computer |
US20070061883A1 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2007-03-15 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for generating fictitious content for a computer |
US20070157315A1 (en) * | 1999-08-30 | 2007-07-05 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for using timestamps to detect attacks |
US8578490B2 (en) | 1999-08-30 | 2013-11-05 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for using timestamps to detect attacks |
US8724625B2 (en) | 2000-03-20 | 2014-05-13 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Method and apparatus for coordinating a change in service provider between a client and a server with identity based service access management |
US20100313251A1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2010-12-09 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Method and Apparatus for Coordinating a Change in Service Provider Between a Client and a Server with Identity Based Service Access Management |
US8396011B2 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2013-03-12 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Method and apparatus for coordinating a change in service provider between a client and a server with identity based service access management |
US7801056B2 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2010-09-21 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Method and apparatus for coordinating a change in service provider between a client and a server with identity based service access management |
US20060104280A1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2006-05-18 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for coordinating a change in service provider between a client and a server with identity based service access management |
US20020099856A1 (en) * | 2001-01-15 | 2002-07-25 | Kazuhiro Shitama | Information processing device and method thereof, recording medium and program |
US20080267201A1 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2008-10-30 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for managing dynamic network sessions |
US8477792B2 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2013-07-02 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for managing dynamic network sessions |
US20040001496A1 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2004-01-01 | Jon Yusko | Method and apparatus for PPP auto-connect |
US20060080458A1 (en) * | 2002-09-25 | 2006-04-13 | Werner Lindemann | Method for transparently exchanging data packets |
WO2004030317A1 (en) * | 2002-09-25 | 2004-04-08 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for transparently exchanging data packets |
US8626945B2 (en) | 2002-09-25 | 2014-01-07 | Siemens Enterprise Communiucations GmbH & Co. KG | Method for transparently exchanging data packets |
US20070127456A1 (en) * | 2003-10-29 | 2007-06-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Communications apparatus and method |
EP1571800A1 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2005-09-07 | France Telecom | Method and system of a client accessing services provided by a service provider |
WO2005096587A1 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2005-10-13 | France Telecom S.A. | Method and system enabling a client to access services provided by a service provider |
US20090011410A1 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2009-01-08 | Masato Mitsuhashi | Method for tailoring administration of drugs by quantitation of mrna |
US20070064649A1 (en) * | 2005-09-16 | 2007-03-22 | Tero Makela | Two-layer network identification |
US7869436B1 (en) * | 2005-10-13 | 2011-01-11 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for connecting to virtual networks using non supplicant authentication |
US20090207806A1 (en) * | 2008-02-20 | 2009-08-20 | Nokia Corporation | IP mobility multihoming |
US8654735B2 (en) | 2008-02-20 | 2014-02-18 | Nokia Corporation | IP mobility multihoming |
CN114128234A (en) * | 2020-02-06 | 2022-03-01 | 华为云计算技术有限公司 | Virtual address allocation for preventing conflicts in a multi-network environment |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6381646B2 (en) | 2002-04-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6381646B2 (en) | Multiple network connections from a single PPP link with partial network address translation | |
US6490289B1 (en) | Multiple network connections from a single PPP link with network address translation | |
US6801528B2 (en) | System and method for dynamic simultaneous connection to multiple service providers | |
US6996621B1 (en) | Method for supporting secondary address delivery on remote access servers | |
WO2004107671A1 (en) | Communication device | |
JP2003273935A (en) | Network-connecting apparatus and method for providing direct connection between network devices in different private networks | |
EP1168718B1 (en) | Method and device to communicate with a device not belonging to the same virtual private network | |
US7420973B2 (en) | Context selection in a network element through subscriber flow switching | |
US20040083290A1 (en) | Software implemented virtual private network service | |
US7443865B1 (en) | Multiple network connections from a single PPP link with network address translation | |
US6829235B1 (en) | Telecommunications network with parallel session function | |
KR100604566B1 (en) | VPN service provisioning method using session agent | |
Cisco | Configuring Protocol Translation and Virtual Asynchronous Devices | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Session Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Configuration Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Configuration Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Configuration Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Session Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Session Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Configuration Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Configuration Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Configuration Commands | |
Cisco | Protocol Translation Configuration Commands |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CISCO TECHNOLGY, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZHANG, SHUJIN;JIN, JANE JIAYING;CHU, JIE;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:009708/0824 Effective date: 19981125 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |